Rush Limbaugh Sits Down With Sean Hannity

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

Last Wednesday and Thursday, the Fox News Channel aired Sean Hannity's interview with conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

As many readers may have missed either all or part of these segments, both are herein presented for your review.

What follows are videos from both nights embedded below the fold along with full transcripts:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: Rush Limbaugh has been the focus of the political world of recent months. He has been viciously attacked by the left and even criticized by so-called members of the Republican Party like Colin Powell.

I sat down with Rush earlier today to get his thoughts on all the criticism that he has faced and his reaction to Obama's Muslim nation comment. And also his thoughts on the country's turn toward socialism.

Here is part one of my exclusive interview with nationally syndicated radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

HANNITY: Rush, great to see you.

RUSH LIMBAUGH, TALK SHOW HOST: Great to see you, Sean. Welcome to paradise.

HANNITY: It is paradise. You look great. I was last here in February.

LIMBAUGH: Right. I weighed 290 in February. And it was fun, believe me. It was fun getting here.

(LAUGHTER)

It really was. It got to be too much. So I've lost 58 pounds now and I'm at 232, so I figure 32 more to go. I want to look like you.

HANNITY: Because I work out a lot like your brother so...

LIMBAUGH: I don't work out at all. I play golf and that's it.

HANNITY: Listen, you've been commenting a lot on your show about state-run media. You actually used the phrase, "I have become an American pinata."

LIMBAUGH: Yes.

HANNITY: The new game in the beltway is to bash Rush. You're in the news almost every day. What's going on?

LIMBAUGH: Well, I think it's primarily because the Republican Party or the - whatever - the opposition to Obama has not surfaced politically in Washington. It's thus - you know, those of us who are consistent on the radio or on television criticizing, we become the focus. For whatever reason, the Republican Party - at any level - has chosen not to take Obama on and chosen not to try to attach him to any of the disastrous things that he's doing.

I do. And of course, Liberals need a villain. They need a demon. They can't win a debate in the arena of ideas. They need a demon and they need somebody to villainies and demonize and I'm it. And I'm happy to be.

HANNITY: But apparently there's even focus group that it was polled by Greenberg and Carville and the rest of these guys...

LIMBAUGH: Yes. You know what? Here's the way I look at that. I'm a guy on the radio. I can't raise anybody's taxes. I can't send anybody's kids off to war. I can't take over General Motors. I can't do anything. I can't exert control over one other person's life - I can't. And yet they're polling me.

I take this is a major career achievement. They are polling me as though I am a legitimate political figure seeking office. So the result of the poll, whatever the approval number is, is irrelevant to me.

HANNITY: Your ratings have never been higher.

LIMBAUGH: No, they haven't. And - you know, we're not having a recession on our business side either.

HANNITY: I agree.

LIMBAUGH: So they can do all they want to try to make me this demon and villain. But to me, it's a major career achievement to be polled as though I'm a political figure that can change people's lives with power.

I mean, I can change their lives with inspiration or influence. But I have no power over anybody.

HANNITY: All right. So last time I'm here, I asked you this question that ended up - people talked about it for how many months. And the question was: Obama and your views, they're the antithesis. And I said, all right, so do you want him to succeed? You gave a very long answer that got reduced to "Rush wants Obama to fail."

LIMBAUGH: Right.

HANNITY: Which wasn't what you said.

LIMBAUGH: Well, in a sense it was - but it was. I don't hide from it. I do want and I still want Obama to fail.

Let me try it this way. And I've seen your interviews with that great guy from the U.K. - what's his name?

HANNITY: Hannan.

LIMBAUGH: Right. And I have all these other people - the Republicans will say, well that's a horrible thing. We don't want the president of the United States to fail. We want our president to succeed.

OK. You want him to succeed.

Does that mean you want Sonia Sotomayor on the Supreme Court? Does that mean you want the government running the mortgage business in America, having control over most of the banking system? Do you want the government making automobiles that nobody wants to buy? Because that's Obama succeeding.

If you want the president, Barack Obama, to succeed then you want the government taking over more and more of the average daily life of the American people.

I don't want that. I define America succeeding by virtue of Obama failing.

I love America. I want everybody to succeed. He's making it harder for that to happen, particularly, Sean, the middle class.

We can talk about what he plans to do to the rich, the people who make $250,000 or more. But he's closing off the American dream to people. It's the middle class in this country that historically has made this the greatest country on Earth because of their pursuit for the American dream - however they define it.

Their pursuit of excellence, trying to be the best they can be, working hard, and to move themselves up the economic ladder. He's just shut that off.

HANNITY: It's interesting here. But you were very clear. You had said if he adds Reagan to FDR.

LIMBAUGH: Right.

HANNITY: And to Lincoln, that - a lot of context and texture now has evolved. A lot of the things you're saying.

LIMBAUGH: Right.

HANNITY: He's apologizing for America's arrogance. He's taken over car companies. They want to dictate CEO pay. All of these things have been unfolding.

LIMBAUGH: Right.

HANNITY: Socialism is America, the Obama vision for America.

