Bill O'Reilly Blows Up At Alan Colmes, Challenges Sam Donaldson to Come on Fox and Defend Thanking Al Jazeera
As NewsBusters previously reported, Sam Donaldson on Sunday's "This Week" actually thanked the anti-American television network Al Jazeera for what they do in the Middle East.
On Tuesday, Fox News's Bill O'Reilly invited Alan Colmes and Monica Crowley on his program to discuss the matter, and by the end of the segment, O'Reilly was practically screaming at Sean Hannity's former partner (video follows with commentary):
It really is amazing how these guys at Fox put up with Colmes who just seems like nothing but a liberal antagonist.
As for Donaldson, he's never struck me as a man that wouldn't stand up to a challenge.
Although I couldn't identify via LexisNexis Sam ever being on O'Reilly's program, he has commented about the "Factor" host with O'Reilly responding on December 19, 2005:
BILL O'REILLY, HOST: Continuing now with FOX News analyst Newt Gingrich, who's been following the Christmas controversy with some interest. Our pal Sam Donaldson weighed in over the weekend on that.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
SAM DONALDSON, THIS WEEK: We're accusing this media of ours of trying to get ratings. Well, Bill O'Reilly wants ratings. He wants to stroke the yahoos, where is Mencken when we need him, in his audience by saying there's a war on Christmas. You can say `Merry Christmas'. You can say `Happy Holidays.' `Happy Hanukah.' Say whatever you want.
The fact that he's simply trying to get ratings on this should not engage us to think that there's a war on Christmas.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
O'REILLY: Yahoos? So -- what do you think's going on here? I mean, it's reached hysteria with The New York Times column yesterday, you know, Donaldson and all these people. It has reached hysteria.
NEWT GINGRICH: Well let me say, first of all, Bill, I don't think I've ever heard a more perfect illustration of the mainstream media's elitism than what Sam Donaldson just said.
It appears there's no love lost between these two making it somewhat unlikely Donaldson would accept the challenge.
Keep your fingers crossed for this would be quite an event.
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
Watched it---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 2:36am.
and Colmes was more actively boorish with his liberal fol-de-rol output than usual.
Disgusting pos.
And that's on his best days.
MD
Wached it too.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 7:36am.
and...mmmperumphhhhh...barrrrigggyyyphhhhhh....mmmoperphhhhhhh...Oh OK. OK. OK. I can't lie to matthewdean in front of Mr. Sheppard. You got me. I saw Colmes start flapping his lips and went for the zippy button. I was zipping through and saw, oh wow, O'Reilly is nearly screaming at the idiot. So I zipped it back a few and watched from there.
Ok. Ok. Ok.
Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 9:37am.
I did stop to watch once before O'Reilly nearly lost it. As I was zipping through, I had to stop and find out why Colmes was doing an owl imitation. Hoo. Hoo. Hoo. Hoo. Hoo.
You guys giving me that evil eye to keep me all truffies. Stop that.
Ha
Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 2:49am.
"truffies" - excellent!!!
Just like with Morning Joe, I force myself to listen to people like Colmes to have a heads up on what the left is thinking. It's painful but I feel obliged. Since I trust NB {and the regulars like you} to keep things honest, I may give myself a break and follow your example ;-P
Ronald Reagan
Whenever I see Colmes lately, he seems that way . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 3:24pm.
. . . more and more.
For better or for warse, he's become Fox News' progressive curmudgeon.
Say what you want...
Submitted by AgentAmerican on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 2:52am.
Bill O'Reilly finds lots of things wrong with both sides. I enjoy watching his talking points every night, and they are usually spot. He hates the left even worse than the most right wing ideologue and his Irish temper was at boiling point with that genetically deformed left wing ideolouge and hack artist Colmes.
Bill knows the score, folks.
Big deal. I could blow up
Submitted by killa37 on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 3:16am.
Big deal. I could blow up Alien Colmes. And Donaldson?? A pathetic has-been. Let's see how Bill OH - Reilly interviews Barack Hussein OH-Bama...................both of who have massive EG-OHS!!!! I'm hoping to be surfing on Super Bowl Sunday, and coming home right before kick-off. I WON'T be watching these two egomaniacs!!! BOR seems really proud of his last interview with Boy Blunder..........I think he totally wimped out.........but then again, I've seen Michael Moron run BOR in circles..........
Smarmy arrogant elitist - posing as some kind of 'conservative'..................
Ahhh, Killa!
Submitted by Newsbubba on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 3:51pm.
There you went and said "blow up" just when the world is supposed to go all mellow, man.
