Liberals Rip CNBC Host Lawrence Kudlow's Japanese Quake Comments
CNBC's Lawrence Kudlow on Friday made a stock market comment about the earthquake and resulting tsunamis in Japan that have liberal media members hyperventilating.
Before we get to the response, here's what Kudlow said (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):
MELISSA FRANCIS: Let’s take a look at the markets right now as we get close to the top of the hour here. You can see the Dow is trading in positive territory. It’s up, you know, a little more than a tenth of a percent, but still in positive territory. Three tenths of a percent for the NASDAQ. And look at the S&P bouncing back. It’s up about four tenths of a percent. All in all, the market taking this in stride.
LAWRENCE KUDLOW: I mean, the human, the human toll here…
FRANCIS: Yep.
KUDLOW: …looks to be much worse than the economic toll, and we can be grateful for that, and the human toll is a tragedy, we know that. But these markets are, all these markets, right - stocks, commodities, oil, gold - there is no major breakout or breakdown.
TRISH REGAN: As the traders told us…
KUDLOW: I have to look at that positive – look at, I look at it as positive.
REGAN: …oil is very much a part of this today because oil’s moving lower. They feel as though this is good news for the U.S. economy.
From what I can tell, the first to be offended by this was Vanity Fair's Jaime Lalinde who posted "Larry Kudlow Devalues Human Life With Japan Earthquake Freudian Slip" Friday:
In these tough economic times, isn’t it nice to know that calamitous natural disasters needn't have an adverse affect on your investment portfolio? After the 8.9-magnitude earthquake in Japan failed to induce a market nosedive, CNBC’s Larry Kudlow expressed his relief in terms that seemed to appall even his fellow cheerleaders for capitalism.
The aggregator Memeorandum linked to the headline shortly after that, followed by a Gawker contributor.
By Sunday, the Huffington Post chimed in with its disgust followed by Mediaite's Tommy Christopher:
Even as horrific scenes of devastation unfolded in the aftermath of Japan’s 8.9 earthquake and 23-foot tsunami, Kudlow found the silver lining: no markets were harmed in the making of this disaster...It must be a rule that in order to be hired by CNBC, you have to be more made of asshole than a pack of Dollar Store hot dogs.
What most of these folks missed in their disgust was that Kudlow addressed this on Twitter at 5:59 PM Friday:
I did not mean to say human toll in Japan less important than economic toll.Talking about markets.I flubbed the line. Sincere apology.
As someone that has been involved in the markets since 1980 - and with full disclosure admitting that I greatly admire Kudlow as well as having spoken with him once at a Media Research Center Gala - let me try to explain what was going on Friday.
People that work in the markets largely have a one-track mind. Everything that happens internationally has a financial or economic component.
When my wife awakened me Friday morning to tell me what had happened in Japan while we slept, I was of course as shocked and terrified as likely everyone else, although earthquakes evoke additional trepidation and anxiety in Californians - trust me.
As I turned on the television, and began seeing the coverage, a reporter on CNN commented that the Nikkei in Japan had plummeted after the quake. I naturally assumed this would bring down global markets and could lead to a major financial rout across the world.
Readers should recall what happened to international markets in the days following 9/11 before our exchanges resumed trading on September 17.
I, frankly, thought the same could happen Friday in response to this quake. Kudlow likely felt the same thing, and was probably shocked by how well the markets held up. Every trader I spoke to Friday and over the weekend was similarly so.
With this in mind, Kudlow wasn't in any way trying to diminish the seriousness of the human toll involving this natural disaster. Instead, he was expressing gratitude that it wasn't leading to a financial collapse that could exact an even greater international toll in the days and months to come.
Remember that the recession of 2008-2009 was largely caused by a global stock and bond market implosion. That downturn wouldn't have been nearly as bad as it was without the massive loss of wealth across the world associated with the bear market.
Taking this further, folks involved in the financial arena are always concerned about market events causing a recession. Without question, the bursting of the stock bubble in 2000 is what caused the downturn in 2001.
With the economy appearing to be picking up some steam, but still not out of the woods by any means, folks are very concerned about anything derailing this recovery. A stock market collapse caused by a natural disaster could easily do this.