LIMBAUGH: And fascism. We must not be afraid to use that word either. It's a combination of the two.

No, I don't back away from anything I've said about President Obama and his policies and his plans. I don't know him personally. I don't wish him ill as a human being. But he's my president. He's all of our president. His ideas and his policies matter.

I can't remember who said this, but you know this is something that I've thought long and hard about repeating in this interview with you: If Al Qaeda wants to demolish the America we know and love, they'd better hurry because Obama's beating them to it.

He wants to impose his values on America. He's running around apologizing for the country.

Sean, I'm telling you, this guy has grown up - he was taught that there's something inherently immoral and unjust about America. And now that he leads it, he thinks it's great. Finally, America is moral. Finally, America is just. And it's his duty to run around the world and apologize because he thinks, he's been taught that everybody around the world hates us and doesn't like us to the degree that he doesn't like the country the way it was constituted.

HANNITY: Well, he said - when he went to France, that's when he first used the term "America is arrogant." He goes to Prague, talks about a world vision, a world without nuclear weapons. The morning after, hours after, North Korea fires a missile over Japan. Chavez, Ortega - sits through a 55-minute diatribe.

LIMBAUGH: OK, stop right there. Two things.

HANNITY: Yes.

LIMBAUGH: Two things: First the nuke business.

HANNITY: Yes.

LIMBAUGH: It's OK for Iran to have nuclear power. It's OK for the North Koreans to have nuclear power, as long as neither nation makes a bomb out of it; right?

Well, what are we doing? We're going to windmills. We're going solar power. We're going to build little lawnmowers with two seats on them that nobody wants to drive at his direction. We're letting the rest of the world go nuclear and we can't because of a single movie, "The China Syndrome"?

Hugo Chavez - you don't know this today because you got in late last night, and you've had to prepare for this interview - Hugo Chavez, a story just broke this morning made a joke. He said: "Fidel Castro and I, if we're not careful, are going to end up to the right of Obama."

HANNITY: Wow.

LIMBAUGH: This guy has nationalized General Motors. I mean, Hugo Chavez is praising Obama as being further left than he, Chavez, is. Now, there's a running competition. You can keep a chart here of who's nationalizing more, Obama or Chavez.

Now you could say Chavez has nationalized more businesses, but the ones that Obama is in the process of taking over are probably worth more. So it's probably neck and neck.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

HANNITY: And coming up, more of my exclusive interview with Rush Limbaugh. Plus the same president who insists our country is not a Christian nation is now calling us a Muslim nation?

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HANNITY: More of my exclusive interview with Rush Limbaugh straight ahead. Plus we have the outrageous video of John Murtha erupting when a reporter asked him to address the latest charges of corruption against him.

And President Obama has said the U.S. is no longer a Christian nation. And now that his worldwide apology tour is continuing in the Mideast, he says we are one of the world's largest Muslim nations.

Really? Straight ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HANNITY: We continue now with more of my interview with Rush Limbaugh:

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

HANNITY: You've been in the middle of this running dialogue, let's say, with Colin Powell, and he's saying, "No, Rush isn't going to get his way." I thought that the Republicans had their moderate candidate in the last election.

Conservatives didn't win the nomination, it was John McCain, who was a moderate, who Colin Powell said he liked and now Colin Powell is mad at you. Colin Powell voted for Obama.

LIMBAUGH: Yes - again, this is something that somebody smarter than I am is going to have to explain to me. How is it that all of these quasi-conservatives and Republicans are running around oh, my gosh, we've got to keep Colin Powell in our party.

Would somebody tell me what Colin Powell has done for the party? Name an issue that he has championed for Republican Party. I can't think of one. Name anything Obama is doing that Colin Powell has disagreed with. I can't think of one.

You're right. Colin Powell endorsed - strategically - at a point in the campaign to destroy the McCain campaign, endorsed Obama. Why in the world do we need somebody who lovingly voted Democrat, endorsed the Democrat, after the Republican Party nominated the classically moderate candidate, Colin Powell says this party needs to nominate?

Well, we've got to get the Hispanic vote, Rush. We - that's why we can't be too hard on Sotomayor. Right. Well, we had a president and a presidential candidate author amnesty for illegals. And that didn't get us the Hispanic vote, did it?

So pray tell, what in the world has Colin Powell ever done for the Republican Party that makes him so valuable?

HANNITY: How do you go - my question for him is, how do you go from supporting Reagan - whose values are the antithesis of Obama's - or even W, to supporting the socialism, the world view of Barack Obama?

LIMBAUGH: I have the answer. I have all the answers, and I'll explain them to you.

(LAUGHTER)

HANNITY: OK. That's why we're asking the questions. Go ahead.

(LAUGHTER)

LIMBAUGH: Colin Powell, I think, is trying to - and he's succeeded now - re-ingratiate himself with the Washington/New York establishment. I think two things were a factor in his endorsement of Obama.

First one is race, clearly. Nobody has the guts to say that, but I mean what else could it be because we just discussed the ideal moderate Republican candidate was nominated, and Powell is off to (INAUDIBLE) to support Obama, so race is clearly a factor.

