Obama's cover is "There is no bill", so he can say anything negative about it he wants and be technically truthful at this point.

The Bill with the Illegal Alien Care, and the Abortions, will be another of those overnight sensations we saw with the Budget and Stimulus.

Van Jones is a Quitter - FS

Obama can say anything because he did not submit a bill. In the present form the house bill bears very little resemblece to what Obama described, but dear leader has cover because Nancy Pelosi and her gang are crafting the bill. Mark my words, Obama will sign anything that comes across his desk, just like George Bush did during his first term, and not veto any bill that comes from his democrat congress.

It seems all politicians have a bad case of truth telling when it comes to what is actually in legislation. The names of bills usually have the opposite effect. Patients bill of rights protect doctors and insurance companies. We could play this game all day long but you get the point.

You Lie! 

The Catholic Health Association, the nation's largest group of not-for-profit health care sponsors, systems, and facilities, has announced it will not support Obama's HealthCare proposal. The story was issued by the American Life League Sept 1.

KA-POW! Right in the kisser, abortion fanatics.

Perhaps we missed that story in the national media. Lesse, must be here in the pile somewhere. Nope. Not there. How odd.

Here's the web site with the story

http://www.all.org/article.php?id=12166

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

All of the governmental mischief comes from a fraud. In the wake of the Depression, the Supreme Court issued a logically tortured excuse for the federal government to control private behavior. They latched into the Commerce Clause, and claimed that anyone who consumes their own wheat is "suppressing sales." Therefore, their private behavior is affecting interstate commerce, and therefore Congress has the right to control what a man does on his own property.

Well, I say the same rule must be applied here. The government cannot subsidize abortions. But if the private citizen chooses a private plan that the government would have otherwise had to pay for, is he not doing the exact same thing as the wheat grower? It's a commercial transaction. And if the government is forbidden to subsidize abortions, doesn't that demand that private citizens are therefore forbidden from buying insurance that covers abortions?

The Commerce Clause cuts both ways.

If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,?? 

B.O. only lies when his lips are moving.. or when he's looking at you, or anyone else, or when he's thinking, or when he's asleep, or.....

Of course abortions will be paid for, it's a done deal. The liberals have successfully taken the 'health of the mother' to such ridiculous extents like –"I can't have this baby because I will be depressed if I can't go clubbing at night", and they get away with it. Those same ridiculous measures will apply to Obamacare and to the onerous requirements the Bamster will place on private insurance in order for them to participate in his 'exchange'.

We need to successfully challenge the 'health of the mother' loophole before Obamacare can be addressed.