Tapper Asks Gibbs Why It's Appropriate For White House To Decide Who's A News Organization

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday, another prominent media member challenged the White House strategy of attacking the Fox News Channel.

This time up at the plate was ABC's Jake Tapper who asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs during today's gaggle:

It’s escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations “not a news organization” and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it’s appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one?

Tapper posted the full exchange with Gibbs at his Political Punch blog (emphases his, file photo):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Tapper: It’s escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations “not a news organization” and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it’s appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one –

(Crosstalk)

Gibbs: Jake, we render, we render an opinion based on some of their coverage and the fairness that, the fairness of that coverage.

Tapper: But that’s a pretty sweeping declaration that they are “not a news organization.” How are they any different from, say –

Gibbs: ABC -

Tapper: ABC. MSNBC. Univision. I mean how are they any different?

Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o’clock tonight. Or 5 o’clock this afternoon.

Tapper: I’m not talking about their opinion programming or issues you have with certain reports. I’m talking about saying thousands of individuals who work for a media organization, do not work for a “news organization” -- why is that appropriate for the White House to say?

Gibbs: That’s our opinion.

Bravo, Jake. Brahahavo!!! 

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Just saw that from a link

Just saw that from a link posted by mvfreeman. Funny conversation. Ok, ABC -- where's your follow-up here? You daily news take on the evening news? Your multiple angles?

Or is poor Jake going to get the silent memo reminder to keep his mouth shut?

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

Was that a threat?

Or is poor Jake going to get the silent memo reminder to keep his mouth shut?

Didn't you catch the threat from Gibbs?

Tapper: But that’s a pretty sweeping declaration that they are “not a news organization.” How are they any different from, say –

Gibbs: ABC -

 

Was Gibbs saying that ABC may be next?  I'm sure it was nothing... or was it?

 

 

"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary."

--Ernesto "Che" Guevara

take one out behind the shed

the rest are supposed to fall in line.  Right?  What is the White House's leverage?  Bailouts and/or a place at the table.  Brit Hume had it right.

ps. If Jake ever had any thought to join Stossel on the move to Fox, you think he'd go now?

____________________________________________ 
The Emperor, he has no clothes

Thanks...

Thisnthat, for the h/t.

Hmmm, maybe Tapper's looking

Hmmm, maybe Tapper's looking to follow John Stossel.  Nothing beats job security.

Jake Tapper is one of a few

Jake Tapper is one of a few that will ask the hard questions of this White House. Where are all the other "professional principled journalists"? The silence is deafening.

A major reason Obama and his

A major reason Obama and his fellow radical parasite political bottom feeders are in the WH, is that the American press did not do its job during the campaign. (I know, I know, we all understand this).

The MSM slackers still aren't doing their job, and continue to enable these crackpot America haters whose prime goal is to steal our liberties and our hard earned money.

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

Oh, the American press did

Oh, the American press did its job - and that job was to get a radical Marxist elected president.  Its job was to make sure Bush lost the war by turning opinion against it.  The American media did its job quite well.

"I dont need to read a newspaper to know the world's been shaved by a drunken barber."

Walter Brennan, The Colonel, Meet John Doe, 1941

I hope you are

I hope you are wrong.....but....you may be right.

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

May?

May be right? 

 

JMHO, you understand.

If Saul Alinsky owned a news channel it would be MSNBC.  ----  Me

“The American media did its job quite well.”

…except for FOX; ergo, the Obama Administration claims that FOX “not a news organization.”  QED.

- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

- I didn't leave the Republican Party; the Republican Party left me.

Does he realize how foolish he sounds....

when he says Fox News isn't a news organization to a room full of people who have been absolutely scooped by Fox on several very important and enormous stories.    In reality Gibbs doesn't consider them a news organization because all the news people he knows take their orders directly from the White House.

" if Republicans are able to stop Barack Obama on health care, 'it will be his Waterloo, it will break him....-Sen. Jim DeMint

Gibbs is a paid mouthpiece nothing more

Know how to keep a Troll in suspense?  Ill tell ya in the morning.

To paraphrase Bill Clinton:

That depends on the definition of a “News Organization.”

- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

- I didn't leave the Republican Party; the Republican Party left me.

X

TRhats our opinon and we're sticking with it.

