How Will Media Report Tuesday's Stock Market Collapse?

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

The Obama-loving media might adore flowery rhetoric with little substance, but stock investors sure don't.

That's what traders and market professionals said was responsible for Tuesday's stock market collapse after Wall Street was tremendously disappointed with the lack of specifics in the highly-anticipated bank rescue plan presented by newly confirmed Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

As such, it's going to be fascinating to see how sycophantic press members spin the market's almost 400-point decline.

Will it resemble how Bloomberg reported the event:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

“Everybody is disappointed in the lack of details,” said Diane Garnick, who helps oversee $354 billion as an investment strategist at Invesco Ltd. in New York. “They came out and said, ‘We want you to believe that we’re still working on this.’ Well, we knew that last night.”  [...]

“There’s still a lack of clarity,” Dan McMahon, director of equity trading at Raymond James Financial Inc. in St. Petersburg, Florida, said of Geithner’s proposal. “These are smart people and they’re supposed to have it figured out. We’ve been waiting all week and then he said nothing.”  [...]

“No one has put anything on the table yet to stop the bleeding,” said Michael Nasto, the senior trader at U.S. Global Investors Inc., which manages $3.5 billion in San Antonio. “This won’t stop until someone comes up with a viable plan and we can see light at the end of the tunnel.” 

Think any of those market professionals will be interviewed by mainstream media outlets in the next 24 hours? Or how about those quoted by MarketWatch:

"The market was really hopeful we would get something substantive out of Geithner and the Treasury today, but once again, he was bedeviled by the details," said Bill Knapp, investment strategist with Mainstay Investments.
 
In particular, Knapp and others said the biggest disappointment was a lack of details about a possible public-private participation plan and what direction such a plan would take. Reports have circulated about a possible "bad bank" plan where the government might buy toxic assets off of banks' balance sheets, but there was no hint from Geithner on what or when that may happen.
Will this be the kind of reporting you'll be seeing this evening from Brian, Charlie, and Katie?
 
Stay tuned.
 

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Why would anyone leave money in stocks?

Why would anyone leave money in sotcks now that the private sector is going to be raided to pay for all the pork?

There will be no job creation. Just job movement from the private sector to government.

I bet there are a lot of big companies already looking for a new home outside of the country.

They are.  In fact, Foster

They are.  In fact, Foster Wheeler just redomesticated into Switzerland to avoid the inevitable Obama administration tax increases

→ I know, teacher!

The market threw a tantrum after a stern talking-to from the highly popular Obama-Geithner duo.

  • When Liberals raise the bar, expect The Limbo

The press will proclaim that

The press will proclaim that this is even more evidence that the Government needs to deficit-spend now to correct the problem.

SpaceMan, you are so prescient

From today's AP:

"It's gone deep. It's gotten worse," President Barack Obama said of the recession at a campaign-style appearance in Fort Myers, Fla., where unemployment has reached double digits. "The situation we face could not be more serious."

If any more emphasis were needed, Wall Street investors sent stocks plunging, objecting that new rescue details from the government were too sparse. The Dow Jones industrials dropped 382 points.

The article correctly noted that the stocks plunged due to the Geithner briefing, but putting those two paragraphs back to back suggests to the casual reader that the stock decline is a symptom of the current economy rather than a Wall Street reaction.

My guess is they will be so

My guess is they will be so busy praising the messiah ad nauseam for his (hollow) performance in last night's love-fest, I mean press conference, not to mention those hideous town hall gatherings (I need a kitchen and a bathroom) that they will just happen to run out of time and not get to it.

Or, if it does get reported it will be a five second blurb when coming back from a commercial break, and I'll wager they will manage to get the word "Bush" in somewhere in that blurb, too.

-Dave

Our clueless political leaders are about to drive us all over a cliff. The time to HITM is now-before we go over.

As in...

The stock market dropped 400 points today, much like the 6000 point drop under Bush's presidency, only 400 is just 6.7% of Bush's entire loss.

Is that what you're asking for? 

I hope I'm mis-reading...

...the tone/content of your post.

If not, you are a buffoon.

The Dumbocrats caused the "6000" point drop "under Bush's presidency"; namely, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid...no need to say more.

If fools don't know history, they are doomed to repeat it!

Do some fact checking...

Nope

You read it right.  But if you want to rewrite history, feel free.  Argue all you like, but the president is in charge.  But if this is your only argument, you then can blame republicans for everything that went wrong between 2001 and 2006, as they were in full control.  Are you prepared to start placing blame where it belongs?

