Zurawik and Shuster Get Into Heated Debate About Olbermann, MSNBC and Fox
Media critic David Zurawik and former MSNBC contributor David Shuster got into quite a heated debate Sunday over the surprise exit of Keith Olbermann.
Appearing on CNN's "Reliable Sources," the pair also quarreled about the difference in journalistic standards at Fox News and MSNBC (video follows with transcript and commentary):
HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: David Zurawik, had Olbermann simply become too difficult and too much of a disruptive figure within MSNBC to continue?
DAVID ZURAWIK, TELEVISION CRITIC, "THE BALTIMORE SUN": I think he did become too difficult during that period right after the November election with the donations, but also, Howie, the one thing that wasn't mentioned, that election night, when he and the four other hosts and commentators he had with him started literally heckling and abusing the conservative politicians who won victories when they came on to do interviews, I think --
DAVID SHUSTER, FMR. ANCHOR AND REPORTER, MSNBC: That's a little unfair.
ZURAWIK: Well, no. It's not unfair. David, it's not even close.
(CROSSTALK)
ZURAWIK: Yes, they were laughing at him. They were making fun of him.
KURTZ: Well, they poked fun at John Boehner for crying, but --
ZURAWIK: No, no, no. I mean when they interviewed him, Howie.
KURTZ: OK. But it's a management decision not to put on news anchors on election night. Instead, to put on Olbermann, Maddow, Schultz.
ZURAWIK: Yes.
KURTZ: Let me turn --
ZURAWIK: And they were very upset about it at MSNBC and at NBC News. They felt the brand was really diminished because politics and media meet on cable TV.
KURTZ: Let me turn to David Shuster.
SHUSTER: I'm not sure if I can accept your assertions of what was going on at NBC, but in any case --
KURTZ: But you worked there a long time.
SHUSTER: Yes.
Not surprisingly, Zurawik was correct and Shuster was wrong.
As NewsBusters reported on Election Night, the MSNBC crew belittled Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) during their interview with her. I guess Kurtz and Shuster forgot that.
That said, things heated up again a few minutes later after Kurtz played a small portion of Olbermann's special comment from the evening of the shootings in Tucson:
KURTZ: Olbermann had great passion. Television likes that. But he also often made it personal. In fact, you were "The Worst Person in the World" I think on a couple of occasions.
ZURAWIK: More than once, yes. That, to me, Howie, is typical of his recklessness and his character assassination. That's why I said he wanted to be Edward R. Murrow and he was more McCarthy than Murrow because --
SHUSTER: Oh, come on, David.
(CROSSTALK)
SHUSTER: There's a false equivalency that you and other folks make between Keith Olbermann and Glenn Beck, and it's not fair.
ZURAWIK: David, let him finish. Let's finish. This isn't one of your MSNBC shows.
KURTZ: I'm going to let you respond in just a moment.
Finish your point.
ZURAWIK: I think that he will absolutely attack people and try to assassinate their character just the way Joe McCarthy did without facts. And to say that Bill O'Reilly, who has been much more reasonable in the last year than Keith Olbermann ever was on the air, much more responsible, to try to pin that on Bill O'Reilly, link him to that, is outrageous, Howie.
KURTZ: David Shuster.
SHUSTER: Look, the fact of the matter is, is there are people who have tried to carry out acts of violence who were inspired by Glenn Beck. That is not --
KURTZ: Wait a minute. Bill O'Reilly -- (CROSSTALK)
SHUSTER: The fact of the matter is you're making a moral equivalency between Glenn Beck and Keith Olbermann, and it's simply not fair.
ZURAWIK: I'm not making --
SHUSTER: And the fact of the matter is, when people say that --
ZURAWIK: I'm not making a moral equivalency.
SHUSTER: -- MSNBC is the liberal antidote to Fox News, and that there's an equal balance there, that's simply not true.
KURTZ: But are you willing to say -- and then I'll get to Jane-- that sometimes Olbermann went too far?
