Comedienne Roseanne Barr called Israel a "NAZI state" Tuesday, while declaring "The destruction of the jews [sic] in Israel has been assured with this inhuman attack on civilians in gaza [sic]."
She also liked Hamas to a bunch of street gangs while depicting Israel's military action "equivilent to los angeles [sic] attacking and launching war on the people of watts [sic] to attempt to kill the bloods [sic] the crips [sic]."
Such was actually posted at her blog Roseanne World Tuesday.
The entire disgraceful rant is below the fold for those that can stand it (h/t Mere Rhetoric):
I said Israel will attack any boat carrying doctors and medical supplies--they have turned away the red cross already and all medical and food assistance. Israel is a NAZI state. The Jewish Soul is being tortured in Israel. The destruction of the jews in Israel has been assured with this inhuman attack on civilians in gaza. Hamas is the street gangs---this is equivilent to los angeles attacking and launching war on the people of watts to attempt to kill the bloods and the crips.
You know what's most amazing about this? Much of her Hollywood friends -- along with the vast majority of like-minded Netroot denizens -- silently -- and, for the latter, not so silently! -- agree with her.
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Not that I really care...
December 31, 2008 - 11:43 ET by Prester John...what Barr says, but I would wager she can't even find Gaza on a map.
not only couldn't she find
December 31, 2008 - 12:08 ET by nicksmith112not only couldn't she find Gaza on a map I'll bet she is spouting word for word something she just heard from air America.
I've heard her get political on talk shows. She is nuts.
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
Only in America...
December 31, 2008 - 12:42 ET by AdmesserThe down side to the right of free speech is that we have to put up with the idiots who exercise it.
Barr needs ...
December 31, 2008 - 13:52 ET by SentryDanBarr needs to lay off of the sauce. Everytime she opens her mouth as of late she makes an A$$ out of herself. She is a typical liberal. She hates the US and our allies. She would be jumping up and down with the destruction of Israel.
Remember folks, Freedom isn't Free. It was bought with the blood and sacrifice of the men and women who are serving and who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
For those who fought for it, Freedom has a flavor that the protected will never know.
Roseanne Barr
December 31, 2008 - 11:45 ET by east tennessee johnLiving proof of what cocaine abuse will do to your "thought" process.
Glad you put "thought"...
December 31, 2008 - 13:53 ET by Wilbur747in quotes. I was about to say that she never had any real "thought" processes. At least those that weren't rambling, incoherant, whiny blurbs.
Of course for her, rambling inchoherant, whiny statements are deeply introspective, worldly knowledgable ideas that warrant mass publication.
Any wonder why she's no longer on TV?
Not to mention a $5 curbside
December 31, 2008 - 14:02 ET by stratmanNot to mention a $5 street corner prostitute.
what?
December 31, 2008 - 15:30 ET by AJB$5? You'd have to pay me a whole lot more than that to even get near her.
HA. To eliminate the crips
December 31, 2008 - 11:46 ET by KevroyHA. To eliminate the crips and bloods you would have to wage war on Watts. I would venture to say that if the crips and bloods were launching a couple rockets per day into LA that is precisely what would happen.
war on Watts
December 31, 2008 - 12:18 ET by SickofLibsBut first Jackson and Sharpton would show up to demonstrate "solidarity with the community."
Kevroy: To one degree,
December 31, 2008 - 12:48 ET by BDKevroy:
To one degree, she is correct albeit probably unintentionally. The Palestinian combatants over the past twenty years have decentralized themselves to the point that they have approached Crip/Blood status and have little control placed over them.
One of the issues my friends and I have often discussed is just how much control of their side of the fight any Palestinian leadership can possibly have since they "Religified" the terrorist fight in the 1980's by allowing JIHAD to be waged in their stead. After all, can someone who expects to go immediately to heaven upon their death have access to all those virgins have any control placed over them by a central authority who wants to adhere to a cease fire?
When Hamas, Hezbollah etc allowed Jihad to be waged as a method, they effectively surrendered the potential for their control of the fight.
One of the key questions is just how much Hamas is willing to do to maintain a cease fire if they ever decide to adhere to one. Are they willing to hunt down and kill those who support them now who seek just such a glorious end? I doubt it since it only provokes Jihad against themselves by the same nutcases and they are riding a very hungry tiger while holdings its tail.