But also and very close to this, I think Powell is humiliated over the fact he was sent to the United Nations to make the case for weapons of mass destruction and then none were found.

And I think he's profoundly embarrassed about that and his life since has been about rehabilitating himself and his image with the people who hated the Iraq war, who mock Bush on weapons of mass destruction, so this is about a legacy. This is about Powell trying to rehab himself with the people that matter most to him, the D.C. establishments.

So those are the two explanations. It's not about issues.

HANNITY: Sotomayor, about her, and we know - we all know the quote about what she said about Latina women with the richness of their experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male.

You said those comments absolutely disqualify her and it made a lot of news, quote, "reverse racism," because you said that's reverse racism.

Why don't you expand?

LIMBAUGH: And I got a little grief from people for saying that there's no such thing as reverse racism, just call her a racist, so - and they're right. That is a racist thing to say and it's bigoted. And she would bring, no question about it, racism and bigotry to the court, if she is confirmed.

But, Sean, I've been thinking about this, and there's something else going on with Sonia Sotomayor. We don't know what she thinks about Roe versus Wade. She hasn't said. Now we know that she's Catholic. We know that she's Puerto Rican - Hispanic Catholic. They tend to be devout.

She has no record. She hasn't said much about it. If, and I'm speaking for me personally, if I learned, if I could be assured, that she is actually a pro-life person and does think that Roe versus Wade is bad constitutional law, and if she would rule on the right side on the life issue, I might look past this racism and even deal with that, but that's something very, very important to me, and she could be stealth in that regard.

And I know that - well, there's no record. Normally most liberals, they love to tell you how pro-choice they are and abortion. She doesn't have any of that.

HANNITY: She is a reflection of Obama's racial identity.

LIMBAUGH: Absolutely. I think Obama wants his mirror image on the court. He wants a radical on the court. Obama talks about the Constitution in terms of he's constrained by it. And numerous speeches he's said Al Qaeda not constrained by the Constitution. He has referred to the Constitution as a charter of negative rights.

Now when you and I hear that, how in the world can the Constitution be negative? To him the Constitution doesn't spell out what government can do. The Constitution limits government. He doesn't like that.

I think he wants, and he's said on many occasions, that the court needs to take - he hadn't done enough on redistribution, it needs to use empathy in the law. He wants people on the court who will make policy. She is - that's why I think the hearings on Sotomayor ought to be full bore whether she gets confirmed or not, full bore. Find out who she is, all about her, because we'll learn and be able to inform the American people who Obama is. That's key.

HANNITY: But it is interesting because that term racist, racial is radioactive, but - and Chuck Schumer said, he made the comment that, you do so at your own peril if you go after Judge Sotomayor, and I found that comment pretty interesting because I'm thinking well, that didn't stop you and your fellow Democrats from going after Miguel Estrada, remember, the - he's a Latino memo or Clarence Thomas or even Alberto Gonzales.

LIMBAUGH: Well, see, that's another thing. They tell us you go easy on her because - our own people say we've got to go easy on her because we want the Hispanic vote. Really? The left went after Clarence Thomas, tried to destroy him. Did they lose black votes? No. They went after Estrada, all the Hispanics you mentioned. Did they lose the Hispanic vote? No.

They're just trying to shut us up. A racist is a racist. You know, they may think, Sean, it's too shrill to say. They may wish I would tone it down, but nobody has refuted the charge.

Nobody has said no, she's not a racist. In fact, the White House has said if she could do it again, she'd say it differently. So they want a do-over. With Obama saying that...

HANNITY: Would you get a do-over?

LIMBAUGH: No. None of us get a do-over.

HANNITY: Never.

LIMBAUGH: No.

HANNITY: Did Frank Ricci get a do-over?

LIMBAUGH: No. That's the point. But - she brings racism and bigotry to the court. There's no other way to describe it.

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: And tonight, we continue with my part two of my exclusive sit-down interview with Rush Limbaugh, where Rush reveals whom he has chosen to take his place as the supposed head of the GOP and why President Obama could soon own the national media. Let's check this out.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

HANNITY: You came on the air one day and you said, "I resign as the head of the Republican Party."

RUSH LIMBAUGH, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Titular head.

HANNITY: Sorry.

LIMBAUGH: Titular head of the Republican Party.

HANNITY: Quoted accurately, yes.

LIMBAUGH: Because I was not the head of the Republican Party. I was named the head of the Republican Party by the White House, by the Obama White House. What they were trying to do was get Republicans, elected Republicans, to throw me overboard, disavow me.

What they would love to do, Sean, at the White House level is really marginalize mainstream conservatism and mainstream conservatives, because that's the primary opposition to Obama. And if they could gotten a couple of Republicans to go out and say, "Yes, Limbaugh is off the reservation, he's a nut, he's a wacko," it would have been a success and a homerun. So, that's why they named me the titular head.

So, I decided to resign as the titular head of the Republican Party and anoint Powell as - since so many of our brains in the conservative, quasi-conservative media and Republican Party, think he's the model Republican. OK, he's the leader.