Nnanananaaaah

If the rest of ABC news was

If the rest of ABC news was like Tapper, I might actually watch it.  He's a rarity -- a journalist who can actually think and report beyond his own personal politics.

I don't know Tappers Politics

I don't know Tappers Politics, but isn't that the point. I do not care, nor should anyone, what the personal politics of a Reporter/Journalist is. If they do thier job it will never come up. The problem today is that we know the politics of too many Journalists. Just like you do not care about the politics of your Doctor. If a Doctor is a good one, it never comes up.

Journalism changed after the Watergate Affair. Agenda Driven Journalism became the norm. If you ask a Journalsism Student why they want to be a Reporter/Journaist the most popular answer is they want to change the world. They chose the wrong profession. A journaists job is to tell us How the World is changing, Not to Change It.

Tapper is old school in that respect. His job is to report the change and he does his best to do that.

Correct Rich

The news is now entertainment and ratings. So the stations cater to their perceived audiences.  The timeline is correct too.  After Watrgate the notion of objective news reporting went out the window .

"Don't let the bastards grind you down."

 Red

Gibbs: "Anything WE TELL

Gibbs: "Anything WE TELL YOU TO SAY is the TRUTH. All else is false or just an opinion; nothing but what WE TELL YOU TO SAY is news."

OBAMA = One Big Ass Mistake, America!

That's Our Opinion

The Gospel According to Barack. We said it...so shut up and believe it.

Pravda, here we come...

All of this is seriously frightening. Seriously.

 

I find the fact that the

I find the fact that the exchange occurred very, very encouraging. The WH has insulted thousands upon thousands of journalists who work for Fox News, who have friends and colleagues among the other news outlets. By doing so, the WH has besmirched everybody who respects them as friends and colleagues. (Read some P.J. O'Rourke for a picture of how chummy news people can get when they're covering a story; they don't segregate by network.) 

 This might be the first time some of these journalists have encountered the huge gap between how the WH characterizes people, and who those people really are. Never underestimate the value of such an epiphany. 

proof positive

Unless the other news media starts to question the white house (typed intentionally with lower case, current occupants don't deserve otherwise), this is proof that the people in it aren't going to try to hide who they are anymore as they have been doing in the last 10 months with occasional slipups like van jones and others, plus un-scripted comments by Obeyme.

This should start making those people who aren't as well informed as we are madder than hell.

I hope.

-Jon

About that "current occupants" thing...

 

Who thinks the White House and the contents given to the
American People over the centuries will be left in a decent shape when
the Arab and his family vacate the premises?

http://gjresult.com

 

Perhaps In Time

The WH seems to think this is working.  They're all feeling a little cocky now, Gibbs, Axlerod, Emmanuel, et. al., so it's hard for them to step back and see the error of their ways.  Of course the MSM isn't helping too much; they're kind of amused by this, particularly the cable networks, since Fox kicks their butts day in and day out.  However, in time, the WH will outsmart itself and perhaps pick a fight w/an AP, a Reuters, ABC, or a CBS, and the news organizations will realize that this game that's being played is the 21st Century enemies list, in living color.  It's not hidden; it's not done in secret; it's done out in the open, right in your face, and they are daring them to push back.  Of course, the WH is also doing every thing they can to silence Fox; so they're going out of their way to play favorites w/the others.  But in time, something will give; something will happen where the MSM will realize they've been played.  So the only question remaining is when and for what reason will they wake up.  Only time will tell. 

 One more thing, people can criticize George Bush for any number of things over his eight years; some deserved, some not deserved.  But, in those eight years, regardless of what was on the front pages, I don't recall his ever refusing to be interviewed by the major networks.  He took his lumps for sure, but he never hid in his office.  The WH did take issue w/NBC concerning some of their coverage, but that's to be expected, and the WH dealt w/NBC on that directly.  There's something very thinned skin about this WH, and it's only too apparent.

“ [eventually] the MSM will realize they've been played”

You are kidding, right?

This is like saying a naked girl, who has frolicked with her lover for the last year and a half, is some day going to wake up to the fact that she has been having sex and is no longer a virgin.

Let’s remember that liberals pride themselves on being smart (though not necessarily moral).

- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

- I didn't leave the Republican Party; the Republican Party left me.

Really?