In the current situation, Isreal cannot expect Hamas, Hezbollah to be able to control ANYTHING. After all, during the supposed ceasefire of the past six months, over 3000 rockets were lofted towards Israeli cities. How many of them were authorized by Hamas? I doubt any were, most were probably fired by the various sects who have little control.
In this case, Isreal is doing the right thing, kill as many enemies as possible and do not tie their own hands through another fake cease fire agreement that Hamas will not nor cannot adhere to.
Barr inadvertantly reached that point with her Crips/Bloods analogy. I wonder when it will be understood?
Mahdi army
December 31, 2008 - 17:40 ET by TjexciteWorth this train of thought, one has to wonder how much control Muqtada al-Sadr had with his army and if it was an army. He may have had control to have the ceasefire, as did the early leaders of Hamas. But after 20 years the leadership is gone and they are separate cells with only a small interaction with each other cells with no down stream orders and with individual control of at most 300 fighters for any one operation. It was just luck that the Mahdi army for all intense purposes died in 2008 as they may have been the the new Hamas and decentralized with the exile of Sadr to Iran.
Long live George W. Bush liberator of Millions
TJ: I have often wondered
December 31, 2008 - 21:11 ET by BDTJ:
I have often wondered what the Sadrists saw in the Muqtada. He did not openly do the Jihad thing as much as we see with the Hamas and particularly Hezbollah, rather acted the Arafat role, trying to ride the line.
One wonders why he did not, perhaps he wished to maintain more control over his minions than to scatter them in the Jihad?
Wow!
December 31, 2008 - 11:49 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsThis is what happens to children who are allowed to continue to play dress-up and make believe after puberty.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Ooooooooo - the ol' "Nazi"
December 31, 2008 - 11:56 ET by Chris NormanOoooooooo - the ol' "Nazi" card! Through knee jerk over use by geniuses like Barr, does it mean anything anymore?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Liberals and Nazis
December 31, 2008 - 12:06 ET by JillCWWhy can't the liberals figure out that THEY are the new Nazis? I'll give you three guesses and the first three don't count. That said, Barr has no clue what it means to try to survive in Israel. Has she ever been there? And why are all those liberal Jews (if one could still consider them Jewish since they hate Israel and fellow Jews so much) on the side of their enemies? Well, for starters regarding Gaza, read 1 Amos 6. And iffin' you have time, read all of Amos. Sheesh, it's short and filled with neat stuff that puts all this in perspective. Now I know why 2/3 of unbelieving Jews (I am a Messianic and can say this) will be wiped out during the Tribulation. Perhaps, it's the just consequence for treason.
comedienne?
December 31, 2008 - 11:58 ET by sentforth5She hasn't said one funny thing in twenty years.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Typical Libtard. I bet
December 31, 2008 - 12:01 ET by mattmTypical Libtard. I bet some of her best friends are Jews....
http://en.wikipedia....
December 31, 2008 - 12:17 ET by nicksmith112http://en.wikipedia....
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
See...
December 31, 2008 - 12:26 ET by mattmSee...
Just wondering
December 31, 2008 - 12:11 ET by Doc_NavySince the majority of American Jews voted for Obama, and a large portion of the new incoming libral Congress, and with the liberal MSM sentiment being that the current fighting in Israel is all the Jews fault... I'm just wondering how long it will be before they realise that when it comes to their own interests, and those of their Israeli counterparts, they backed the wrong horse.
Doc
how long before they realize?
December 31, 2008 - 12:22 ET by SickofLibsMy estimate would be possibly 150 years. But probably never.
DN
December 31, 2008 - 12:23 ET by Noel SheppardDN,
Jewish support for Democrats goes back to FDR who defeated Hitler and Nazism. As a result, three generations of Jews in America have been raised as Democrats. It's very difficult to break this chain of indoctrination.
After all, we could make the case that Republicans have been FAR better for African-Americans than Democrats. Yet, this bloc is virtually all left-leaning as well.
In fact, you could make the case that there are very few demographic groups that are at all served by Democrats. Yet, they now control two branches of our government.
Is it better propaganda coming from the left or diminished intellectual capacity? You tell me. ns
My dad gets his news from
December 31, 2008 - 12:33 ET by nicksmith112My dad gets his news from the network nightly news and Newsday.
Big bad Israel picking on the poor people of Gaza is the message most Americans are getting.
Noel, send an intern out to any street USA and ask them whats going on in Gaza.
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.