HANNITY: Well, if he was so accurate in America's desire for more government, more services, higher taxes, they're willing to pay for them - those are the comments he made - then he seems to be out of sync with even the voters in California, of all places.

LIMBAUGH: Well, that's a - I'm glad you reminded me of that, because he did say Americans want to pay higher taxes and they want bigger government, and then the California vote came. He's clearly - this is my point - he's clearly out of touch, as most people inside the beltway are.

The longer you live in that town, that town becomes your world. And Washington is not America. I mean, it's a great city. There's great things to do there. I don't want people to misunderstand. But the political and social structure of Washington, D.C., there's no resemblance to how life in this country takes place.

Government and everything there is number one, two and three in everybody's lives. And out in the country it ain't.

HANNITY: No.

LIMBAUGH: It's their job. It's their kid's future. It's these kinds of things. And so, the idea that somebody who believes government ought to grow and grow and grow is the ideal candidate or identity factor of the Republican Party is absurd.

HANNITY: Do you see any leaders emerging, some people that you're watching, that you like? You were pretty disposed towards Bobby Jindal for a while.

LIMBAUGH: Yes. You know what I've learned? I'll tell you something. I am - because of this profile, high profile that has been bestowed upon me, I'm not going to mention names.

HANNITY: But are there people you see?

LIMBAUGH: Yes.

HANNITY: There are?

LIMBAUGH: There are.

And I think others are going to emerge as Obamaism continues to happen.

Yes, there are. I think others are going to emerge as Obama continues. I think President Obama is an angry man. They say he's cool and calm and. I think he's cold. I think he's angry.

The people that he ran around with and who mentored him, that matters. You tried to call attention to it. You were the first out of the box with the Reverend Wright and the Bill Ayers stuff. And people didn't want to hear it because they have a cult-like association and attachment to Obama.

But the fact of the matter is, the way to understand him is he wants to return the nation's wealth to its rightful owners. He comes from a belief that those in America who have succeeded have done so on the backs of the poor and the disadvantaged. They've had their wealth stolen from them. That's why he wants to cap CEO pay. That's what he doesn't want them to be flying their jets to Las Vegas. He can take two G-5s and three helicopters to New York for a date that you and I pay for, but if I pay for it, even myself on my airplane, I get castigated because it's somehow not cool.

I think he just - If you want to understand what this man is doing, what his policies are about, returning this nation's wealth into its rightful owners. That's how the UAW, the union, ends up with a major ownership stake in Chrysler and GM.

HANNITY: And debt holder are put aside. Hang on a second. If Karl Rove is right, and he's arrogant, and Rush Limbaugh is right, and he's angry, and Sean Hannity is right, and he's radical - you made the same point as I have - that's frightening for America.

If all of that - because I think it is. I think the America we knew, Rush, I think it is going away, and I don't think people see what's happening. I think by the time it's all finished, we're going to have trouble.

LIMBAUGH: You know, I'm not yet fatalistic about the country. There's still time for this to be stopped. There are the elections of 2010 and there are the elections, of course, of 2012.

If you look at polling data, his approval numbers are pretty steady at 63, 64. That is much, I think, guaranteed by the state-run media, the way they report. But if you look at polls on issues, issue after issue, you'll find that on most of them the majority of the American people, like, don't want Gitmo closed.

They don't want bailouts at General Motors. Most of the American people, a clear majority disagree, policy-wise, with everything he's doing. Yet, has this wildly high approval rating. He's very charismatic, demagogic, and it's not what he says that has people captivated. It's how he says it.

HANNITY: Obama said to the BBC the U.S. can't impose its values on other - you know the quote I'm saying - cannot impose its values on other countries.

LIMBAUGH: Yes. It's a typical Obama straw man argument. He comes up and says, "America, we can't impose our values." Well, when do we?

And what are our values? The next part of the question. What are our values? Freedom...

HANNITY: Liberty.

LIMBAUGH: Democracy. He says those are universal. So after he says we can't impose our values, he defines our values. You can't impose freedom. We liberate people.

Somebody is going to have to tell me, Mrs. Clinton, who's been marginalized, by the way - she's over there at the State Department with nothing to do. She's running around the world, telling other countries they have to do gay rights the way that we do. I think that's imposing our values, his values on the rest of the world.

On other aspect of this, somebody's going to have to convince me I'm wrong. I think Obama has got something against Israel. This - you know, letting Iran do this. Telling Israel it's got to stop imposing values. Hey, Mr. Netanyahu, stop doing your settlements. Stop defending yourself. Who's imposing what on whom?

It's Obama imposing his view of his around the world.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HANNITY: And we continue now with more of my exclusive interview with radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

HANNITY: We saw what happened in California. We see the takeover at GM. They want to monitor CEO pay even for companies that don't get any government money.

LIMBAUGH: Right.

HANNITY: They're taking over banks. They're taking over financial institutions. It is the definition of socialism. What does this mean - let me give you the debt numbers. You know them as well as anybody. We quadruple them in a year. We quadruple the deficit in 10 years. We'll be paying nearly $1 trillion on interest on the debt in 10 years.