Regardless of Friday's firmness, a crash is still possible. The Nikkei opened down over five percent Monday.
As such, being a financial analyst and commentator - as well as an eternal optimist! - Kudlow had to be sitting there Friday amazed by how well our markets responded to this calamity feeling tremendously grateful we weren't crashing on the news.
Although he may not have expressed it as well as he would have liked, having been watching Kudlow for decades, I guarantee that's what he was thinking and trying to convey Friday.
Those that are jumping on Larry are most certainly not familiar with his work or his eternal optimism for the human condition and spirit.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
That's Odd
Submitted by Birch Barlow on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 10:14pm.
Liberals are rarely concerned about the devaluing of human life.Typical CNBC Spin
Submitted by Vic138 on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:48pm.
to keep the markets up. He's just a shill for the federal reserve who wants to keep the u.s. stock market spinning higher. He was saying the same crap (as were almost all the other cnbs hosts) when gm declared bankruptcy and a thousand other negative news items that should of taken the u.s. equity markets down. For example: "This is good for oil because they'll consume less making more available to everyone else." Forgetting the fact that with the nuclear plants off line they'll need more oil. I stopped listening to that propaganda outlet for this administration over a year ago. GE (or GE/Comcast the owner of cnbc) is the real culprit; they're in bed with the obama administration and rarely tell the truth... Their viewership is dwindling. Bloomberg and fox business are not much better. The next thing they'll be saying is that with toyota, sony and other japanese companies down that its good for u.s. companies like gm, ford and apple. Or, money fleeing japan will go to u.s. treasuries, etc. We're living in interesting times...Another Tsunami coming?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 10:55pm.
Geraldo is reporting another 10 ft Tsunami coming into Japan. Drudge says so too.→ Within minutes?
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 10:56pm.
I don't know what the heck's going on, but I am watching the news.→ Update
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:10pm.
Apparently, the seismic activity was caused by yet another hydrogen explosion in one of the problem reactors.Only 10ft?
Submitted by Vic138 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:51am.
Could be worse, could be 20. Stock market up. /sarc offObama golfs and attends Gridiron "roasts
Submitted by Texndoc on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:02pm.
Selective outrage.It doesn't matter one bit whether those who are criticizing
Submitted by Rush Fan on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:13pm.
Larry Kudlow are familiar or not with his work or his personal characteristics. To those on the Left, Kudlow deserves to be criticized because: Larry Kudlow is a Republican who believes in supply-side economics, i.e lower taxes, fiscal responsibility, and less regulation and other barriers that inhibit economic growth.
Even at the Huffington Post there are a few decent posters. For example, I am in agreement with GG NV who posted these comments:
Did they have the vapors over
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:14pm.
Did they have the vapors over Chris Matthews' "born in Hawaii" comment? I'm guessing no. It's only inappropriate to mention money, not political advantage
Didnt the Vapors sing,,
Submitted by brutony1 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 3:06am.
Turning Japanese?When will liberals WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE! -Me
Just think: Liberals and abortion...
Submitted by notinstl on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:16pm.
....they're always quick to talk about the economic impact of an unwanted, unintended pregnancy......no talk of the human tollCertainly During An Abortion...
Submitted by Samaritan01 on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:20pm.
The human toll is greater than the economic one....and that is something the progs can be grateful for, right??!! So this would be an example of leftist situational ethics, or perhaps a leftist attempt at gaining popularity/votes without invoking a great deal of thought.Liberals are Liberals
Submitted by jfhdsiu on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:20pm.
To a Liberal it isn't of any importance WHY they jump on and savage someone. It is only important that they DO jump on someone and savage them! It's their nature!Kudlow's gaffe has probably
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:24pm.
Kudlow's gaffe has probably been overblown and his intended point was no doubt as Noel states it. But his phrasing was undeniably clumsy and unfortunate and he should have exercised far greater care in choosing his words. If the same shoe were on a lib's foot the conservative media--including this website--would be in high dungeon.Jer
Jer
Submitted by Noel Sheppard on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:53pm.