Noel, I sort of asked
December 31, 2008 - 12:48 ET by Chris NormanNoel,
I sort of asked the same thing myself here yesterday. The elected national Democrats have been, up until now, fairly consistent in their support of Israel. However, the "New Left" - the Kos and Air America crowd's anti-Israel attitude will sooner or later start showing up in the Democrats in Congress. I wondered that, when it does, if that will be enough to snap the Dems lock on the Jewish vote?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Dems are more shrewd,
December 31, 2008 - 12:38 ET by mattmDems are more shrewd, slick and clever. They are far better at political calculation and propaganda. They set up policy positions, which if opposed, make the opponent look like a bigot.
But since only idiots or ignoramuses could fall for this, the answer to your question is both.
I've heard some Jewish conservatives claim that the Liberal Jews are the non-religious ones whose Jewishness is merely nationality and has no more to do with Israel than I have to do with Italy.
As for the other constituency groups...the Dems pander, and they get votes in return... This is why Obama was compelled to dance around the question of when life begins and say it's "above his pay grade" to answer. It's also why Dem voters can bring themselves to vote for someone so obviously full of crap.
Republicans need to learn how to fight, while not abandoning their principles. Sadly, they're too busy trying to pander to Democrat swing vote, instead of trying to persuade people to convert.
Many Jews who were communist
December 31, 2008 - 12:50 ET by ahussersupported Stalin. Probably not in their best interest considering that Russia was probably only second in line behind Germany in the anti-semite department, (remember Julius and Ethel Rosenberg). I suspect that for many Jews political ideology trumps support for Israel. It seems a little confusing to me but the Jews are known for their business acumen which would also conflict with their socialist leanings.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
Fake Jews
December 31, 2008 - 13:36 ET by sentforth5Cain's children are not Jews, but say they are.Christ said in many places(I'll just choose one)Rev.ch2:9..."I know thy works,and tribulation,and poverty,(but thou art rich)and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews,and are not, but are the synagogue of satan."
The children of Judah are good people whose reputations suffer greatly by the actions of cain's children.Don't think for one minute that the Jewish people killed Christ.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Um, what?
December 31, 2008 - 13:37 ET by BDUm, what?
Cain
December 31, 2008 - 14:02 ET by sentforth5was not Adam's son,unfortunately the so-called "churches" scarcely teach that."Um, what?" is all too common.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Cain
December 31, 2008 - 14:16 ET by botgum what?
----- Radical Liberal
See?
December 31, 2008 - 14:19 ET by sentforth5Very sad.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
saw
December 31, 2008 - 14:24 ET by botgGenesis 4
1And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
----- Radical Liberal
and do be careful not to
December 31, 2008 - 14:34 ET by botgand do be careful not to mix the spiritual linages with the physical as you'd be apt to equate the spiritual death of Adam with physical death of animals.
----- Radical Liberal
C'mon botg
December 31, 2008 - 14:51 ET by sentforth5I've taught Scripture for 20 years, now,from the oldest transcripts available...I know what I'm doing. What you need is a FIRST EDITION Strong's Concordance and a little patience.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
are you a teacher and
December 31, 2008 - 15:01 ET by botgare you a teacher and know not these things? my words are spirit and they give life the flesh profits you not.
----- Radical Liberal
Uh huh.
December 31, 2008 - 15:03 ET by sentforth5Uh huh.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Gen.3:16
December 31, 2008 - 14:35 ET by sentforth5"Unto the woman He said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy CONCEPTION..."
Eve had fraternal twins. Two seperate conceptions;same birth. satan fathered cain and Adam fathered Abel. Keep reading ch 4 and you'll find cain has a seperate genealogy from Adam. Two seperate bloodlines. Shame on the so-called "churches".Where are the teachers??
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
told you to be
December 31, 2008 - 14:44 ET by botgtold you to be careful.....
----- Radical Liberal
Sent forth
December 31, 2008 - 15:10 ET by cocodrieThe scriptures do not say that Cain and Able were twins. It specifically says "Adam knew his wife ; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord". "Knew" means sexual intercourse so Adam begot Cain. To say that Satan begot Cain is adding to scripture and is strictly forbidden. Shame on the so-called bible scholars that put meanings to scripture that are not there.
Thank you for your two cents worth cocodrie
December 31, 2008 - 15:25 ET by sentforth5As I said, I've taught the King James for two decades, now..How long have you taught it? The King James is the best English translation available. but the original manuscripts are written in Ancient Hebrew, Chaldean and Greek...hence the need for teachers. But, hey, you have a good New Year!
