As most NewsBusters readers are aware, former Virginia Sen. George Allen's re-election campaign in 2006 -- and likely his entire political career -- was destroyed when media members spent months focusing attention on a word he uttered that likely nobody in the nation had ever heard of prior to that point.
At the forefront of such politically motivated obsession was the Washington Post which according to LexisNexis mentioned the word "macaca" along with Allen's name in 107 articles prior to Election Day 2006.
Now, according to the Washington Examiner's Michael Barone, the Post might be trying to do the same thing to the Republican candidate in the Virginia governor's race, Bob McDonnell:
Item number one on the Macaca Watch is the Sunday front page story on the thesis Bob McDonnell wrote in 1989 at Regent University where he obtained a masters degree in public policy and a law degree. This is, as the story acknowledged, a publicly available document and its contents would certainly be a legitimate part of an article on McDonnell’s background and the evolution of his political views. But the first paragraph of the story, prominently on the front page, sends the culturally liberal voters of Northern Virginia in the Post’s local circulation area a pretty clear message: you better not vote for this guy. He went to an “evangelical” school (Regent University Law School), described feminists as “detrimental” and “said government policy should favor married couples over ‘cohabitors, homosexuals or fornicators.’”
Item number two on the Macaca watch is Tuesday’s front page story headlined “Governor’s Race Erupts Over McDonnell’s Past View.” The “eruption” consists of a bunch of emails sent out by Democrats quoting from McDonnell’s thesis and a McDonnell conference call with reporters answering questions—pretty routine campaign stuff, hardly front page material. [...]
The obvious agenda here is to raise the specter that if McDonnell is elected, all women in Virginia will be fired from their jobs and forced to stay home knitting or driving car pool. We’ll see how much longer the Post can keep this story on the front page.
We'll be watching as well.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I live in Virginia
September 1, 2009 - 14:11 ET by candanceThe Democrats are desperate to stop McDonnell. Creigh Deeds had a slight lead over him early in the summer. Then Obama came here to campaign with him, and that's when he made that famous comment about how conservatives need to shut up. Deeds did a nosedive.
All the sudden, Deeds starts talking about Bush. How convenient. McDonnell is Bush's lackey, he'll govern just like Bush, he's friends with Bush, he liked Bush's tax cuts, etc. Quite a change of pace from the campaign he had six weeks ago.
The Democrats are desperate to hold on to Virginia, and it's showing.
ETA - They've been hitting the abortion thing hard too, saying McDonnell will "take Virginia back in time" on feminine issues. Again, none of this started until a few weeks ago.
Jim Webb
September 1, 2009 - 14:14 ET by kgVirginia Democrat Senator Jim Webb whose "novels disturbingly and consistently – indeed, almost uniformly –
portray women as servile, subordinate, inept, incompetent, promiscuous,
perverted, or some combination of these" gets a great big WaPo Pass!
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/jim_webbs_dirty_books/
"DumbAssity of Dope"
This won't become an issue
September 1, 2009 - 14:56 ET by G. MayThis won't become an issue until Webb switches back over to Republican.
Just finished reading the piece
September 1, 2009 - 14:35 ET by Calypso Jonesthat WaPo says belittles women. Ninety some pages including the bibliography, notes etc. NOT A WORD, in the entire paper suggests any such thing. The post must be slipping. Seems this might have potentially given deeds a temporary lift if they ran it in october instead of september seeing as how WaPo readers would not have waded thru the thesis in the first place and would have just taken the Post's word for it.
Desperation rears it's ugly
September 1, 2009 - 15:14 ET by bigtimerDesperation rears it's ugly head once again.
'Go Green...Recycle Congress'
....and where is Barry and
September 1, 2009 - 15:46 ET by midnight cowboy....and where is Barry and Michelle's thesis along with the rest of their collegiate material? Oh yeah, locked up with Hillary's thesis in sealed files along with other incriminating documents for no one to see. How convenient. Will the republicans please grow ap pair of 'nads and level the playing field on go on offense?
I think it should be a
September 2, 2009 - 01:07 ET by Clear thinkerI think it should be a requirement for any politician running in 2010. If someone is asking to see your thesis, tell them the following... "I will when Obama shows us his".
LMAO!
http://iamnotaracist.wordpress.com/
D*mn right... You really
September 2, 2009 - 01:17 ET by JerD*mn right...
You really don't know a person until you read what he or she thought about Beowulf.
Jer
Let the mudslinging begin...
September 1, 2009 - 16:32 ET by PrairieSkyHere it comes...This is just one of the opening salvos of what's coming regarding the elections in the next couple of years. The Dems are scared stiff of losing the Virginia governorship, and they will do just about anything to hold onto it.
"The problem is not that people are taxed too little...the problem is that government spends too much." ~President Ronald Reagan
McDonnell said it 20 years
September 2, 2009 - 00:58 ET by WisdomMcDonnell said it 20 years ago so I agree that it shouldn't be used like it was said yesterday. But you have to admit it is a pretty outrageous statement to say something like "government policy should favor married couples over ‘cohabitors, homosexuals or fornicators.'" So the govt. is supposed to tell us when to fornicate?
And George Allen killed his political career and potential run for the '08 GOP ticket himself with his own ignorance. If the first thing you can think to say when seeing a non-white person is a racial slur, then you don't deserve to be in public office, sorry.
more caca
September 2, 2009 - 07:26 ET by AgnosticStraight from the President Barak Obama retaliatory game plan of - I don't know the facts but I'm right and the other guy is acting stupid. None of the 'facts' you've gleaned from the talking posts are correct but are indeed shortened versions of someone's opinion about what the facts. All sides do this but the liberal media has built it into the art form of bias that we see today.
A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections
Don't know how that has
September 2, 2009 - 11:15 ET by WisdomDon't know how that has anything to do with a Barack Obama "game plan". Can you explain to me what was incorrect that I claimed as fact?
My opinions were McDonnell made a pretty outrageous statement (the cohabitators/fornicators part), Allen killed his political career with that statement, and because of his racial slur he doesn't deserve to be in office.
'game plan'
September 2, 2009 - 11:28 ET by AgnosticI refer to the statement, I don't know the facts but the police acted stupidly. The same type of logic President Obama used seems to be driving the attack on McDonnell and previously on Allen.
In all of this I'm not agreeing with either candidate on what they said or what they meant only that because of the desire to create 'hit' pieces political opponents and the media took a single word used by Allen and turned it the greatest harm to mankind since the dawn of time. There were several sides to that story and there was a quick apology from Allen stating that he did not know the racial aspects of the term. True or not if he was a Democrat it would have been buried in two days tops.
McDonnell wrote opinions several years ago while immersed in a school of thought and it was written to a specific audience. Besides did you actually read it? What I've read is not near as bad as portrayed but I haven't read it all and besides he is a Republican so he deserves it, right?
A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections
"So the govt. is supposed to tell us when to fornicate"?
September 2, 2009 - 07:42 ET by SickofLibsHow do you get "when" out of that? It's "with who."
McDonnell's (20-year old) opinion is shared by the majority today, even in ultra-liberal California as evidenced by Prop 8.
Sorry, but you are in the minority.
I wasn't referring to the
September 2, 2009 - 11:08 ET by WisdomI wasn't referring to the his use of "homosexuals" in that statement. That is fine. I'm referring to his use of "cohabitators and fornicaters"