Ahhhhhhhh, you're right!!! MY
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 1:46am.
Ahhhhhhhh, you're right!!! MY BAD!!! I have noticed that everything and everybody has been gettin a LOT more 'mellow' since Boy Blunder issued his 'civility' fatwa...........
Sam Donaldson
Submitted by sarge329 on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 3:43am.
" Stroke the yahoos " is it? Well, that pretty much nails down who and what he is. Just another elitist media snob, whose every thought is so much more scintillating and interesting than ours. Someone whose every word is to be greedily, hungrily inhaled by the ignorant, unwashed masses in the vain hope of becoming even one iota smarter than they are now. Am I being sarcastic? Well, maybe just a little. As I see it, maybe Mr. Donaldson should leave ABC for PBS and the McGlaughlin Group, where he can join his fellow elitist analysts. Of course, the ratings would sink even further than they have to this point, it being PBS and all. Their numbers are higher than PMSNBC, which really isn't saying a great deal
The McLaughlin Group
Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 3:11am.
I like The McLaughlin Group. Again, I find it useful to know where people are coming from/where they intend to go. I also glean tidbits that go deeper than just each sides talking points from it. Like China manipulating their currency - Pat Buchanan said China is following a trade agreement or something. So once again, we've created our own reality and attempt to blame others for our misfortune!!!
I think the big divide is because the elites have to much disparate info, and since THEY have trouble assimilating that info into anything that doesn't fit their ideology, they think "regular folks" aren't smart enough to look deeper and give weight to valid points.
BOR's frustration with Colmes is basic "So since they aren't ALL bad, you think it's OK to equate them to real news" On the heels of "Mubarak is a dictator, sure, but he's the GOOD kind" since he's a staunch ally. So BOR got angry at Colmes for what he did? That would be Colmes' view, I'm sure.
Ronald Reagan
Sam needs to leave
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 3:59pm.
Sam needs to leave broadcasting for a more honorable line of work.
Say for instance, sucking septic tanks with a drinking straw...
That way he could get a taste of what he has been dumping on the real world all these years.
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
America Needs a Conservative TV News Outlet
Submitted by DemsRFascists on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:27am.
I'm kind of surprised Colmes keeps working for Fox.
I ALWAYS have the mute button handy when watching Fox. One must maintain a constant vigilance on that network (especially on O'Rielly) lest one be subjected to "liberals" spewing their insanity and/or vitriol. But Mr. Colmes is so hyper-incapable of acknowledging the Truth, it's astounding. At least Mark Lamont Hill can listen to the conservative viewpoint before he responds with his delusions. Mr. Colmes seems to be absolutely tortured by anything remotely approaching the Truth.
I'm surprised Bill hasn't blown up on him before.
America needs a conservative television news network. The abundance of "liberals" (especially abandoning the weekend to Geraldo) on Fox, is just too annoying.
Colmes on FNC
Submitted by kiwikit on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 7:39am.
He's particularly obnoxious on News Watch every Saturday night. We record it and watch later but even then, I've not been able to get emails complaining about his dispicable nature to Fox because their mailbox is always full. Until he's off, we've found the only was to view the show is with the use of the fastforward button whenever Colmes is spouting his garbage.
Ugh
Submitted by DemsRFascists on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:39pm.
I can't even watch News Watch...best to watch the (WS) Journal Editorial Report, and then find something productive to do...or just watch paint dry...
Whenever I see Colmes, the
Submitted by 98ZJUSMC on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 8:50am.
Whenever I see Colmes, the only things that come to mind are wisdom tooth extractions and root canals.
God, what a douchetool.......
Colmes
Submitted by DoktorFranken on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 9:19am.
Highly descriptive and accurate appraisal of that Leftist tool. He was the major reason I stopped watching H and C many years ago.
Does Colmes remind anyone else of Achmed the Dead Terrorist?
SILENCE!!!! I Kill You!!!
Nahh...a gaunt Ed Schultz
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:59am.
Nahh...a gaunt Ed Schultz would remind me more of Achmed the Dead Terrorist ("Jingle Bombs") than Colmes.Well....
Submitted by DoktorFranken on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:21pm.
Crazy Eddie's ranting and level of insanity is, I'll admit, very Achmed. But Colmes skull-like appearance is mucho grande Achmed.
;-)
The End For Donaldson, If There Is Justice
Submitted by Boil It Down on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:49am.