Jer, Doubtful. Let's assume Krugman or Reich was on "Morning Joe" Friday chatting about the financial and economic ramifications of the earthquake/tsunamis. If either had said the same thing Larry did in that context, we wouldn't have found anything wrong with it. I'm not coming to Larry's defense because he's a Con and I like him. I very much understand what he meant, and think the clamor is unfounded. If this had been said by Krugman or Reich and other websites jumped on him, we wouldn't have been on that bandwagon. Trust me. nsNoel...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:10am.
I like him, too--even if he is a conservative. But I think an independent objective observer reading the words: human toll while tragic was greater than the economic toll and we can be grateful for that... [I'm paraphrasing...I don't have the actual quote in front of me] would blanche at the manner in which Larry expressed his opinion. And he definitely left himself open for the not so objective observers.
But I agree that too much was made of it.
Jer
But is the reason they made
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:35am.
But is the reason they made too much of it because liberals are:a) being overly sensitive?
b) stoking up their cherished stereotype of greedy Capitalists?
c) looking to change the focus off of Obama's international flop on Lybia?
d) looking to change the focus off of Chris Matthew's turd remark about Obama growing up in Hawaii?
or e) some other inane reason?
or f) Jer, give us your best guess as to why they behaved this way since we really don't get it.
Because on the face of it, dscott...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:52am.
it was an extraordinarlly insensitive remark. Do you really expect with hundreds [thousands?] of amateur journalists swarming the internet that it would be completely ignored?
For heaven's sake...Matthews made a minor slip of the tongue mistakenly saying "Carter" instead of "Obama" and it was the subject of a blog here at NB. I don't have a problem with that. But it's naive to think that a much more dramatic and embarrassing gaffe by a well-known commentator would go unreported.
Jer
But that can't be true...
Submitted by Tenebrous on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:07am.
...because liberals didn't care when Rwandans were murdered with machetes, liberals don't care about children butchered in the womb (or even children born alive, as Obama indicated with his vote on the Infants Born Alive Act), and liberals only care about the homeless when a Republican is in the presidency. Liberals also LOVED Stalin and Mao and threw millions of poor Chinese and Russians into Death's hungry maw because then, like now, liberals care only about the unfortunate when it suits their politics. Insensitivity, thy name is liberal.Liberals also assume malice without cause. "Extraordinarily insensitive" means that he was being insensitive, as opposed to someone making a flub. If he had a track record of being insensitive, then ok, this would be in character. Does he? I don't see any evidence presented that he is this way, unlike Matthew's penchant for saying stupid and false things, which is a character trait of that drooling idiot.
So you can't say that he was insensitive; all that we have evidence for here is a flub.
You lie again, Jer. By the way, a lie is when you say something that is not true -- I know you need help with basic moral distinctions.
Visions and Principles blog
Note I said "on the face of it" the remark was insensitive...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:46am.
Tenebrous--not that Kudlow was insensitive or that he intended to be insensitive. I readily acknowledge it was a gaffe...a flub.
I wish there were some way to improve your comprehension skills, but sadly, there is very little that can be done for plain stupidity.
Jer
And you are an idiot.
Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 11:46am.
Tenebrous the Idiot that thought he could start picking on The Vet: ...a lie is when you say something that is not true.
No Idiot. A lie is something you KNOW to be untrue.
lie 1 a : an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker to be untrue with intent to deceive
You are describing misinformation or a misstatement. ,Idiot.
misstate: to state incorrectly : give a false account of — mis·state·ment \-mənt\ noun
Try to be correct next time you get into Mr. Teachy mode and decide to go after The Vet.
Word!
Submitted by Rukus on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:28pm.
You said it more better than I did below. Thank you.I throw the yellow hanky!
Submitted by Rukus on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:26pm.
What is your problem Ten? Jer is not a liar, he gave his opinion and said it was a misstatement. So why are you so damned nasty, it was his OPINION and he stated it well. No need to be nasty just for the sake of being nasty. Jer is good folk that just happens to have a different outlook than yours. Chill the frell out! Peace.I don't see the remark as
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:18am.
