That old fart has really been chugging down the Blue Kool-Aid.  Someone get this man some meds!

This, from a guy who supports people who side with the jihadists who want Israel off the map and every Jewish person either enslaved or killed.  Oy vey!

Malloy and Buchanan are both blithering idiots. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

The negative effect of News Busters:

Way too much ink and time for a nobody.  Who cares what he says or thinks.

Here is some of the data from one of my many posts about Buchanan and his hatred of Jews.

Buchanan has challenged the historical record that thousands of Jews were gassed to death by diesel exhaust at Treblinka:

"Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxide to kill anybody." -New Republic, 10/22/90

Pat Buchanan's website
espouses views that most Americans would find distasteful. Not only
does he blame AIPAC (his code word for Jews) for pushing America into
the Iraq war but he also blames Israel for 9/11:

So here it is again for those of you unaware, that on
9-11, the largest foreign spy ring ever uncovered in the US was in the
process of being rounded up, and that evidence linking these arrested
Israeli spies to 9-11 has been classified by the US Government!

Of course that statement is not different from previous statements which blamed American Jews for the Iraq war

In Buchanan’s essay, “Whose War”
where he blames the Iraq war on a bunch of mostly Jewish public figures
such as Bill Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Max Boot and Richard Pearled.
Buchanan has charged those public figures with” colluding with Israel
to ignite those wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with
deliberately damaging U.S. relations with every state in the Arab world
that defies Israel or supports the Palestinian people's right to a
homeland of their own” he goes on to say:

“For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that
holds nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us
to survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations between the
West and Islam? Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel,
Sharon, Likud....Moving through Congress, powered by the Israeli lobby,
is House Resolution 362, which demands that President Bush impose a
U.S. blockade of Iran, an act of war.Is it not time the American people
were consulted on the next war that is being planned for us"

Israel
Lobby is the PC way of saying JEWS. In July 2006, during Israel's
conflict with Lebanon, he accused President Bush of "subcontracting
U.S. policy out to Tel Aviv, thus making Israel the custodian of our
reputation and interests in the Middle East." Further, he said that
when Bush was asked if he would urge Israel to restrain air strikes, he
"sounded less like the leader of the Free World than some bellicose
city councilman from Brooklyn Heights." (TheAmericanCause Where are the Christians, by Patrick J. Buchanan, Tuesday, July 18, 2006)

Sean, you dont want to believe me then believe the William F Buckley Jr.  In Search of Anti-Semitism" December 31, 1991, subsequently made the cornerstone of a book, William F. Buckley, Jr. concluded, that Buchanan was indeed an anti-Semite:

I find it impossible to defend Pat Buchanan against the
charge that what he did and said during the period under examination
amounted to anti-Semitism, whatever it was that drove him to say and do
it: most probably, an iconoclastic temperament.

Please don't tell me he is only Anti-Israel...Buchanan doesn't perceive a difference between Israel and the Jews:

There is a legitimate grievance in my view of white
working-class people that every time, one very issue, that the black
militants loud-mouth it, we come up with more money.... If we can give
50 Phantoms  to the Jews, and a multi-billion dollar welfare program
for the blacks...why not help the Catholics save their collapsing
school system." (Boston Globe, 1/4/92)

MSNBC Has much
to be ashamed of, not the least of which is their Hypocrisy. Don Imus
got fired for making a racial remark, yet their chief political
correspondent Pat Buchanan is a racist.

In 1969, Buchanan urged Nixon not to visit King's widow,
Coretta Scott King, because he felt, "It would outrage many, many
people who believe Dr. King was a fraud and a demagogue, and perhaps
worse. ... It does not seem to be in the interests of national unity
for the president to lend his national prestige to the argument that
this divisive figure is a modern saint memo dated April 1, 1969, quoted
in AP wire story: Buchanan's Positions ... In His Own Words Charleston
Gazette March 03, 1996.

Back in 1991 he accused the former head of the KKK of theft.

"David Duke is busy stealing from me. I have a mind to
go down there and sue that dude for intellectual property theft."
(Manchester, NH Union Leader, December 15, 1991).

In a memo to President Nixon, Buchanan suggested that

"integration
of blacks and whites -- but even more so, poor and well-to-do -- is
less likely to result in accommodation than it is in perpetual
friction, as the incapable are placed consciously by government side by
side with the capable." (Washington Post, 1/5/92)

Shame On Human Events. A usually fine website, but on Holocaust Remembrance Day it published the usual anti-Jewish venomous column by Pat Buchanan which inferred that the Jews living in the Middle East have no right to defend itself:

In 2006, Ehud Olmert used the border ambush of an Israel
patrol and the kidnapping of two soldiers to launch a second Lebanon
war. Hezbollah lost hundreds of fighters, but its stature soared as it
became the first Arab force to fight Israel and emerge unbroken and
unbeaten. And the thousands of Hezbollah rockets that rained down on
the Galilee destroyed forever the myth of Israeli invulnerability.

