Trump Calls Spitzer To Correct Him On The Air About His Net Worth
By Noel Sheppard | April 23, 2011 | 17:02
Media members better get their facts straight when reporting about Donald Trump or they just might end up biting off more than they can chew.
On Friday, while CNN's Eliot Spitzer was doing a report contradicting Trump's claims about his net worth, the real estate mogul called into the studio to set the record straight (video follows with transcript and commentary):
ELIOT SPITZER, HOST: OK. Now we have something surprising right now. We have a phone call coming in right now from Donald Trump.
Donald, can you hear us?
DONALD TRUMP, ENTREPRENEUR: Yes, I can.
SPITZER: Well, thank you for calling in. Thank you for joining us. I gather -- I know from a call earlier in the day you're not happy with the critique that we've made of the deposition. As I said to you when we spoke, I'll give you fair chance to respond. Fire away. Take your best shot.
TRUMP: Well, I don't think that -- I didn't see the piece, but I heard one or two people called me up -- not too many, but one or two people called me up and they said it was a very unfair piece.
First of all, I'm a private company, you know nothing about what I own and what I don't own, Eliot. And in all due respect, I think you'd be the first to admit that. You don't know where I come from or what I -- what I own, although I did -- I was a fan of yours, and I was a little bit surprised to see that you would do a negative piece.
But being a private company you really have no idea what I own and it's very substantial. Now should I decide to run -- and by the way, among my best years have been the last two or three years, should I decide to run, you'll see all of that because as you know I have very, very detailed Federal Disclosure forms that I have to fill out, and I think people would be surprised to see what the numbers are. They are very, very substantial.
SPITZER: Look, Donald, just so it is clear. I have made it very clear on this show. In fact, I just added a few moments ago, you may not have been able to hear it. I'm a fan of yours. I love the bravado. I think all of that is wonderful. The issue here, and I also agree as a private entity and a private company you do not have the obligation to make the disclosures that a public company does.
And therefore there's a certain lack of knowledge that all of us bring to this conversation which is why the only thing we've used here is the deposition.
Tell me if I'm right about this. You made certain presentations to banks in a certain point of time, Deutsche Bank and North Fork. You said you had a net worth of $3.5 billion. They came back with very significantly lower numbers. TRUMP: No. But as you probably know they were only looking at certain assets. This was for a building that I was building, and they didn't need to have $3.5 billion. They just needed to have a certain net worth.
SPITZER: That's right.
TRUMP: Anything -- and not even a net worth. Just assets of a certain amount in order to --
SPITZER: But Donald, you would agree --
TRUMP: -- for a building. Excuse me, Eliot, let me talk.
SPITZER: Absolutely. So what they did is this was just a percentage. They just took a basic percentage. It had to be over 750 in order to do the loan. This wasn't a net worth of 750. This was a statement that it had to be over 750 in order to do a loan and that's very well documented by Deutsche Bank.
SPITZER: But you would acknowledge that looking at the same materials that you presented to them they came in with a net worth that was significantly lower than what you had initially stated.
TRUMP: That's not right, Eliot.
SPITZER: No, wait, wait.
(CROSSTALK)
SPITZER: Donald, it was sufficient for the loan --
TRUMP: Well, in excess of $750 million.
SPITZER: Right.
TRUMP: In other words, it had to get up to $750 million in order to make a loan. This is many years ago, just so you understand.
SPITZER: OK.
TRUMP: So I'm going back many years.
SPITZER: OK.
TRUMP: Many, many years.
SPITZER: Can we --
TRUMP: But we had to have a net worth over a certain amount in order to do a loan.
SPITZER: OK.
TRUMP: Now, once that amount was hit it didn't make any difference because you didn't need any more than that, so all they wanted to do was to make sure it was more than the $700 or $750 million. That wasn't a net worth. That was just to be over a certain limit.
SPITZER: Right. But your initial signed statement to them was $3.5, they came in at $1.2 instead of --
TRUMP: Let me just -- no, that's not right. Let me just tell you something.
