You mean actual objective programming on a massive liberal spending/powergrab/citizenry-control/massive-govt-dependency bill?

Ha! I was thinking the same thing, bt.

Thanks for the tip Noel. Should be worth watching.

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."

—Margaret Thatcher

I would like to see an objective, completely scientific study regarding Tower 7.  Conspiracies abound all over the place, but no matter what regarding Towers 1 and 2, the truther will always move to "what about Tower 7 that wasn't even hit?"  I think a study of that, similar to this one posted, would be interesting, and answer that question.

the steel beams when the building were being constructed had only been covered partially the way up because some environmentalists claimed that asbestos is so harmful(after being covered in concrete) to the users of the buildings so it could not be used anymore. so a lil more than halfway to 3/4s up the beams were covered with asbestos, the planes stategically hit above the area where the asbestos had not been installed, in the environmentalists claim to protect peoples lives. would this have prevented the fall of the buildings? maybe not, but it might have given many more hours or even a few days before the metal had heated and weakend before they fell allowing more to be saved.

fyi environmentalists also wouldn't allow more efficient cfcs to be used to cool the tanks on the space shuttle, resulting in the big insulation and ice sheets to fall off the tanks now and punch holes and destroy them on reentry.

yes a fine job those environmentalists are doing. i think their actions could have actually led to more peoples deaths than people they have saved.

fyi if you know of any truther out there that says fire can't melt steel(when for the buildings all it had to do was weaken), recall to them the hinderburg steel frame blimp that burned(hydrogen doesn't even burn as hot or as long as all the plastics do in a contained building), or for instance any old lumber yard that catches fire(like a weekly event) they normally have an open steel frame cover, they melt very nicely, but the best thing is to have your truther buddy hold a wad of steel wool, and they must hold it as you light it and have them explain their full theory of how steel can't melt in fire. 

lunaticcringeradio

Not to nitpick, but those were in fact two fully loaded 767s.  I can only imagine what would happen if 747-400s hit them. 

Back in the 1960s when they were designed, the largest commercial planes in the world at the time were the 707 and the DC-8.  The events of 11 September 2001 were literally beyond imagining for those who designed and built the towers. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

   This is the insaneness of the 9/11 truthers. Steel only has to soften and lose a portion of it's tensile strength. Much as candle wax gets soft at temperatures lower than the actual melting point of wax.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Certain liberals hate Bush, Cheney, etc with a consuming passion (sorry about the apparent pun).  They cook up (oops) one theory tying their hate objects to this heinous atrocity; and when that does not work, they cook up another (oops again).  They start with their much needed conclusion, and then work bass-ackwards pushing and tugging on the puzzle pieces like hell to make them flesh out their kooked up theories, because the one thing – perhaps the only thing – they know for sure is that their hate object must be to blame for 9/11.

Oh, and a key element is that all of these explanations are first and foremost rational, because, you know, liberals (a heavy preponderance of whom are college professors in this case) are “smart” (don’t cha know), and not like those other people.

All this lends substantiation to another theory; namely, that Liberalism is a sickness.

- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler for your portfolio management.

LOL Fl...

That's what I was saying above...GMTA.   ;-)

Obama's a Community Agitator, a walking, talking destroyer. ~ Rush Limbaugh

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 86% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.

Wow.  As if everyone descended from a single pair of humans or something like that?

Sounds familiar . . . ;-)

 I didn't figure that National Geographic would be the one to come up with scientific proof that we all descended from Adam and Eve.

Surprise, surprise, surprise.

Thank you.

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

I find that time frame way too short and unconvincing to account for the striking racial type differences between people.

How does this time frame fit in with another recent study which traced our common ancestory back FIVE MILLION years to one female called Eve?

That's a rhetorical question, I don't expect you to have the answer.
 

Thanks Barack! You've done more to promote conservatism than any president since Ronald Reagan (PBUH).

24... Yes, the project which you are referring to is called the Genographic Project. Nat Geo is partnered on this project with IBM and has additional funding as well. I am one of the donors of DNA for the project.

The goal of the project is to map out the migration of the human family using DNA Markers, etc. The project is not complete yet, and DNA collections are going on around the world and being submitted for analysis.

In a nutshell, this is what they think they have. There were groups of humans living in river valleys (Indus, Amazon, Africa, Mesopotania areas, China, etc., well over 200,000 years ago. A major catastrophe, Nat Geo thinks it was the Suma Volcano in Indonesia, wiped out all the people living in the world, EXCEPT those in the area of the Rift Valley in East Africa--Tanzania, Ethiopia area.

As best they can figure out now, using the genetic markers, we all now descend from the people in that area of Africa, the only survivors of that huge catastrophe in Indonesia.

So in a sense, there was an "Adam" and an "Eve" from which we all descend, and in the material Nat Geo sent to me as a participant in their study, they use those terms.

These survivors seemed very different from their "cousins" in other parts of the world who were decimated by the volcano. They created sophisticated tools, understood the basic principles of agriculture, created art etc. They seemed far more advanced than those who lost their lives.

They began to migrate from the Rift Valley, following their animals who were foraging outward for food. There was a long period of Global Warming at the time, and the Sahara actually became grasslands, and thus feed for the animals. Much later on, we entered another Ice Age and the Sahara became impenetrable for them.

This is where it gets interesting. As they moved toward what is now roughly Israel, the groups broke up. Some went West, toward the Mediterranean and ultimately Europe, etc. Others split off East and migrated to Eurasia, Asia, China, and eventually Australia and the Pacific.

It would seem that, as DNA markers made their physical changes on these humans to accomodate cold weather, desert living, etc., we began to develop different physical characteristics.

There's is still a lot of work to be done on the project, but it is an extremely interesting piece of work.

My own results indicate that my ancestors went from the Rift Valley, north toward the Eastern Mediterranean area, then on to the islands off Greece, then to middle Europe.

The project keeps participants updated as new data is developed, so there will be more information sent to me as more participants' DNA is analyzed.

As an added bonus, you can plug in your DNA in the Family Tree genealogy site, and find people who "have" your DNA, more or less. Thus far there are four people who have my DNA pattern in the world.

This is way, way, way , way more than you wanted to know about all this, but you might find it interesting.

Here's the Genographic website:

https://genographic....

No citizen's right to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, or property is safe as long as Obama is President of the United States.

  Could you please explain to the rest of the class what you are on about?

...he states it is not scientificially possible for the building to collapse without some outside influence. Yes. A 747 with a full load of fuel is most definitely an outside influence.

 And please don't give us links to entire websites full of writings and videos as some kind of clue as to what you are on about.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

What movie are YOU watching? Didn't see this claim anywhere in the movie or at that link.