SHUSTER: Yes, of course. And, look, I consider myself a friend of Keith Olbermann's. I like his work.
I'd like to say that his friendship was what was clouding his objectivity, but as NewsBusters has chronicled over the years, David Shuster is hardly a bastion of impartiality. Earlier this month, he even made the indefensible claim that MSNBC will never be as liberal as Fox is conservative.
But I digress, for a few minutes later, former Fox contributor Jane Hall chimed in setting off some more fireworks:
JANE HALL, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AT AMERICAN UNIVERSITY'S SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION: I want to say one thing since I've been supportive of him. I think that some people on Fox had more people who disagreed with him on the air than Keith Olbermann did.
KURTZ: Well, I've talked to him about this every time I interviewed him.
HALL: I think he was pretty narrow, and therefore he left them open to the moral equivalence that people have been drawing.
KURTZ: Well, I mean, let's be careful here. But, I mean, he did put on an hour which was very popular with his most passionate fans on the left, but which basically he did not invite guests who disagreed with him. And so there was a certain element of preaching to the choir.
SHUSTER: Well, in part because most of the guests that he had on were journalists. I mean, he was interested --
HALL: And they all agreed with him.
SHUSTER: -- in getting people on who provided information in a factual base to sort of set up Keith's analysis.
KURTZ: But many of them were liberal columnists, too.
HALL: Yes. They were more columnists than --
SHUSTER: There were some, but --
(CROSSTALK)
ZURAWIK: Howie, I just want to make one point about --
SHUSTER: But it was a very different type of show though than what Hannity or O'Reilly have been doing.
ZURAWIK: I don't agree with him being a poetic voice for the left and all of the things that were said. What I am upset about is the recklessness he exhibited.
When people say, oh, he was a little over the top, and, oh, he was a little bit too much, no. That is dangerous. That is the dangerous kind of rhetoric we have.
And NBC News is absolutely right to say this does not belong on our airwaves, we're going to dial it back. And that's what's happening here. You watch how fast Maddow and all of the rest of them dial it back in a week.
SHUSTER: Well, David, that may be true, that, in fact, NBC News want to put a certain set of journalistic standards on MSNBC, and a lot of people will cheer them on to do that, including people at MSNBC who respect Steve Capus.
However, there are journalistic standards on many of these shows on Fox News. With the exception of a couple of new shows, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, they don't even attempt to subscribe to the journalistic principles that --
(CROSSTALK)
KURTZ: He said except for some news shows.
Honestly, what can you expect from a liberal shill like Shuster?
As for Zurawik, bravo!
- Noel Sheppard's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Shyster is just looking for a
Submitted by d1carter on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:29pm.
Shyster is just looking for a job. He hopes Olby creates his own media empire so Shyster will have work.
It's funny you say that.
Submitted by NeoKong on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:39pm.
He was being a little extra polite towards NBC he was certainly defending OlbieWon Baloney. I have to wonder if all this talk of Olbermann starting his own media empire might include Shuster in some way.
the sky was NOT the limit
Submitted by MidAmerica on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:32pm.
From a business standpoint one of the major problems of the MSNBC line-up and olbermann in particular is that they have hit a ceiling on the numbers of regular viewers who will watch them. Evidently there is a finite number of demons in Hell who have cable access.
"He wanted to be Edward R. Murrow ..."
Submitted by NeoKong on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:33pm.
But he came across like Morton Downey Jr.
How did Shuster manage to get on camera....? Did he have to bring a pizza ?
Not pizza
Submitted by Deskpilot on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:31pm.
but a Red Herring. Confuse, deflect, and cast blame elswhere without facts.
The best we could possibly expect from Schiester
Whose "fact" is that?
Submitted by CobraMan on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:39pm.
"Look, the fact of the matter is, is there are people who have tried to carry out acts of violence who were inspired by Glenn Beck."