I don't see the remark as embarrassing or dramatic. Explain it to me...Why being greatful that the situation wasn't worse is embarrassing or dramatic?
Let me explain why I don't: Japan's insurance industry is on the hook for billions upon billions of dollars to cover all the claims. Where pray tell do you think the insurance industry invested/saved all this money to pay the insured's damages???? The stock market and bonds. IF the Japanese Property insurers are forced to liquidate investments in a DOWN market then they might not have enough money to cover the claims. That Jer would be rubbing salt into the wound, an additional even greater tragedy in which the victims of the earthquake, Tsunami and radiation leaks would have limited means to recover.
So Kudlow apologized for
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:34am.
So Kudlow apologized for nothing and was mistaken when he admitted he flubbed the line? If so, that's a very interesting perspective, dscott. And makes Kudlow appear to be a dunce.
Jer
Yeap, he got hustled.
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 4:07am.
Yeap, he got hustled.Well, I think he's smarter than that.
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 4:22am.
But maybe not.IMO, in any event I disagree
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 4:41am.
IMO, in any event I disagree with Kudlow as to the valuations of the Stock Market. IMO oil is NOT the primary cause of the US Stock Market not tanking. IMHO the market has been going up due to investor flight from US bonds and Treasuries to equities. The money has essentially no place to go for a reasonable risk/reward other than overseas. We are essentially at the beginnings of an equity bubble because the current domestic economic situation does not justify these valuations.
Look at the DOW components like GE. GE has P/E (ttm) value of 19.17, that's about 5.2% earnings, whereas the Forward P/E (1 yr): 12.57. This suggests the stock is close to 65% overvalued. http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GE
dscott...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 5:23am.
You may be right, although my view is not quite so pessimistic. However, I do believe the recent impressive market gains have been driven, if not by irrational exuberance, at least to some degree by an unwarranted optimism on the part of investors reading far too much into far too meager signs of economic recovery. My opinion--and I hope you and I both are ignominiously wrong--is that we are headed for an extended period of general sluggishness/moderate declines--but not an equity bubble-bursting plunge.
I appreciate your point re GE overvaluation, and yet the consensus recommendation remains a "buy".
Jer
Equity Markets tied to percieved power
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 9:15am.
The United States equity markets correlate almost 1 for 1 with the perception of Obama's political power. Stocks started their big sell off in the spring/summer of 2008 when Obama got the lock on the Dem nomination and he was favored to win in November. The market hit bottom in the spring of 2009 and started to turn around when it finally became clear that he didn't have the power to nationalize the financial sector.
And with regards to any stock being over-valued based on future P/E: The lower the expected future P/E, the better. Higher future earnings expectations are a good thing. Stock price is based on future expected earnings more then current earnings. (I'm not defending GE here, just talking about P/E ratios.)
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
My 401k hopes so as well.
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:39pm.
My 401k hopes so as well. Does that make me insensitive of Japan's current situation? Correlation does not equate Causation.The conservative media, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 5:02am.
might well be in high dudgeon, which shouldn't be confused with gudgeon ; but I wouldn't mind at all if the liberal press were indeed consigned to a dungeon. :o)
MD
gudgeon?
Submitted by Rukus on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:35pm.
Euro bait-fish or circular logic? But I repeat myself...This is what I find outrageous
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:43pm.
Even as his administration and the U.S. military help Japan recover from a devastating earthquake, and as the world worries about Fukushima's nuclear reactor, the president could not resist taking advantage of the 48-degree weather in the Washington, D.C., area.
What an embarrassment this man is.
motherbelt...Obama's golfing
Submitted by Jer on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:56pm.
Reagan was notorious for short workdays, abbreviated workweeks, and lots of R & R. He seemed to do okay. In fact, he is reported to have said 'show me an executive who puts in long hours and I'll show you a bad executive'.I trust your outrage was a bit more subdued back then.
Jer
The differences
Submitted by jon_torlin on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:19am.
The differences between the two, one had experience running the state as governor of California, the others just voted present and doesn't show any real leadership. He has shown he's a capable dictator though.
-Jon
Thats crap JER
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:07am.