You are a prime example...

...of our failed governement educational system.

So

You have no response.  Got it.

Read on...

...maybe, just maybe you might be able to understand...I'm not holding my breath, as it appears you are an Obamatron fool.

 

Apparently, since you

Apparently, since you couldn't even interpret that response, public schools have REALLY failed you.

Ups and downs

Why do you fail to mention the gains that were made during Bush's presidency, if you're so interested in historical accuracy?

For historical accuracy, it must be pointed out that the Dow Jones Industrial Average went from a low of 7591.93 in July 2003 to a high of 13930.01 in October 2007 for a GAIN of 6338.08.  Source

Tell me, guttermouth, who was President from 2003 to 2007? Are you ready to start giving credit where credit is due?

On edit:  That's October 2007 and not July 2007. My Bad.

Obama: My job is above my pay grade

Okay

I'm hearing both sides of the argument here.  Is it or is it not the president's doing?  On one side of the argument I'm hearing it's not Bush's fault the economy collapsed.  But now you're taking credit for the gains under his terms.  Next it's "Obama's plan is going to destroy the country." Which is it?  Does the president have control over what happens to the economy under his watch?  Is he responsible or not?

Does the president have

Does the president have control over what happens to the economy under his watch?  Is he responsible or not?

Depends, a Presidents actions can affect the economy, foreign relations, trade and a host of other things.  Congress also has a hand in these things.  Under Carter foriegn relations plunged to record lows with his mishandling of Irans beligerance to the USA and it took Reagan to fix.  The week Reagan took office teh Iranians capitualted.

President Bush was also faced with a beligerant Muslim problem and he took care of it with some stumbles along teh way but IMO overall did very well.  President Bush also inherited a failing economy, one that would have fallen further had he not taken action.  President Bush made cuts in taxes and confidence in teh economy grew ... so Bush is responsible.

If he had not taken proper action and raised taxes and spent like a drunken sailor then Bush would had killed the economy.  Bush stumbbled and blinked last year when he said we need to bailout teh banks.  He had some bad advice and when congress took his initial idea of lending teh money and gave it away then it got worse.

Now we have a President who believes that government spending not only to make sure banks dont go under but we need as in big Government to spend like crazy.

President proposes and congress disposes.  The congress decides how and where teh money goes and the President spends it.  In Bush's case with TARP, teh original idea of lending money grew into a monster when congress got ahold of it.  In fact President Bush only spent 350 billion and said he was not going to spend the rest.  Obama said spend the rest and Bush being accomodating did so because he knew that Obama would have spent it anyways in a few weeks.

So Bush saved the economy from a downward spiral and it grew under his Presidency.  He is resposible for teh good and as for teh downward spiral that is uop to debate as what or why it happened.  The markettook a nose dive because they wer not confident in teh banks and the economy.  Seems funny teh downward spiral was during teh last two years of congress.

And Obama is resonsible for teh economy because tehre is no confidence in his abilities to pull us out.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Guttermouth, Before you

Guttermouth,

Before you spew out Liberal propaganda PLEASE get your history straight!

Republicans were in full control of both houses of Congress briefly during 2001. You seem to have never studied or cared about the fact that in 2001 Republicans lost control of the Senate. DASCHLE a DEMOCRAT became the Senate leader from 2001 until the 2004 Congressional elections! Might want to stay away from you Liberal websites and the Obama empty and pathetic rhetoric and open up a history book!

So, let us get it straight....

From 2001 through early 2004 the Senate was controlled by the Democrats

Republicans controlled the House.

From 2004 until 2006 REpublicans controlled both houses of Congres.

From 2006 until today Democrats have had full control of both houses of Congres.

Thus, as you see child, your historically challanged post above is wrong.

Please open up a book and get an education. Please do yourself this favor before you make pathetic attempts to attack Republicans and Conservatives.

Liberal=poorly educated and easily brainwashed.

ABSOLUTELY WRONG

Read the facts:

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/one_item_and_teasers/partydiv.htm 

http://clerk.house.g...

I admit I was wrong.  I missed a 1 and a half year period when the republican senator switched his party affiliation to independent.  

Thus, as you see, CHILD, your facts are incorrect as well.  Before you start jumping up and down screaming for attention you might want to do a little FACT checking.  A$$!!! 