Look @ that chicks reaction, sitting behind Jake! She looks absolutely astonished that anyone would dare question them about this! Why don't these dumbasses realize that if they don't stand up and say something, they could be next!

Civil service employee's...

The Fringe (former MSM) Media members are fighting for the few GS5 news reader slots O'Dumbo will allow the media within a year. The rest will commit suicide by shooting themselves in  the back 10 times or join the soup lines. It ain't gonna be pretty but it's going to happen. The many stupid people in America are going to get what they ask for, slavery.

 

Old, Retired and glad of it.

Video

Is the any video of this exchange? I can only find written transcripts.

I think O'Reily said on his

I think O'Reily said on his show tonight that while he could show the video, he wouldn't because the quality was quite poor.

__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song

News pool feed

I assumed there would be continuous news pool feed from WH press briefings with the Hon. Robert Gibbs, goalkeeper extraordinaire. 

I checked C-SPAN. Couldn't find it. I checked with the WH site, but all they posted were just printed transcripts, the putzes. But I suppose their little cookie that could uploaded my unique IP address ("We'd like to know a little bit about your for our files").

I checked it out on YouTube

Thank you Mr. Tapper

Thank you Mr. Tapper for having courage. Thank you for standing up for free speech, even if is an organization you don't agree with. I wondered if the MSM had another Tim Russert, now I know they do. God Bless.

Noel, You could follow this up

With what ever abc shows of this. Be interesting how other cover this as well. Frankly I have low expectations.

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

How is Fox different?

Well gee. Seems to me that numerous media studies, including the likes of UCLA, the  Harvard School of Journalism, as well as numerous national polls, have generally found Fox to indeed be close to the center or the most balanced of the lot. Therefore, it would appear that Fox is more of a news station than the competetion.

Here was one interesting excerpt from the UCLA study:

"If viewers spent an equal amount of time watching Fox's 'Special Report' as ABC's 'World News' and NBC's 'Nightly News,' then they would receive a nearly perfectly balanced version of the news," said Milyo, an associate professor of economics and public affairs at the University of Missouri at Columbia.

On the other hand, if viewers spent any time listening to Gibbs - they'd be completely out in la la land.(;~/ gary

The Swine on the Wing

Are going to leave some serious deposits... hide the car. :) And now might be a good time to set up an ice skate shop in Hades.  

At least Jake is trying

to keep these SOBama-ites honest!

Maybe Fox can find room for him?

From Jake's vantage point he is beginning to see the light or at least point out the hypocrisy.

Keep up the good work if you can?

Wow. Scary stuff there, Mr.

Wow. Scary stuff there, Mr. Gibbs. Sounds like something Josef Goebels would say if you ask me. I'm not surprised by it though, we all knew it was coming at some point or another...

Jake's More Powerful at ABC

Some here have raised the idea of Jake Tapper perhaps moving over to Fox. That would be a big mistake, both for Tapper and for the Conservative movement. Jake's a much bigger thorn in the WH's side staying right where he is.

If all the honest, fearless journalists were stacked over on one network, it would be much easier to isolate and marginalize them. By staying at ABC, he maintains MSM credibility and he can go places where FoxNews reporters just can't now because they're being shut out, like lepers with a deadly pox. The Fox Pox.

 

Abraxos, ABC is going to do

Abraxos, ABC is going to do to Tapper what they did to Ratigan when he continued bashing the administration.  In Ratigan's case, they fired him for his show, Fast Money on CNBC, and sent him off to a liberal reeducation camp.  He came back a few months later speaking liberal and nothing but liberal over at PMSNBC. 

Well, one of two things are

Well, one of two things are going to happen to Tapper.  Either he is going to go over and work at the "not a news organization."  Or, he will never be called on again at a WH press conference.  In any event, his once upon a time numerous invitations to cocktail parties around D.C. will dry up to nil. 

By the way, one of the posters here thought that this may backfire on the WH since the WH could one day do this to one of the socialist propagandists aka ABC, cBS, NBC, PMSNBC, CNN. etc.  That is wrong.  With plummeting ratings/revenue and the only saving grace a WH bailout, the socialists will play along, as if that was not a foregone conclusion, or forego needed funds to keep them afloat.  In any event, objective journalism on their part has long ago faded into smooching every liberal politicans "fourth point of contact." 

 

I feel like a German from

I feel like a German from the 30's that didn't buy into the lunacy going on around me.