SPITZER: Right. I'm listening.
TRUMP: My net worth, you may very well see and very accurately because of federal forms --
SPITZER: OK.
TRUMP: You're going to see in very great deal. I have built a great company.
SPITZER: No doubt about that.
TRUMP: I have built a company that is -- and I think you sort of know that because you're involved in real estate in New York. I have built a great company. I have built a company that has very little debt, has a lot of cash and I have among the best locations anywhere in the United States. I have great property.
SPITZER: Donald --
TRUMP: If I decide to run, and I may surprise you by my decision.
SPITZER: Right.
TRUMP: You will see filed, not 90 days later when that I'm expected to do it, but the day that I decide to run, you will see a large number of papers that add up to a certain number and on that paper and on that cover paper will be the amount of cash I have, what banks the cash is in and also what net worth there is, approximately.
SPITZER: Donald, just so it's clear --
TRUMP: And it will be very simple. And you're wasting a lot of time on your show and to be honest, you know, you'll find out, very likely, you'll find out -- hopefully you will find out because this country is in such bad shape that somebody has to do something as quickly as possible.
SPITZER: We'll get to that --
TRUMP: So hopefully you'll find out in a very short number of weeks.
SPITZER: We'll get to that in just a moment.
TRUMP: What the number is.
SPITZER: We'll get to that in just a moment. Here's the question I have for you. What is your net worth? Why don't you tell us right now?
TRUMP: I will save it but I will tell you this.
SPITZER: You're going to say your net worth or you're going to save your statement?
TRUMP: My net worth -- excuse me, Eliot. Excuse me. My net worth according to "Forbes" is $2.7 billion?
SPITZER: Right.
TRUMP: I will tell you this, it is substantially in excess of that. When I say substantially, much, much more. They don't have access to my books, they don't have access to my records.
JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN: It's Jeff Toobin.
SPITZER: Jeff has a question for you.
TOOBIN: Let me ask you a question about the Hawaii project, in Waikiki that we raised earlier in the program today. He said that -- you said you own it. In interviews and in letters you said you own it. In fact, in the deposition you said well, I have a license. It's a licensing agreement but it's really a good licensing agreement.
Isn't there a difference between owning something --
TRUMP: You're talking about Hawaii? I really don't know if it's an ownership position or license. I have so many jobs that I wouldn't know that. I can tell you this, it's a very successful job, it's a beautiful job.
TOOBIN: I don't doubt that for a second that you're very successful but --
TRUMP: And it's -- and it's --
(CROSSTALK)
TRUMP: Excuse me, Jeffrey.
TOOBIN: I'm sorry.
TRUMP: It's up, it's open, it's doing very well and people are very happy. As to whether or not it's a licensing deal or an ownership deal, I have many, many deals all over the world. I'd have to really check that, I don't know.
SPITZER: Donald, we've got to take a quick break. You know this. You have a TV show somewhere, don't you?
TRUMP: I do. I certainly do.
Something media members must find very scary - and possibly one of the reasons they've been so on the attack concerning Trump - is that he's not afraid of them.
Part of the press's power especially on television is that politicians generally fear those that make a living offering political opinion to the public.
What we've seen in the past few weeks is this is not one of Trump's concerns. Quite the contrary, he seems to love getting in the ring with his adversaries as the cameras are rolling.
If The Donald is really going to run for president, and this isn't just him having a lot of fun getting the nation's attention in a greater fashion than normal, his courageous, devil may care attitude around the media may be a quality that goes a long way with voters.
What the talking heads don't realize is for better or worse, most Americans don't vote based on the issues. If they did, Obama never would have gotten anywhere near as far as he did in 2008.
One of the many things to be learned from that campaign was how many people in this country vote for personalities not issues or positions. Say what you will about the former junior senator from Illinois, he did ooze what a goodly percentage of the public was looking for at that moment in time.
The same could end up being true of Trump if he decides to run. There's potentially a sizable number of people that would support him just because of the confidence he has to call an on air television host and challenge him or her about what he or she is reporting at that instant.