Nope

You read it right.  But if you want to rewrite history, feel free.  Argue all you like, but the president is in charge.  But if this is your only argument, you then can blame republicans for everything that went wrong between 2001 and 2006, as they were in full control.  Are you prepared to start placing blame where it belongs?

Try re-writing this history...

...

2001

April: The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

2002

May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

2003

January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years.

February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that “although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations,” “the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them.”  As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market.  (”Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO,” OFHEO Report, 2/4/03).

September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO’s review found earnings manipulations.

September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact “legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises” and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.

October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error.

November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any “legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk.”  To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have “broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards” and “receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE.”  (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03).

2004

February: The President’s FY05 Budget again highlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital, and called for creation of a new, world-class regulator:  “The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore…should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator.”  (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)

February: CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to “not take [the financial market's] strength for granted.”  Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by “ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator.”  (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, “Keeping Fannie And Freddie’s House In Order,” Financial Times, 2/24/04).

June: Deputy Secretary of Treasury Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and called for reform, saying “We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system.  Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs:  Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System.”  (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04).

2005

April: Treasury Secretary John Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying “Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America… Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system.”  (Secretary John W. Snow, “Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee,” 4/13/05).

2007

July: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds invested in mortgage securities collapse.

August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying “first things first when it comes to those two institutions.  Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options.”  (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, The White House, 8/9/07).

September: RealtyTrac announces foreclosure filings up 243,000 in August – up 115 percent from the year before.

September: Single-family existing home sales decreases 7.5 percent from the previous month – the lowest level in nine years.  Median sale price of existing homes fell six percent from the year before.

December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying “These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I’ve called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs – and ensures they focus on their important housing mission.  The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start.  But the Senate has not acted.  And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon.”  (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, The White House, 12/6/07).

2008

January: Bank of America announces it will buy Countrywide.

January: Citigroup announces mortgage portfolio lost $18.1 billion in value.

February: Assistant Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, says “A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully.”  (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08).

March: Bear Stearns announces it will sell itself to JPMorgan Chase.

March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and “move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages.”  (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08).

April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and “modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by … helping people stay in their homes.”  (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08).

May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.

  • “Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans.”   (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08).
  • “[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that – and Congress is making progress on this – is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator.”  (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08).
  • “Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans.”  (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08).

June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying “we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.”  (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08).

July: Congress heeds the President’s call for action and passes reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.

Nice outline. Succinct.

Nice outline. Succinct. Thanks.

So

What you're saying is that from 2001 to 2006 when the GOP controlled the House, Senate, and Executive branches of government, they still failed to stop any of this from happening? And that it's easier now just to blame the Democrats and Obama for what's happening? Fine.

Guttermouth, WRONG! the

Guttermouth,

WRONG!

the GOP did not control both houses of Congress from 2001 until 2006.

Please educate yourself and stop spewing Liberal propaganda.

Think Daschle majority leader in the Senate in 2001 my young, poorly educated friend. 2001 until early 2004 the Senate was controlled by the Democrats.

Open up a book and please get an education. Learn some history before you spew out so much Liberal propaganda.

You are wasting your time...........

trying
to educate GUTTERBRAIN with facts. He is posting here for one reason only, to
disrupt any thread that does not agree with liberal dogma. He does not care one
wit of searching for the truth in media; he only wants to spew his BDS among
posters here who actually care what happens to their country. He/she/it will
pop up now and again then disappear after leaving their vile droppings among
other random musings that seem to pass for thought among the liberal/socialist
left. He is scum. You will never change his mind because he does not want it
changed; so your time is better spent watching paint dry than conversing with
such a non-entity.

True

I fail to understand what he hopes to accomplish with his trolling?

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Bolton/KEYES 2012 

Dis-information campaign

Dis-information campaign using serial one liner falsehoods.  It only takes 10 words or so to make a false statement, it takes more than a hundred words to expose the falsehood.   By the time you finish exposing the first falsehood, your opponent has already spewed 10 more falsehoods during the same period of time.  This is what I call the Joe Biden propaganda method (remember the VP debate).  Now who wants to listen or read through a seemly never ending cascade of explainations?  The public is ADD, they will never fully hear the exposing of each and every falsehood because after 10 minutes or so their eyes glaze over.  Remember, if you don't refute a false assertion it becomes accepted truth.