Name one, just one. I dare you.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
CobraMan,
Submitted by Ashrak on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:46pm.
Glenn Beck should focus on this one on Monday, both Radio and Television. It is a two-fer - MSNBC and CNN both. However, Shuster made the claim in the plural and he should be tasked to produce miltiple examples as a result.
Despite the difficulty in getting a slander judgement
Submitted by TheHistorian on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 8:49pm.
Glenn Beck ought to go after one of these libtards with both barrels blazing*. It is time to humiliate them in front of their great liberal shrine, that of the courts. I would love to see a $1 judgement and a seven figure punitive judgement over one of these slanderous attacks. They behave this way because they believe that no one can hurt them legally, and they know that their media buddies will propagate their slander. It might even make Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes and some of the other liberal hooligans clean up their stuff with some occasional truth.
____________________
*Politically incorrect, but who cares?
Dennis Prager
When a liberal starts a
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 6:35pm.
When a liberal starts a sentence with "The fact of the matter is...."
it's a sure sign that what's coming next is right out their......well, let's say...imagination.
Good point, motherbelt
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:43pm.
Other over-used words from their BS lexicon
- at the end of the day
- moving forward
- social justice
- economic justice
- pivot (they're always looking for someone to 'pivot' from something)
- AND THE LATEST ADDITION: civility
Let's not forget the newest
Submitted by marpel on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 2:45pm.
Let's not forget the newest one: shelacking (sp)....(only because it was annointed by BO himself) I never want to hear that word again...
"Deep within my heart lies a memory. A song of ol' San Antone..."
And there's always
Submitted by panzerakc on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 10:51pm.
"some people say".
Yes, exactly whose "fact" is that?
Submitted by needle on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 10:03am.
“Look, the fact of the matter is, is there are people who have tried to carry out acts of violence who were inspired by Glenn Beck.”
I was shocked to hear this assertion. I came late to this topic, so I combed through the comments to see if anybody else reacted to this line, and I found that your comment Cobra Man. It is now 19 hours later, and nobody has volunteered a single instance to back up this slander. Noel, do you know of anything? This sounds just like deliberate disinformation lying the liberals are famous for.
“The fact of the matter is you're making a moral equivalency between Glenn Beck and Keith Olbermann, and it's simply not fair.”
You betcha it’s not fair. It is outrageously unfair to Glenn Beck.
I think that Keith Olbermann has done more to instigate BDS and PDS than any other single person. And no matter how much Shuster blathers and lies, he cannot come up with an equivalent to the raw pervasive hatred of BDS and PDS in American society.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
I predict the Bears will lose today based on the fact that ...
Submitted by Jayke on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:38pm.
... "DEAR LEADER" has used his reverse Midas touch on "da Bears" according to this ESPN story:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?id=6049658
He called the score as 20-17 so the Packers score will be doubled and the Bears score would be about half. That means the final score will be Packers 40 - Bears 7 (you can't score an 8.5 in football).
Oh, and did you notice the DIG at the "Red States" by the non-politcal ESPN? Is it too much to ask to keep politics out of sports?
The USURPER in the White House is not my President nor my "leader" ESPN so you got that right.
Who is this Jerry Greene
Submitted by Reaver on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 5:01pm.
Who is this Jerry Greene clown? I realize he is trying to be satirical here but the piece just drips with liberal condescension.
“If the Packers win, as they are favored to do, they have gone against their President. If they even want to think about health-care coverage in their golden years, they had better give that some careful thought. After all, has a football team ever been vetoed?
But if the Bears lose, as they are favored to do, they have let their President down. Remember in "West Wing," how they always would say: "I serve at the pleasure of the President of the United States?" Doesn't that mean the Bears must win?”
Why am I not surprised that he’s a West Wing fan?
Reverse Midas touch STRIKES AGAIN ...
Submitted by Jayke on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:14pm.
"DEAR LEADER'S" Pick LOSES. Bears fans, you know who to blame.