Bad comparison and you know it. Reagan didn't go golfing while the rest of the world was figuring out how to help thousands of people that were just in a huge natural disaster. Can you imagine what would have been said (justifiably) if Bush went golfing on Sept 3 2005?We Are The 53%
I'm not sure what Bush was doing on 9/3/05...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:30am.
but on 8/30/05, the day after Katrina hit, he was partying in California and strumming the guitar.
Jer
Gosh Jer
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:52am.
I know your left, but linking to a site that gets it's info from DailyKos? Couldn't you do any better than that?
Funny how that was the last thing they complained about, nothing about what Bush was doing during the aftermath.
What else happened on that day?
Blanco FINALLY asked for Federal help, and over 10,000 national guard troops were deployed.
August 31st, Bush returns to Washington early. HE CUT HIS VACATION, because of the disaster. Compared to the chairman, who decides to go golfing ANYWAY.
We Are The 53%
Good grief, Denny...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:12am.
Do you want a similar link from about a hundred other sites? Are you claiming the story was false and the photo was a forgery or photoshopped?
Granted, Nagin and Blanco screwed up big time. But the fact remains that while New Orleans was going under water, Bush headed to California for some fun and fundraising--NOT a smart move.
Jer
One that doesn't praise Dkos might be acceptable
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 3:14am.
My point is that Bush was following his schedule before the realization that it would be a huge disaster. Once the disaster happened, he cut his vacation, and returned to the office.
Obama on the other hand, A disaster happens, reports that thousands may have lost their lives, and he still thinks it's OK to go golfing 48 hours later.
How many hurricanes have come up the gulf, building steam, and then fizzle out before making landfall. The prez followed his schedule until they realized that it was a devastating disaster. Once he started taking care of the problem, he didn't decide it was a good time to hit the links.
We Are The 53%
Denny...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 4:15am.
Katrina had been taking dead aim for New Orleans and/or nearby Gulf coastal populated areas, and the reports of a potential major disaster had been disseminated for days. Bush had already been on vacation for nearly five weeks--by some accounts the longest vacation ever taken by a sitting President--when Katrina made landfall.
While the storm turned slightly away from New Orleans, it was clear that the city was by no means out of harm's way--and those fears turned out to be well-founded. Despite the ominous developments, Bush had continued his vacation,.stopping in Arizona to present John McCain with a birthday cake, and then traveled on to San Diego for a speech commemorating the 60th anniversary of the Japanese surrender. It was there he was given a guitar backstage and the subject photo was taken. The next day he was convinced by his aides to skip the final two days of his vacation and get back to Washington. I'm sure they realized that goofing around with a guitar wasn't the sort of crisis management optics they wished to be portrayed to the American public.
Yes, Bush didn't deserve anywhere near the amount of blame heaped upon him in the aftermath of Katrina. But neither does Obama deserve to be attacked for playing a round of golf on one afternoon during the ongoing calamitous and tragic events in Japan.
Jer
You know Jer I just realized
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:03pm.
You know Jer I just realized something and am kicking myself for not catching on to this sooner. This is what happens when I'm not fully listening when you speak. My fault and thank you for helping me challenge my assumptions which cloud my vision of the nuances of the underlying thought patterns.
The basic premise of your argument in comparing Obama's vacation time to Reagan and Bush is that ALL three men are entitled to the same amount of vacation time. Therefore, Obama is not doing anything different nor without precedence. Underlying that premise is Equality of Outcome as liberals call it. Based on that premise your argument is Obama is being unfairly criticized for taking vacation.
EXCEPT that assumes vacation is an entitlement and NOT a reward for hard work and good results. That's like saying if I walked a mile and you sprinted that same mile, I am entitled to the same amount of rest you would be after going a mile. In the real world I would not be entitled to squat and you would sitting in the shade having a cold drink of water.
Obama is NOT entitled to all his vacations since he still hasn't gotten the job done properly. Obama is a salaried employee of the US and for said salaried person there is no other Equality of Outcome than RESULTS.
