Rachel Maddow Accuses Sunday Talk Shows of Being Biased Towards George W. Bush
Forget about Bush Derangement Syndrome.
According to MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, the Sunday morning political talk shows are all biased towards the 43rd president we conservatives all thought they despised (video follows with transcript and lots of debunking commentary):
RACHEL MADDOW: I will admit right off the bat this is petty. I’ll admit it. But it is also true and it has got to drive Democrats in the White House absolutely nuts.
Here it is: Republican Senator Dick Lugar, Republican former presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, Republican former Congressman Tom Davis, the Bush administration’s CIA director, General Michael Hayden, the Bush administration’s secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, the Bush administration’s homeland security secretary, Michael Chertoff, the Bush administration’s defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, the Bush administration’s vice president, Dick Cheney, the Bush administration’s vice president’s daughter, Liz Cheney -- the week the Obama administration announces it has killed Osama bin Laden, that’s the guest list on the Sunday morning political talk shows to talk about it.
The Sunday shows are supposedly the apex of political debate -- the pulsing, throbbing heart of what’s going on in American politics. Is the biggest story in American politics right now retirees from the Bush administration and how they feel about stuff? Plus, Dick Lugar?
Honestly, this is the roster? This is Sunday morning in all of its thundering seriousness?
Now, among those nine Bush administration officials and other Republican politicians, there were three outliers: Senator John Kerry, also a former White House communications director named Anita Dunn, and one current White House official Tom Donilon, the national security adviser. So, there were those three.
But the week the Obama administration announces that bin Laden is dead, the invitees to the adult’s table, the measure of serious and importance in Washington is three-to-one, Bush administration and Republican officials. Why is that?
Sometimes I really wish I was a liberal and could say anything I wanted - even on television - with total disregard for the facts.
Yes, there were indeed more members of the Bush administration and Republicans on the various political talk shows this Sunday. However, when you add up all the time these nine folks were given on these shows, it was still less than the minutes alloted to folks connected to the Obama administration.
In the end, that's all that matters.
Here are the numbers:
-
ABC's "This Week"
- Obama National Security Adviser Tom Donilon - 9 minutes
- Bush Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice - 2 minutes
- Liz Cheney - less than two minutes
-
CBS's "Face the Nation"
- Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) - 11 minutes
- Bush Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld - 8 minutes
-
CNN's "State of the Union"
- Donilon - 14 minutes
- Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.) - 8 minutes
- Former Obama Communications Director Anita Dunn - approximately 4 minutes
- Former Republican Congressman Tom Davis - approximately 4 minutes
-
"Fox News Sunday"
- Donilon - 15 minutes
- Former Vice President Dick Cheney - 15 minutes
-
NBC's "Meet the Press"
- Donilon - 13 minutes
- Bush Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Bush CIA Director Michael Hayden, and Rudy Giuliani in a joint discussion with host David Gregory - 10 minutes
Totals by administration affiliation:
-
Obama
- Donilon - 51 minutes
- Kerry - 11 minutes
- Dunn - 4 minutes
- Total - 66 minutes
-
Bush
- D. Cheney - 15 minutes
- Chertoff, Giuliani and Hayden - 10 minutes
- Rumsfeld - 8 minutes
- Lugar - 8 minutes
- Davis - 4 minutes
- Rice - 2 minutes
- L. Cheney - less than 2 minutes
- Total - less than 49 minutes
This means that despite there being fewer Obama administration officials or affiliates on these five programs Sunday, they actually got 35 percent more air time than guests tied to the Bush adminstration.
Taking this a step further, the panel discussion on "This Week" besides Liz Cheney and regular George Will included liberal guests Tom Ricks, who writes the Best Defense blog for Foreign Policy magazine, and Lawrence Wright of the New Yorker.
The "Meet the Press" panel was tremendously skewed with liberals Doris Kearns Goodwin, the BBC's Katty Kay, and the Washington Post's Bob Woodward. The only so-called conservative in the group was Republican strategist Mike Murphy.
If you add this to the previous data, no impartial analysis of these five programs Sunday could possibly conclude that conservative views were more present than liberal ones.
Of course, as Maddow and her entire disgrace of a "news" outlet admittedly "lean forward," one doesn't expect even a shred of impartiality.
Nice try, Rach. Keep up on leanin'.
*****Update: Liberal websites the Huffington Post and Mediaite both reported Maddow's nonsense without doing any research to verify her accuracy.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Maddow definitely going into glass houses territory
Submitted by OffTheLows on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 12:06pm.
she occasionally allows a few republicans on her show, almost universally to get grilled, but I suspect 90% of her guests "lean" to the left But to her credit, that's about 9% more than Keith Olbermann.
That graphic reminds me of
Submitted by Tom Paine on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 12:20pm.
