Krauthammer: It's Funny to Hear Liberals Talk About How Awful it is to Delegitimize a President After What They Did to Bush
Charles Krauthammer on Friday perfectly elucidated the media's hypocrisy concerning their avid defense of Barack Obama against attacks from Donald Trump and the birthers.
As the discussion on PBS's "Inside Washington" turned to the President finally revealing his birth certificate, and liberals on the panel including the Washington Post's Colby King expressed disgust about how the White House resident was being treated, Krauthammer marvelously replied, "I think it’s somewhat amusing to hear people on the left talking about how awful it is to delegitimize a president when they spent half a decade saying that George Bush stole the election" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I think it’s somewhat amusing to hear people on the left talking about how awful it is to delegitimize a president when they spent half a decade saying that George Bush stole the election. The bumper stickers “Reelect Al Gore,” and questioning the legitimacy of his victory in 2000. So, on that issue there’s a double standard and hypocrisy.
Two of the liberals on the panel clearly weren't pleased by this comment:
COLBY KING, WASHINGTON POST: Not quite.
NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: That’s not personal.
KING: Consider the people who were doing it.
KRAUTHAMMER: You guys have spoken for about eight minutes. Let me have one minute here.
That's not personal? The attacks on George W. Bush throughout his eight years in office weren't personal?
Oh, that's right. When liberals mercilessly attack a conservative, it's well-reasoned. But when the shoe is on the other foot, it's personal.
Any questions?
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Krauthammer
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 12:05am.
I'm busy arguing with a googly-eyed lefty in another forum who still thinks the National Guard documents, fabricated by/for Dan Rather, were real.
The claims are still out there.
The MSM and Obama Caused this uproar.
Submitted by Boil It Down on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 12:23am.
Krauthammer was absolutely right, as is his habit, but he could have tried to be a little more emphatic about the complicity of the liberal media.
Had it not been for the MSM burying pertinent facts like the birth certificate, the transcripts, Obama's teachings at Harvard, his radical associations etc. instead of faithfully vetting him to the public none of this controversy would have grown into the monster it is now. The MSM has to answer for all this as much as Obama himself now. -bidn-
Nina and Colby
Submitted by ConservaSerb on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 1:39am.
Two of the biggest haters around. Denying they hate. They should go on the road with their comedy.
A wise & frugal government, which shall leave men free 2 regulate their own pursuits of industry & improvement, & shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government. T. Jefferson
Nina...
Submitted by Mark81150 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 4:57am.
true,..
I can remember Nina during the 80's, she was reporting her opinion as fact then. She was one of the main reasons I left off watching PBS back then, she just can't keep her leftwing hate in check.
Dr. Krauthammer appears to be afflicted with BDDS
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 2:48am.
i.e. "Bush Defender Derangement Syndrome".
His reflexive "Yeah, but look what they did to Bush" mantra has become a chronic reaction to any and all examples of anti-Obama behavior.
Jer
Thank You
Submitted by txradioguy on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:08am.
You've perfectly illustrated the double standard Noel and Dr. K were talking about.
Quick quiz Jer...who started the birth certificate rumor?
Keep up, tx...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:15am.
I've already commented about the birther origins on at least three other threads.
Jer
Sorry Jer
Submitted by txradioguy on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:26am.
I have more important things to do than hang on your every moronic word.
I just like pointing out when you and other Libs are being raging hypocrites.
You're argument boils down too..."It's ok that we did the same thing because it was done to a Republican".
Different President...different set of rules.
You're dealing with another lib
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 10:42pm.
whose head is so far up his butt he can get wallet size photos of himself smiling during a colonoscopy. They constantly point at what someone else does as an excuse for their behavior but when they're shown to be hypocrites it's the same blah blah blah.
The rest of their waking hours they scheme like this birther nonsense which they promoted and are still promoting. It's the lets marginalize our opponents so how bad our policies are never gets discussed gambit.
"Promoted and still promoting
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 12:38am.
"Promoted and still promoting the birther nonsense"??!!