In defending Donaldson, Colmes has permanently shamed himself and O'Reilly is exactly right to get in his face. I do think O'Reilly should have dialed it back a notch and framed Donaldson as more indefensible and pro-radical. Colmes portraying Al Jazeera as a friend of the Arab people and reporting the news "for" the Arab people is just too absurd. Colmes is in complete denial of all the damage that Al Jazeera has done to the region and foreign relations.
Colmes seems to view folks like Chris Matthews as center and O'Reilly as far right. His perspectives are so skewed in this way that he talks like the majority of the country is the problem, having moved too far to the right. I'd tell Alan that if the majority of the country agrees with a given news anchor, that measure makes the anchor center.
For Donaldson to thank Al Jazreea is to show his appreciation for an entity that tears down the U.S., advocates for the genocide of the Jews and supports the operation of terrorism. If that is Donaldson's position then every Pro American news outlet and anchor needs to denounce him and black-ball him from American journalism in perpetuity.
Donaldson is a male
Submitted by Iron Tigers Vet on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 7:37am.
version of Helen Thomas. He will end up not being asked to speak in public before it's all said and done.
Cringing
Submitted by Bob K on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 7:05am.
Colmes always seems to be cringing and looking as if he expects someone to deck him at some point. Maybe if he took the smirk off his face from time to time.
One of Colmes' oft-used
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:56am.
One of Colmes' oft-used strategies is to push the opponent's hot buttons so they end up reacting in an emotional way. When Colmes smirks it's his body language indicator that he's pleased at his provoking. The smirk turns into something else when he's confronted by those who have done their homework, refute Colmes with documented facts, and keeps a level head throughout. That's when you can see Colmes really squirm.The grandfather of cringing and smirking
Submitted by Bob K on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:07pm.
The smirking seems to be a common thing they simply cannot help doing in many cases. I first noticed it long ago, being done by the king of it ............ Michael Kinsley. That was when I when I was first annoyed by it's overuse.
Colmes nitpicks arguments.
Submitted by Red Jeep on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 9:13am.
Colmes nibbles here and there trying to pull on a thread to disrupt the whole argument,but he never tries to counter.the main argument.
I bet when Colmes goes home to see his mother she scolds him, saying "Alan, I raised you better than that!"
Colmes the nitpicking nitwit.
Smoke Break
Submitted by CarolinaJimbo on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 9:28am.
Colmes never answers a question or seems to respond appropriately. His schtick is to attack the conservatives tangentially. He is always the biggest apolgist for Obama. Whenever Colmes comes on, as he did last night, I step out on the porch for a smoke. By the time I got back, the lovely and reasonable Monica was talking.
Donaldson was only being fair
Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 9:31am.
Why shouldn't the Arab world have a US and capitalist hating/biased media? Donaldson and friends have made sure we have one in America.
Who on the left hates America
Submitted by dmaley1714 on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 9:47am.
Micheal Moore, Code Pink, moveon.org, the storm project, Professor Pivan, Daily Kos,
George Soros. thats just off the top of my head.
Add to the list.
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:54am.
Saul Alinsky, Michelle Obama (IMHO), SEIU, et al.One consistent thing I have
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:51am.
One consistent thing I have noticed about Colmes...although I admit he is well-read, he does make claims which are untrue and are easily refuted by facts. Unfortunately many times he is on a panel or with someone who hasn't done their homework well enough to counter Colmes. Each time I have witnessed Colmes opposite of someone who has done their homework and is able to point out Colmes' falsehoods with documented facts, it becomes obvious that Colmes can't handle the truth when it refutes his liberal position. He squirms. He bloviates. He desperately tries to change the subject. He plays the "but conservatives do it, too" card. Colmes has an overabundance of hubris and is a liberal example of "if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with 'bravo sierra'."Does He scare anyone else?
Submitted by lkotur on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:58am.
I know we should not make fun of how people look.
What the hell is up with Alan Colmes and that eyebrow?
That eyebrow sorta reminds me of the trees in the Two Towers LOTR the way it moves on his forehead.
It gives me the creeps!
Creepy perhaps but pales in
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:04pm.
Creepy perhaps but pales in comparison to Ox Baker's eyebrows.
"Theater"
Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 11:13am.
Easy folks. Colmes is doing exactly what he's hired to do. Chances are pretty good that after they're done taping, O'Reilly and Colmes sit in Bill's office and have a beer. It's "Crossfire Lite", with less talent.
From reading O'Reilly's books
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:42pm.
From reading O'Reilly's books I figure if he really disliked someone, he wouldn't have them on his show in the first place.
Good Point
Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:51pm.
He's doing the Obama interview before the Super Bowl (I hope I can say "Super Bowl" without paying a royalty to the NFL).
The Blowhard vs. The Ears.
You may say "Super Bowl"
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:10pm.
You may say "Super Bowl" without royalty payment but remember...
This telecast is copyrighted by the NFL for the private use of our audience...any other use of this telecast or...any pictures, descriptions or accounts of the game without the NFL's consent is prohibited.
Colmes is a typical liberal....
Submitted by sam12663 on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 11:14am.
....apologist.
Whenever he is on a panel show, you can count on half truths, innuendo, and nonsensical retorts. In his mind, liberals are the saviors of the world, and can do no wrong.
He's a clown.
OReilley Is Correct
Submitted by Utherpend on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 11:22am.
No one on the left are talking about how the Muslim Brotherhood are behind the uprisings they are constantly talking like this is Democracy at work. They dont want Democracy they want control and in time a reinstatement of rulers like in Tehran. Today they have the other side of the population clashing with them and now the MSM is talking like the pro government supporters are fake?? WTF
Seems like their newest
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:45pm.
Seems like their newest tactic: radical Muslim takeovers thinly veiled in the shroud of democracy. And the liberals are too myopic and fixed to their fantasy, feel-good world to see through that gauzy veil into the harsh reality.
Colmes and Sharpton and Geraldo
Submitted by Theporch on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:06pm.
When ever I see any of these 3 on TV I can't change the chanell quick enough. Especially Sharpton on BOR. I get tired of BOR sucking up to the race hustler in chief.
BOR and fair and balance
Submitted by Theporch on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:08pm.
One must never forget the BOR has his peons keeping a tally of lib versus cons so he can come back later and tell us how great and how balance his show is. Keep that in mind always.
He comes out with his tally about once a year. It is called CYA.
So how many of those "peons"
Submitted by Beukeboom on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:48pm.
So how many of those "peons" told you this?
[NOTE: "Theporch": An account that's over 4 years old and this is only the second NB entry of which commented? Smells like liberal, sock-puppet troll to me.]
Actually
Submitted by amyshulk on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 4:46am.
BOR does like to toot his own horn - I've started FF'ing through those parts like I do with MJ when Joe starts bloviating. He usually does it the most when he has Bernie Goldberg on. I used to watch him during the 90's, but when it turned in Clinton and his sex life 24/7, I quit watching until 2007 or so.
BOR also seems to interrupt women more often than men, and anyone who doesn't speak to his narrative gets cut off quick!!! Now, I know it's his show, and he is trying to keep them on point, but he comes off as rude and condescending. I also noticed he gets people on to speak to the more extreme opinions so he can say he IS fair - that is a tactic used by most of the hosts, not peculiar to BOR.
I enjoy THOUGHTFUL analysis, not personal attacks, so I'll listen to those segments, Colmes does NOT provide that.
Ronald Reagan
Hey....thats fine!!
Submitted by Patriot II on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:15pm.
I blow up everytime I see that stinking cucarocha colms should his damn face on tv!!!!
Bill O
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:19pm.
I was happy with the way Bill slapped Mortimer Snerd around in front of his sister-in-law.
As long as it's a Liberal defending anti semitism, Colmes is fine with it.
Sam Donaldson is pitching for a new job, but he doesn't know Neville Chamberlain has no use for a spokesman anymore.
Well..
Submitted by theprofessor on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:39pm.
O'Reilly knows what Colmes is and he still gives him a platform on his program, so,,,,I would say O'Reilly is the biggest douch of them all.
I'll give you the last
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 1:51am.
I'll give you the last word.................what say you???
And the last word
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 12:13pm.
And the last word is... Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.At least colmes is honest
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 12:54pm.
At least colmes is honest when he said, repeatedly, "I hardly Think..." during the segment.
Truer words have never left his mouth.
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
I watched this segment and
Submitted by Ashrak on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 1:55pm.
I watched this segment and noticed how he got mad at Colmes. That is exactly what Colmes wanted and it is the reason he was smiling so much. Bill's anger got the best of him and he made a mistake as a result.
When Colmes was talking free speech, Bill should have said Oh Really? How about free speech for only one side? That is what AL Jiz is. Yes, Bill taked about balance but he failed miserably to make the real point. Colmes set him up with theperfect pitch and Bill struck out.
Bill made another mistake in the Laura segment afterward. He offered a reason, a example, for why the framers put the Commerce clause into the Constitution. His example about tomato sales acoss state lines was a great one, a perfect one, but he dropped the ball after that as to what the target of regulation was. Indeed, that is the example demonstrating why the Commerce Clause came to be, however, states themselves, their governments, were the target of being subject to the federal regulation - not the people themselves. That is why the Constitution itself says STATES and not PEOPLE......