What does this mean? As you stand back - you were talking earlier about the middle class and the impact it's going to have on the middle class. What does this Obama economy look like, assuming he doesn't get a second term, after four years of Obama economics?

LIMBAUGH: Well, most of the stimulus spending, for example, doesn't go into effect until 2010. There's a chance that those elections would dial some of that back. But if this man succeeds, Sean, it's going to be 25 years rolling this stuff back.

And if they get nationalized health care, they are going to be able to control every aspect of our lives, because you get in a car the wrong way, it could impact health care costs. If you eat popcorn with coconut oil, it could impact health care costs.

If they get that, then people have no idea the control over their lives the government will exert. And that's got to be stopped. That is intolerable, to go single payer government socialized medicine.

I want to say one other thing, even if I go overtime here. People ask me about the Fairness Doctrine all the time, and I've been watching something here. Newspapers are losing money. Advertising revenue is down, circulation. But radio companies, too, Sean, television companies, their advertising revenues are down.

Now, individual shows, my show is up.

HANNITY: So is mine.

LIMBAUGH: Yours -- but radio stations ownership groups - advertising as a whole is down. Now what happens if they have to file Chapter 11? What if all these radio companies can't make their debt payments next year or the year after that and have to go Chapter 11? If Obama is controlling the banks, and the banks then will or will not lend to the broadcasters and the newspapers to make them solvent, we could reach a point where Obama controls radio and TV, because he will own it by virtue of the banks he controls owning it.

This is a very stealth way - you don't need the Fairness Doctrine; you don't need localism. And people say that will never happen.

Well, did you ever think that government and Obama would be dictating the kind of cars GM and Chrysler make? Did you ever think Obama would be dictating what people on Wall Street can earn? Did you ever think that the mortgage business would be controlled by a single man, Barack Obama? Nobody ever thought that.

So, if you think that the media in this country cannot also be owned by Barack Obama, think again. Well, that's the path we're headed down.

We have to stop and shout, and stop this and oppose it. This is not the America that you and I grew up - I said earlier if Al Qaeda wants to demolish the America we know and love, they'd better hurry, because Obama's beating them to it. I read that in a British column. I think it was the U.K. Telegraph. Now, it resonated with me because this guy is changing the America we've come - I think he's got a big chip on his shoulder.

HANNITY: It's frightening.

LIMBAUGH: It is. It is seriously frightening. And we look out, where are the American people. Sixty-four million or whatever voted for the guy. When are we going to wake up? The Democrats really - the people who voted for him really want this kind of America.

HANNITY: Don't you want the Republicans to wake up. You see, of all the contortions they've been going through about who their head is and whether or not Reagan conservatism needs to be, you know, pushed in the past. And this new modern version of a watered-down conservatism or watered-down Republican Party.

I think Reagan spelled it out pretty well in March of '75 when he said, you know, no pale pastels. Bold colors, bold differences. If they can't distinguish themselves now from Barack Obama and socialism, and Jimmy Carter national security...

LIMBAUGH: Exactly right.

HANNITY: ... This is it.

LIMBAUGH: It is the greatest opportunity they've had to draw that contrast between what Obama represents and what traditionally the Republican Party or conservatism. The problem with the Republican Party is the old guard, country club, blueblood, Rockefeller types are now learning it - the Colin Powell types, the Tom Ridge types. And they want to share in the power. They're content to share it as losers.

The Republican Party right now is not led by conservatives. That's - there are plenty of conservative Republicans in the party, but it's hard for them to get noticed. But you can't wait for the Republican Party, Sean.

HANNITY: Yes.

LIMBAUGH: At some point, somebody in that party is going to emerge and carry the banner forward. In the meanwhile, there's a population out there that has to be told the truth. And if the party's not going to stand up and do it right now, we have to.

And I think at some point they're going to get over their fear. Right now it's still early. We're just past 100 days.

Republicans are still deathly afraid of being criticized for criticizing Obama. They don't want to attach Obama's policies to him, and Obama doesn't either. You know, Obama is still blaming Bush.

I think he's - I think he's just a sitting duck target politically to score major, major points for the traditions and values that made this country great to triumph again.

HANNITY: Listen, he jokes about the Special Olympics. He gives an iPod to the queen and speeches of himself. He flies an airplane over New York and spends 300 grand. He goes on a date with his wife to New York, as you mentioned earlier.

LIMBAUGH: And he's been to all 57 states, and he said that we need to hoist values. It's - I mean, he's got...

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: If George Bush did this...

LIMBAUGH: I know. I know. Well, look, we just have to come to grips. There's a double standard. There's a double - he's loved and adored by the state-run media.

Obama's blaming Bush...

HANNITY: Yes.

LIMBAUGH: ... for all that he inherited. He is escaping so far any attachment to the disasters that he's causing. At some point that is going to change. And that, I think, I'm hopeful, is when the elected class of conservatives and Republicans will rise up and take the baton and run with it.

HANNITY: I don't think there's any way it can't happen. You mentioned earlier I'm optimistic. I think there's going to be a lot of damage done in the meantime, but it's got to happen.