Are you really a towering idiot, or do you just play one while at NB?
Jer
He merely points out the hypocrisy, Jer
Submitted by Galvanic on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:14am.
There's certainly hypocrisy on both sides in American politics.
But certainly Bush-43 was subjected to illegitimacy attacks, the most vicious one disguised as a CBS 60 Minutes news story by Dan Rather that presented two alleged memos suggesting that Bush-43 was AWOL from his Air NG commitments. Those documents proved to be fake, and CBS's own internal investigation determined that there were no fewer than ten major breeches of good journalistic practice and ethics.
That story was no accident and it aired several weeks before the 2004 election.
The birther crap pales in comparison to Rather's conspiracy.
Galvanic...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:22am.
The Guard AWOL controversy wasn't an attack on Bush's legitimacy, in contrast to the birther allegations which were a direct attack on Obama's.
Jer
So if that is a "direct attack"...
Submitted by txradioguy on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:29am.
Would the questioning of John McCain's citizenship and eligibility for the Presidency by Libs be a "direct attack" on him as well?
Jer, gotta give you points on the Guard AWOL---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:43am.
controversy, according to you, not being an attack on Bush's legitimacy, whereas, according to you, the birther allegations were a direct attack on Obama's.
While I can see the reasoning behind the statement; given the general subject, I award you the points for displaying the biggest example of picking nits I have ever seen from you.
That said, I must again give you credit; you ain't nothin' if not consistent in looking out for your albatross.
MD
I'll take the points, Matthew.
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:47am.
I don't care what the motivation is for awarding them.
[See...I'm not so nitpicky after all.]
Jer
I award you another---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:52am.
point for a humorous reply.
MD
U really r an ass, arent you Jer?
Submitted by brutony1 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:27am.
What is your major Malfunction?
When will liberals WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE! -Me
It depends on whom you ask, brutony.
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:50am.
Jer
Damn, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:55am.
I gotta check in more often in the wee hours.
You come up with some really funny stuff after the bewitching hour.
Or, at NB's, would that be the wee bitching hour?
MD
And notice the correct usage of the word "whom", Matthew...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:59am.
Gotta be on my grammar toes when you're in the room.
Anyway, see ya later.
Jer
Oh please.....
Submitted by Truestar on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:28am.
It was a chronic mantra to delegitimize Bush for 8 years. BDDS??? All Dr. Krauthammer is doing is being consisent, and wondering correctly, about the apparent flaming hypocrisy on the left.
The more the operation of the Chicago---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:49am.
Sleaze Machine comes to light on the national stage, the harder it is to defend it without resorting to liberal silliness.
This silliness sometimes appears to be tracing the very fringes of the insanity defense.
MD
Nah, I think since Dr. Krauthammer was the originator
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:53am.
of the term "Bush Derangement Syndrome", he feels a constant need to confirm his diagnosis.
Jer
So what?
Submitted by Truestar on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 6:49am.
Krauthammer was correct in diagnosing BDS, because it went on and on and on for the whole of Bush's presidency. I mean, what other choice does Krauthammer, or any other rational human being have, when addresssing the monumental hypocrisy of the media towards Obama's criticizers?
Jer, with all due respect, you don't have a logical leg to stand on by criticizing Dr. Krauthammer.
Truestar...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:18pm.
If you know me through my posts, then you should know that I am a longtime reader and admirer of Charles Krauthammer, and I don't disagree with his BDS diagnosis regarding the irrationality of much of the opposition to Bush. My BDDS reference was just a light-hearted effort to flip the analysis back on the psychiatrist who does seem, to me at least, a bit too eager to pull out the BDS card whenever there are complaints about the behavior of Obama's critics.
Jer
he is however, correct.
Submitted by Mark81150 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 5:20am.
The main problem with your line of rebuttal is, that it's little more than, Stop telling the truth about our hypocrisy, it's scaring the women and horses... If there were no substance to Charles's point, the Nina express with knickers in a twist wouldn't be so flummoxed by it.