~Chad 

This has all been done

This has all been done before, and I mean in this country.  Early in the last century the democrats own Woodrow Wilson had magazine offices and the editors of them that didn't agree with his policies literally smashed with clubs to get them in line.  He had protesters arrested with no charges other then he didn't like what they were protesting. He had truth squad goons beating the hell out of his detractors.

This has all been done before, and it appears to be starting again.  It always starts out small with these Fascist.  Pathetic really.  And I always thought the Uncle Sam poster was supposed to be patriotic when in fact is was just another fascist poster.  We'll see more in the future.  Bet on it.

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Woodrow Wilson

The Peace Prize guy?

The Peace prize

 was also given to Arafat.

 

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny
individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities" Ayn Rand

In all seriousness, what

In all seriousness, what qualification does Gibbs have for his current position? He's not eloquent at all. He seems to never do his homework so when facts are presented to him he's very rarely prepared. He appears confused many times when given real questions from Tapper and a handful of others. He looks completely uncomfortable in front of the press. Tony Snow did much better as did Dana Perino. Heck even Dee Dee Myers did better than Gibbs does. Gibbs seems to be woefully unqualified to be a WH press secretary.

“Gibbs seems to be

“Gibbs seems to be woefully unqualified to be a WH press secretary.”

Ahem, compared to Obama's parliament of Czars? 

Gibbs may be absolutely lousy, but relatively speaking he is not that bad.

- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

- I didn't leave the Republican Party; the Republican Party left me.

Must be a brother-in-law

Must be a brother-in-law deal or some other kind of legacy.

Know how to keep a Troll in suspense?  Ill tell ya in the morning.

Every so often Jake acts as

Every so often Jake acts as if he has a pair.

Maybe he'll end up on FNC.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.

Jake Tapper

If our Founding Fathers were to be made aware of the ''press'' in it's current state, and that someone, such as Jake Tapper, would be the rare reporter to seek, and report, the truth, I believe that the Constitution would have made provisions about misreporting (A La Rush, Sarah, FNC, et al) and proper punishments would have been spelled out.  However, I believe they did their best.  They just had no foreboding of the extent, speed, and single-minded ruthlessness of today's ''press''.

 

JMHO, you understand.

If Saul Alinsky owned a news channel it would be MSNBC.  ----  Me

Can Jake Tapper be the next

Can Jake Tapper be the next Edward R. Murrow?  What Obama's thugs are doing is at least as bad as what McCarthy did.  McCarthy was a demagogue but at least he was factually correct and his goal was to protect america.  Obama's thugs are factually wrong and their goal is destroy anyone who criticizes them.

This is very encouraging at least

I find it encouraging that Tapper referred to Fox News Channel as a "sister organization" even though the sentiment wouldn't be echoed by the likes of CNN and MSNBC.(those two are VERY deep in the pockets of the Omen-instration) 

Essentially it's a challenge of "why are you attacking one of us?"  I prefer to think of it as "They may be Fox News but they ARE a news organization, you attack them, you attack all of us."  Even Helen Thomas was defending them, that's saying something!

Does that sound about right?

-Jon

Tapper Dat Azz

Wow! This Jake Tapper is worse than a racist Hitler!

LOL!

I don't know why. That made me laugh.

 

"If God is dead, somebody is going to have to take his place. It will
be megalomania or erotomania, the drive for power or the drive for
pleasure, the clenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or Hugh Hefner."
— Malcolm Muggeridge

Maybe some people are starting to wake up?

All journalists should ask themselves "Am I next?". Is it appropriate for the White House to declare a cable news channel "not a news organization"? Could they declare the Wall Street Journal "not a newspaper"? Would it be appropriate for them to declar Bill Maher a "journalist" and give him a seat at the WH briefings? Maybe displacing Major Garret from FNC?

I'm starting to see many parallels with the end of the Weimar Republic of Germany in the 1930's and it is scaring the HELL out of me.

Throw 'da bums out!!!

no incumbent re-elected, with very few exceptions!

www.loyaltoliberty.com

Olberman and Maddow included in White House Briefings

Fox excluded.-------------------

Your references to Germany in the 30's is on target.  But also look at who Hugo Chavez targeted when he took the reins.

"Don't let the bastards grind you down."

Red