Rush Limbaugh Discusses Politics With Jay Leno

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

As NewsBusters' Brent Baker previously reported, conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh had fun with Jay Leno Thursday evening actually driving an electric car over a cardboard cut-out of Al Gore.

Prior to that hilarious scene, Limbaugh sat down with Leno and discussed politics, President Obama, Medicare, and even weight loss.

For those that missed it, the entire first segment is embedded below the fold with the transcript (videos in two parts):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

JAY LENO, HOST: Now, either you love or you hate my next guest, but you can't ignore him. He hosts the highest rated national radio talk show in America, with 20 million listeners a week. Please welcome Rush Limbaugh. (music, cheers) I must say, now, I think people are stunned at how thin you are because we don't see you on TV that often.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: That's right.

LENO: How much weight have you lost?

RUSH: Eighty-two pounds, Jay.

LENO: Eighty-two pounds. (cheers and applause) Let me ask you something. Would you attribute your weight gain to liberal portions? (laughter)

RUSH: (laughing) No. I would attribute my weight gain to no discipline and loving every minute of it.

LENO: Well, you know what fascinated me. They followed this on the news shows. "We're going to go to Rush Limbaugh's weight gain -- weight loss now."

RUSH: Let me tell you about this.

LENO: Yeah.

RUSH: I saw a spread on you in People magazine. Twelve pounds you lost over the summer.

LENO: I did.

RUSH: Big whoop!

LENO: I know. (laughing)

RUSH: I mean I could lose 12 pounds... anyway.

LENO: All right.

RUSH: So I lose 82 pounds, and ABC gets their medical director on Good Morning America: "He can't do it that way." I just did it! "You can't do it that way. It's too fast. He didn't do any exercise. He's gonna put it back on. It's not healthy. He's going to die." Here I am. You lose 12 pounds over the summer, a glowing tribute --

LENO: Thank you.

RUSH: -- in People magazine. Why? Because you exercised, or whatever you did.

LENO: Well, I didn't really do anything, actually. (laughter) See, but, now, would you say -- like some people say you are a polarizing figure. Would you agree that you are --

RUSH: No.

LENO: -- or not?

RUSH: No, everybody agrees with me that listens to me. I'm not controversial at all. (laughter) Seriously, this polarizing business. (applause) I'm not -- Obama is polarizing Jay.

LENO: Now, how? Now, why would you say that?

RUSH: Now, remember the campaign. We were gonna have a utopia, postpartisanship, there wasn't going to be any more red state/blue states, postracist, we're not going to have any racial acrimony. Look at how divided this country is right now. His approval numbers are plummeting. People who voted for him did not think this is what they were gonna get.

LENO: But we've always been divided. But you don't see --

RUSH: That's right. So why do you ask me about partisanship? Of course we've always been divided. The country was founded on that.

LENO: You know what -- I think it comes from the way you look at it. There -- and tell me if this is a fair analysis.

RUSH: All right.
LENO: Like I tend to come from the, "Is it cold in here?" kind of guy, and you're I think more of a "close that damn window." (laughter)

RUSH: No.

LENO: Not what you say? Is that not fair?

RUSH: You're talking about, you're doing a Rodney King on me: "Can't we all just get along?" Well, fine. You give up what you believe in, agree with me, and we'll get along. Why is it I have to give up everything I believe in for comity? Tell Obama, "No, we do not want you owning car companies. No, we do not want you running the banks. No, we don't want you taking over student loans. And, no, we do not want nationalized health care." (cheers and applause)

LENO: Now, what would you have done with General Motors? What would you have done with that?

RUSH: Well, let the market take its course. Let 'em do bankruptcy first or go out of business. That's --

LENO: Yeah.

RUSH: -- just the way it works.

LENO: But, see, to me I --

RUSH: But we haven't saved them. We saved the unions.

LENO: Yeah.

RUSH: Now, Obama, who's got a five-minute career, has never run a business, is now running the car company. You know more about it, Jay. You own more cars than Obama's ever seen. (laughter)

LENO: Well, what I'm saying is, to me, my great fear is once you let a company like General Motors go under, it doesn't come back in America. It goes somewhere else, and your competition -- once you lose your industrial base -- like you and I, I think, would agree that --

RUSH: Ah, ah, ah, ah, ah --

LENO: -- manufacturing jobs should be here in America and we should have more manufacturing jobs in America, and people should buy more American-made cars. Would you agree with that? (cheers and applause) And to me, to me, you know, when you go to Japan --

RUSH: Didn't even give me a chance to --

LENO: No, let me finish, let me finish. The Japanese government will subsidize Honda and Toyota and Mazda. And in the seventies they did. They said, "Honda, you're going to be this company, Toyota, you get this money," and they gave them all money.