The left has defined the first decade of the 2000's as the I hate George W Bush decade, they did everything from street freaks with signs to ex VP Gore in a screaming denouncement speech to labeling a Harvard grad a low grade moron to claimimg he was building Mordor on the Potomac...
and a nonissue like the birthers is too much disrespect of the office for the left to handle?
Try reading ThinkProgress prior to 09, and see if any of that seems too disrespectful of the office for you.
The left needs to own this, they set the bar lower and lower and lower,... remember assaination chic' in film stage and literature? We do... your side owns this, and till they on bended knees apologize for cheapening the culture, for all the disrespect they SUDDENLY notice.. for the raw feelings they kicked, for the callous and foul minded loathing they heaped on half the country..
scuse some of us for feeling zero sympathy for your hurt feelings about disrespect.
The main problem you have, Mark...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 6:14am.
is reading far too much into very brief observations and then arrogantly dispensing orders for me to "educate" myself, "read" so and so...
For future reference, I am eminently unimpressed by condescension. Indeed, I find it extraordinarily offputting and a nonstarter when assessing the potential for productive dialogue. So dismount your high horse and perhaps we can give it a go.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 10:38am.
Matthew 7:5
CX...
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:30pm.
The same would apply to probably 90% of the posters here...even you, my friend.
So unless you are familiar with Mark's previous--and even more obnoxious--exercise in lecturing me, I think it would be wise to withhold judgment.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 4:55pm.
Why should I be interested in basing a comment to you on something someone else has said?
CX...Why are you interested in just dropping by
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 5:07pm.
and leaving a bible lesson?
Jer
Jer...
Submitted by 26CX on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 5:45pm.
Why the non sequitur?
Because I enjoy responding
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 4:47am.
to non sequiturs with non sequiturs of my own. It underscores the essential pointlessness of the conversation.
Jer
Please accept my thanks
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 8:39am.
for so adroitly demonstrating the impetus for my original point.
Well, if you are now acknowledging that the
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 12:03pm.
impetus was to insert yourself into a matter which doesn't involve you--and regarding which you were entirely unfamiliar with the underlying circumstances--in order to deliver a brief but gratuitous sermon, then please accept my thanks as well.
Jer
No, Jer.
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 12:20pm.
That is not what I was acknowledging.
In that case, CX...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 1:02pm.
I would suggest you...
a.) review and take to heart the injunction of Matthew 7 : 1, and
b.) when another poster graciously concedes a point to you, that you at least acknowledge same instead of simply disappearing without comment, as was your inclination in the following case:
#8 CX...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 04/26/2011 - 9:10pm.
I meant any grievance more appropriately belongs to Dutch Koch since he is the one who was actually targeted, but I can see how my wording may be construed as denying Ellender's right to complain at all. So your point is well taken.
Jer
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2011/04/26/npr-makes-light-de...
Fair enough?
Jer
Thanks for the suggestions, Jer.
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 1:15pm.
a. It doesn't bother me to be judged
b. Didn't realize I needed to thank you for acknowledging that your wording might be misconstrued.
Please accept my belated thanks for acknowledging that your wording might be misconstrued.
You're welcome, Brother CX...
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 2:28pm.
and I certainly don't wish to further delay you in performing your important mission of roaming the threads of NewsBusters to post appropriate scriptural remonstrances.
Regarding the other matter, an expression of gratitude was not a requirement by any means, but even the most basic acknowledgement would have been preferable to silence.
Jer
BTW...you're welcome.
Thank you, Jer,
Submitted by 26CX on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 3:10pm.
for acknowledging that the biblical reference proffered to you at the beginning of this thread was appropriate.
irony much?
Submitted by Mark81150 on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 3:38am.
"For future reference, I am eminently unimpressed by condescension. Indeed, I find it extraordinarily offputting and a nonstarter when assessing the potential for productive dialogue. So dismount your high horse and perhaps we can give it a go."
but you find me condescending?................... ok,
you might consider in the future, you not use quotation marks around a word I never used.."educate" or "read" as a command,.. when I actualy wrote...