Argue for your limitations and you get to keep them!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Pride goeth before a stumble
December 31, 2008 - 15:30 ET by choselife3xAnd a haughty spirit before a fall.
You're coming off arrogant, whether you intend to or not.
God didn't write the Holy Scripture for you to use against people to prove your superior knowledge. Stop sneering.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
I sneer not...
December 31, 2008 - 15:38 ET by sentforth5I am only interested in what the conversation started with..."LIBERAL JEWS"...I never threw the first punch.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
sry sent
December 31, 2008 - 15:45 ET by botgbut the "i've taught for...how long have you" does indeed come off as prideful.
----- Radical Liberal
Well, for that I will apologize
December 31, 2008 - 15:50 ET by sentforth5I'm sorry,cocodrie. I'm not here to flame threads or start trouble! Please overlook this little encounter. I really do wish you a very good new year!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
sentforth
December 31, 2008 - 20:10 ET by cocodrieI apologize to you also. I meant no offence.
Our exchange on this thread was very mild. You needed to be at some of our discussions and classes at church. My closest friends were the ones I had the hottest discussions with. unfortunately for me most of them have already gone on.
Sometimes I get a little too passionate about things. We are all in this together and we need to bless one another. I'll behave in the future
Who's punching?
December 31, 2008 - 15:52 ET by choselife3xYou dropped a theological bomb with the good/bad seed reference.
As a pastor, you know how controversial the subject is in theological circles, much less the general public. You going to start talking about nephilim now?
This is a site concerned with liberal bias in the media.
Go find a theological site to discuss the Hebrew texts with.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Relax
December 31, 2008 - 16:00 ET by sentforth5Not everyone understands "liberal Jews", K? Yours are the only feathers ruffled.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Relax
December 31, 2008 - 16:21 ET by choselife3xI was writing that post while you were apologising to cocodrie. When it posted I saw your apology, K?
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
K!
December 31, 2008 - 16:35 ET by sentforth5I'm sorry goes to you.too...I was not dropping bombs, I just hate to see my brother Judah called communist, and then, BAM!
HI SHERYL!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
SF5
December 31, 2008 - 17:00 ET by choselife3xAt college I met many dyed in the wool secularists. After getting to know each other over the course of the semester they would (hesitantly) ask if I was a Christian. Upon responding in the affirmative, the response was always, "you can't be, you're too nice!"
Apparently they had all been hit over the head with the Bible at some point. They were all now convinced that Christians are super arrogant jerks with nothing to offer but empty platitudes and lousy attitudes. Yuck, didn't mean to make a lame rhyme.
Anyway, ever since, I get annoyed when I see people quoting the Bible in a way that can be perceived as know it all. If we do that, we are playing into the stereotype that effectively pushes people away.
All I'm sayin' *shrug*
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Me too cl3x
December 31, 2008 - 17:03 ET by sherylsimsI had a woman tell me that she liked me because I wasn't like those "Christian moms" at all. At first I was a little offended but then she explained how they were always acting very holier than thou and telling everyone what they "shouldn't let their kids do". I guess it was a weird compliment. At least that is what I will tell myself.
fortunately
December 31, 2008 - 17:14 ET by sentforth5I knew from the word go that Iwas easily the worst teacher God could have chosen, so I'll be okay, THANKS!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Hey sf... I just bet that
December 31, 2008 - 17:30 ET by bigtimerHey sf...
I just bet that there are quite a few other people you have met/taught in your life who feel different than your summation.
You and yours have a healthy wonderful New Year!
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
sentforth
December 31, 2008 - 17:42 ET by sherylsimsI have found great value in what you have put here in the past. Don't be hard on yourself. I am sure you are a great teacher, and it is obvious you have studied the Bible and love the Truth of God's word. It is often difficult to communicate on the computer because people don't REALLY know you and only have what you have typed to go by.
BFF
December 31, 2008 - 17:20 ET by choselife3x"Holier than thou know-it-all.....who does that remind me of....oh yeah, Pharisees! (no, I'm not calling you one, sf5)
Just saying, people didn't flock to Jesus because he browbeat them.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
3x
December 31, 2008 - 17:30 ET by sherylsimsLooks like we need to find a fatter thread or go on a diet...
Heavy Sigh
December 31, 2008 - 17:46 ET by choselife3xNow all my fellow Bibliophiles are gonna start thinking I'm one of them thar 'permissive' Christians. All sweetness and light. God'll LUVVV yew no matter what.....types. *hurling*
I've read the whole thing too, guys. Many, many times.