You may have heard this old example, there are gifted people who seem to do any task effortlessly with out really trying and thus miss their potential of greater things. Then there are those people who are not gifted who must by virtue of their determination work hard and long to achieve the same results and many times outshine the gifted because they are so busy focusing on the results that they don't know when to stop. Barack Obama is NOT only NOT gifted, NOT experienced but he stops before the job is even done then whines when he is taken to task for crappy results. i.e. "do you want me to suck the oil up with a straw?"
Dscott
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 10:21pm.
You forgot. Obama's a union man. He's entitled to the exact same things that everybody else in the same position gets, no matter what their job performance is. Why are you trying to divide the workers? /sarcWe Are The 53%
Jer, LOL...you spent two
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 3:03am.
Jer, LOL...you spent two full paragraphs, about 9 lines, attacking Bush for supposedly taking a vacation he shouldn't have and you throw a one liner in an attempt to "defend" him, which was more a transition to excuse the Liberal messiah Obama and you expect people to consider what you wrote fair? LOL Let's get somethings straight... 1) Bush took his vacation BEFORE he knew, as well as before anyone, Right or Left, Liberal or Conservative knew what a complete and utter disaster Katrina was going to become for New Orleans. On a side note, do not forget that there were communities which suffered equal or more than New Orleans, but since they do not play into the Liberal victimhood mentality of us minorities, the media and Liberals never cared about these communities. 2) What Bush could do without running over the Constitution, he did. He mobilized the Coast Guard immediately!!!! Something no one ever talks about. The Constitution did not allow Bush to mobilized any troops without Blanco asking for help and how long did it take this Liberal governor to ask for help? 3) As soon as Bush and his administration realized the disaster Katrina became, he cut his vacation short!!! I am stilling waiting to hear Obama cutting a vacation or gulf outing short due to Presidential duties! In fact, it looks like the man makes his gulf outings longer when disaster hits or his Presidential duties call upon him. But heck, Obama calls for us the "little" people to make economic sacrifices while he takes his wife to a dinner in New York which cost tax payers a quarter of a million dollars. His wife goes off to Spain and spends half a million dollars on a vacation, while us the "little" people are being told by Obama that we must make sacrifices and not take vacations! LOL 4) The people of Libya are being massacred by Gaddafi and what is Obama and his administration doing? Biden was sent off to Russia, Obama is out playing gulf and Hillary is getting infront of microphones informing us that the USA will not take the lead. instead, she is waiting for a consensus from the world community!!! The Libyian people are hating America thanks to who? thanks to the inactions of who? Obama!!!! 5) Before you talk about Bush allegedly missing in action while Katrian was turning into a disaster, make sure your Liberal house is not made out of glass. Clinton, his administration and the Liberal worshiped UN did what in Rwanda? what did these Liberal politicians do to stop the massacre of 8000,000 to 1 million Tutsis? Or what did Jimmy Carter do and the UN do, once again Liberal politicians, to stop the massacre of 1 million human beings in the fields of Cambodia? These are the Presidents, the ideology which you admired? A Liberal legacy that have led to the death of almost 2 million human beings for lack of action, for the Liberal believe that the world should act as one? Not the USA as a leader and everyone following our lead? Rwanda and the Fields of Cambodia are what Liberal foreign policies lead to. Thus, as I said, before you whine about the supposed inaction and vacation of Bush make sure that your Liberal politicians are not sitting back and allowing massacres to go on around the world. Obama-Lybia, Clinton-Rwanda, Carter-Cambodia. Liberals should be proud of this legacy of doing nothing and millions dying thanks to Liberal policies and way of thinking!Jer, Almost, but no cigar.
Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:21am.
Jer, Almost, but no cigar. Man you love to defend your Liberal politicians. I wouldn't care how much Obama worked if.. 1) He actually got some work done before going to play a billion rounds of golf. 2) More importantly, the United States of America, her citizens, us the people of America were informed on a daily basis, on a nightly basis, 24 hours a day by Liberals how much of a dunce, idiot, moron, incapable of running the USA President Bush was because he didn't work enough hours and took too much time off. It was the pro-obama individuals and if I am NOT mistaken Obama himself who said Obama was going to put in full days work and not take as many vacations, as much time off as Bush. in the two and a half years this President has been in office, he has played more rounds of golf than Bush played in 8 years. He has taken as many vacations if not more than Bush took during his first term. Man, where is the outrage from the MSM, Liberals and the rest who criticized Bush for taking too much time off from being President?Nice shot Jer, but missed. I
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:50am.