"Try reading ThinkProgress prior to 09,"
a suggestion you might not like, but only a command if you were getting it from your father. If your skin is this thin, with a comment that neither called you a name, or questioned your intelligence, I'm at a loss as to what I could say you wouldn't find offensive if you were having a bad day.
Look.. jer,.. I have my own issues with high pain levels, meds, and steroid injections to the spinal channal... and I get cranky too.. so.. have a beer consider that you too... come across as a highly condescending sort, especially when you tell us.. no, we aren't REALLY offended by the lefts rank hypocrisy.. just wave it off...
We tolerated that kind of bile aimed at us for a long time, and now that we can finally speak out about it, nobody's gonna tell us, we need to stop rocking the boat. Why? Because the left has had the stage alone for so long, they can't tolerate an opposition view?
That's how it looks from our side of America..
Mark, I'm going to assume you had forgotten the previous
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 4:28am.
occasion you dropped by to scold me and deliver a lecture with accompanying instructions to "read and educate" myself--and then departing from the scene. Maybe this will jog your memory:
#36 really? Submitted by Mark81150 on Sun, 04/17/2011 - 3:38am.
I've sat through decades of watching the left become more and more clinically insane as they suffer the normal election loses that come with a two party system. They have stirred their outrage to such a pitch in some cases there are democrats out there who can't believe a republican can ever win an election, they're all "stolen, by..(insert whackjob conspiracy of choice).. It's past irrational, and to point to one bigoted crazy guy out of the endless stream of violence in the news, as if that justified anything.. do you really want a match up of the politics of psychos and criminals?
really?
Typical to pluck one item from the news and from it smear half the country with it... try reading and educate yourself. _________________ [my emphasis]
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/04/16/maher-democrats-didnt-use-any-violent-rhetoric-towards-republicans-du#ixzz1L5QQ2ejb
My "offense" on that occasion consisted entirely of posting a link to a letter outlining the violent motivations of its author prior to his shooting rampage.
In this case, you completely misinterpreted my perceptions of Krauthammer (as well as BDS). I think it would be helpful if you would at least seek a clarification of my views before acting on inaccurate presumptions.
Jer
You really took almost an hour,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Submitted by old cro on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 8:01am.
to research a reply to support your point? Wow! I thought you were better organized than that. Your book "How I Dominated NB with Superior Liberal Cunning and Wit" outline needs updated. Your tracking name support seems to be lacking.
*
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:15am.
delete
And what's also funny...
Submitted by Phryj1 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 3:53am.
...is watching liberals who viciously attacked Bush squirm and struggle to try to justify their obvious hypocrisy.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
what really galls...
Submitted by Mark81150 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 5:48am.
I can remember when they trained us, that it was a punishable offense to disrespect the president as CIC, under the UCMJ, service people hadb to be respectfull. Then wheever a democrat was elected we as a nation got the, You HAVE to respect the office, wether you respect the man or not. all well and good, until of course...
One of, (ugh,...hhhhaaaaawwwk spitttooooo,,,,) THEM is elected,.. er (staged a coup)...
I swear to God, the next guy I meet who tells me that it's just mean to point that out, had better be wearing asbestos coveralls for the flaming hot return he's going to catch. I'm sick of our political debate being set by 4 year old progressives in the media. I'm done,
I'M DONE..
I'll be exactly as civil as the last prog I talked too was to me... Why should we even try,.. to be civil, it get's us nothing but contempt from people who think we're mentally ill anyway. I know alot of dems, most are pretty decent people, mostly...
but I've yet to meet a progressive who wasn't an utter snob filled with contempt, even for conservative and moderate democrats. Booting these guys would clean up the debate immensely.
Perfectly stated Mark
Submitted by Truestar on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 6:36am.
I hope you're not done though. There's no other choice but to continue to argue against the 4 year olds in the media.
It's really simple with Obama---he's just not a credible person, let alone a president, and it's the fault of the media that he's gotten so far. There are millions and millions of people like yourself and me, who could do what should have been done with Obama by an objective MSM 4 or 5 years ago.
