Juan Williams to O'Reilly: If You Called Koran 'Hate-Filled' Like Maher You'd Be Whipped and Stoned
After Bill Maher called the Koran "a hate-filled book" on HBO's "Real Time" Friday, NewsBusters asked if he would be attacked by the media for doing so.
With no outrage having ensued, the folks at Fox News on Monday questioned why Maher's comments went ignored by the Muslim defenders in the press, with Juan Williams telling Bill O'Reilly that if he had said anything like that, "They would have tied you to the pillar and be whipping you and stoning you" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
BILL O'REILLY, HOST: "Impact Segment" tonight, if a conservative or even a moderate journalist criticizes the Koran all hell breaks loose in the media. But a left wing comedian can pretty much skate on that.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
BILL MAHER: We are dealing with a culture that is in its medieval era. It comes from a hate-filled holly book, the Koran, which is taken very literally by its people. They are trying to get nuclear weapons. I don't think Tim McVeigh would ever have tried to get a nuclear weapon because I think right wing nuts, they think they love this country.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
O'REILLY: All right. Now reaction from the media about that, zero. Nothing. And even Congressman Keith Ellison who was on in the discussion was tepid in his response to the attack on the Koran.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REP. KEITH ELLISON (D), MINNESOTA: Bill, I think that you should investigate this issue a little more because I think that you're lumping together things that shouldn't be lumped together. And you're casting a very wide net and, therefore, coming to the wrong conclusions.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
O'REILLY: He was talking to Bill -- Bill Maher. Imagine if it was Bill O'Reilly who that said that to Congressman Ellison which I had him on last week, the response would have been different.
Joining us now from Washington to analyze: Fox Newsmanalysts Mary Katharine Ham and Juan Williams.
Juan all you said was you get a little nervous seeing a Muslim at the airport getting on a plane. Maher calls the Koran a hate-filled holy book, NPR should be doing hours on this, should it not?
JUAN WILLIAMS, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: Hours, days. I mean literally, if I said something like that -- wait a second, forget me, what if Bill O'Reilly had something like that.
O'REILLY: I would have been out of there. I would have been --
(CROSSTALK)
WILLIAMS: They would have stripped you in public, man. They would have tied you to the pillar and be whipping you and stoning you. That's what would happen to you.
O'REILLY: You bet. So why Juan, why is this -- now look, before I let Juan answer, I do have two reasons which may take the edge off this.
Number one, Mr. Maher's program is on HBO. It's on during the weekend. I don't know how well-watched it is.
Number two with the Japanese intrusion on cable news, everybody is paying attention to that, this takes on a lesser importance. So, that might be two reasons why nobody is involved with this, Juan.
WILLIAMS: Well, I think it's also important to say here that, you know, there is oftentimes excuses made for Bill Maher because people say oh, he is a comedian. But that's a show in which he has serious people like Congressman Ellison on, he's having a discussion --
O'REILLY: Absolutely.
WILLIAMS: And he describes the Koran as a hate-filled document. Now, if you, Bill O'Reilly, you are doing an information show here, and if you said it, I don't think they would say oh, you know, that's just Bill O'Reilly,he's a big personality. No, they would say that's a news show and you would be held responsible.
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: Some people think I'm a comedian, Mary Katharine. I mean I have heard that before. I'm a joke. Isn't that the same thing as a comedian? I'm a joke? What's your theory about why Maher skates about this?
MARY KATHARINE HAM, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: Well, it's clearly double standard. Partly because I think mostly because is he a liberal. He is allowed to say these things even in front of Keith Ellison. I think the irony is that Keith Ellison who broke down into tears at the hearing that Representative Peter King held the other day he hears something far more broad-brushed and far more mean and sort of about Islam than anything he heard at the hearing the other day. And it's just sort of like well, let's have a conversation about this.
But Bill Maher actually succeeded in saying something actually politically incorrect this time instead of the liberal orthodox he usually labels as politically incorrect.