Nice shot Jer, but you missed. I am really glad you brought up Reagan since he was one person who really understood what being a leader and CEO entailed. A good CEO delegates to people he implicitely trusts and knows how to get the job done. A good leader does not micromanage. When the Navy shot down a Lybian jet, Reagan was called in the AM and then he promptly went back to bed. The MSM was all atwitter about Reagan going back to bed. Maybe you are too young to remember that? What was Reagan's response?
Now contrast that with Obama's team handling the Gulf Oil spill, one buearucratic bungle after another. Obama admitted he was involved to the point of picking where to send clean up teams. The team Obama assembled to run the government failed him because he, Obama, failed to choose competent people. Given Obama's track record of constant bungling, does anyone have any expectation he has picked competent people to get the job done? At this point in the game, Obama having a track record as a micromanager now goes golfing, what message is he sending?
Well, dscott...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:03am.
My recollection is that two Libyan jets were splashed by USN F-14 Tomcats, but I could be wrong. And I don't recall what Reagan said, but it was probably funny.Jer
the wonders of the
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:27am.
the wonders of the internet:Within six minutes Washington was told of the incident, and National Security Adviser Richard Allen and White House Counselor Edwin Meese, who were in Los Angeles with President Reagan, received the news at 11 p.m. local time. They decided that there was no need at the moment to waken the president. Instead, according to Time, “they monitored the news for the next 5½ hours before calling Reagan, who was sleeping in his suite at the Century Plaza hotel.” Meese told Time that "The President was in charge, and if there had been any action he needed to take, he would have been awakened." Reagan saw nothing wrong with the delay. Said he: "If our planes were shot down, yes, they'd wake me up right away. If the other fellows were shot down, why wake me up?"
http://www.nj.com/hudson/voices/index.ssf/2011/03/mr_president_lead_or_g... It's all about teamwork...competence. Yes, it was funny and liberals at the time were aghast.I really don't see any
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sun, 03/13/2011 - 11:49pm.
I really don't see any problems with his comments. He was just saying that there were not many lives lost and the markets are up. This was pretty much blown out of proportion.I have sympathy for Larry
Submitted by OffTheLows on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:01am.
he's on tv 2 hours a day, once in a while his mouth and his brain are going to cross wires and say something that those who think the worst of everyone will jump on.. but I feel this way about everyone talking a lot, whether it be Bush's peeance freeance Iraq or Obama's 57 states, people not on the airwaves hours a day need to accept the occasional flub and move on. If you listened to Larry's weekend radio show, he had plenty of complimentary things to say about the Japanese people.why is this a partisan issue?
Submitted by michiganruth on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:21am.
why do I have to defend Larry Kudlow? because I sympathize with the tea party? nobody enjoys a good old Dem vs Rep throwdown as much as me, but why is this a left-right thing? Kudlow had a foot-in-mouth moment. surely nobody really believes he believes that money is more important than human life. he apologized. end of story. I don't fault anyone for calling him out on it, tho, it was a pretty stupid thing to say. selective outrage? well of course! but let's pick our battles. this one just isn't that important. (so...why am I commenting? ;-))It seems to me that he was
Submitted by robert108 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:34am.
It seems to me that he was saying that the combination of economic and human tragedy was less then expected, due to the economic toll being lower than expected. Nothing complicated or wrong about that.Look...even Kudlow
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:45am.
admits he flubbed it. And he apologized for doing so. End of story.Jer
More PR repair than anything
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:44am.
More PR repair than anything else.Kudlow is wrong. The
Submitted by jdhawk on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:35am.