RUSH: Yeah, but you're talking about Japan, Inc., and they had a 20-year recession. The government cannot run the private sector. Now, you used a favorite typical ploy, "wouldn't you agree with me," then you asked me a question. I don't accept the premise, "wouldn't you agree with me."

LENO: All right. Okay. Okay.

RUSH: What happened to the buggy whip industry when we ended up with the automobile? Did we keep the buggy whip industry going because, oh, my gosh, those people are so wonderful, and buggy whip is so cute, and we haven't a need for it anymore.

LENO: Right, right.

RUSH: Just because General Motors goes under -- it didn't -- doesn't mean people can't buy cars. People already weren't buying the cars for a reason.

LENO: Yeah.

RUSH: The market speaks. And I love General Motors. I don't want anybody to misunderstand. I'm just saying the market will fix itself for people far better than a bunch of people in Washington with no experience in it tinkering in it and trying to control it.

LENO: Yeah, the thing that --

RUSH: So you're getting caught up in you think it's compassionate to save all these jobs, to save various kinds of jobs.

LENO: I do.

RUSH: The market has more compassion than Washington. You name for me a government program that's actually helped, that hasn't cost far more than what they projected, that's actually working. I mean, there's no reason on earth, after Social Security, Medicare, Great Society, war on poverty, they don't work. Why are we going to turn over the whole health care industry to them?

LENO: They worked for millions of Americans. Medicare has worked wonderfully well for millions of Americans. (applause) I mean, now --

RUSH: Wait a second.

LENO: -- to say that it's starting to run into a deficit --

RUSH: It's bankrupt. It's close to being bankrupt, as is Social Security. Your perspective on how it's working --

LENO: No, don't say it's not working. You're saying it's not being profitable. But if it's helping people, it's working. If you're saving a number of people from being -- (applause)

RUSH: No.

LENO: No?
RUSH: No. I'm not arguing to take Social Security away. I mean, I'm not arguing to take Medicare away. But don't build on them. They don't accomplish what they're supposed to accomplish. Social Security is supposed to provide for somebody's retirement. That was the original plan. It doesn't do that.

LENO: Yeah.

RUSH: I'm saying we've got enough mistakes the federal government's run. We don't need to compound it with more programs. I just believe the market will take care of it. Most of the people in this country are very happy with the health coverage, the health treatment that they get. There's no reason to turn it all upside down. And all this is being done -- Jay, I'll tell you what really worries me about it. Forget the intricacies of health care. If the government gets control of health care, that's the single best way that they get to control every aspect of our lives: what we eat, what we drive -- because it will all have impact on health care costs, their responsibility via our taxes, and it's just a mechanism whereby government grows and grows and grows and we lose liberty and freedom to it. And that's what the problem with nationalized health care is. (applause)

LENO: I understand. I understand.

RUSH: Pure and simple.

LENO: But who would you like to see as president? If Rush Limbaugh could appoint the president, who would you like to see?

RUSH: Me.

LENO: All right. (laughter)

RUSH: But, see, I don't want the pay cut.

LENO: Yeah. Yeah. (laughter) Was George Bush a good president?

RUSH: Again, depending on your perspective. Now, he kept us safe. He also did great damage to the Republican Party. To a guy like you, that's two good things he did.

LENO: Now, what's that mean? What does that mean? See, here's something that bothers me. You believe in the capitalist system; I believe in the capitalist system.

RUSH: Right.

LENO: I watch Wall Street, and I go, "Okay, you can make a million, or two million a year. Okay, you can make ten million a year." Eight hundred, $900 million, some of these people made, a billion dollars. At some point, I mean, how much pie can you possibly eat? I mean, where did it go? Somewhere it went wrong 'cause when I was a kid, Howard Hughes was the richest man in the world with $3.2 billion dollars. Now people have hundreds of billions of dollars, and other people have absolutely nothing.

RUSH: The economic pie is growing. It's not a zero-sum game. Just because somebody has $800 million doesn't mean somebody lost it. It means the market produced it. It's none of my business what they make, Jay. It's certainly none of yours, and it's certainly not Barack Obama's what anybody makes. (applause)

LENO: No, but, to me it's happening because --

RUSH: This whole question of what -- you said you believe in the capitalist system.

LENO: But it's how you make it.

RUSH: No, no, it's not. If you believe in the capitalist system, then you have to erase from your whole worldview what does somebody need. It's not about need. Capitalism is not about need. It's about providing; it's about growing; it's about opportunity; it is about doing whatever you want to do.

LENO: Did Wall Street deserve this --

RUSH: You know what American Exceptionalism is? I'll tell you about Wall Street.

LENO: Did they deserve the $700 billion that they got from us? Now, using your theory --

RUSH: No.