Show of hands, who's got a copy of the book of Jasher referred to in Joshua and 2nd Samuel?!!
Ooh, ooh, me!
Now, go to a theological site and bash each other over the head with the Bible quotes while I talk to my good friend Sheryl. About something relevant. To this site.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
who's bashing anyone?
December 31, 2008 - 17:52 ET by porpoiseboydon't read more into posts than the print on the page, unless you have something previous from that person that would give you reason to infer such. you seem very nice & together, i know sheryl is....
"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason" Ben Franklin
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
Pboy
December 31, 2008 - 18:05 ET by choselife3xI agreed with every point of your post. I inferred from your posting it that you thought I would disagree with you. I didn't want to get in a discussion trying to defend myself from all the different ways I might have been misinterpreted.
If I was incorrect, I apologise.
Sf5 was the one posting a reference to my favorite book in the Old Testement.
I've read it.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
no worries 3x
December 31, 2008 - 18:16 ET by porpoiseboybut i did not mean to infer that i thought we were in disagreement. i was trying to add to a discussion not start a dissention. it's nice to be able to play off each other to expand a conversation. i've read the things you write and generally would say we are sympatico on many subjects.
"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason" Ben Franklin
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
Ditto
December 31, 2008 - 18:33 ET by choselife3xLove your tagline(s), BTW. :)
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
3x
December 31, 2008 - 17:57 ET by sherylsimsYes, back to the IMPORTANT topics like Roseanne! LOL! For reals, these threads just take on a life of their own, don't they? Oh and by the way, we also have the book of Jasher< and Josephus, and an entire room of historical commentaires and other Biblical reference books, but I have to admit, I haven't read most of them.
sheryl
December 31, 2008 - 18:04 ET by botgperhaps a better moniker for our friend than XXX
just saying....
----- Radical Liberal
Bruce
December 31, 2008 - 18:09 ET by sherylsimsI had to read that several times before I got it. LOL. Yeah, maybe we will just rate her XXX and keep the kiddies away. HAHA (Kidding, loveya Dog Whisperer)
; )
December 31, 2008 - 18:18 ET by botg; )
?
December 31, 2008 - 18:36 ET by choselife3xI didn't do NUTHIN.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
cl3x
December 31, 2008 - 18:39 ET by botgnever said you did but people were callling you 3X (XXX)
----- Radical Liberal
Bruce
December 31, 2008 - 18:46 ET by choselife3xPM me their names, I'll deal with 'em. *rolling up sleeves* :)
Did that start before or after I swatted the dog?
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
j u s t s c r o l l u p
December 31, 2008 - 18:56 ET by botgj
u
s
t
s
c
r
o
l
l
u
p
----- Radical Liberal
jesus beat on the pharisees hard
December 31, 2008 - 17:31 ET by porpoiseboybecause they were supposed to be the religious leaders of the people and held the people to standards they did not hold themselves to and used their position to beat the people over the head with. jesus also told sinners to repent...i don't remember the people castigating him for that because they knew they were sinners. now that we live in a time when God's definition of sin is not even recognized, when you tell people to stop sinning you fall in the world's catagory of "browbeater" ....not the same thing. christians are castigated for not only preaching a higher standard, but also for living a higher standard with God's help.
"Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason" Ben Franklin
Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left
Exactly porpoiseboy
January 1, 2009 - 12:16 ET by sentforth5Discipline executed with real love is necessary...they were called disciples because Jesus was DISCIPLINING them for the important work they were about to do. I know Christ was whipping the backs of the bigshots in the church for money changing and selling stuff not worthy for sacrifice or offerings.
I am a tender man and I wish I could be sweeter in teaching but I am a disciplinarian and I often am received with anger, but hey...they killed Christ, and I just get shouted at and questioned. Well, not always, but it happens and I seem to be working against what I'm trying to accomplish. I am imperfect and am ever learning. I am often wrong and still keep studying with prayer...but I cannot stop from teaching. I'm sorry, but I just can't I;m trying to tone myself down on NB as I know this is not a church, we are exposing liberal bias,which often ends up in the religious realm.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
I can't resist!
