Op-ed: 'U.S. Has a 45-year History of Torture'

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

As media members pressure Congress and the White House to prosecute Bush administration officials for enhanced interrogation techniques employed at the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay, they present their case as if such practices began quite recently.

This is by no means surprising as the full grips of Bush Derangement Syndrome cannot be felt without either a complete revision of history or one totally ignoring everything that happened prior to January 20, 2001.

With this in mind, an op-ed published in Sunday's Los Angeles Times, which accused one of the left's most-sacred golden idols, Robert F. Kennedy, of being involved in teaching torture techniques to Brazilian police officers, is sure to raise a few eyebrows (h/t Gary Hall):

The meddling in Brazil began in earnest during the early 1960s under a Democratic administration. At that time, Washington's alarm over Cuba was much like the more recent panic after 9/11. The Kennedy White House was determined to prevent another communist regime in the hemisphere, and Robert Kennedy, as attorney general, was taking a strong interest in several anti-communist approaches, including the Office of Public Safety.

When OPS was launched under President Eisenhower, its mission sounded benign enough -- to increase the professionalism of the police of Asia, Africa and, particularly, Latin America. But its genial director, Byron Engle, was a CIA agent, and his program was part of a wider effort to identify receptive recruits among local populations. [...]

When Brazil seemed to tilt leftward after President Joao Goulart assumed power in 1961, the Kennedy administration grew increasingly troubled. Robert Kennedy traveled to Brazil to tell Goulart he should dismiss two of his Cabinet members, and the office of Lincoln Gordon, John Kennedy's ambassador to Brazil, became the hub for CIA efforts to destabilize Goulart's government. [...]

The Brazilian people did not deserve what they got. The military cracked down harshly on labor unions, newspapers and student associations. The newly efficient police, drawing on training provided by the U.S., began routinely torturing political prisoners and even opened a torture school on the outskirts of Rio de Janeiro to teach police sergeants how to inflict the maximum pain without killing their victims.

The author, A. J. Langguth, then detailed some of the tortures inflicted upon Brazilians apparently with the instruction of our OPS. Given their gruesome nature, they will not be shared:

During the first seven years after Castelo Branco's coup, the OPS trained 100,000 Brazilian police, including 600 who were brought to the United States. Their instruction varied. Some OPS lecturers denounced torture as inhumane and ineffectual. Others conveyed a different message. Le Van An, a student from the South Vietnamese police, later described what his instructors told him: "Despite the fact that brutal interrogation is strongly criticized by moralists," they said, "its importance must not be denied if we want to have order and security in daily life."
Brazil's political prisoners never doubted that Americans were involved in the torture that proliferated in their country. On their release, they reported that they frequently had heard English-speaking men around them, foreigners who left the room while the actual torture took place. As the years passed, those torture victims say, the men with American accents became less careful and sometimes stayed on during interrogations.

For the record, Langguth is currently a Professor Emeritus at USC's Annenberg School for Communication, School of Journalism. He is a former correspondent for LOOK magazine, the New York Times, and the New York Times Magazine.

As such, this is doubtful a conservative looking to alter the present discussion by accusing a sacred, liberal Democrat of far-worse practices than the Left and their media minions wish to prosecute Bush administration officials for.

On the other hand, given his years in the field as well as his background on this subject, it will be interesting to see if his op-ed makes it out of Los Angeles alive.

Stay tuned.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bobby Kennedy ~ McCarthy

Bobby Kennedy ~ McCarthy.

Who'd thunk that? Well, not that being Godfather to Robert Kennedy's first child would be a hint.

Great work, NS.

(;~> 

 

Bobby Worked for Joe McCarthy

Bobby worked on McCarthy's Subcommittee on Investigations.  If you look closely you will see Bobby in the background in the old hearing tapes.

Somehow it has become a forgotten moment in history.

allanf..

somehow?

 (;~> gary

Wet Rags And Rehabilitation.

Serious law breakers from all walks of life should be water boarded daily for one month and released. Most will fear returning to prison. This method will cause civil disobedience to end. Fear of painful punishment works. Torture of the guilty will end crime. Long term imprisonment is expensive and rarely causes rehabilitation. A gallon of water and a wet rag is a simple gift from heaven to rid the world of evil.

http://www.associate...