LENO: -- using your theory, all those guys --

RUSH: You're talking about --

LENO: -- should be out on the street because they screwed up.

RUSH: You're taking about TARP money?

LENO: -- because they screwed up?

RUSH: TARP?

LENO: All of it --

RUSH: Giant scam. "If we don't give them $700 million in the next 24 hours the world financial system will crash." We're hearing that if we don't do health care by August, my God, the health care system will crash. No, we didn't need to give them $700 billion. The biggest problem we have right now that caused all that was the subprime mortgage crisis --

LENO: Right.

RUSH: -- which was lending money to people that had no way of paying it back, and there were two people that led the way on that, three: Bill Clinton, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd.

LENO: Well, I think everybody was in on that one.

RUSH: No.

LENO: I mean both sides --

RUSH: The Bush administration tried to regulate this and tried to get this brought under control because it made no sense. ACORN was out forcing banks, pressuring banks to lend money to people that couldn't pay it back, all under the guise of, "We must have affordable housing."

LENO: Well, I tell you what. When we come back, are you ready to take our Green Car Challenge and see how you do?

RUSH: Oh, yeah.

LENO: This will be your first time in a --

RUSH: Oh, yeah.

LENO: -- nonpetroleum-based car.

RUSH: It will be.

LENO: We'll see how Rush does. Right back with Rush right after this. (cheers and applause)

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I saw that and suffice it to

I saw that and suffice it to say Rush never ceases to amaze me. I wish I was a listener from day one. I know I missed a lot.

Hi HC... I know what you

Hi HC...

I know what you mean, we listened to him, watched his half hour show he used to have, which we loved, really looked forward to, then moved to where we couldn't get cable or radio, I missed about 10 years of him, glad when I got a computer...so I can listen to who I want now.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Hey BT

To be honest during my brainwashing years as a Democrat I was convinced that Rush was the bad guy (that he hated black people and the like) but later on in life I started to do my own research on him and others like Rush and realized I was on the wrong team.

 

The only thing Rush was guilty of in most eyes was being patriotic and caring for his country and I realized that I was on that side of those who was making those complaints and as I said before I knew I was on the wrong team. Also after this whole hoopla when Obama came on to the scene was the final nail in the coffin.

 

Better late then never I suppose :-)

Hey HC... Better late

Hey HC...

Better late than never indeed!   ;-)

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

HC

Don't feel like the Lone Ranger. I didn't really pay attention til 9-11-01. Heck, I'm ashamed to say I voted for Clinton...twice! The more I thought about things, the less sense liberals made. Who was it that said...if you're under thirty and are a conservative you have no heart; and if you're over forty and are a liberal, you have no brain!

"What a revoltin' development this is!"

Chester Riley

jdlybrand...

guilty as charged I voted for Clinton as well. Thought he was doing a bang up job come to find out his job wasn't the only thing he was "banging."

that quote is from Winston Churchill

"Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any
man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains."

-Winston Churchill

-ascended conservative

Say 10 hail Kennedy's and

Say 10 hail Kennedy's and you are forgiven my son! 

(A couple of our Obama's wouldn't hurt either!)

"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"

 

Huffington Post..

I read about this on the Huffington Post earlier and was incredulous reading the comments about El Rushbo...I know for sure that maybe 99% of those idiots have never even listened to him. It's like they get marching orders from ZsaZsa to print those comments...Talk about group think over there...

adam... LOL, typical of

adam...

LOL, typical of the leftist blog sites, I don't have the time or the stomach to check them out today, the thought did cross my mind, glad you did it for me.

Can't you just hear the KosKids...bet it's the same blather as well.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Rush is right...Giant Scam

Rush is right...Giant Scam to the utmost!

...and it's still continuing.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Well, let's give a little credit

Jay Leno invited him on. He didn't invite him on to ambush him. He wanted to have a little fun, and allowed Rush to show a little humanity. They talked a little politics, and Jay wanted to rub elbows a little bit, but after all, it's an entertainment show. They weren't going to debate Keynes v. supply side.

I appreciate the fact that Leno invited him on and gave him pretty much a fair shot.

Think Letterman would have done that? Leno deserves credit.

KC - I agree with you about Leno

Leno has always seemed to be a pretty fair-minded guy who treats people nicely and with respect. 

I hope Rush never goes on Letterman because Letterman would try to ambush Rush at every turn.  Rush can certainly take care of himself, but what's the point of going on a show with someone who's so bitter and openly partisan?

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

FF... I just won't want

FF...

I just won't want him to go on Letterman's show...Letterman would get the ratings...which I wouldn't want to see him get.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

BT

You're right.  That's another good reason for Limbaugh to stay away from Letterman. 