That graphic reminds me of the Brady Bunch opening theme
Bob Schieffer is the pulsing, throbbing heart of politics?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 12:27pm.
LOL.
Stat!
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 9:14pm.
I think this "heart" is in dire need of a by-pass or a transplant. :)
Would you like some cheese to
Submitted by johnsonl on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 12:29pm.
Would you like some cheese to go with that whine, Richard? Where's your "smart guy" glasses?
Well we all know that Randy "Madcow" wouldn't know the truth....
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 12:34pm.
If it hit s/him in the face at 100 miles an hour!
Maddow - how bout balance looking back?
Submitted by Gary Hall on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 1:40pm.
Naturally, as Noel laid out, her presentation was simply pathetic. More time to the liberal guests, and one surely knows that more questions came from the left than from the conservative POV, both to the Republican guests and to the Democrat guests.
I'd note that if one considers that almost all of the effort in creating the national intelligence effort, and the information coming out because of that effort, came from and because of the intense and focused efforts of the Bush Administration and it's friends in congress.
Just what policy here did the liberals put in place that brought us to this place where we finally located Bin Laden, etc. One can thank them for not screwing it up any more than they have.
(;~> gary
PS - it's my guess that the running question of the week, being:
Were all met with the White House's agreed to "single talking-point line of:
Duh, really - but did it contribute? .. and that not a single national MSM host got an answer to that question - not even a generic, "well, perhaps a piece or two."
Rachel is having trouble
Submitted by Ashrak on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 1:44pm.
with the lean forward thing, as she is so bent on leaning left.
What a conflict she must endure daily.
An interesting comparison would be to see the time allotted during those same shows when the number of guests one way and the other is reversed. My bet - the lefties would still have more time afforded to them.
Poor, Misguided Shemale...
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 2:19pm.
I know it may be hard to read this from my posts, but I am very tolerant of sexual perversion, errrr, homosexuality.So I am not picking on Ms Madcow, just because she hates my pee-pee.
Look at it this way. If a person can't decide if she is a she or a he, don't you think that equates to a pretty basic level of conviction, that would be needed to form an objective opinion??
How then, can you expect a thing, errr, person to have a rational and objective opinion about ANYthing?
Here is a transcript of Rachel He/She talking to itself in the mirror while getting ready for work"
RACHEL: God Randy, you look great today.
RANDY: Thanks, do you like my oversized Larry King eyeglasses?
RACHEL: Yes, hey did I tell you I shaved my girl parts?
RANDY: No, but I WAS wondering why my junk was itchy.
Rachel: I have to go now. I need time to practice my "Gotchas".
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Unintended admission
Submitted by Model850 on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 2:59pm.
But the week the Obama administration announces that bin Laden is dead, the invitees to the adult’s table...
Did Rachel just admit that her own program is lightweight fluff and inconsequential?
Ms Madcow is miffed
Submitted by wizardjr on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 3:57pm.
She's all upset because there are so few Demoncrats who advocated for the things that got us the intel, or for the wonderful Special Ops folks and what they do. This is just a petulant peeve that somebody that's not Teh Won or his minions getting kudos for setting this up.
There, there, Rachael.... or Randy... or whatever. Hang out in a tranny bar and I'm sure you'll find your true love.
Alternate universe?
Submitted by Tomorama on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 4:02pm.
Is this something like the third time I heard a libtard whine this week about the "great coverage" that Bush and the Republicans are getting and have been getting?
On what %&%*%^*^%%% universe?
If she wants 50-50 coverage of an issue (including guests from both sides) maybe she should give Fox a look see.
NOBODY on TV gives a harder interview to WHOMEVER he is interviewing than Chris Wallace, NOBODY.
Maybe she should lean straight?
Yes Rachel, do tell us how it
Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 4:56pm.
Yes Rachel, do tell us how it feels to have people attempt to go to the source for their questions instead of having others opine on what they REALLY meant when they said X.
Ronald Reagan
Maddow's good at one thing only...
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 05/10/2011 - 9:18pm.
Once again, Maddow lies so smoothly and serenely, she probably could ace any lie detector test telling her whoppers..
Madcow's analysis of Sunday shows
Submitted by donaldduck on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 12:35am.
Her problem is that she does not want a conservative anywhere near a camera and microphone AT ALL. She knows that liberals cannot win the arguments based on facts, so she would prefer no arguments at all, therefore, NO CONSERVATIVES. Her logic is rock solid. Has she ever commented on how many conservatives appear on her beloved MessNBC network? I rest my case.
Maddow is sick
Submitted by nogard on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:28am.
Have you seen the latest videos of him? He has definitely contracted aids. I think he'll soon be going the way of that Keith guy. What was his name?