Idiocy Alert: Maher Wrongly Tells Former Congresswoman 'You Were Head of the Intelligence Committee'
We at NewsBusters love to point out when Bill Maher makes a fool of himself on national television by stating an absolute falsehood while cameras are rolling.
The "Real Time" host made a doozy on HBO Friday evening telling the esteemed former Congresswoman Jane Harman (D-Calif.), "You were the head of the Intelligence Committee" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
JANE HARMAN, FORMER CONGRESSWOMAN (D-CALIFORNIA): But the Wilson Center offered me the job in February and it was a job I couldn't turn down. I mean, imagine this: scholarship programs that are bipartisan and relevant, solving problems. Does that sound like the United States Congress?
BILL MAHER, HOST: Well, no, but you knew what, you knew what the Congress was. I mean, it kind of sounds like Donald Trump saying I'd like to save the world running for president but I’ve got to be back on "The Apprentice. "
HARMAN: Well, I, okay, I think it's a sensational opportunity. Lee Hamilton, who many people know is the co-chair of the 9/11 Commission - he served in Congress for 30 years before that - had the job I now have for 12 years, and I'm succeeding Lee, and I’m the first president and CEO who happens to be a woman, head of this huge organization in Washington and I'm very proud of it.
[APPLAUSE]
MAHER: You don't happen to be a woman. You're a hell of a woman. But, but wait, it can't be as exciting as your job in Congress. You were the head of the Intelligence Committee. You were privy…
HARMAN: No, no, no. I never became the head of the Intelligence Committee.
MAHER: What were you?
HARMAN: Remember that? I was the ranking Democrat for years. And then I was, could have become the head of it.
MAHER: You still got to see things that almost nobody else, even in Congress, got to see.
HARMAN: That's true.
Readers are likely aware that Harman had been the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee for years, and was considered a shoo-in to take over as chair when her party took back Congress in the 2006 midterm elections.
However, she had a terrible relationship with incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi also of California, and ended up being snubbed.
As the New York Times reported in December 2006:
Incoming House speaker Nancy Pelosi today named Representative Silvestre Reyes of Texas to become next chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, ending weeks of closed-door lobbying and public posturing among top candidates for the post.
By choosing Mr. Reyes, a Vietnam veteran and former Border Patrol agent who has served on the committee since 2001, Ms. Pelosi passed over the panel’s top Democrat, Rep. Jane Harman of California, with whom Ms. Pelosi has long feuded. [...]
Ms. Pelosi had privately criticized Ms. Harman for not more aggressively challenging the White House on issues such as the faulty intelligence leading to the war in Iraq and the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program.
As a result of the snubbing, Harman actually left Intelligence when the Democrats took over the House in January opting instead to serve on Energy and Commerce as well as Homeland Security.
With this in mind, Maher didn't just get it wrong Friday evening. He poured salt in the wound of the former Congresswoman on national television.
Ironically, this pompous, holier-than-thou know-it-all just a few minutes prior made a joke about people constantly asking him if Sarah Palin is going to run for president saying, "What am I, the Idiot Whisperer?"
No, Bill - just an idiot that like so many before you has been propped up as a political commentator by folks that probably also don't know that Harman was never given the position she so richly deserved.
Keep up the bad work, oh great one.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
All of 'em
Submitted by iveseenitall on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 10:04am.
Maher, Colbert, Stewart, the "commentators" on MSNBC and "liberal" talk radio,et.al all have the same schick--- they run their mouths in order to get a laugh or be noticed in some manner. As with most "liberals", truth doesn't matter--the only thing that counts is the visceral reaction they can extract from their audience. Ignorance is bliss in the world of over-rated,over-paid media "liberals". And the saddest effect of all of this is that so many people, particularly the young, believe them and will follow them over the clifff.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal" (progressive)
STOP THE PRESSES!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 10:31am.
That is, if people still gave a flying crap about the newspaper industry-after all, what new avenues have they journeyed recently-oh yeah, the Palin emails-wow, what a gamble!