Maybe Letterman would go on Limbaugh's radio show.  That might be fun to see how Letterman does without the support of his audience.

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

Lol FF... Now that would

Lol FF...

Now that would be delicious, Letterman couldn't handle it without his audience or at least some canned laughter.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

I don't know...

 

It would be good in a way.

Week one (without Limbaugh) 321 viewers.

Week two (with Limbaugh) 4 million plus viewers.

Week three (without Limbaugh) 37 viewers.

ol davey might get the message....

 

http://gjresult.com

 

And Jay

 

Got an EDUCATION!

If he had scrapped the car episode, Jay, and his audience nationwide, as well as the studio crowd would have all woke up this morning a whole lot less stupid.

 

http://gjresult.com

 

Did anybody just hear Rush

Did anybody just hear Rush mention about Leno asking him who he would want for Prez so far, and he said 'Me'...just kidding, he would never run for Prez, or some-such, then Rush said later someone after the show asked him about this and he said he would run as a democrat, because the don't ever criticize their own, he said he could drive a car off a bridge with a woman in it and still be elected.

I'm paraphrasing here of course, but that is exactly right.

Although we all know the dems would never let him get through in the primaries...

What fun he is at times.

As an aside Rush just mentioned that O's poll ratings are down to 50%  ...please keep talking 24/7 O....pretty please.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Limbaugh's production values

Limbaugh's production values and parodies are the best in the business. I think Leno listens to him secretly, at least when he's not driving his "Tank Car". At least Leno is pretty much a normal guy, as opposed to the moronically biased Letterman. I can't imagine Letterman with grease on his hands from his cars, Jay would look upon it as a badge of honor, a result of honest work to achieve an honest goal.

GREAT COMMENTS !!!!

A couple of great comments under Rush/Leno's clip I found on YouTube:

Even on the liberal-loving NBC, massive applause when Limbaugh makes good conservative points, and a tepid response when Leno tries to make some liberal point. Obama's leftism is killing this country and even libs understand it when they hear the truth.

Will Smith makes $ 350 million dollars in 10 years and that ok but some guy sitting at a desk on Wall Street working for 16 hrs a day, 6 days a week to make the same amount is the epitome of evil... Hollywood logic is stupid.

 

Rush the Conservative Oz

I'm a registered Conservative, and I know I am much further to the right than Rush. And I'm sick and tired of this Rush hero worship.

I don't begrudge his success one bit. He has had tribulations in his life. And apparently, after three attempts, he doesn't have the right answers for a successful marriage. Sadly, there are many people in that category. 

But, the day I hear Rush has actually allowed disagreement from a fellow Conservative on his show . . I may actually change my opinion about him.

I used to watch his old TV Show until they scheduled it into oblivion. And I used to be a frequent listener to his radio show. He annoyed me to no end that a caller who was honestly a Conservative, but wanted to disagree over a point, was cut off, mocked and talked over. On to the next caller.

Not allowed on Rush's show. His ego needs to be deflated.

This from a man who endorsed NAFTA. I have heard from some still devoted listeners that Rush has finally admitted NAFTA was not good.

So much for having the only Right answers under the Conservative Banner!

 

 

 

Isaiah 5:20a Woe unto them who call evil good, and good evil. . .  KJV

Howdy LL... Not everybody

Howdy LL...

Not everybody agrees with everyone else all the time, just wouldn't be natural.

As far as his marriages, as far as I am concerned, that's his own business.

Anyway, good to see ya here.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

You're a troll my friend.

You're a troll my friend.

excuse us, nada?

LilacLady has been on NB for a while and is no troll. So she dislikes Rush, big deal. We all have radio personalities that rub us the wrong way.

 

nad.. Howdy friend, LL is

nad..

Howdy friend, LL is not a troll, by any means.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

It's funny that you proved

It's funny that you proved her point.

You think that's

"You think that's a Troll?...Now this is a Troll!!"

 

"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"

 

MM

MM,

With impeccable timing, too! :-)  ns

Are the G20 Protester Racist?

The President spoke at the G20 Summit and there are protester so just like the people who marched on Washington D.C. 12 September 2009. These people protesting must be racist too right?

Update More Photos from the G20 Pittsburgh Protest. Guest Blogger “Terrible Towel”

 

El Chubo was awkward

I do not mind Rush Limbaugh, of the entire conservative talk hosts, I find him the most likable; but honestly, the rest are so disgusting and repulsive that he really does not have a peer.  I digress; I think that Mr. Limbaugh should refrain from going on live TV again.  As I was watching this last night I felt so uncomfortable for him.  Seeing Mr. Limbaugh on the television was so awkward.  It was just weird.  Did anyone else notice how he sat on the chair at one point like a woman?  How bizarre.    

Sheesh

The only awkward I see, here, is your post, sterling.