And you know what? A lot of people I think are going to come through and say, "You know what, Rush? You were kind of right about all this stuff."

LIMBAUGH: Yes. You know, I joked the other day. I told people - when I claimed I'm America's pinata. And I said, you know how people always say, "Why didn't somebody tell me?" I'm the guy telling you. And I'm going to keep telling you.

Sean, I'm optimistic, too. You look at FDR and what did we get after FDR? We got 40 years of liberalism. We're not going to have 40 years of liberalism after Obama.

There is an opposition media. There is an opposition to this kind of destruction that's being made to this country, done to the country. Whatever he does, we're going to be able to roll it back. And I don't think he's going to be able to get away with as much as he would like to. There is simply too much attention being brought to bear on it.

So and if - we're America. We are Americans. We still have the freedom to do what we want and to be who we want to be. And you have to be optimistic when you have that kind of ability.

HANNITY: Rush, it's always a pleasure.

LIMBAUGH: Thank you.

HANNITY: I appreciate it.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Rush speaks the truth and doesn't apologize

What I like about Rush is he speaks what he believes and doesn't back down when attacked like our wussypants Republicans in Washington.  Conservative principles cannot be denied.  Liberals can only call names.  That is why you see liberals calling Rush fat but never refuting his ideas.  How pathetic they are. 

Rush needs to speak to the 50,000 patriots who will gather at America's Tea Party at Southfork Ranch in Dallas, TX on July 4th!

www.dallasteaparty.o...

Angry White Dude

www.angrywhitedude.c...

You're right,

You're right, jeff....

Their best attack/defense line is Why should anyone listen to what a fat drug addict says?

Or  even worse, the comedian who made the ED joke.....as if that's a reason no one should listen to someone.

And yet Ted Kennedy embodies the wisdom of all the Sages....

It's too funny.

 

 

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.  -Bart Simpson

 

Mother, I wrote about this today on AWD

Liberals are not very smart.  They rely on name calling and cheap shots.  But their votes count the same as ours.  I wrote what we're up against today on my blog:

http://angrywhitedud...

Angry White Dude

Liberals are in control of both houses of Congress

And the Presidency. If liberals are dumb, what have conservative's been - stupid, lazy, or incompetent ? They have been the  loser. Why, if liberals are so dumb? No one wins a battle by underestimating their opponent, and that seems to be a favorite indulgence on the right these days. If liberals are dumb, why are they winning?

I didn't leave the Republican party, they kicked me out.

If liberals are dumb, why

If liberals are dumb, why are they winning

The Federal Govt. control of Educational System for the past 40 years, the communist news networks, community activists like ACORN and sister groups, Leftist activist Judges in varios states, illegal aliens, voter fraud, The Unions Heads, the power of George Soros and ilk, along with illegal campaign $$$ along with various formed groups to bundle and wash their $$$, Congress-critters, and RINOs.

...and we are paying for all of this...and will for a long, long time to come.

 Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Doesn't sound dumb to me

 Does that sound dumb to you? What is the plus in underestimating a foe ?

I didn't leave the Republican party, they kicked me out.

Troll on shawn...I'm not in

Troll on shawn...I'm not in the mood to play with a glittering jewel of colossal ignorance like you tonight.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

How is asking a question

 How is asking the simple question "How is underestimating a foe , a plus?" trolling? You appear to not have the sense to debate. Your sense of entitlement is clearly showing.

I didn't leave the Republican party, they kicked me out.

"How is asking the simple

"How is asking the simple question "How is underestimating a foe , a plus?" trolling? You appear to not have the sense to debate. Your sense of entitlement is clearly showing."

- Clearly, you flatter yourself, Shawn.  We have been all over the debate spectrum and you continue with the same losing talking points. 

- I spent the better day with you about a half a week ago and when you were sitting there with egg all over your face and reduced to making fun of people who are in back pain and RL with gaining 'goofy balls'... well, there really isn't a point except time killing with you NWAHS.  

When you see that you have been beatin' you slither off to another thread...  how fun!

BT is just using common sense and saving her arguments for someone who matters more than just time killing.

On a personal note.  You and I know you were never ever a Republican and you just want to beat your favorite topic like a dead horse... ; )   yeah, we all know you pretty well, nwahs.

 

Well we remember it different

I remember you going off the deep end and turning into a drama queen when I asked you about doctor shopping.

Here : http://newsbusters.o...

I've pretty much ignored you since. People who flip out over questions are not usually standing on a stable foundation.

I didn't leave the Republican party, they kicked me out.

Poor poor NWAHS... let's assess what you actually linked as

evidence.

Here is the 'evidence' you provide in all of our discourse:

pahuber:

No, just answer my question you smug little troll.  I am just
frustrated by your inability to feel sorry for those truly hurting. 
You want to poke fun at Rush, but I know he had back pain and wasn't a
junkie. 


You are just trolling like enak, rag, et al.


Do you think pain pills, while addictive, give you the high of other drugs like... say pot, morphine, etc.???