USED?
Buchanan thinks that Olmert woke up in the morning and said Gee, I hope
Hezbollah attacks so I can Start a war? What about the all of the
rocket attacks and other Hezbollah terror that immediately preceded the
2006 war?  How about the fact that Israel left Lebanon SIX YEARS
EARLIER. And it wasn't until Israel left that Hezbollah gained power. 
But of course that would ruin Buchanan's main argument the Jews are war
mongers:

Now, in the aftermath of the war on Gaza, which almost
all in Israel supported, come the second thoughts. Of 1,400 dead from
air strikes and invasion, one-third were Palestinian children. Al
Jazeera video of the dead and dying civilians, juxtaposed with video of
Barack Obama enjoying a round of golf in scenic Hawaii, were
devastating for the U.S. image, as U.S. weapons had been used by Israel
to deliver the death and destruction.

As opposed to the
Iranian weapons that were used to deliver death and destruction on
Israel. Oh I get it he is using the phony "disproportionate response"
argument. So you tell me Pat, how many Hamas rockets makes it OK for
Israel to respond? Was the A Bomb Dropping on Hiroshima
"disproportionate response?"  How many Nazis was it OK to kill in WWII  Sorry I forgot for Pat that one is close to home.

Like Hezbollah, Hamas has emerged more entrenched, while
the moderates like Mahmoud Abbas are portrayed as Quislings. Now, a
rift has appeared between Obama, who has called for a lifting of the
Israeli blockade of Gaza to allow aid and commerce to flow freely, and
an Israel determined to maintain its choke hold on Hamas.

Buchanan forgets the fact that the reason for the
"choke hold" is to prevent more weapons of terror from getting into
Hamas hands.

In none of these three wars was the Israel Air Force
challenged or the IDF defeated. In casualties, Hezbollah and Hamas,
Lebanese and Gazans, all suffered many times more dead and wounded.

Yet, looking back, were any of these wars necessary? Did any make
Israel more secure than when the Lebanese border was quiet? Does the
future look brighter today than in 1982, after the peace with Egypt and
withdrawal from Sinai, before the war on Beirut?

Lets examine for a second what happened since 1982,
Terrorist appeasers Buchanan ruled the day, some appeased because of
the taste of Arab Oil, others like this columnist appeased because it
would mean more DEAD JEWS.

Three months before launching the Gaza war, Olmert told
two journalists that Israel, to achieve lasting peace, would have to
return the Golan Heights to Syria and almost all of the West Bank to
the Palestinians, and give East Jerusalem back to the Arabs who live
there.

"In the end, we will have to
withdraw from the lion's share of the territories, and for the
territories we leave in our hands, we will have to give compensation in
the form of territories within the state of Israel at a ratio that is
more or less 1:1."

Like Rabin in 1994
and Ehud Barak in 2000, two of the most decorated soldiers in Israel's
history, Olmert had concluded, late in life, that it is either land for
peace, with all its risks, or endless war for Israel.

Really....
Rabin and Barak?  Begin Gave Back the Sinai, Sharon left Gaza, NO PEACE
CAME. Maybe Buchanan's terrorist friends want a little more than "Land
for Peace"

Yet, after that interview, he launched the December
blitz and invaded Gaza, killing and wounding 5,000 Palestinians, making
of the Strip a zone of permanent hatred and making Hamas, whom he
sought to dethrone and undeniably wounded, even stronger.

Folks there above is the inhumanity of the article
allowed in Human Events. Not mentioned is the 7,600 rockets/mortars in
the three years since Sharon left Gaza. Human Events believes that
Israel should not defend herself. Human Events' Message to Jews on
Holocaust Remembrance Day is SIT BACK AND DIE.

http://yidwithlid.bl...

Sammy Benoit

Yidwithlid

Http://yidwithlid.bl...

                   This idiot is just trying to boost his popularity and double his listeners to four.                       Angry Mobster

Malloy is a self-syndicated talk show host who is on only a handful of am radio stations mostly in California and mostly very low-powered so his listenership is quite limited. Possibly the bulk comes from satellite listeners. However the recent increase in the amount and vitriol of his over-the-top comments seems to indicate acts of desperation from a man who realizes his career is pretty much over so he desires to go out with bang and not a whimper.

However hardly anyone cares.

I may be wrong on the latter but I forsee the following as good possibilities:

1) some and perhaps even most of the low-powered AM stations carrying his program may drop him and/or are already in the process of dropping his show (I'm not going to guess about the satellite carrier since I don't know how that is set up);

and

2) Malloy may publically announce his "retirement" soon.

Time will tell. But is indicates the last gasp effort of a very desperate radio talk show host that hardly anyone knows.