You are dismissed.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

He sat on the chair like a

He sat on the chair like a woman?  Pray tell, how does a woman sit on a chair differently?  If you're referring to crossing his legs or some such, the idea that it's less manly or some such is a view only found in the US...more of a social construct than anything.

you mean disgusting liberal progressive radio talkers?

"the rest are so disgusting and repulsive"

I'll agree if by rest you mean Ed Schultz, Stephanie Miller, Montel Williams, Bill Press, Ron Reagan, The Young Turks, Randi Rhodes, Mike Malloy, Ron Kuby, Rachel Maddow, and Thom Hartmann.

 

Didn't notice that either

I didn't care for his shirt, though. Should have been tucked in.

                  ~~save your tea, dump congress~~

TROLL ALERT!

EOM 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Last night was the lowest

Last night was the lowest rated Leno so far, only 4.99 million viewers

I think you'll find that

I think you'll find that trend will continue! 

"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"

 

so that explains

why Fox News is killing every other cable news channel. Rush's 10 million radio listeners say hello. :)

Leno's show debuted with high ratings, granted, but only after NBC promoted it every five minutes on air for a week. His ratings will settle down into its real point.

 

you'r a liar according to this:

LOS ANGELES, Sept 15 (Reuters) - Jay Leno's
new prime-timeexperiment on the struggling NBC network pulled in
bigaudiences, according to early ratings figures on Tuesday, butmostly
underwhelmed TV critics.

Some 17.7 million Americans tuned in for the closelywatched debut of "The Jay Leno Show" at 10 p.m. on Monday,preliminary numbers from Nielsen Media showed.

That compares to the roughly 5 million strong audience thatused to regularly watch Leno's old "Tonight Show" and puts thenew chat show's first outing on a par with crowd pleasers likethe "CSI" crime franchise on rival CBS (CBS.N).

and here's the link:  http://www.mashget.c...

For our little vomiting propagandist

It is good to back what you say instead of vomiting propaganda.  This way you can avoid the embarrassment poured on you by a poster who not only contradicted you but proved it and backed it up.   

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Funny Thanks

Funny Thanks to.

HAHAHAHAHA. HEHEHE. I didn’t even know about it. Um. So, you’ve got me at a loss. I don’t know. (Charles Gibson of the dead media.)

I was surprised

I was surprised at the response the Left Coast audience gave Rush.  This is the first time I watched Leno in a long time and it was only because I wanted to see how Rush handled the car.  The interaction between Jay and Rush was good - Rush didn't let Jay frame the interview.  He spoke his own thoughts on his own terms.

All in all, a great television moment.

Rush and Jay

Well, they've both got years of experience interviewing and Rush knew Leno was a small "l" liberal (unlike someone like Letterman). He actually managed to find common ground with him. What didn't come up was something I know Rush was thinking, "OK, Jay, if you think people can make too much money and the government should make a cap on that, what cap would you be willing to take? Half your salary? Half your cars?"

Yup

Rush is too classy to have made that point direct and personal with his host.  But he did mention that Jay has more cars than Obama has ever seen - a tiny hint.  I was laughing my rear off during the interview.  Rush was so on last night.

And you're right about the small ''l''.  Jay knows not to tick off half of his possible audience.  Letterman (capital ''N'' for Nutcase) should, but could not care less.

Re Ratings

If Rush couldn't rescue Leno, he's truly toast. Let's hope Conan, Letterboy, Ferguson, and that young kid go next.

Leno - on letting Insurance companies go out of business....

LENO: Well, what I'm saying is, to me, my great fear is once you let companies like General Motors Cigna, Humana, Blue Cross, Blue Shield, etc., go under, they don't come back in America. It goes somewhere else, and your competition ..

(;~/ gary

Way to go Rush.  If only

Way to go Rush.  If only Michael Moore was on with him, but Moore knows he couldn't handle the intellectual debate.

Odd....

 

You mentioned "michael moore" and "intellectual" in the same sentence.

It must be a 'spacee/time continuum' thing.....

http://gjresult.com

 

Thanks for the video and the transcript. I caught the green car

challenge, but missed Leno's interview with Rush.

I rarely watch Leno anymore. I like Jay Leno (as opposed to my dislike for uninformed lefty Letterman). However, Leno's interview with Rush reminded me of some of the naive Letterman interviews I've seen. I hope Leno doesn't turn into another obnoxious leftist like David Letterman. 

As usual, Rush was on the mark. Surprisingly, the audience, who I would guess would lean toward the liberal persuasion, seemed to agree with Rush's comments as evidenced with the applause.

-----------------------------------------------------

“Conservatism is a universal set of core principles. You don't check principles at the door.” ~ Rush Limbaugh

 

Rush fails

People on this list are already are fans of free markets. So Rush may sound good. But he explains poorly to those who don't already embrace freedom.

