Blitzer and Dobbs Casually Discuss Pot's Smell and Appearance

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

There were some potentially interesting and concerning admissions on CNN Monday night when Wolf Blitzer said he thought he could identify a marijuana plant by its smell, and Lou Dobbs followed by saying he could recognize it "rather readily" by sight.

Unfortunately, neither mentioned whether or not they inhaled.

Somewhat comically, Dobbs, speaking with Blitzer and Jessica Yellin during the 6PM edition of "The Situation Room," seemed more concerned about the career implications of this incident for them than for himself (video embedded below the fold with partial transcript, h/t Mediaite): 

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

JESSICA YELLIN, CNN NATIONAL POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Oh, yes. On more. And this is our favorite from our favorite quotation category.

Here we go. Congressman Barney Frank says he would not be able to recognize a marijuana plant because "he's not a great outdoorsman."

You ask, why would a Congressman bring that up?

Well, it turns out the Massachusetts Democrat was on hand when his partner was arrested for pot possession back in 2007. The "Boston Globe" reports Frank was on the front porch of James Ready's home in Maine when police found marijuana plants in the backyard. Now, Frank says he did not see the plants and he wouldn't know what they were anyway.

Who knew that only outdoorsy types know a marijuana plant when they see it?

So, Wolf, would you know a marijuana plant if you saw one?

WOLF BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: I'm not sure -- I -- I -- I'm not sure I would know. If I could smell it, I think I'd know what it smelled like. But I'm not sure...

YELLIN: How would you know what it smells like?

BLITZER: Let's check in with Lou Dobbs.

He's got a lot more on this story coming up, I'm sure, at the top of the hour.

You can smell marijuana, Lou. But you probably wouldn't recognize a plant.

Am I right or wrong?

LOU DOBBS, HOST, "LOU DOBBS TONIGHT": Well, you're dead wrong. I would recognize it rather readily.

BLITZER: Oh, good.

DOBBS: And I think that we've got to give Barney Frank great credit for -- I love the fact that he said that he's not an outdoorsman. I mean that's funny as it can be.

Wolf, thanks a lot.

And, by the way, you and Jessica, I think, got out of that just in time to save both your careers.

Interestingly, this was the second time in eighteen months that Blitzer's familiarity with marijuana came up on "The Situation Room," as last May he had the following discussion with Jack Cafferty (video available here):

JACK CAFFERTY: Did you ever smoke, Wolf?

BLITZER: No, not really. I tried it in high school. I didn't like it.

CAFFERTY: How about marijuana and stuff?

BLITZER: No. Well, you know, you're getting into the sensitive areas.

CAFFERTY: I think we should release your medical records.

BLITZER: You know what, thank God, I'm OK.

Jack, thanks very much.

CAFFERTY: Good-bye.

Does he or doesn't he?

Maybe only his hairdresser knows for sure.

Granted, this exchange might seem trivial.

However, there is a push towards illicit drug legalization in America. Many believe California will legalize marijuana in short order. 

As CNN.com reported in July, there is a drive in the Golden State to get a marijuana legalization proposition on the 2010 ballot. 

With this is mind, a couple of middle-aged, high-profile CNN anchors matter-of-factly discussing what marijuana plants look and smell like adds to the ongoing desensitization of the public towards "casual" drug use.

Those against legalization should find such casual discussions by prominent media figures concerning.  

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I tried it.

I inhaled it. I liked it. I'm too old for it now, but it should be decriminalized.

Wolf should man up and just say yes or no about trying it.

→ But why?

I see such admissions as lending one's name to a cause.

Aren't you saying you want a news reporter to become the news?

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Cool

I find it refreshing when people are honest about what they did in the past

Oh and Cool

If the Republicans ran a strong consertative in 2012 that says marijuana laws should be left up to the States to maintain the status quo on the feds not raiding pot clubs, the repubicans will gain way more  pothead votes than they will lose from social conservatives.

Interesting theory, but...

...getting true potheads out to the polls in any significant numbers will never happen. Not even absentee ballots would help, as that requires at least some pre-planning.

Occasional users who vote regularly, that's another thing. 

SOL

You are so glued to the image of potheads in front the tv with no jobs and keeping Fritolay in business.