His positions on a number of issues might be offensive to some, but that could end up being largely irrelevant to people who couldn't care less about Obama's birth certificate or possible tariffs on Chinese goods.
This real estate mogul right now is playing the press better than any candidate we've seen in a long time, and that could be winning him more fans than some campaign promise they expect will be reneged upon shortly after their vote is cast.
Another wild card is ratings, for if Trump's even come close to what media outlets were getting in 2008 every time Obama or his wife was in a studio or on a magazine cover, this could get really interesting in the coming months because they're going to want him on as much as possible.
That could mean this is just the start of a lot of Donald exposure which will certainly make him very happy, but will end up really displeasing the current White House resident.
Wouldn't that be a shame?
(H/T Mediaite)
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
his net worth
Submitted by kinijane on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 5:27pm.
No matter what it is Obama is going after it.
obama's main line of attack
Submitted by ThisnThat on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 5:36pm.
obama's main line of attack this week is that rich people are:
Trump is going to tear him apart.
BTW - I'm still waiting on obama to explain why he took a tax deduction for his charitable gifts -- and waiting for him to explain how hard he worked this year as he raked in money from the sale of his books -- how much money does he need, anyway, from the sale of his books?
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Context? Facts? Accuracy?
Submitted by ThisnThat on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 5:31pm.
Naw, none of those things listed above are important to the MSM.
Agenda. Opinions. Mis-leading information. Opinions expressed as truth. Truth discounted and twisted by talking points. Half-truths. Emotions trumped up and blown out of proportion.
These are the weapons of liberals and the MSM. And these are what Republicans are deathly afraid of. Glad to see Trump doesn't scare easily. Nor does Palin.
I say -- Trump/Palin. Let's see a courageous team go up against this liberal establishment and tear it to shreds. It would be fun to watch.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
I cringe...
Submitted by gregfahey on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 5:36pm.
whenever I hear Trump speak now. That's because the left has already anointed him as a "Conservative Republican" and will make him the poster child for that said title.
Trump, in most every interview, comes across as the kid that always has to claim he has the biggest bag of marbles. "Substantial marble collection". There are things I like about Trump too. He's not afraid to be frank about "taking the spoils" of a war like in Libya. To me, he was spot on about Iraq too. We spend all this money for Iraq and don't get any oil out of the deal? I've NEVER figured that one out. Meanwhile Mexico is paying $2.86 a gallon for gas and US taxpayers are paying to have Mexican truck exhaust systems retrofitted to comply with US laws. At least Trump wonder aloud like I do "what the hell is going on?"
Problem is that the media sees how easily provoked he can get.
Trump will never win the White House but, I'm afraid he will ensure Obama gets re-elected.
greg you are sooo right about trump
Submitted by porpoiseboy on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 9:48pm.
he is a punk. nothing but a leftist caricature of everything bad about conservatism. to me he comes across as a god-less, greedy, media whore, and proud of it. i can hardly believe how many on here seem to have "drank the koolaid". IF....somehow he was the candidate for the right....there is NO WAY i would EVER vote for him. the left HOPES he is the candidate and is doing everything they can to make sure he gets most of the early publicity.
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
The best social program is a JOB...ronald reagan
Kool-aid
Submitted by Tenebrous on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 11:34pm.
I see some people here rooting for him; I see a lot of people praising his courage, but I don't see much Kool-aid drinking going on. Trump is getting the coverage here because of the liberal media hack job.
Visions and Principles blog
You drink the Kool-aid Mr. Tenebrous.
Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 11:01am.
Tenebrous: Yes, I'm sure you do, because she whimped out and agreed with your position -- that is -- that a COLB = a long form Birth Cert.
You have claimed over and over that a Certificate of Live Birth is not a long form Birth Certificate (COLB) when in fact it is. You are quite confused between the terminology, maybe you ought not discuss it either more as it clearly confuses you badly.