Saying the framers intended to have the federal government regulate the individual is a non-sequitur. It does not follow. It does not compute. It does not fit.
This was admitted with the prohibition amendment. It was recognized that governent did not have the power to do something and that the Constitution had to be amended to gain it. It was repealed. It's time to admit that so we can move forward.
O'Reilly should have stuck to
Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:15pm.
O'Reilly should have stuck to his guns. Liberal think being American means it's your job to destroy it, just as muslims think that having peace means that all non-muslims are dead.
If that frog faced leftist stands by Al-Jazeera, there is something seriously wrong and evil with him. Nobody seems to recall the beheadings shown on Al-Jazeera. These insects are the lowest form of scum.
O'Reilly should have stuck to
Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:15pm.
O'Reilly should have stuck to his guns. Liberal think being American means it's your job to destroy it, just as muslims think that having peace means that all non-muslims are dead.
If that frog faced leftist stands by Al-Jazeera, there is something seriously wrong and evil with him. Nobody seems to recall the beheadings shown on Al-Jazeera. These insects are the lowest form of scum.
O'Reilly should have stuck to
Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 4:20pm.
O'Reilly should have stuck to his guns. Liberals/Progressives/Communists think that being American means it's your job to destroy it, just as muslims think that having peace means that all non-muslims are dead.
If that frog faced leftist stands by Al-Jazeera, there is something seriously wrong and evil with him. Nobody seems to recall the beheadings shown on Al-Jazeera. These insects are the lowest form of scum. And if that Jewbag POS ever stepped foot over there, he would be beaten to death.
I'm starting to see how the NAZI's were able to exterminate so many. You American Jews need to get your shit together. It's like you want to die. Why is that?
→ Thoreau
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:40pm.
I'm not Jewish. I'm not a "Jewbag". But I am offended.
Certainly Colmes should perceive reason for alarm whenever anti semitism is exalted, even by his own political ideology, but from my side of the spectrum, "jewbag" isn't acceptable.
~Jewbag?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:52pm.
WTH?
Different Thoreau
Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Sun, 02/06/2011 - 6:44pm.
You don't sound like a Walden Thoreau. You sound more like a Munich beer hall Thoreau. We'd be well-served were you to spend more time in Bavaria and less time on this site.
Colmes
Submitted by bsny on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:24pm.
Figures FNC would feature a liberal who actually has less intellectual gravitas as his former H&C partner.
The more thFNC says FAIR & BALANCED, the more you know it's a bunch of horses***. Go ahead, be conservative, that's fine, but don't continue to run this nonsense by us.
→ Sure, bsny
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:44pm.
Like who? Marc Lamont Hill?
What 'us'?
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:49pm.
Look at your browser address bar - you're no longer on Dummy Underground.
→ SOL
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 5:56pm.
bsny has any number of Liberal sites to which he can form his adhesion, but he chooses to lurk here.
Maybe his life partner has convinced him he deserves abuse. Who knows?
But it's a cinch he's not capable of contributing stimulative thought among "us".
Cool:
Submitted by SickofLibs on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 6:01pm.
Let's hope he doesn't advance to Stage IV 'Us' like you know who.
BS mostly just drops one lame turd and then poof, he's outta here.
CA
Submitted by DoktorFranken on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 6:45pm.
'' ...his life partner... ''?
Is it bsny's right or left hand?
→ Don't know Doktor
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 6:48pm.
Whichever it is, you can bet it's cheating on him..
Maybe not. If the hand
Submitted by Willis_Leon_Johnson on Wed, 02/02/2011 - 6:53pm.
Maybe not.
If the hand doesn't feel the love and compassion it needs to achieve some level of relief and goes elsewhere looking for Love, is it really cheating?
End 'gun violence in America' - Require training and MANDATORY "Shall Carry" by every Citizen.
If harry reid is the best person to lead the senate, what does that say about the other 99 senators?
Biblical proportions, Not
Submitted by Bosco1123 on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 1:51am.
Did someone compare AlJazeera to Fox News? No way. BillO is absolutely right about AlJazeera's anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism and lack of opposing voices. They did provide more information than we otherwise would have had. Good or bad, we have something to check and verify.
AlJazeera has earned vilification. Seeing the left as anti-American makes as much sense as seeing the right as anti-American. Are there moments? You betcha. What did the Bible say about the mote, the log and the eye?
~It said
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 1:26pm.
Take the mote out of your eye so you can see where to hit Syrius with a log.