Kudlow is wrong. The devastation is so vast and the Japanese economy into hock even more than we are (their deficit is 120% of this year's GDP with their equivalent Federal Reserve pegging rates at 1% for years now), they have little manuever room. Presently, the Kopix is down 7 1/2%!!! The Nikkei is down 6 1/2%!!! Those indexes are measuring the entire Japanese market. That means that some companies are seeing declines much much worse. You can't have the third largest economy on the planet take blows to their stock market like that of above without it affecting the rest of the planet's stock markets. Presently, the futures for the European countries indexes are down as are ours. The European stock market opens at 3:00am EDT today. We'll see how well they fair and in turn it will tells what we can expect at 9:30am this morningJdhawk, I have to agree
Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 1:24am.
Jdhawk, I have to agree with you! This is were Kudlow made the mistake! claiming the the economic impact from the Earthquake and Tsunami is not huge. We could be witnessing Japan being turned into a second if not a third world nation! Let us hope this si not the case, but wow, the economic impact is huge! and if the huge afterschock hits like scientist are predicting.....Japan is done for for decades to come. This could be the big thing that will prevent any type of world economic recovery. That being said....Let us pray for the people of Japan and those of us who can, we should start a drive to send food and water to those who have lost so much!!!!Huge Indeed
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 9:02am.
But decades to come? What did Japan look like in 1955, or 1965?"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Kingfish17, Yes, decades to
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 3:07am.
Kingfish17, Yes, decades to come. Given the nuclear disaster that is about or already blowing up all over Japan....yes, decades to come. I hope that I am wrong and like Limbaugh said today that the people of Japan get back up stronger. Let us hope that they do not have the same stupid laws, local ordinances, zoning restrictions etc which have thwarted a quick build of the Freedom Towers! I hope that I am wrong, but it looks more and more that the economic impact, wh ich will cause a huge impact against human beings, is going to be huge and Japan will pay for it for decades to come! I wonder, does obama have it in him to do what the USA did right after WWII and help Japan rebuild itself? Hmmmm....I wonder. I really do. let us see if Obama keeps on treating America's allies worse than he treats our enemies.Unfortunately
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Tue, 03/15/2011 - 11:41am.
The aftermath of WW2 taught us that it's possible to rebuild quickly from total devastation, as they did in Japan. The earthquake, tsunami, and any nuclear reactor problems pale to the devastation that was Japan after WW2. Logistically, it's not impossible for Japan to rebuild rapidly, but unfortunately, it may be impossible, politically.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Yawn...
Submitted by Tenebrous on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:08am.
...this isn't news. Dude on TV makes a flub. Leftidiots poop their pants. Just another day in crazyville.Visions and Principles blog
Let's see how it looks when
Submitted by Thoreau on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 2:35am.
Let's see how it looks when Japan cashes in it's US bonds to pay for the disaster.Exactly, it's called QE3.
Submitted by dscott on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 4:05am.
Exactly, it's called QE3. The Bank of Japan has pumped 15 trillion yen into their economy over night, at 80 yen to the dollar that's about $187.5 billion that the Fed has to print to trade in those US bonds. Japan being a close 2nd in holder of US bonds.Not Enough Drama to Suit Liberals
Submitted by Boil It Down on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 3:53am.
I've determined through the process of elimination, that Kudlow is one of the voices in the media to be trusted in terms of being right most of the time. This is no small feat considering his employer. I also find Kudlow a critical thinker who consistently discounts the liberal gray areas that their guests frequently try to inject into money issues. Kudlow didn't place the markets above the cost in human life, yet they had to make it seem as if he did since he's the greedy capitalist. Obviously, these critics 'feel' like he should be crying about the devastation in Japan instead of reasoned analysis of the markets, which is his job. Clearly, the drama of reality TV is what they're demanding of him.We really need to stop trying...
Submitted by stage9 on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 12:59pm.
to explain why liberals do what they do. They're insane. It's that simple. After all, they're the ones who brought us the idiocy we've all come to know as "political correctness." Mentally unstable people are characterized by paranoia and fear. Someone is always out to get them. Liberal radicals are no less mental."If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner." — Malcolm Muggeridge
As Kanye West would say...
Submitted by TruthMatters on Mon, 03/14/2011 - 4:33pm.
"George Bush hates Japanese people"