True Torture

Will Christopher Hitchens or any other reporter subject themselves to some of the methods described in the article in order to make a point? Too me, the fact that they would volunteer to be waterboarded to get the "story" proves it is not torture. There's one particular technique described in the op-ed that I wouldn't mind seeing done to a certain few of these ridiculous reporters and pundits(at least the male ones)

Seriously though, RFK's methods were performed on pie-in-the-sky leftists, students and journalists, not murderous jihadists. If the left can't see the difference, they're beyond help.

 

"...it will be interesting

"...it will be interesting to see if his op-ed makes it out of Los Angeles alive."

Actually, I am surprised the LAT printed it to begin with.

It won't matter, anyway, because to the still-BDS afflicted lefties, history only goes back to January of 2001.

-Dave

This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.

Anyone ever see the movie

Anyone ever see the movie Guarding Tess, with Nicolas Cage? Especially when he shoots off the villian's toe to obtain critical information that saves Tess's life?

Or how about Patriot Games, with Harrison Ford? His enhanced interrogation techniques included shooting the villian in the leg. Here's how one movie critic painted the picture: In a key scene, the wife tells her husband (Harrison Ford): "You get him. I don't care what you have to do, just get him." From that point on, the film becomes the story of a nuclear family in imminent danger.

In other words, when lives are in fake danger, Hollywood and the leftists don't seem to mind "doing the right thing". But when our country is in real danger, with President Bush in charge, well then nothing we do is correct -- except to coddle the terrorists.

I just can't stand all the pretend "concern" from the leftists in this country. If it was up to them, we'd all be speaking Russian by now.

___________________________________ 

The challenge is to follow a consistent plan despite inconsistent prices - Sarah Palin, State of the State of Alaska speech

And I'll bet liberals won't

And I'll bet liberals won't have any problem with the fact that Bobby Kennedy actually taught torture techniques!

As usual, with liberals, it's all about whose hands the implements are in.  In the hands of the "right" people, torture is OK.

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

Shows people what they know of "history"

The US, like every other country in the world, that ever has been or will be, has a MUCH longer history of torture.  All the way back to the very beginning.  We have a 45 +/- history of cowardly weanies that do not understand that torture, while not pretty or very humane, is effective and no matter what these bleeding heart dummies say or conspire to prevent or sweep under the media rug... it will continue.  If it does not, we will lose the country.  May as well have the military hand their weapons over to any non US combatant and surrender.  This also means... they need to figure out how they are going to pop off at the mouth about things they have no earthly comprehension of such as how they are going to whine about this or that government that does take over and crams them into a deep dark cellar of which there is no escape.

Americans need to get a grip on some reality.  They need to stop being the cowardly whimps they have come to be.  They need to understand a few things and guess what.  Life sucks.  It isn't fair.  It never will be fair no matter what they do.  We have it pretty good because?  Anyone?  Anyone?  Anyone?  Because we in the past (The USA) have gone that extra distance.  We did what it took to win.  We did that and much more to become free.  We sacrificed, lied, killed, murdered, bombed, tortured, <insert vile whatever here> on the idea that OUR country was going to be a FREE Republic.  To do so, we have to defend it by any and ALL means.  Up to and ncluding droping atomic bombs.

 When the rest of the world stops torturing, the US can stop, but not a second sooner and my advice to any sitting government ours or an enemies is keep it on the back burner for use if needed.  

War sucks.  Protecting a country is next to impossible against people that want to destroy it.  Obama included.  He has forgotten a rule that will come back to bite him in the ass.  What he is doing to a former president can and will be done to him once he opens that can of worms.   for a man that is supposed to be so smart he is pretty damned stupid.  I don't know who all he is listneing to... but he better wise up.

Which City?

Interesting point here on which US city the Bamster would be willing to sacrifice to uphold his high ideals; would make a great Presidential debate question: Which City Would You Sacrifice?: http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com

Slick, that would be an

Slick, that would be an excellent debate question. I think Obama's knee-jerk reply would be "Crawford, TX". A PETA candidate would reply "any city, as long as the pets are evacuated first". My reply would be "Here's a list. And while we're at it, how about whole states, beginning with Massachusetts and moving quickly to Vermont".

___________________________________ 

The challenge is to follow a consistent plan despite inconsistent prices - Sarah Palin, State of the State of Alaska speech