With this understanding go listen to the debate between Steele (RNC chair) and Kaine (DNC chair) you will see what I mean.   http://www.gop.com/c...  

The point is SR, spewing one liners has the effect of derailing discussion and sewing doubt when they are not adequately exposed.  It's called waging a disinformation war by word attrition.  

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

Same to you

Read up and learn: 

http://clerk.house.g...

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/one_item_and_teasers/partydiv.htm  

Gutter

GAME SET MATCH-----to----Ontheright!

Nope

You lose too.  Read the facts here.  There was only a 1.5 year span that the GOP didn't have control, versus the 3 year span that ontheright claimed.  I'd call that a draw.  Stay out of this until you read up and learn something from a reputable source, not a blog.

Troll.........

You replied;

"Stay out of this until you read up and learn something from a reputable source, not a blog."

Stay out of this?  What's that supposed to mean, scum?  Are you getting in your censorship practice early?  Go away kid, ya bother me.

  Ontheright, Very

 

Ontheright,

Very nice, thank you for this time-line.  Of course it is useless to liberals, they are unable to comprehend facts and figures.  They live in a make believe world where 1+1=Tuesday. 

When one trys to explain this to them they retreat into denial and respond with either deflection or name calling, sometime both.

What is that...?

....is that crickets I hear from the guttermouth??

Thought so.

There's one thing that is sure as the sun rising on the eastern horizon...facts and/or factual history baffle liberals and/or dimocrats.

ontheright

  I am impressed that you got her to FINALLY shut up!  I need to carry you around with me wherever I go!

Shut this up sweetheart.

Shut this up sweetheart.

→ Thanks gutter

I was looking for a storage spot for my Humvee.

  • When Liberals raise the bar, expect The Limbo

There's space

There's space for a Saturn Rocket in there too. It probably would fit in between the ears.

You contradict yourself.

You contradict yourself. You want to blame the market woes on Bush (that is sooooo 2007), but then chide everybody, saying the Republicans should be blamed for everything that went wrong from 2001-2006. Which is it? The entire 8 years, or just 6?

January, 2007, (you know, the first day AFTER you claim the Repubs are to be blamed for everything, and when the Dems took control of Congress), the Dow Jones was at 12,600.

Now is it at 7,850. Based on your own logic, this is in the lap of your comrades on the left. Interesting.

You may go now.

 

 

The stock market dropped

The stock market dropped 400 points today, much like the 6000 point drop under Bush's presidency

How much ignorance can one poster contain?  The drop was like 4K over a month and was in response to the banks about to fail.  The congress is the problem in that instance not the President.  The really interesting thing about Duh One is he promised he would fix it and has not.

In fact seems like everytime he gets involved or speaks the market drops.  Seems like Duh One is Duh problem .

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Hear, Hear...

...was hoping I wasn't the only sane mind looking at an embicile's post.

Get use to the spin, the

Get use to the spin, the libs have coalesced around blaming Bush for the economy, using the Biden tactic of serial mis-statement one liners.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

Guttermouth, lets recap,

Guttermouth, lets recap, shall we? First of all, the market closed yesterday at 7888.88, not quite 400 points. More like 340+. Next, the drop in the market came from fannie and freddie. They were the instermental cancer that broke the system. A quasi federal system run by Barney "Fanny and Freddie are in good shape" Frank. He said that in front of the Congress, after Bush AND McCain had warned of impending desaster if something was not done. Barney, being in charge of the banking and finance, not to mention the overseer of fanny and freddie, continued to say everything was ok.

Fannie started its decline in Oct of 07. That is about the time Bush started warning about fannie and freddie. (Freddie was also in decline in the same time frame). Volume peaked on Sept. 8th at over 570 million shares, closing at .74 cents a share. That is just a few days after Barney said fannie was in good shape.

Would you like to get in depth in this, or do you wish to let it go while your backside is still in tact?

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Mattress Discounters!!!

If you want to be able to see and feel your money grow...hide it under your mattress.

Odd Job

Here's how it will be

Here's how it will be reported:

(said really fast) TheStockMarketDippedToday...(said slowly) Now for some more reviews of President Obama's press conference from our "analysts."

Just wait...the phrase "Bush

Just wait...the phrase "Bush Recession" or "Bush Depression" will become a common expression by the msm...in 2009, 2010, 2011 and even in 2012...

gopsteve... Exactly

gopsteve...

Exactly right!

How will the msm report

How will the msm report todays numbers...