Yes there are many of those people, but many are very successful and many of the came out to vote for the democratic party.

Shawn, no, I'm not glued to that image at all

I personally know more than a few, let's say 'extremely unmotivated', people in their 40s-50s, including several in my own family. 

Oh and Shawn

The point I made was that news reporters should not be lending their support to such causes as Marijuana legalization.

Beck, O'Reilly, Olbermann, and Matthews can do it, to their own increase or detriment, as they are not news reporters.

Political party platforms had nothing to do with my observation.

LYDSEXICS UNTIE!

Ooooo! Here's another good idea!

How about we grow it on military reserves and let our brave fighting men and women dope up too?

 

Stupid...

Been there and done that as

Been there and done that as well, Shawn, and I enjoyed it too.

Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.

Yep

Smoked it.  Smoked some more.  Liked it lots but, not anymore.

"Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain." Official Motto of the State of Iowa

I too

I too tried it as a yout, and from that experience, I draw these conclusions:

1.  If I were to smoke it again I might find Bawny Fwank to be funny, which in itself is reason to NOT smoke again...ever!  On the other hand, it might also explain why the goofballs in Mass continue to elect him...they do smoke pot!

2.  Assuming gay men have pride (their parade is named such), they would have to smoke pot in order to overcome the nausea of a relationship with Bawny Fwank.  Which leads to the conclusion that every "boy" he's been with has had to smoke, therefore, Bawny actually does know what it looks like, smells like, and...dare I say it...tastes like. (eck...wretch).

I find it very disengenuous

I find it very disengenuous that in this day and age you can say you would not recognize a pot plant by sight. Or at least question why someone might be growing half a dozen or so "tomatoes" in their crawlspace or attic? The ubiquitous leaf is all over t-shirts posters etc. Furthermore, the "Outdoorsman" comment from frank is just ludicrous and no one should take that seriously. To think that Barney would need his field guide and a sturdy pair of boots in order to recognize his boyfriends smoke of choice is insane.

Yeah, disingenuous x1000

Show a picture of a pot leaf around any nursing home, and I'll bet the majority could identify it.

I would bet next weeks pay

That Barney could not pass a drug screen,,,,,nobody is that stupid without help

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

gc... He was lying thru

gc...

He was lying thru his teeth, if he has any that is....the way he mumbles when blathering... I'm not even sure about that.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

C'mon now Bigtimer, That

C'mon now Bigtimer,

That is one thing no one can ever accuse Bawney of doing. Lieing through his teeth, that is.

Well my lack of culture

Allows me to remind folks of the tasteless joke about the prostitute with dentures who had the guarantee.

Sorry but it ran through my head when reading your post. And seemed like a perfect fit.

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

...You've both got me

...You've both got me laughing here.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

"Partner'' is a euphemism,

"Partner'' is a euphemism, as it sounds like a business associate. "Barney's boyfriend'' would be more accurate.

Potheads

Those who smoke pot are known as "potheads". Funny how easy it is to spot a "pothead" (or an alcoholic, or  a "cokehead").  Al Gore, for example, admits he was (is) a pothead. Just sayin'...

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Although if Wolf were a

Although if Wolf were a pothead, that would explain his lack of Jeopardy skillz.

 It has to be hard to hang on to that buzzer when your fingers are encased in a thick coating of Dorito flavoring :D

Well Mike, Wolf does need

Well Mike, Wolf does need an excuse, for that pathetic showing. Maybe he had sticky fingers from a pint of Ben & Jerrys he "wolfed" down, prior to the game.

Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.

LOLLLLLLLL!!

Good ones from both of you.

"Hey man, am I governin'

Too funneee Matt

POT(R)US

Please...

"a couple of middle-aged, high-profile CNN anchors matter-of-factly discussing what marijuana plants look and smell like adds to the ongoing desensitization of the public towards "casual" drug use."

Uh, no.

As some one mentioned, you'd have to have led a very sheltered life not to know what a pot plant look like, especially by the time your 30-40.

How are people supposed to discuss it? Isn't matter of factly how news anchors are supposed to cover things? Without any bias or sneering, or hyperbole?

And even drug prevention programs in schools show the kids what the drugs look like. 