O'REILLY: Well, I thought Mr. Ellison's tepid response was interesting too which is why I noted this because somebody said to me the New Testament of the Bible is hate-filled which is dangerous to the world I pretty much would take exception to that and have a much more spirited response than Mr. Ellison did, Juan.
And I'm saying does Maher -- does he intimidate the congressman and other left wingers because they are not expecting this from one of their own?
WILLIAMS: No because -- no, the last part of your statement is the precise (INAUDIBLE) that I'd offer you, Bill, he is one of their own. So, therefore, you know what? You get a pass. You know what?
Yes, maybe, Bill, you are just going off a little bit. You are off. You need to investigate it more. You need to look into it more but they don't attack him. They don't question his credibility. Remember, he said it was a hate-filled document.
I hope everybody hears that. I mean because if I had said that, boy, all hell. But hate-filled document and remember, that when you are talking about people like Major Nidal Hasan, the guy who did the shooting at Fort Hood; when you are talking about the Times Square bomber, I could go on. They all cite the Koran. So Maher is using that as a basis. And Keith Ellison doesn't engage in the debate. He just says you are just a little off. You should reconsider.
O'REILLY: Yes. I thought it was a little wimpy, I mean with all due respect to the congressman.
Now, the other thing that makes this a very interesting thing, Mary Katharine, is that it isn't politically based. Maher's statement is not politically based. He just hates all religions. You know that. He's an atheist. He hates all religions. It could be any religion. If it's in the spotlight, he's going to take an axe to it.
I don't think Ellison processed that. I could be wrong.
But when you hear Maher say this stuff, it isn't at any political belief. It's an anti-religious across the board belief. Let Mary Katharine wrap it up for us.
HAM: Yes. I think what's going on here is that he is getting a double standard. And the fact is -- what I kind of like about the political incorrectness of the discussion is that political correctness is what prevents us from seeing the actual real conflict between moderate and fundamentalist forces in Islam and facing up to that.
And Keith Ellison himself, facing up to that and saying we have a problem that we need to fix. You heard at that hearing the other day real Muslims dealing with this problem in their communities. People were freaking out so much about the political correctness that they couldn't hear those stories and I think we need to hear them and deal with that.
O'REILLY: Well, you know, just like the Christian religion and the Jewish religion, there are a lot of different interpretations of the scripture. You know, there are fundamentalists Christians and then there are Christians who don't take it literally, they take it as a metaphor.
WILLIAMS: Yes, but don't use that as an excuse because those terrorists are talking --
O'REILLY: I'm not using it as excuse.
WILLIAMS: Jihad -- I mean they're not talking about a personal journey. They are talking about killing me and you.
O'REILLY: There are peaceful Muslims, Juan, I think you would agree with me. They read the Koran --
WILLIAMS: Absolutely. Most Muslims.
O'REILLY: -- and they are not incited to blow anybody up.
WILLIAMS: No, I just -- I was just picking up on Mary Katharine's point that you have to be honest about the fact that people are using that document as justification for violent action.
(CROSSTALK)
O'REILLY: There's no doubt about it. All right. Thanks very much for a good discussion
HAM: Only if you are a liberal though.
Of course, O'Reilly, Williams, and Ham were quite right. If any conservative said what Maher did Friday evening, he or she would have been pilloried and excoriated by the Left. Ditto if any conservative host had questioned Ellison that way.
The double standard here is astounding, but sadly not at all surprising.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
juan is quickly coming around
Submitted by TruthMonger on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 10:12am.
juan is quickly coming around from the dark side of the force - this episode could turn him into a radical right wing nutcase like the rest of us...Congratulations Jimmy Carter!
Consistency is key
Submitted by hurtado_j on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:06am.
Bill Maher disparages both the bible and The Quran equally. When he does talk ill of the bible the right talks about how evil Bill Maher is, when he talks ill of The Quran all the right can come up with, like a little kid, is " but when I do it you yell at me!" Be consistent mr. bill and juan and maybe the left will ignore you the same way they ignore HBO, RealTime with Bill Maher.True
Submitted by Iron Tigers Vet on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:16am.