President Obama produced a Certification - not a Certificate - of Live Birth. While both are accepted as "birth certificates" in HI, some interesting information would be learned if one reads the websites of Hawaii's Deportment of Health and of the Department of Hawaiian Homelands:
•Only the Certificate of Live Birth (the one Obama did not produce) is considered an "original birth certificate." (read the Homeland website)
•"A person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii," is eligible to apply for an amended birth certificate. (Read the Health website)
•"Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth.When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth." (Read the homeland web site)
--- Violet and Purple blog
Learned something new,..
Submitted by briefsynopsis on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 9:11am.
I did not realize there was Republicans and Democrat paradigm when the Bible was written,.. silly me.
Social programs that many of us Do not care for and think are wrong are here to stay, we can only ensure that we are not enabling them thru subsidies,... at present there is no bar to step over for much of what is available, just an imaginary line in some imaginary place.
If the GOP does not solidify behind a ticket by July, the forces of ZERO and his TOTUS will be nearly impossible to overcome.
I do not believe elected officals carry sufficient power any longer to remain relevant, the power in the federal level is held firmly by the unelected, that is the battle we now must fight.
Any option other then 4 more years of the current crew must be considered rationally.
Good luck to us all!
Okay, this is the second time
Submitted by bkeyser on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 6:34pm.
Okay, this is the second time I've watched a lengthy Spitzer vid, so I have to assume that the sh*t-eating grin is normal for him. And it's really annoying, especially for a host.
That being said- Spitzer apparently isn't aware of minimum qualifiers. I saw this all the time when I was designing for a high-end home builder in Howard County, MD; a very wealthy county just north of DC. Buyers were making $1.5-$2.5M purchasing agreements and divulging to the lender only what was required to achieve the loan. Sometimes that was a statement of cash on hand, other times it was nothing more than a signing statement. (Thankfully, these types of loans are no longer in vogue.)
What Trump was doing was proving a minimum asset value to secure the loan he needed to move forward with whatever project he was working on. If Spitzer is unaware of these types of deals, he surely shouldn't be in the position to report on them. If he was aware, then he was clearly trying to downplay Trump's worth. Why? I have no idea because it likely wouldn't help or hurt Trumps soon-to-be short-lived candidacy. I suspect it was to try and show a GOP candidate as dishonest.
Spitzer's not a businessman
Submitted by falcon on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 9:47am.
Since he's never run a business (like so many in Congress and government nowadays), he doesn't know all the ins and outs. So he spouts some nonsense that viewers are supposed to take as gospel. But when he's called on it, he spits and sputters and tries to play the semantics game.
Trump may not become President, and I probably won't vote for him. But at least he's not afraid to stand up to the media. Whatever his reasons, I pray his apparent courage rubs off on others who might run for the office (and there are already a couple of folks out there that are bulldogs like Trump - can you say Sarah Palin and Allan West?).
Frankly, though, even with Trump in the mix, the GOP is frakked unless Palin and/or West runs.
“I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership, that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose.” – Ronald Reagan, July 17, 1980.
I get giddy
Submitted by Marsh on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 6:41pm.
at the thought of Trump debating Obama.
That video shows Trump steam rolling the f***** steam roller himself.
Obama is already curled in a fetal position having nightmares at the thought.
Liberal Media Libel Machine
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 6:44pm.
Don't mess with The Donald.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
Expecting more?
Submitted by Boil It Down on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 7:02pm.
Did anyone seriously think that Spitzer was going to be anything more than a left wing hack?
Despite the fact that by now everyone should expect CNN to have the absolute best in research facilities, they hire someone like Spitzer who invariably makes them look bad. Even opinions should be backed by research.
Trump says that he "was a fan
Submitted by TE on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 7:08pm.
Trump says that he "was a fan of" Client No. 9?
Anybody who has ever been a fan of Client No. 9 shouldn't be allowed to vote or run for any office.
Spitzer as Attorney General was an utterly lawless, militant, marxist renegade. Of course, that made Spitzer (and Richard Blumenthal and that lunatic, Democrat attorney general in Mississippi who sued tobacco companies, et al.) an uber darling of every leftist political activist/lobbyist (aka self-described "journalist") in the Washington/New York/American press corps.