Things Rush might have said that actually open minds:

a) "The market is where we interact by agreement. Peacefully. On the other hand, government is force - properly used only for crime control. When we try to be compassionate by force - by law - the most well-connected use that power to get ahead, as we see today."

(If Rush said this, he'd anger establishment Republicans who like to promote business with tax subsidies.)

b) "The market is another word for your choice."

(But Rush can't utter the powerful word "choice", or he'd be cornered on abortion.)

c) "Regulations kill competition and jobs, because as businesses lose some choices of how to operate, the smaller competitors can't afford to operate, and larger ones start to feel the cost of having so many people on the payroll. And after a century of regulation, the larger companies are now uber-connected, and the outrageous salaries of CEOs is an outgrowth of that perversity. It's not from a free market, which is non-existent in the U.S."

(Instead, Rush defends the large salaries, as if they are natural.)

d) "Do you want there to be lots of jobs? So employers are forced to cater to YOU? Then repeal the expensive regulations that turn our country into the metaphorical constipated invalid."

---

Really. Where's Rush? 

This last week, I heard Rush promote lower taxes. His mantra.

Lower taxes, lower taxes, lower taxes.

Never lower spending. Pitiful. You can't cut taxes and keep spending this much. But saying as much would have branded Ronald Reagan as the problem, because he lowered taxes but never conquered spending - the real problem.

I'd love to have lower taxes and lowered government spending. But lower taxes and continued spending led to our current reality:

  • Shackles still tying up what could be a free market, and...
  • Public debt as far as the eye can see!

---

Rush is without a convincing idea unless you already know.

Rush has little talent - and little interest? - in converting the unfortunate graduates of ABC, NBC, CBS, and the Federally dumbed-down public schools.

Rush won't speak real educational truth, because he'd hurt Republicans, too.

Depending on Rush is like depending on Gilligan's Skipper.

This interview did the country something like zero good.

Hopefully, I have not offended.

Thanks and peace,

Dan Litwin
www.PeacemakersRock.com

So wonderfull you have

So wonderfull you have superior intellect ot kinow what the proper income should be. And waiting till everyone leaves this thread to drop this. Spoken from people who pretend to worry about fairness while excusing democrats in office who don't pay their taxes. And who gave us this mess.

We had fairness. And it was ruined by rgulation that forced banks to loan money to people who couldn't pay their loans back.

Your regulations didn't help the poor. And they didn't help the rest of us who are shouldering the debts Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Bill Clinton regulated through.

HAHAHAHAHA. HSWome of the dumbest utterances in a EHEHE. I didn’t even know about it. Um. So, you’ve got me at a loss. I don’t know. (Charles Gibson of the dead media.)

Not my regulations

I had nothing to do with any regulations. I've never voted Democrat or Republican. I have been for limited government all along.

I'll never excuse Democrats. And I'll never excuse the high deficits of Reagan.

You're an idiot

democRATS controlled Congress when Reagan was President. When tax revenue was increased, democRATS simply spent more. Get a history book, cowardly moderate. 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

 "But saying as much would

 "But saying as much would have branded Ronald Reagan as the problem, because he lowered taxes but never conquered spending - the real problem."

Not so.  Who writes the tax bills, the President or the House of Representatives?  Who writes the spending bills, the President or the House of Representatives?

The fact is that Ronald Reagan campaigned and won the election in a landslide on tax cuts.  When the Democrat controlled Congress did not cooperate, Reagan got on TV and spoke to the people, all those in fly-over country who actually make this country work, and told them how the cow at the cabbage.  They, in turn, got on the phone and called their Representatives and Senators, and wrote letters and actually made Congress represent the will of the people and pass the tax cut bills.  Because they were forced to do their jobs, the Democrats hated (and still do hate) Reagan.  So, when Reagan sent his budget up to the Hill, the Democrats added a doodoo load of pork to the spending bills, and told Reagan to take it or leave it.  The "Reagan deficit" wasn't Reagan's at all, but belonged totally to the Democrats.  

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Heard of the VETO?

Reagan didn't veto those bloated budgets. He signed them with spending intact. The buck stops at the White House until Congress overrides a veto.

If he fought for the tax cuts and not the spending cuts, then my point still stands.

And, sorry, but he ran for office not on tax cuts, but on "Getting big government off your back". That's a direct quote.

The fact is he failed to reduce government, and we were not supposed to notice this because he cut taxes. Perhaps his plan worked. Heck. Limbaugh is still reciting the line.

After this failure, Conservatives seemed to give up on smaller government. They now pursue nationwide rules for marriage, a war on drugs, a war on terror, and other such bigger government items with a non-liberal twist. Oh yes, and tax cuts.