Consistency is a factor, but it's the "do as I say, not as I do" with the left that makes that "consistency" a non-factor. That key element is null and void.What?
Submitted by Vic138 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 12:22pm.
They are both being consistent and principled. Are you implying that one cannot say anything bad about Islam unless you also trash Christianity? How is that logical? They are apples and oranges. Maher is a uneducated child compared to someone like Christopher Hitchens. Btw, I do not like bill or juan, but in this case they're correct. If bill had said that he would have been death threats and a fatwa on his head.is CAIR condeming maher for
Submitted by TruthMonger on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 10:56pm.
is CAIR condeming maher for this....?Congratulations Jimmy Carter!
hurtado
Submitted by hydrodynDM on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:36pm.
So in your view, the only consistent stance is one which disparages all religions equally?
You sure about that?
And how about the main point here about the inconsistency of the media? If a public/political figure bashes Christianity, no one in the media cares. If such a figure bash any other religion, they take issue - unless, apparently, you are a liberal. Then they don't care.
Where's your criticism of the media's inconsistencies?
hydro, hutado is
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 3:04pm.
a 3 week member, who's sole post is on this thread. So, I'll go way out on a limb here and opine that he's a drive-by troll, or a member of Maher's audience, but I repeat myself. I'm sure Hurtado sees Maher's stance as wholly compatible with consistency and even-handedness. And, he sees equivalency between Fox and HBO? Tells me a lot of what I need to know about his critical thinking.Troll Alert!!!!!!
Submitted by adamsmith on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 6:02pm.
I've seen pretty much everything that the little Gnome from Hef's Grotto says. It's a first Maher has ever said about Islam or the Koran. Busted, punk. Now you have to ask yourself, "Do I feel lucky?, Well, do ya, punk?Watching Juan Williams is
Submitted by Mazzi on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:31am.
Watching Juan Williams is like an exercise in social science. We are witnessing a liberal (although, a "fairly reasonable" liberal, if there is such a thing) learn the basic fundamentals of conservatism. At least he is starting to see that conservatism does NOT mean bible-thumping, xenophobia, and stubborn clinging to ideas that others tell us to believe in, lol. I think it's fascinating, and I hope he had enough fan base that followed him, that some more people can be chipped off the hard-core liberal block.O'Reilly and Williams should
Submitted by metaphorsbwithu on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:47am.
O'Reilly and Williams should read the comments from weekend Newsbusters where some of us explained the meaning of Ellison's response in objecting to Maher's point that the Koran teaches killing one is like killing all.
His admonition to read other verses included one directed at the "Children of Israel" where killing (and maiming) is said to be only justified against those who create "mischief" in the world, insult the Prophet, etc. - in which cases it is okay to kill them, chop off their hands and feet, etc.
Any REAL dialogue must include more than vague references and get down to brass tacks and discuss on exactly what extremists base their murderous (to some) behavior.
Bill Maher offends everyone.
Submitted by wiwf on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:47am.
Bill Maher offends everyone. Not surprising.I'd love to hear from the Body language expert
Submitted by ProudAmerican58 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 1:24pm.
Bill O'Reilly occasionally has on to analyze the expression on Ellison's face as he listened to Bill Maher check off his individual reasons for considering fundamentalist Islam a unique threat. He sat there with squinted eyes and slightly pufffed cheeks. Regardless, I haven't trusted this man since the day he decided to be sworn in by placing his hand on that "hate-filled" Koran.Stoned like Maher....pot smoking weirdo...
Submitted by mrwiffle on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:25pm.
Great headline...Maher should get stoned more often...what a creep. Everybody I know who knows him say's that he is an ASS.I dont know anyone who knows him
Submitted by Boudin on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 5:29pm.
But they all think he is an a$$ anyway?