They are birds of a feather
Submitted by Master-of-Disaster on Mon, 04/25/2011 - 1:39pm.
The Donald was not only a fan, he sounds like an admirer. This is something the Donald would have supported, hell he may have even paid for a night for Spitzer of there was something he needed or just wanted to bank a favor for a later date. I can't believe the traction Trump is getting. At first I was taken in a little by the rhetoric and bawdiness of it all. I thought how cool and in your face guy like him would be. Now I see it as sad and dangerous. He has supported both parties for years, as long as it curried favor upon him and his business. Don't get me wrong he has built an empire and God bless him. I just feel like I don't want the cast of the Jersey Shore (or worse yet, that Board Room of the Apprentice) filling the White House. I am tired of being looked down upon buy the current societal leeches occupying the People's House, why the hell would I want a bunch of elitists doing the same. When he says he understands the game and has played it successfully he isn't joking. It sounds like trading one narcissist for another.
AS THE FAMOUS SONG SUNG BY ETTA JAMES IS TITLED....."'AT LAST!"
Submitted by Herbster on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 7:19pm.
"At Last!" At last we have someone with real testicular fortitude who will stand up to the "Media" that is populated by people like that rat-faced pimp, Client #9 and the repulsive little jeffrey Toobin. Bravo, Donald! You are just what the country needs....someone with the courage to put these scum suckers in their place. Since we have a coterie of castrati like Romney, Daniels, Huckabee, Good and Pawlenty, etc., running for president we need a Trump, we need a Palin, we need a Bachmann! Will the "Rupublicans" once again snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? I hope not - for the sake of the Country. The silence from the Republicans on Libya, the economy, oil prices, etc., is deafening. They continue to allow obambi to demonize the "Wealthy," scapegoat "Speculators" on oil prices, etc. It's the same old democratic song of class warfare and the "Republicans" just stand around humming the tune. Go get'em, Donald! I can't wait to see Donald debate the teleprompter! The state run leftist media is terrified of Donald...and Palin....and Bachmann.....BECAUSE THEY SPEAK THE TRUTH AND MUST BE DESTROYED! You only get flak if you're over the target. Did anyone see Colonel West - Representative from Florida - calling obambi a Communist community organizer on Greta's show? She was "Shocked." West responded that he was only speaking the truth! Amen! We need MORE Colonel Wests' in this country. "Ant the TRUTH shall set ye free!" Keep going, Colonel, keep going Donald, Sarah and Michelle! God bless you all.
Spitzer Takes Candy From Baby
Submitted by Avitar on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 8:23pm.
My broker was shaken down by Spitzer for campaign contributions that cost my account about $3000. In any Trump/Spitzer smack down I root for Trump.
"Quite the contrary, he seems
Submitted by balboa on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 10:39pm.
"Quite the contrary, he seems to love getting in the ring with his adversaries as the cameras are rolling."
That's because he's an egomaniac and loves being the center of attention. He's probably going to get his clock cleaned by someone on some show when he does this again.
Like Trump or not.
Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 11:03pm.
"He's probably going to get his clock cleaned by someone on some show..."
Who do you think can clean his clock? Certainly not the teleprompter in chief.
"Who do you think can clean
Submitted by balboa on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 11:19pm.
"Who do you think can clean his clock? Certainly not the teleprompter in chief."
Do you anticipate Obama and Trump being on a show together sometime soon?
Trump will do his typical bluster at some point, and it'll backfire.
That's All You Have?
Submitted by Tenebrous on Sat, 04/23/2011 - 11:28pm.
You predict that a guy will fail because why, exactly? Who do you have in mind that would clean Trump's clock, Balboa? Come on. You can tell us. I can't think of a single leftist that reasons well enough to debate him. Some centrists, yes. Quite a few conservatives.