What, exactly is obama's cumulative sports record now?
Submitted by ThisnThat on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:56pm.
His actions are as pathetic as Kerry's "Can I git me a license here" and wind-surfing stunts.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Bears lost, and I predict that after the Super Bowl . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:45pm.
. . . Hillary Clinton will declare that all her life, she's been a Green Bay or Pittsburgh fan (depending on which one wins).
Ummm?
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:11am.
Wrong thread?
We Are The 53%
Shuseter: Beck has inspired people to carry out violence
Submitted by krendler on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:39pm.
SHUSTER: Look, the fact of the matter is, is there are people who have tried to carry out acts of violence who were inspired by Glenn Beck. That is not --
Must have missed it, I guess. Who are these "people" again?
And Kurtz doesn't even challenge him?
Unbelievable. I guess this is about as "fair" as it gets at CNN though.
I'd say CNN is as liberal as FOX is conservative. And MS-NBC is a complete joke - off the charts.
Why do people think FOX News is so conservative?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:14pm.
Yes, Beck, O'Reilly, and Hannity are conservative shows. Greta isn't. Geraldo isn't.All their news hours are fair as far as I can tell. They always give both sides time to discuss issues.
Maybe it is such a shock to watch unbiased news that it seems too extreme to some.
You are right
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 8:01pm.
Fox isnt near as conservative as folks claim, yet the libtard media is 100x worst then anyone seems to be willing to admit. To the point that you cant believe a single thing they say.
And Hannity et al speak to two talking heads.
Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 8:26pm.
One talking head has democrat strategist in the scrawl below his/her head. The other has Republican strategist in the scrawl below his/hers.
Right Wing Media!!
Submitted by MrShy on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:27am.
FAUX NEWS FAUX NEWS FAUX NEWS RUPERT MURCOCH BROUGHT & SOLD BY BIG CORPORATIONS AND ALWAYS PLAYING GOLD ADS !!!!!
Hannity, Beck & O'Reilly spew hate and are Christian wackos!!!!!!
- Shy Lost His Mind Cuz Jets Lost
Join Mr. Shy and The 1* Percent
Drink much?
Submitted by Red Jeep on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 8:46am.
Drink much?
Don't forget Shep "Katrina"
Submitted by ThisnThat on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 10:57pm.
Don't forget Shep "Katrina" Smith and that NPR reject Juan Williams.
__________
“Didn't win the Medal of Honor? Didn't even serve? Then lie about it. We'll support you." — 9th Circuit Court
Fox is conservative
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:13am.
Because they don't let liberals (or conservatives)get away with lying on the news shows. And they don't treat conservatives (or liberals) like the enemy.
We Are The 53%
A Tidal Wave or a Tsunami.
Submitted by Ashrak on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:41pm.
There can be doubt that implosion is happening before our eyes. For almost a decade now, the position at MSNBC has been to deride and tear down the person in order to avoid debate about substance. The lefties are now coming to grips with the fact that all they have is opposition and that opposition could not lead.
When it comes down to it, NBC wants that MONEY. Like Air America on radio - there is a very small amount of money to be gained from the anti-American position, from the hate everything about America position.
Rachel, Ed, Lawerence and others there, Joe and Mika too maybe, will make a serious change that will prolly drive the left more crazy than Olberman's departure. They will not accept the rejection now any more than they did last November.
You've pretty much hit it on
Submitted by jkwtrading on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:03pm.
You've pretty much hit it on the head...they tried, but now are failing miserably... may their end be more swift then their rise.
Name one
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:44pm.
SHUSTER: Look, the fact of the matter is, is there are people who have tried to carry out acts of violence who were inspired by Glenn Beck.
Your a liar, and a punk. It's time to make these morons back up their accusations. As soon as he said that, someone should had asked him to back it up!Clearly Schuster really wants
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 3:46pm.
Clearly Schuster really wants his job back at MSNBC. I don't believe his signature style of nasty rhetoric he once again highlighted defending Olbermann ( toilet ) against O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck ( soaring like eagles ) is going to get him there.
Barack_Must_Go.....
Speaking of nasty rhetoric...
Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:07pm.
Looks like Bracky the ScatBoy is again posting with questionable scat rhetoric. What toilet ScatBoy?I searched the net.
Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:06pm.
Can't find a single incident of violence that Glenn Beck inspired.
right?? what was that? i
Submitted by shannon76 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:12pm.
right?? what was that? i vaguely recall MSNBC trying to push some narrative of a shooting in California and MSNBC was trying to make a really random connection to Beck.
Well, we can see how MSNBC would come to that conclusion.
Submitted by The Vet on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:23pm.
California shooter says he saw Glenn Beck as ‘schoolteacher’
Well, now, looks like Glenn Beck was responsi.... Wait, there is more.
Glenn Beck would never advocate violence? Well, the guy perpetrating the violence doesn't blame Glenn so how do you... Wait. There is more.
There you have the nugget of truth. It is really school teachers that are responsible for all the violence. The Violence Makers say so!
I think he was talking about
Submitted by bkeyser on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:13pm.
I think he was talking about violence during MSNBC production meetings. We wouldn't be privy to the number of coffee cups thrown, chairs overturned, table-stomping, and expletive-laden outbursts committed by Rachel Maddow and Joe S. I can't imagine the number of destroyed cigarette and candy machines by the likes of Special Ed and Larry O'Donnell.
Staggering that Kurtz wouldn't ask Shuster to back up his claim
Submitted by krendler on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:46pm.
Staggering that Kurtz wouldn't ask Shuster to back up such an incendiary claim.
That's what liberals do: They throw out these wild allegations at the end of a statement, knowing the moderator (at least if it's CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, or ABC) isn't going to challenge them, or that the moderator is about to move on to something else. Hence, there's no need to be prepared to defend their drive-by smear.
Little David Shuster really are you kidding?
Submitted by CT on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:48pm.
From beneath what slimy smelly rock did they dig up David Shuster and why? He was the Olberdouche substitute that strived to be more vulgar than Keefy himself until they fired him!
Shuster
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 4:41pm.
This is a pretty strong statement to make about Beck. Shuster's feet have to be held to the fire about a comment like this. No proof,not even a mad up example. They just get finished talking about Olbermanns personal attacks and what does his little sister do? I'm surprised CNN is going to put this guy on after stuff like this and his previous comments on the Clintons. If he ever gets another hosting any conservative that would stupidly appear with him should ask him to back up and cite the examples of this statement.
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Change the subject
Submitted by Jerry Mack on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 5:09pm.
If you can not defend something , change the subject. I watched this program and was not amazed at how fast Shuster tried to make it about Glenn Beck ect.
I'd, until now, forgotten how
Submitted by sergeant stogie on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 5:22pm.
I'd, until now, forgotten how effeminate, insipid, and annoying Shuster really is. Thanks for reminding me...
Schuster shows his cards
Submitted by CO2Maker on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 5:51pm.
This was a very telling exchange:
KURTZ: Well, I mean, let's be careful here. But, I mean, he did put on an hour which was very popular with his most passionate fans on the left, but which basically he did not invite guests who disagreed with him. And so there was a certain element of preaching to the choir.
SHUSTER: Well, in part because most of the guests that he had on were journalists. I mean, he was interested --
HALL: And they all agreed with him.
Let's review the videotape: Kurtz says that all of Keeth the Sports Boy's guests agreed with him. Schuster agrees and adds that "most of the guests ... were journalists"! And Hall adds that the journalists all agreed with KtSP.
The syllogism:
K is liberal
All K's guests are journalists
All K's guests agree with him.
QED
Very good
Submitted by Boudin on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 8:15pm.
And these 3 are a perfect example of exactly why Fox is considered right-wing
Olberman
Submitted by nadnad1776 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 6:32pm.