December 31, 2008 - 17:34 ET by sentforth5Isaiah 65:4&5
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
cl3x
December 31, 2008 - 16:28 ET by sherylsimsYou still here?? I thot u had laundry to do!
sheryl
December 31, 2008 - 16:32 ET by botgthe place can be addictive ;^ )
----- Radical Liberal
It must be botg
December 31, 2008 - 16:37 ET by sherylsimsI keep drifting back in all day long. You people are just so entertaining, enlightening, and downright LOVEABLE!
Bruce
December 31, 2008 - 16:40 ET by choselife3xVery.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
BFF
December 31, 2008 - 16:37 ET by choselife3xDid it. :) I don't log off. I just go do stuff and check back in. Now I'm going to go cook up a little salmon for the girls' dinner. :) yum.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Mmmm... Sounds yummy. We
December 31, 2008 - 16:44 ET by sherylsimsMmmm... Sounds yummy. We are having lentil soup. I wish it was salmon though. I wonder if anyone cares when these threads go so far off topic. Wasn't it originally about Roseanne? Ok, I can get it back there... Remember when she first got famous? She was the whiney "Domestic Goddess" comedienne. I don't think she had any other act than that. It was what her entire TV show was based on. She hasn't had much going for her since back then.
Sheryl!
December 31, 2008 - 16:38 ET by sentforth5Happy New Year and may God give your family a fantastic 2009!!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Thank you sentforth
December 31, 2008 - 16:46 ET by sherylsimsAnd right back at you! God bless you in your studies and endeavors.
BTW
December 31, 2008 - 16:54 ET by sentforth5I do remember waaaay back when roseanne was funny...not any more, though.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
sentforth
December 31, 2008 - 16:59 ET by sherylsimsYes, we thought she was very funny back in the early 80's when we first saw her. And she did some ads for Ralph's grocery store that had us all laughing out loud. I think at some point during the second season of her TV show she got bitter and also full of herself. Then she wasn't funny any more. (It was about the time she divorced her husband and abandoned her kids.)
well in my KJV it does say
December 31, 2008 - 15:36 ET by botgwell in my KJV it does say pride goeth before a fall....
of course i prefer the KJV since i am more familiar with it than other English versions even though the NASB and NIV etc are from manuscripts closer to the autrographs than the KJV was, not to put down the Textus Receptus.
----- Radical Liberal
-
December 31, 2008 - 19:44 ET by cocodrie-
Sent forth
December 31, 2008 - 19:42 ET by cocodrieIt is not my two cents worth. That is what is written in scripture.>/p>
Better check on your translations of the bible. The King James was translated from the Latin Vulgate and not the original languages and is not the most accurate.
congratulations on your years of teaching but I have a few more years teaching than you.
Be careful being dogmatic on some points. You could be wrong - I have been wrong many times over my many years. That is why I take the bible for exactly what it says without any added meanings.
Gen. 3:16
December 31, 2008 - 19:23 ET by cocodrieGen 3:16 tells Eve she will have difficulty bearing children.
Gen. 4:1 says "And Adam knew Eve His wife and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said I have gotten a man from the Lord." Her conception of Cain is when she had intercourse with Adam.
I have seen this claim before that Cain and Abel were twins but it is not supported by scripture.
God bless and have a blessed year.
Don't get angry with me...
December 31, 2008 - 21:29 ET by sentforth5but all I did was take a simple Strong's concordance and looked up that word AGAIN and it sent me to the Hebrew dictionary reference number 3254 and the word in the Hebrew is yasap and it means: "a primitive root; to add or augment (often adverbally to continue to do a thing ) :- add, again, any more, cease, come more, conceive again, continue, exceed, further...etc"
So in context we read: Gen 4:1-And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said. I have gotten a man from the Lord.
Yes, Adam did know his wife and the child was Abel. EVE said(nine months later) I got a man from the Lord...Eve said that...not God...let's read on:
Gen 4:2 And she AGAIN bare his brother Abel. And Able was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
So she continued in birth which means she had twins. Note in verses 3 &4 that the children came of age to make their offerings to God at the same time...simple, they were twins.And isn' it interesting that Abel kept sheep, much like Christ.
I don't expect anyone to believe me or disbelieve me,but I am a teacher, and as such I am responsible to teach the truth of what I've learned, and I will certainly answer to God for what I've taught. In fact, we teachers are going to be the first one's judged so that everyone can see what is to become of us. I won't apologize for the Word of God. I wish the King James Bible still had the original letter that the orginizers wrote to the readers. They said they did the best they could, but it was only a translation and that they knew there were things in it that may not be correct, and to be a diligent reader.