I'm not going to be impressed until the actual spending is less than the year before.

dlitwin

Oh great.

Another two-week wonder pipes up. 

I suppose you expect us to believe that you do not recall the Congress threatening to shutdown the govt if Reagan didn't sign those spending Bills?

Caving

Sure I remember. I also remember Reagan caving.

So, did Reagan do everything right, like some on the left now say about Obama?

But of course you forget

But of course you forget the press putting the blame for the showdown on Reagan?

And I'll bet you forget the press putting the blame for the '90s budget showdown on the GOP Congress.

 

Your question about Reagan doing (or not) everything right ?  Nice attempt to change the subject but: FAIL!

FAIL!

What was that dlit?  I can't hear you.

LOL

Oh, my good man. I remember bad press against conservatives my whole life. The press leans left.

And if you think the press treats you unfairly, try being a libertarian for a while. The devil himself has always arrived!!

LOL

I know your pain on this one.

Did you vote for Bob Barr?

Did you vote for Bob Barr?

Regrettably

Regrettably. Party loyalty. My conscience would be feeling a lot better if I had simply written in Ron Paul.

To understand why I felt such regret, here's a laugh. Back just a few years, Bob Barr was branded by the Libertarian Party as the "worst drug warrior in Congress". The LP raised money to help get Barr tossed out of Congress, which actually happened. And after all that? Barr changes his spots and gets that same party's presidential nomination??

Just kill me now!

LOL

Then you pass the test.  I

Then you pass the test.  I have met some who claim to be Libertarians yet they voted for the Marxist, Obama, giving all sorts of stupid excuses such as, 'I like him'.

And if you think the press

And if you think the press treats you unfairly, try being a libertarian for a while. The devil himself has always arrived!!

I agree with you there. Libertarians get a raw deal from the MSM.

 

"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows."  --Boris Epshteyn

Reagan's policies clearly

Reagan's policies clearly worked, especially in the long term.  I think they would have been even more effective if he had other than a liberal Congress to deal with.  Those who succeeded him raised taxes and failed to control spending as well as he did. 

Obama's policies clearly won't work.  Not in the short term and not ever.  He makes no pretense about balancing the budget and he openly plans to raise taxes on everyone, in direct contravention of his empty promise to 'tax the rich'.

Ah, but I have such unrealistically high standards...

At some point in the process, I guess I'd like to have seen the public debt go down.

And no, I'm sure Obama has no plans to cheer me up.

dlitwin

They now pursue nationwide rules for marriage...

Um, a man and a woman, which has always been the rule. What rule are they/we "pursuing", exactly?

a war on drugs...

We don't want a country full of potheads. What are we thinking?

a war on terror...

We are at war with terrorists, yes. Terrorism is heinous and brutally killing people all over the world based on some barbaric religious teaching, and we are finally waging a war on it. What is our PROBLEM ???

and other such bigger government items with a non-liberal twist...

Like?? Nothing big-guv'mint about #1... #2 we can maybe debate... and #3 is national defense.

Now..... what are you going on about again?

 

Hey Shy.  I see you've met

Hey Shy.  I see you've met our newest Liberal.

Free

I'm up to my eyeballs in liberal blathering. Just had another big fallout with my bro.

A disease, I tell ya'... He thought Cx2 was being meeeean to him (she was part of the debate) and it became personal.

I honestly think libs do NOT really debate and get themselves dirty like we do here at NB. Those lib blog sites are all circle-jerks with the occasional quickly-banned conservative... or he/she finds it impossible to hang. 

 

Wow. He thought C was

Wow.

He thought C was being mean?  Translation: She used facts and logic against him.

Free

You could make a living being a translator, Free. :)

It was that and my three very logical questions posed to him.... the combo set him off. He warned that if he stayed on FB, he'd turn REALLY vitriolic like some other people we both know (me and him, I mean.... and do I have doozies of stories to tell you... some that you probably know already.)

 

Good for you, Shy!

I remember my convo with liberal bro....he's an asshat (and stupid, too).

They all shout like mad, but are without facts.  Overgrown teenagers.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

J

Hey J, yeah, libs really do love their fabricated outrage.

 

Not a liberal

Is anyone who disagrees with your party lines a "liberal"? 

You guys want bigger government than I do.

The war on drugs has no Article 1 Section 8 spec. It's illegal for Federal action. It's up to the states.

Same with the definition of marriage.

The 10th amendment doesn't matter to you, does it?

dlitwin

Hey, not-a-liberal. If we're "us guys", what are "you/you guys" ??

Conservative? Libertarian? Or you're above all that?

 

Shy - a good sanity check

Shy - a good sanity check for this guy would be:

  • His opinion on Israel.
  • His opinion on Governor Palin.