Come on Noel, must be better things to cover.

I am for decriminalizing

I am for decriminalizing all drug use. I used a lot of different drugs, including alcohol, and quit harming myself some time ago. Because of employment in the transportation industry and personal reasons, I have been clean for years. The most destructive drugs in our culture are alcohol and tobacco, IMO.

It has been suggested that taxing pot might be helpful to goevernment in terms of taxation revenue. Get a grip. I grew tomatos (does that need an 'e' ?)  this year, and  if I was still getting high, I'd grow my own dope. The last entity on earth that I would help as I rolled my own would br the government.

What is the differance

Between decriminalizing drugs and legalizing drugs? Do you have another example of this? This claim of decriminalizing something make no sense to me.

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

The difference is that

The difference is that decriminalizing would leave the government out of the picture, and legalization would give the gov't authority to tax consumption. The Feds and state governments have opposed drug use for many years, and many people have served time in prison for use and possession of 'illegal' drugs.

The only reason the gov't might be interested in legalization is to take more money from more people. Given the history of prosecution and persecution, I don't think that the gov't should switch sides. Please reference the 'Whiskey Rebellion'.

The next thing I expect the Feds to tax is sexual activity. Nancy Pelosi will join Charlie Rangel in paying no tax, I presume.

BTW, I'm curious. Is it the Governor of a particular state that thinks you're dangerous, ot the Government in general? I enjoy your frequent comments, and hope that I have clarified my position.

Ok good Frank, But is there

 The difference is that decriminalizing would leave the government out
of the picture, and legalization would give the gov't authority to tax
consumption.

An example of this else where?

 The next thing I expect the Feds to tax is sexual activity. Nancy Pelosi will join Charlie Rangel in paying no tax, I presume.

There is just no way we could afford this?

 BTW, I'm curious. Is it the Governor of a particular state that thinks you're dangerous, ot the Government in general?

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

Just dont want anyone getting hurt.  ; ]

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

That is one argument that

That is one argument that has never held any water with me. The "Legalize it and Tax it" man.

First off, understand that pot is probably the number one cash crop in America. The feds are doing a bang up job crushing that illegal industry right? Second, even you dont know a dealer personally, I think we can all typify the individual to some degree. So, those two facts in mind how do you propose the taxation to work? Does anyone honestly imagine the typical solo or organizational pot grower to now fianlly breath a sigh of relief, go down and get his business license and start paying taxes now thankful he is working within the law? Its just never made sense to me.

If we can all agree that

If we can all agree that marijuana is a drug, then the legalization of such a drug, something consumable, would fall under the control of the FDA.  You can't very well sell liquor without a license, and pot would be no different.  Do you buy liquor from a dealer who shows up at your house when you call?  Do you meet your alcohol dealer in a back alley, where he slips you 750ml of whiskey, while you slip him a hundred dollar bill?  The legalization of pot would be no different from any other legal product, subject to government intervention and taxation.  

Legalizing pot would also put the small time growers out of business.  Farmers around America could begin mass production of the drug, similar to the way tobacco is sold.  And yes, taxes are a big part of that.

Noel....you just don't get it, do you...

The Libertarian wing of the Republican Party wants weed legalized as much as the hippie Liberals of the Democrat party do.

And if Republicans want to 'add to the tent' (even tho that phrase disgusts me) with young voters, this is an issue that can do that.

Even young people who don't smoke weed don't care if it's legalized or not.

It's gonna happen sooner or later, better to be on the right side of the issue.

rer... ..and just think

rer...

..and just think of all the $$$ the govt will make taxing it, in so many ways...trial lawyers later on down the line.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Though I believe in

Though I believe in legalization because I don't think the government has the right to tell adults what they can and can't do unless it directly harms someone else...

The people I know that smoke are irritable, lethargic, and moody.  It's every bit as much an escape/crutch as booze, rock and roll, sex, and other drugs can be.  It doesn't make anybody happier. It supports criminals who will do anything for a nickel other than get a real job and/or get an education or learn a useful trade and do something positive with their lives.  

But, like I said, it should be an adult's choice like smoking.  But I'm pretty sick of all the denial that marijuana users like to engage in.  Smoke it and shut up.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.