Asked at American Digest
Submitted by sherlock1 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 6:11am.
The Question the Media Must Not Ask:
Could a Republican be elected President, and if elected assume office, if there was the slightest innuendo about their qualifications, and they simply insulted those who raised the questions, but refused to take an easy and obvious step to address them?
Obvious answer...
Submitted by Truestar on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 7:05am.
Not a chance.
Very pleased at Obama-bashing
Submitted by ChrisNH on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 6:39am.
For well over eight years, Lefties mercilessly bashed Bush. They still continue to today. So it is indeed laughable how, after less than TWO years, Lefties are 'incensed' at what people are saying abut 'Their Guy.'
Maybe in SIX YEARS Lefties can complain; they sure have no cause to now. But, 'offended' Lefties are limp-wrists, so we'd expect this from them.
Expected for sure
Submitted by Truestar on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 7:02am.
However, Chris, it's far more simple. It's called hypocrisy. The left can accuse the right of the same all they want, but it means nothing if they're hypocrites themselves. Which the left is---it's their lifeblood.
Chris Please....
Submitted by bigdaddy on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 11:43am.
...I think you meant to say "in NINETEEN MONTHS"...
Four more years of this train wreak would be way too much.
I remember some liberals
Submitted by redfish on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 10:52am.
I remember some liberals being hung up on Prescott Bush's business dealings with Nazi Germany.. and they're insulted you'd mention Obama's father as an anti-colonialist
Lets see, they called Bush a
Submitted by sar1 on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 10:55am.
Lets see, they called Bush
a racist
fascist
dictator
questioned his military service
said the only reason he got into harvard was because of his dad
alcoholic
ran the Texas Rangers into the ground
war criminal
hitter
stole elections
Illegitimate president
he orchestrated 9/11 for oil
and camped outside his house in Texas to protest, not the the White House but his own house in Texas!
Boy, some of these things sure sound personal to me.
2000 election losers are the real 'bitter clingers'.
Submitted by Slyrr on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 11:10am.
FIve years?
Note to Krauthammer: The libutard media, leftist crazies and demorat loons STILL believe that. In fact, a large part of their campaign of corruption is based on the lie they have adopted - that Bush 'stole' the election from the blessed Al Gore.
So their current ignoring of the law to force Obama care down our throats? That's OK, because they're just 'getting even' for Bush stealing the election.
Obama's Eric Holder refusing to enforce legitimately passed laws because he 'doesn't like' them? Hey, that's OK - because it's payback for Bush stealing the election!
Obama seizing control of private businesses? Hey, get used to it. It's payback time for Bush stealing the election!
Obama putting the oil industry out of business and boasting that he will 'bankrupt the coal industry'? Well that's sad, but he wouldn't have had to do it if Bush hadn't stolen the election and used his terms in office to enrich the evil oil/coal industries in the first place!
Make no mistake, the liberals and leftists are still raging over their 2000 defeat and I guarantee that many rank and file lefties see this lawless regime and their crimes against the constitution, and they're smiling and nodding their heads and thinking, 'Ha - at last we're getting even! Now the Republicans will feel what its like to have something THEY like stolen from them!'
They refuse to accept that Al Gore lost - fair and square. There's an old missionary saying when trying to preach the gospel to someone who is very hard-hearted. 'To the person not seeking an answer, no answer is good enough.' The 2000 election losers are the real 'bitter clingers'. They cling to their defeat and despair and their hate and they won't let it go, and they live their lives in a perpetual hunt for revenge.
Pointing out the truth to them does no good. Truth is: 1) Al Gore lost the first ballot count, and therefore lost his bid for president. 2) Al Gore lost the first recount. 3) Al Gore lost the second recount. 4) Al Gore lost the third recount. 4) Al Gore recognized defeat and conceded.