This after making fun of RL, again, for the umpteenth time.  Hey, let anyone who wants to link and read the thread.  I am very happy to post anything that I have wrote.  I also notice you slithered back into your hole after being pinned down.  Let them observe our posts you little troll baby.

BTW...  NWAHS... nobody believes you were ever a Republican...lol  geez that one is so obvious.

So you're saying the

So you're saying the Republican party isn't smart enough to come up with a way to beat that system? Hard to believe.

boa... My reply to shawn

boa...

My reply to shawn applies to you as well tonight.

Do something original would you?

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

Whatever. Just make your

Whatever. Just make your "claims" without any questioning. You make it sound like your poor party had no chance against the big mean bully Democrats. That's pretty lame.

OK Bal, I'll play.  I don't

OK Bal, I'll play.  I don't think liberals are "dumb" this election cycle anymore than conservatives were "dumb" in 1994. 

Having said that, you have to admit that even when Republicans win, there are certain government and non-government organs which remain firmly in liberal hands, such as State, DOD, and most forms of information dissemination.  BTW, anyone who thinks our "libertarian traditions" will prevent the internet from being regulated need only read about the near-stranglehold the People's Republic pulled off.

So dumb?  No.  But there is a gap where their theories meet practice, and the sheeple of our nation seemed to have figured out that they can vote themselves a raise.  Was it d'Tocqueville (too lazy to look up the right spelling) that said that's when democracy dies?  I don't know, someone pretty smart said something like that.   

But, notice I said their theories, and not your theories?  That's because I've taken note of something over the last few years.  In spite of your contrarian ways, I don't think I've ever seen you write anything like "I support forced wealth re-distribution."  So, I don't consider you a liberal.  In fact, I'm guessing you are reluctant to label yourself at all.  Have I called it right?  LOL - care to comment? 

Pesky: My only point

Pesky:

My only point would be your classification of the DOD as being part of the Liberal left.  It is probably the only portion of the government in which the conservative side reigns supreme.

And it is the only functionality of goverment which follows a strictly non-interference basis in politics.

I'm pretty moderate. I think

I'm pretty moderate. I think I lean more to the right economically and left socially.

balboa

And here I thought you were a neocon.My bad.

?

?

lol

Have a nice day balboa

It would seem

 In BigTimers mind, the use of deductive reasoning is trolling.

I didn't leave the Republican party, they kicked me out.

No, BT is correct... Balboa and NWAHS are both trolls.

Call it what you will...  Seminar trolls, Drive By Trolls, Snippet Trolls...  each with a function that they believe is effective.

Balboa with the snippets...  or hit and runs.

NWAHS with the DNC talking memos which for some reason never seem to be updated....ever....   All talk radio all the time....RL is on 'goof balls' hehehe or all talk radio is bluster or comparing RL with the likes of KO or ES...if you could even fathom the similarities....

And they wonder why people rarely want to play with them.

 

Bal, you are describing your own methods in your own post.

"Whatever. Just make your "claims" without any questioning. You make it
sound like your poor party had no chance against the big mean bully
Democrats. That's pretty lame."

"That's pretty lame."

Yes, you are bal, yes you are.

Original?

This little branch started because of this comment:

"Liberals are not very smart.  They rely on name calling and cheap shots."

You are confronted with the fact, that if liberals are so simplistic, it says volumes about conservatives who are being trounced by liberals.

You reply with name calling and cheap shots

I didn't leave the Republican party, they kicked me out.

NWAHS, you are a troll... pure and simple. Everyone should

know that you are a tremendous waste of time and very dishonest.

Rush can afford to not back

Rush can afford to not back down because he doesn't have to get re-elected. As long as advertisers pay, and people listen, he can say what he wants to. 

I think a lot of the concern about Obama is premature. Just over 100 days in office, and the end of the world is coming? I'm not buying it. I don't approve of everything Obama's doing, but I don't think it's a fascist state he's developing. That's nonsense. 

On "Geraldo (Is Still) At

On "Geraldo (Is Still) At Large" last night, he had Huckabee as his guest. He showed clips from this interview and asked Huckabee for his reaction. Huckabee proved to be his usual squishy self, downplaying and almost flippantly Rush's comments about Sotomayor and managing to disagree with Rush without openly denouncing him. He did get off one good line, referring to MSNBC as "MSBS", which made Geraldo laugh (I guess the blood is bad with MSNBC even among Fox liberals). He also gave a diplomatic answer regarding Rush's expressed desire for Obama (his policies, actually) to fail, saying it wasn't a matter of him wanting them to fail, but rather, that he knew they would fail. Not a very aggressive stance, but better than saying he wanted Obama to succeed. I still don't think Huckabee is a conservative's candidate. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Chris, Hucksterbee has shown himself to be what he is

After reviewing Huck's performance as Arkansas governor and watching him during the last Republican primary, I have seen enough of Hucksterbee! 

