Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun
  • New Liberal Study 'Lends Credence to Conservative Charges' of Bias; Dramatic Media Tilt Toward 'Gay Marriage'
  • Senate Amnesty Supporters Boast Marco Rubio ‘Neutralized’ Limbaugh, Fox News

Charles Krauthammer: S&P Issued Negative Outlook On Obama's Deficit Reduction Speech

By Noel Sheppard | April 18, 2011 | 20:29

A  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

Credit ratings agency Standand & Poor's Monday placed a negative outlook on the future of America's AAA debt rating as a result of looming budget deficits as far as the eye can see.

Later in the day, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer of Fox News's "Special Report" said this move by S&P was actually a negative review of President Obama's deficit reduction speech last Wednesday (video follows with transcript and commentary):

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: I don't think what S&P issued was a plea. I think what it issued was a review, and it was a review of the President's speech. This is not about whether there’ll be an agreement on the debt ceiling as the White House would like to pretend. What we heard from S&P is this is about will there be real deficit reduction agreed to by the President and the Republicans. It has to be agreed between them, because one controls the White House and the other controls the House of Representatives, and their answer is "No." And this credit rating is not in jeopardy today. It is an outlook, but what it means is there is a one in three chance it is saying today that within two years it’s going to have to downgrade American AAA rating, which would be a shock to the system unlike any we’ve ever had.

BRET BAIER, HOST: Right. Outside of the debt ceiling vote or anything pending in coming days.

KRAUTHAMMER: Right, the debt ceiling vote is not what this S&P forecast is about. It's about what are the prospects of getting control of the debt itself. And the answer is “Little.” And the reason is the Wednesday speech, the beginning of a campaign kickoff. That is why the President is out in the country now. That was not a speech about reducing the deficit. The numbers the President offered were suspended in air untethered to anything. That was a kick in the teeth at Republicans with incidentally the House leadership and Ryan sitting in front of him. It was not an invitation to any negotiation. It was a way of saying, “You walked into my trap, I'm going to now attack you from now until Election Day.”

Krauthammer is likely quite right.

There was nothing economic that happened last week other than the President's speech to precipitate this action by S&P. If the agency had been disappointed by the 2011 budget agreement reached by Republicans and the White House on April 8, this negative outlook would have been issued last Monday.

Instead, the ratings agency likely waited to see how the President was going to respond to Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) 2012 budget proposal, and clearly wasn't pleased with what it saw.

This is now two credible deficit reduction plans this White House has chosen to ignore with the first being offered in December by the President's own debt commission.

As much as the Left and their media minions want to claim this is about raising taxes and/or the upcoming debt ceiling vote, all the credit rating agencies are fully aware that you can take every penny of income away from the so-called rich, and it won't balance the budget. Readers are advised to review Monday articles by CNS News and the Wall Street Journal on that very subject.

As for the debt ceiling vote, since the deadline is still weeks away, there was no reason for S&P to go "negative" now when those discussions are just beginning.

Instead, America's credit rating agencies are looking to see evidence that Washington is serious about cutting spending, and as far as S&P is concerned, what they got from the President Wednesday didn't assure them this is at all the case.

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Budget
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Taxes
  • Economy
  • Bret Baier
  • Charles Krauthammer
  • Paul Ryan
  • Special Report
  • Fox News Channel
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

You could hear me cheering all the way out there, NS?

Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 04/18/2011 - 8:38pm.

Dr. K. nailed it tonight.

Thx for posting.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

→ Alas, Babylon!

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 04/18/2011 - 8:43pm.

It's not exactly a trap unless you happen to believe President is a victim of circumstance rather than master of chaos.

There is absolutely no evidence this President wants anything less than the fall of Western Civilization through incremental surrender, culminating in a crescendo of cries from the masses, "But you promised!!"

We debate whether this man is foolish, or crafty.  He's entirely too successful with his agenda, to be foolish in the sense we generally think of foolishness.

The fool has said in his heart "there is no God".

  • Login to post comments

Great Book, CA!

Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 04/18/2011 - 9:17pm.

I haven't thought about it in years....may have to dig it out again.

This was just a warning shot across Obama's bow, but apparently he's too stupid and willfully ignorant to heed it. Hence Carney's dismissal of "politics".

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

I noted earlier today that

Submitted by bkeyser on Mon, 04/18/2011 - 8:59pm.

I noted earlier today that Reuters put out their first report on this by quoting one liberal as saying his S&P warning was about Republicans not wanting to raise taxes. Clearly though, the warning indicated austerity measures, not tax increases. Reuters was interjecting into the story their own narrative. (My link from earlier now goes to a later piece; I looked on Reuters' site for the earlier piece, which appears to have been scrubbed.)

An AP piece from later in the day couldn't get away with it -too much had been revealed by that point- but still spun it as a "rebuke to President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans." Congressional Democrats were left out of both reports outside of brief "gang of 6" references.

I'm just wondering if the S&P isn't really just sending a cautionary signal about grandma and snow.

  • Login to post comments

What???

Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 04/18/2011 - 9:14pm.

You mean S&P don't think Obama can fix this just by giving a speech about it?

<shakes head in disbelief>

The debt commission was wrong, Ryan is wrong.  Obama knows that everything will be fine; they just need to tax rich people more!

  • Login to post comments

I agree

Submitted by KC Mulville on Tue, 04/19/2011 - 2:13am.

There's no reason to believe that Obama is serious, or sees this as anything beyond the next campaign slogan. The only way to avoid the question of spending without actually cutting anything is to demagogue this to the point of distraction and fear, and that's exactly what the Democrats are actively doing.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • Rand Paul: ‘I Want to Go From 5% of the African-American Vote to At Least 20-25%’
  • Chris Cuomo Claims He’s ‘Completely Divorced From Ideology’ While Talking Up ‘Advocacy Journalism’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use