And by the way, Obama is very easily provoked. All someone has to do is challenge him on the facts and figures. The instant he gets pushback, he throws a tantrum. That's what you have to defend, Balboa. Good luck on that.
Visions and Principles blog
I'm not talking about Obama.
Submitted by balboa on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 12:59pm.
I'm not talking about Obama. I never said Trump will "fail." Please pay attention. I said that Trump's bluster will eventually catch up with him, and someone on a show, be it liberal, conservative, communist, tree-hugger, SOMEONE will make him pay for that mistake. It could be Rush, it could be Brian Williams, it could be Ann, it could be Jon Stewart, it could be Wallace, and so on and so on.
Trump's record versus any Dem's....
Submitted by big.league.slider on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 12:29am.
Trump may be a bit of a blowhard, but put his record up against that of any Democrat. He's more successful, more experienced, and more knowledgeable than any of them. And he's willing to call BS on any of them. He's not worried about how the MSM will portray him, and that's refreshing.
That's more than I can say for most of the GOP elites, like Rove, Romney, Huckabee, Graham, Hatch, Boehner, McConnell, etc..
Trump considered
Submitted by Unsane on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 10:18am.
Before we start seriously gushing over Trump, two things:
1) He IS a shrieking populist.
2) He has praised Canada's single-payer health care system (in a book published in 2000). And that's not surprising. Canada's elites love it too; they can leave the country and pretty much do what they want when they have grave medical concerns: ask Belinda Stronach or former NL Premier Danny "It's My Heath, It's My Choice" Williams. And at the same time, they can stick the rest of the population with crappy medical care at a high price in the name of "compassion".
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Agreed. Trump would be better
Submitted by Newsbusterbrown on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 10:29am.
Agreed.
Trump would be better than Obama, but that's not necessarily saying much.
Happy Easter, everyone!
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)
Thanks, buster
Submitted by Newsbubba on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 11:08am.
... and a Happy Easter to you, too!
I'm just glad to know there are some people left who don't refer to it as the Spring Festival!
You show me your's and I'll show you mine!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 10:42am.
"therefore there's a certain lack of knowledge that all of us bring to this conversation"
That's a hoot! Obama IS the definition of a "certain lack of knowledge" about his entire life! That doesn't seem to bother the MSM. They don't even have to make up shiite about Him because his press office sends out the lies for them!
Sometimes I love The Donald, and other times I hate his blowhard ways. Hell, he's from Noo Yoork. How can you not hate him sometimes? That's the way I feel about all my NY friends. Tell me you don't.
If the question comes down to The Donald vs Da One, there is NO DOUBT in my mind who I vote for. To sit this one out just because you don't like everything about him would be moronic. I voted for Mc Cain, and he was a total loser, but compared to Bambi, he was a prince.
There is NOTHING about Obama that I like, except that he can ONLY serve 6 more years max, if the country can just survive that long!
I'd vote for Homer Simpson before Bambi.
Backpedaling Weasel!
Submitted by Ole_Sarge on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 12:23pm.
Opps! I am sorry to all Weasels, wild and domesticated to insult them by comparing Spitzer to one. Even though he does look a little bit like a pet weasel some friends had; and unlike the disgraced politician, theirs was a loyal mate.
Now to Mr. Trump,I am not a huge fan of Mr. Trump. I think his private life at times is a real mess. And some things he has done, less than sterling... He is however, one that not only has stood up to Obama, but is not cowed by the Media. He spins them (the MSM media) like a debutant on the dance floor.
If we had MORE leading MEN in the GOP, (we have leading women thank God), Trump would be a side-bar diversion not the headlining act.
"Excuse me, Eliot, let me talk."
Submitted by CobraMan on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 12:55pm.
This exchange is priceless!:
"Excuse me, Eliot, let me talk."
"Absolutely! (yak, yak, yak)
"That's not right, Eliot"
"No, wait, wait."
Eliot, let the man talk!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Hi Client #9...
Submitted by Flying_Flynn on Sun, 04/24/2011 - 5:04pm.
My name is Donald Trump, and I just made you my b****!