Anyhoo, Maher is WRONG in EVERY DAMN EP! Why is this news! His career should be as dead as the paper biz!
Okay, Maher needs some help
Submitted by Blonde on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 10:42am.
And I'm happy to oblige:
Ironically, this pompous, holier-than-thou know-it-all just a few minutes prior made a joke about people constantly asking him if Sarah Palin is going to run for president saying, "What am I, the Idiot?"
Yes, Bill. That's it, EXACTLY.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Thank goodness Harman never made Chairwoman.
Submitted by Rush Fan on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 4:32pm.
Lefty Jane Harman visited Cuba a week ago, along with a delegation of other leftist that included political strategist Donna Brazile. As expected, Harman was enthralled with Cuba and the Castro regime and the AP reported the following:
The website Capitol Hill Cubans had a different view of Harman's Cuba visit. In an article titled Cuba's Courageous Women Deserve Better they pointed out that rather than visiting "the courageous women leaders of the Cuban pro-democracy movement" or "the mothers of the pro-democracy leaders that have been murdered" Harman and her crew met "with the princess heir of the Castro family dictatorship -- Mariela Castro" [Raul Castro's daughter]. [.....] "Yes, the same Mariela that in an interview last week referred to young Cubans that don't support her family's tyrannical dynasty as "uncultured.""
You may recall that Harman's husband, Sidney Harman, who died this past April, was the individual who bought NewsWeek for $1.00.
On a personal note, Jane Harman was my congresswoman for many years, and I am ashamed to admit that I ignorantly voted for her when she first was elected in 1992. Thankfully, I rediscovered Rush Limbaugh and Milton Friedman shortly after, and never voted for a Democrat again.
P.S. The word "esteemed" in esteemed former Congresswoman, which is defined as "To regard with respect", is not a description I would use with Jane Harman.
Earth to Jane Harmon.............
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 7:25pm.
The Castro Regime already LIBERALIZED Cuba. That happened way back in 1959. Remember? Oh, wait. You Liberals always preach that HISTORY BEGINS EVERY MORNING UNDER OUR LORD AND SAVIOR BARACK OBAMA. The good people of that once great country risked their lives swimming through shark infested waters to get away from liberalism. The "misunderstood" commander, Fidel Castro, has had your sympathy for too many years. To all you libs, ESPECIALLY YOU, OBAMA AND CLINTON, here is what I have to say to you: If you couldn't take out Fidel Castro, who is only about 100 miles from the US, HOW IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU WILL GET QADHAFI? Enough. RESIGN!
Nothing new here
Submitted by Kat Outta the Bag on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 4:53pm.
"We at NewsBusters love to point out when Bill Maher makes a fool of himself on national television by stating an absolute falsehood while cameras are rolling."
This is at least a weekly occurance, is it not?
Nope
Submitted by Maestroh on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 6:12pm.
Hourly.
Nice job, Bill.
Submitted by HockeyKid on Sun, 06/12/2011 - 8:15am.
Next time you have John Kerry on, ask him how it feels to be the least popular former President.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
It wasn't that big of a
Submitted by FAR52 on Sun, 06/12/2011 - 9:18am.
It wasn't that big of a gaffe. The point he was making is that she was privy to some very sensitive intellegence info. As the ranking democrat on the committee -- that is certainly correct. This discrepancy wasn't worthy of a post, in my opinion.
Then you
Submitted by HockeyKid on Sun, 06/12/2011 - 5:23pm.
don't understand Washington or politics AT ALL. The way in which Harman was kept from being the chair is notorious, and indeed the embarrassing capstone of her political career.
You are correct about the point Maher was trying to make. But by making the false assertion, he not only betrayed his own ignorance, but embarrassed Harman again--all while trying to suck up to her and show her in the best light possible. In other words, he is hoist on his own biased petard.
And THAT is why it's worthy of a post.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me