Why they will point the fingers at the previous administration....namely Pres. Bush.

Sure they'll report it -

Sure they'll report it - but not what caused it - just as evidence that we must do as Obama says - maybe even more and even faster. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

stock markets

tend to overreact.  then there's also the 'buy on the rumor, sell on the news' phenomenon.  let's revisit this topic a week from now.

 

swing hard in case you hit it.

But they're geniuses,

But they're geniuses, they've had months to think about this. Does the Emperor not have clothes? First the stock market tanks when Obama is inaugurated, then it tanks when the Senate approves the crapsandwich bill and tax cheat Geithner doesn't have a clue how to help the economy get back on its feet.

you're preaching to the choir, padre.

i'm underwhelmed by what i've seen so far, but i know that markets overreact to bad news as well as good news.

 when this is all done, the democrats in the house, senate and casa blanca will be unable to pin blame on the gop.  with the exception if three rinos, it was a united republican opposition to a package that the cbo has strongly denounced.

 

swing hard in case you hit it.

Way to go team

Way to go team Obama!

...and for his next trick, inflation! Followed by take-over of the banks, medical industry, and the markets!

(He'll need to do that since for some reason the GNP is heading south!)

Look, if everyone promises

Look, if everyone promises to keep this quiet, I have some shocking news that concerns this timely post...

Comrade Obama had his Communications team draw up two press releases that were to be faxed, to all media outlets, depending on how the markets reacted today after his incredible performance last night. After seeing how the market tanked today they sent out the second choice fax. It clearly stated in no uncertain terms "tell the people that it's all BUSH'S FAULT!"

San Fran Stumped!

 

 

 

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

CT

That first link was cruel.  You should be aware that many people may have eaten within a couple of hours of viewing that San Francisco Undercover Terrorist. Plus, those shoes just simply do not go with that outfit.

Doktor Dryheave

Triple Play

President Obama speaking in FL& Tim Geither speaking about TARP II & Congress passing the PORKER equals 383 point drop in the DOW.  I would say that that is 127.66666 pts each. Wow they are good !!!!!!!!!!

I just noticed that CNN

I just noticed that CNN doesn't have a DOW Down 400 on it's front page alert like it did all those times prior to the inauguration.

 

hmmmm...

He doesn't care!

I believe we conservatives are not able to see the world the way Obammy does and that is a flaw in our understanding and ability to predict what he will do. Do you think Obammy cares about the stock market? What makes us think he might care? To the far left socialists the stock market is the playground of the corrupt and evil rich. Sure, if the stock market tanks, some in the middle class will suffer, but that serves them right for getting greedy. When in doubt, consider Obammy's mentor, and ask -what would Bill Ayers do?

Socialists obsess over 'the gap between rich and poor'. The easiest way to narrow that gap is to destroy the rich.

Inevitably, Obammy's policies will lead to disastrous inflation. Ask yourself again, who is hurt by inflation? Mostly people with a lot of money. The liberals in the ruling class will take care of themselves along with their Big Union goons by giving themselves raises. The rest of us will face wage and price controls in a vain attempt to rein it in. The result, more power for government.

Same for government Daschle-rationed health care. You don't think that will apply to the ruling class, do you? Do you think Obammy would pull the plug on Teddy or Bobby Byrd and say 'you have to accept the inevitable'? 

In every Marxist experiment in history from the USSR to Cuba or the lowliest African hellhole, the ruling class has had special privileges for themselves. 

The point is, the things that we care about and consider the measure of whether a President is successful or not, and whether our country improves or not, are a function of our political and social viewpoint. Obammy sees things very differently.

John Cornyn of Texas

Just for the record, John Cornyn of Texas voted to approve the tax crook geitner for Sec, Treas. and he was "not voting" on the porker bill. I'm afraid you might as well lump him in with snowe, collins and specter. I am ashamed he is from Texas and hope he gets thrown out with the rest of the crooks.

   kilrod 

Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier

Kilrod, I cannot figure Cornyn out

He is good one minute, bad the next.  He really has an opportunity to step up and lead conservatives but keeps stepping in it.  I wonder who is advising him.

Angry White Dude

www.angrywhitedude.c...

You got me Bowski

 You got me Bowski, but if he don't man up and do whats right i got no use for him. That tax crook geitner vote just about did for me. Screw me once shame on you, screw me twice shame on me.!!~~!!

   kilrod

 Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier