I like mine better, but maybe I'm just more detail-oriented. ;^]

It sounds like you are an obnoxious name-calling New Yorker

No, I do not read the other erudite junk you write.

At a quiet moment, please contemplate why.

- Relying upon the Liberal Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

Could ah, used cards.

Should ah, wore a different hat on the beach.

She should do something, other than what's she done.

Keep whining about nothing...

Skip my Crib notes question, typical.

Pop this bubble; smell wormwood in the morning.

advances the cons. and/or repubs. cause. 

Then let me know who would be a good candidate(s) for the RNC?

Am sick and tired of this crap (from many, not just you) without some kind of solution.  It's too easy to criticise and not come up with the answers.  Done for the night.  Will check your response tomorrow.  Better not be chauvanistic like today.

"The moment you concede some small point to liberals, they go to work building an enormous elaborate edifice on top of the first lie." ~Ann Coulter 

The crib notes took whatever progress she made and reversed it by playing into the media's hands.
 

Spare me.

The bias against her in the press is so obvious now, even some of my apolitical colleagues have noticed.

خال

"Obama gave a great appearance of substance but has been shown to be an empty suit since and you have to agree that an egg could get elected to office facing a Democrat now because of how bad Obama has been."

You're giving far to much credence to appearance. Americans are more likely to vote for someone based upon their political connections, or lack thereof, than their "appearance."  The history of the last several Presidential elections points to this.

Obama, just like Bush W, Reagan, Carter, and Clinton were elected not because of their appearance, but because of the fact that they were not Washington insiders. You see, ever since Nixon, the American people have been wary of Washington insiders gaining the White House.

This Insider aversion is what is driving political elections these days, especially in Presidential Elections. Just about every time a Washington insider, like McCain, has faced someone who's not a Washington insider, like Obama, those insiders lose. McCain's election was actually helped by the inclusion of Palin, who's Washington outsider, as his running mate.  I have no doubt that she is the one who brought him so close to the Presidency.

Bush Sr, was the only "insider" (due to the fatc that he was VP foir 8 years) since Nixon who was elected to a first term, and that's because he never faced serious opposition from Washington outsiders. Once he faces competition from an outsider, in the form of Governor Clinton, Bush lost.  That wasn't because Clinton's appearance was better than Bush's.  It's because Clinton was not a Washington insider.

This anti-insider trend is even true for Congressional elections, although that aversion to Washington insiders is affecting those election at a far slower rate, mostly because of the difficulty new candidates face against an entrenched incumbent. (Due to term limits, Presidential candidates have a far better chance at beating the entrenched insiders.  I mean, how hard is it to beat someone who can't, by law, even run for that office?)  But even those incumbents are facing stiffer and stiffer opposition and are beginning to lose.  Look at all the first time Senators and Representatives that have been elected in the last 10 as an example.

All of this has NOTHING to do with appearance.  It has everything to do with political influences on the office holder.  It has everything to do with a paradigm shift of the voting pubic itself. Americans are tired of the Washington insider power structure, and they're re looking for change.  That's why Obama won, and that's why Palin has so much support, especially amongst independents. 

The reason Obama is currently losing popularity is because he's relying to much on those Washington insiders to formulate policy instead of relying upon himself, a Washington outsider, which is what the people wanted.  Look how he relied  upon the House and Senate to  formulate his Health Care policies, something the majority of Americans are rejecting.  That's a perfect example of how Americans are rejecting the "Washington
Insider" power structure.

Appearance?  That's just a weapon the insiders use in their political battles.  It's a lousy weapon though as it's not very effective.   

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Pick a Republican candidate to support, for any office, anywhere; spend one tenth the amount of energy and time campaigning for that candidate as you have in poor mouthing Sarah Palin, and your choice will be a shoo-in.

MD

Goldwater, I must hand it to you.

You are either the densest human being on the face of this earth, or, you are only a stage, microphone, and audience away from being the funniest comedian on the face of this earth.

Or, you are the greatest writer of comedy/satire on the face of this earth.

You continually bad mouth Palin.  As a free persons' right, it's ok.
As a vocation, it exhibits the density between your ears.

As a comedian, your Palin schtick would play well to the msm and liberal groups.  You would be number one instantly.

Comedy/Satire author.  Re-read your 8:32 ET post.  Hysterical!

Your last sentence makes you a world class whopper teller.

I will admit, Jonathan Goldwater w.is.p., you are not a vicious troll; but as you stroll through the kingdom of the trolls you are the leader of the pack.

MD 

It's all your fault.

In your 17:59 ET post, you used the phrase "grace and poise under pressure", which smacked ole Goldwater right between the running lights, cuz JG knows he ain't got it.

Good on ya, mate.

Cheers.

MD

Crickets from JWF again.  He doesn't like it when people show him to be wrong.  As I have done routinely.  For all the troll calls around here, I can't believe nobody but Candance ever confronts this guy.  He's nuts.

J. Goldenshower,

JWF has already replied to you.  Now take your lies and pound sand.

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws" Tacitus