Sanity checks

I know the story of Israel pretty well. They settled there on land that was often purchased or even not owned by anyone previously. They settled peacefully, and deserve peace in their space. That's their right, but it's not wise U.S. policy to back that up. Instead, I say Israelis are all invited to come live here, but I support foreign aid to no one. It's not authorized in the Constitution, and it makes enemies. I do support trade with all nations, including Israel, as trade makes peace.

My nephew, an orthodox Jew, thinks if Israel was not constrained by U.S. and U.N. policies, that they'd have solve their problems long ago. I am more pessimistic. I think the Middle East is a lost cause for now. Theodore Herzl, the Zionist founder, proposed a move to another area of the world, but was attacked by his own movement for not wanting to move to the worst neighborhood on earth. That was their decision, and I say good luck to them. I do not stand in their way.

Is support for Palin some sort of litmus test?

Palin's not really told us all about herself yet. I'm listening for what might be some good stuff. Seems to be holding back a bit. But she did well in Alaska standing up to corruption, so kudos for that. Thumbs down for promoting McCain, though. I don't think she's proud of that at this point.

You think it's not wise for

You think it's not wise for the US to support Israel's right to exist?

 

 

Entangling alliances

I support those founders who warned against entangling alliances.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_non-interventionism

Washington, Jefferson, Thomas Paine, John Adams, etc.

As I said, I personally support their right to exist. I support many things that I think government should stay out of.

As I said, I personally

As I said, I personally support their right to exist. I support many things that I think government should stay out of.
 

I asked because the Ron Paul supporters I know are rabid haters of Israel.  Glad to see your not amongst that group.

 

I support those founders who warned against entangling alliances.

I suppose NATO would qualify as one of those ?

IMHO, "entangling alliaces" was a reference to the sort of European alliances that set off the chain reaction that became World War I.  I just can't imagine the USA turning our backs on Israel, Japan, or South Korea.

What am I?

Short answer = libertarian, interested in solutions that create choice, like the 10th amendment, which would solve most of our problems of Federal excess. Interested in having 50 states that differ enough that everyone can find a place to suit them. Not interested in edicts from DC for everyone.

"I'm not going to be

"I'm not going to be impressed until the actual spending is less than the year before. "

 

Then I would assume you are not now, nor will you ever be, impressed with the Democrats.

No, not impressed.

No, not impressed with Democrats. I'm sure that's a point of agreement between us.

Then you must also favor the

Then you must also favor the immediate removal of the Democrat Congress, since they are doing nothing of net good for the country.

Removal

Yes, I support removal of all Democrats from Congress, and all Republicans that I know of except Ron Paul. If there's another Republican or Democrat who supports the 10th Amendment, let me know. I would be glad to change my mind.

There are plenty of

There are plenty of Republicans who support limited government.  Michelle Bachman for one.  I think John Boehner is a reasonable conservative.  In fact, most of the Republicans in the House are conservatives.  The Senate is noted for its RINOs, including McCain.  But there are also conservative Republican senators, mostly from he South and West.

Bachman

Interestingly, I believe Bachman and Paul are working together. I saw a report of a joint appearance perhaps in an email from Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty.

I really think a lot of new blood wil be required. But maybe more important than who is in charge, we're going to have to be real specific about what we want, and say it to them repeatedly.

Dan

For dlitwin

 After this failure, Conservatives seemed to give up on smaller government. They now pursue nationwide rules for marriage, you must really hate the fact that state governments already have a say in marriage, no?  Personally, while I will lose no sleep over civil unions, I think gay marriage is a bad idea a war on drugs, a war on terror,  See, right here, this is why I can never, ever be a Libertarian.

One, Libertarians are horrified and angry that the government enforces societal standards.  Hell, they are disgusted that societies even HAVE standards.  They are simply aching endlessly to induce societal ROT through things like drugs.  In fact, I have noticed that drugs are the #1 obsessive devotion for them. 

Two, they are totally enraged that the United States would DARE pay attention to things like The Outside World.  Your snide "war on terror" comment reveals the tendency of Libertarians to want a very whiny, pathetic, defenseless America that Just Ignores The Big Bad World To Make It Go Away.  (That worked VERY well in December 1941, didn't it?)

Yeah, its not the federal government spending money on things like funding people's retirements (very poorly at that) or Medicare or Medicaid, or the Corporation for Public Broadcasting or the NEA that's running up the debt.  The country dares to defend itself and enforce laws and societal standards, and damnit, THAT must be stopped at ALL costs.  Right, dlitwin?

 and other such bigger government items with a non-liberal twist. Oh yes, and tax cuts.  Tax cuts, if done properly, increase revenue to the federal government. 


"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME"
- Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)