But Al Gore was a backstabbing snake at heart, and he helped his bitter clinger followers to forment the notion that 'Bush stole the election'. And the media has been helping to promulgate the lie ever since to the point that this leftist regime is destroying the constitution, the economy, national security and our standard of living and the media is saying 'it's OK - we're just getting even for what you did to Al Gore'
No surprise. Toten-berg=Death-mountain/fortress in German
Submitted by russedav on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 12:08pm.
She's a zombie that's never had a living brain cell.
Off and on, I paid attention.
Submitted by amyshulk on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 12:54pm.
Off and on, I paid attention. During Clinton, I did until it became sex 24/7. It obscured the real issues and was a BIG turn off.
During Bush, he was always portrayed as an idiot, yet I knew he had the smarts to surround himself with those smarter than he so I didn't follow things like I do now.
Obama thinks he's ALWAYS the smartest guy in the room, so I worry. Election night I said we're in trouble because Obama won't be smart enough to know when he's not smart enough. Seems like I was right.
The "surface voters" I now disdain? I guess I was one of those during Clinton and Bush because I didn't get into the weeds and know the back story of issues enough - it's why I never voted until last year - I never felt confident that I knew enough to do so.
However, I did notice the difference in reporting and determined that the media was out for blood with Bush. Call it BDS, or just bigger microphones, but I remember such vitriol, that was indeed personal, directly aimed at Bush.
20% of the country is trying to convince the "middle" that ALL objection to Obama's policies are racial, and it's disgusting. Instead of the media sayng the President is the idiot {ala Bush} it's now US who are the idiots, and they frequently tell us so.
Saying "they started it" solves nothing. The real solution is to rid ourselves of all this "nuance" and "back story" bs so those who don't have the time/inclination to learn this "art" can be TRULY informed.
Charles is correct, the left does have BDS, but identifying the problem is only step one. I'm hoping instead of giving up, our "leaders" take it to the next step.
Ronald Reagan
Lib hypocrisy
Submitted by SaguaroJack on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 2:05pm.
Liberals can't help themselves. They just HAVE to have one set of rules for themselves and another for everyone else. They get to say anything they please. Everyone else has to carefully pick their way thru the minefields of political correctness.
As Jonah Goldberg says: Liberals can't win a fair fight.
It's libs who use the f-bomb, including in their presidential candidates (John Effen Kerry). It's libs who march in those disgusting Gay Pride parades; at which conservative gays are just as irritated as anybody else. It's libs who use ethnic slurs in public. It's libs who destroy private property and shout down people they disagree with.
I once credited libs with sincerity. I no longer can. A lib is either nuts or a liar or weak in the head, or all three. The sole exception would be those who are still too young to know better.
Notice how they all start
Submitted by mattm on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 2:57pm.
Notice how they all start yapping at the same time the second Krauthammer exposes them?
The truth to a lib is like salt to a snail.
I don't know if anyone else remembers this...
Submitted by pbthinker on Sat, 04/30/2011 - 11:03pm.
Right after Barack Obama won, there were a couple of Democrats who, rather sheepishly, made comments about how terrible George Bush was treated and they hoped the Republicans would be adults and not try to get even.....
It was pretty pathetic to watch, especially since these guys waiting until the end of George Bush's presidency to speak up, but the facts are out there. Thanks to Charles Krauthammer for pointing it out to the libs, who will always try and change the facts. The thing is the press gave them a free ride, and even assisted on some of it, so what can you say?
Would someone please explain how this Kenyan commie puke...
Submitted by Dave. on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 3:10am.
...of a former affirmative action-promoted comoonity organizer got hisself elected POTUS?
Seriously, has this country really become too God-damned stoopid to survive?
I think it has.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
I can't take this anymore - I just can't
Submitted by Dave. on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 3:32am.
I have had enough of the moochers, leeches, and ticks screwing up my country.
F'ing screw them all.
No sh*t, I have had it.
Die, you f'ing, stinking commie pukes, along with the horses you rode in on, as well as your spawn for the next three generations.
Maybe even four.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Indeed, Dave---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 05/01/2011 - 7:08am.
Indeed.
MD