Angry White Dude

www.angrywhitedude.c...

jeff, I don't what

jeff,

I don't what possessed Fox New to take him on, giving him his own show, and what seems to be ten guest slots a week on their other shows. Its not like his analysis is so original or insightful. Surely, any number of people from their standard rotation are more astute and just as or more entertaining. His own show is hopelessly clunky and should be re-named "Hokey-bee". 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Agreed, Chris

The only worthwhile part of Huck's show is the musical guest....occasionally.

That and Lauren Green, I wish Fox would quit shoving her in the background, she's one of my favorite news readers.

 

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Blonde, It does make me

Blonde,

It does make me wince to see Huckabee up there "jammin'" in a suit and tie. I never got what happened to Lauren Green. She's attractive, well-spoken, obviously intelligent, and very musically talented (I remember her playing the piano on Cal Thomas' old Sunday night show). I thought she was heading for a more prominent position at Fox, then - poof! - I thought she was gone until I saw her do a report on religion a few months ago. Fox has a tendency to squander talent and stick with the same getting tired faces. Maybe I'm wrong and that's the secret to their success - unlike CNN or MSNBC, who have had constantly changing personalities and shows. I wonder how long they will have to keep Glenn Beck off prime time in favor of Hannity or Van Susteren. You know they'd like to put his show's numbers in the evening.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Glen's show would make the

Glen's show would make the slot that Van Sustren is in sing. I can barely stand to watch her or Gerry Rivers.

Really? I don't mind Greta

Really? I don't mind Greta at all (Geraldo should be sent on permanent asssignment to Antartica). She's not a conservative, but at least, unlike O'Reilly, she actually lets her guests answer questions in full, without the constant cut offs and interruptions. O'Reilly has absolutely no respect for any of his guests or their opinions. He uses them as props so he can lecture to them or us. The only nit I have to pick with Greta is her tendency to get stuck on one detail and keep coming back to it (ie the fact that no one read the stimulus bill before voting). Now, that she doesn't focus so much on criminal cases and kidnappings, I go to her show to listen to guests like Stephen Moore.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Greta rocks

I like her best of all because she can actually think on her feet.She gives the best interviews.Doesnt matter right or left.

Hi w99... Yep...she's

Hi w99...

Yep...she's good.

Boy, I can remember way back now when very few if any liked Greta here...besides me, I used to watch her on CNN, her half hour show they gave her too, I understand now why she left, and had to be so frustrated like she has stated since then.

I am not talking about her Crime Story reporting either (although I am a true crime buff) just not ad nauseum...I was posting about how good she was with political interviews etc, everyone knew she was a liberal, she has never said different...I wanted others to just watch and see themselves, glad that has happened over time.

I remember her first show on Fox with Dick Morris...now that was funny....and priceless in a way.

Nope, she does a great job, a great reporter and journalist...she's a good talking-head.

 Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

BT

I not into the crime thing.I do like her interviews and doesnt matter which party she always does it in respectful way.She will ask tough questions without being a jerk about it.

here here! I lived here

here here!

I lived here in Arkansas while that nimrod was in office, you could barely tell the differance between him and Clintoon.

RE: eR

He's looking much better than he did at CPAC, I think he's lost a lot of weight. Good for him, I want Rush around for many more years.

& RUSH LOST 60#S!!

Good work and great interview and great answers.

Do you get the feeling.....

That FOX could air 60 minutes of just Sean Hannity staring at Rush Limbaugh and not a word spoken and still outdraw CNN and MSNBC in the ratings.

Jack

"If at age 20 you are a conservative then you have no heart.  If at age 30 you are a liberal then you have no brains."   Sir Winston Churchill

Rush is Optimistic

This time in our history, I—we—have every reason to be confident that the millions will make the changes necessary to recover from our amnesia and reject the phony medicine that has been sold to us one tax at a time.  Our voices will not fall on deaf ears any longer, as we petition, show, and write—as we expose and humiliate—as we effect prosecutions by our demands of accountability for Congress too—they are not above the law and it is up to us to push the bureaucracies to act.  Our strongest advantage and most effective work are found in by actions we take.  We must get off the sofa long enough to become part of the public domain and demand our own representatives to move forward by directing the FBI and Justice Department to get busy if the politician would expect our support. 

Every trip Pelosi makes to Rome or Shanghai is on our dime.  Every extreme partisan press conference is at our expense.  Every terrible bill is written with our money—often to do little but take more of our money.  Every staffer who received bonuses in early 2009 were paid with our money—and it did not matter if their jobs were to find out as much dirt on a member of the opposition party or if it was to fetch coffee for the madam Speaker.  While many of us were losing jobs and struggling to find work, the Washington crowd was doing grand—even if the work they have been doing costs jobs.

 

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

Rush is boring.  I feel

Rush is boring.  I feel that way because everything he says I agree with.

Free enterprise works if the government doesn't dick around with it; people need to rely on themselves; Republicans need to stick to the fundamental principles of the party; Socialism doesn't work; government can't solve anything...

Yeah, yeah, yeah...*yaaaaawn*

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

LIKE LIMA BEANS...

but i do listen, then form my own conclusions. At 69 I am involved with a church with people living in it, and it could use some $$$ help as they are eschewing anything with the "godernment" strings attached. Gotta love it.