Someone said there was a Baby Ruth in O's bathub. I don't know about that, but I do think he bites any bubbles that surface suddenly.
YAK, YAK, YAK....ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK
Submitted by Herbster on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:35pm.
No facts, please. It would ruin my argument of, "Everyone knows, everybody says so, the American people know, the American people want, the experts say...no, make that ALL the experts say, i have no evidence, but I KNOW it is true/false, etc. Pick any of the staterun TV empty suits and empty skirts and you'll hear the above comments........GUARANTEED!
Here are some choices for '12. Take your pick:
Trump/Bolton, Bolton/Bachmann, Rubio/Christie, .....mix and match as you like.
David the Shyster
Submitted by Herbster on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 7:45pm.
David Schuster? Is he back? The lightest of the lightweights. A trotal twit. I thought he had a job picking sh_ _ with the chickens. Are they planning to bring him back to TV? Maybe on The Oprah channel? These people keep popping up like a game of Whack a Mole. CNN would be a good fit for him...he and John King coiuld cast adoring glances at each other through the crosshairs!
Cannot be said enough.
Submitted by okiehawk44 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 9:17pm.
MSNBC doesn't have the numbers. If it were really run like other TV businesses its ratings would demand changes. Did Schultz, Olbermann, Maddow and O'Donnell together have as many viewers as O'Reilly most nights?
If ratings still matter to advertisers, why is Parker-Spitzer or Joy Behar's show still being televised? Who watches either of them?
They all look like loss leaders for the left to me.
Where's the beef?
Submitted by zachlind on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 9:27pm.
I’ve watched this woman Jane Hall off an on over the years and I still do not understand where the value is. And they say she’s an instructor at a university? Surely this can’t be. Somebody’s got to be funning me.
She is an excuse maker and an
Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:05pm.
She is an excuse maker and an explain-bias-away-er. A clear sign of her cleverness , is the incredibly smart move by her to leave Fox Newswatch for the sterling-ratings CNN show. Brilliant, Prof. Hall.
Jane is scared of Glenn
Submitted by Red Jeep on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 11:19am.
"This morning on Reliable Sources Howard Kurtz, former Fox News contributor Jane Hall shared her own personal criticisms of Fox News, saying that she wasn’t bothered so much by Fox’s Republican bent as the network’s lack of discussion and debate. She added that she’s outright scared ofGlenn Beck."
http://www.mediaite.com/online/former-fox-news-contributor-criticizes-lack-of-debate-says-msnbc-guilty-of-same/
But Schuster got fired from his job
Submitted by WarEagle01 on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 9:42pm.
nt
How typical of Kurtz to talk
Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:07pm.
How typical of Kurtz to talk around a media issue and never honestly address it for what clearly it is. How this guy can be considered a media analyst and never honestly or directly confront liberal bias is bad enough, but when he cannot even begin to call olbermann's blatant distortions, taunts, and bomb throwing for what they are is beyond the limit. Kurtz is worse than having nothing at all.
Well.......
Submitted by GregE on Sun, 01/23/2011 - 11:49pm.
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2011/01/22/olbermann-predicts-end-of-tv-car...
Hitler finds out that olberman got fired
Submitted by upcountrywater on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 12:50am.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjHP2g4N3S8&feature=player_embedded#!
You Didn't Build That.
All four of them are liberal shills.
Submitted by Rush Fan on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 2:04am.
It's only a matter of degree.
VIDEO: CNN consults FIRED propagandist
Submitted by politicalpaw on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 2:05am.
NOW THIS: CNN actually consults the last FIRED @MSNBC propagandist that brandished identical homosexual pejoratives http://tinyurl.com/4r5fzrg
@PoliticalPAW
PoliticalPAW........Thanks for the link. It displays the
Submitted by Rush Fan on Mon, 01/24/2011 - 11:04am.
hypocrisy of those on the left in a nutshell.