Through the years since 1611, God has blessed us with many aides to help us study...we have the Smith's Bible Dictionary, The Strong's Concordance, The Moffat Bible, The Companion Bible by E. Bullinger and many others to help us study to show ourselves approved.
I'm not bashing anyone, this is simply what I teach..if I'm wrong God will make short work of me, He guaranteed me of that. This will be my last comment for the night,as I fear I am whizzin every body off, and this is a night of celebration.
God Bless NB!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
But how does this
December 31, 2008 - 21:35 ET by BDBut how does this apply?
The select group called "Liberal Jews" were cited as a political force and suddenly we get a million six postings digressing into biblical theory?
How is it relevant?
sentforth
December 31, 2008 - 22:49 ET by cocodriePlease, I could never find fault with a good discussion. I am just going by the simple scripture. I use the King James along with others.
While the word again (yacaph) can mean to continue its primary is to add or augment. It simply means she added another child to the family. In Gen 25:1 It says "Then again (yacaph) Abraham took a wife and her name was Ketturah." This is a separate occurance from his taking other wives.
I beleive that the two verses Gen.4:1 andd Gen.4:2 are two separate occurances.
Cain's murder of Abel was committed years after their birth. Scripture says nothing about their age at that time.
This is one of those areas where interpretation one way or the other is neither right nor wrong. It has no bearing on the bible message. I enjoy reading your posts an find that I agree with them. I should not have commented on this here because I made it appear that an insignificant point is of major importance.
God bless - Jesus is Lord!
when a new
January 1, 2009 - 11:18 ET by sentforth5When a new thought or occurence happens in the scripture, or the beginning of a new subject is introduced, just after the verse number a black bold mark appears (not available on my keyboard) to denote the new thought. In 2Peter ch 1: 20 God says through Peter that no no prophecy in scripture is of any private interpretation. That's why Christ said "Behold, I have foretold you all things."
cain and Abel produced their offerings to the Lord at the same time, whatever the age of accountability was is not relavent...they both came to that age at the same time. Twins.
In John ch 8 v 44 Jesus says to the kenite scribes:"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. he was a murderer from the beginning....."- who was the first murderer? Cain. The law against murder was not pronounced by God prior to the murder of Abel, Therefore God did not punish him with death, but rather put a mark on him so people could identify him as a killer.That is the root of the mark of the beast. John ch 38 is only one of many places that identifies the children of cain.
In Rev ch 20:2 it says satan was "that old serpent"-"And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the devil, and satan, and bound him a thousand years."
Can you really buy the story that a talking snake was in a wooden tree talking Eve into eating an apple? I don't see apple anywhere there.....
Thanks for the discussion; as I said, I don't want you to believe me or disbelieve me, this is simply what I teach, and I will answer for it good or bad,
Thanks!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Question sf5
January 1, 2009 - 11:24 ET by sherylsimsIf it were the case that some people were descended from Satan then wouldn't they have been eliminated through the flood? How did they all go through Noah's family and not combine blood lines?
well....
January 1, 2009 - 11:55 ET by sentforth5Noah was instructed to take TWO OF ALL FLESH aboard the ark(Gen 7:16). The children of satan had Eve for their mother and were therefore flesh and in 1Chronicles ch 2 v 55 we read:
And the families of the scribes which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and the Suchathites. These are the Kenites that came of Hemath, the father of the house a Rechab.So the kenites did make it through the flood.
Some even believe that the flood was not world-wide, that it only filled the valley of the giants...Kidren, I think, and even ancient Chinese history recorder a huge flood to their west..... I'm not sure, but an olive tree cannot grow to maturity in 150 days, but as the flood waters went down, the dove returned to Noah with an olive leaf in her beak. So that's my understanding so far.
Noah's Generations were perfect in pedigree, but after the flood there were instances of cross breeding and the outcome was not good. That's how Esau lost his birth-right and the promise was given to Jacob. But through Japheth, I think, Adam's bloodline was preserved.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
sentforth, why would you
January 1, 2009 - 12:23 ET by botgsentforth, why would you assume the offering is brought for attaining the age of accountability?
Also it is explicitly stated that the mark was so others would not kill Cain, it was implied that they would know him.
Also you will note that Noah brought 7 each of the clean animals into the ark, does this not teach you that the law was known before it being codified through the writing of Moses? What else were they aware of? Yom Kippor, perhaps?
----- Radical Liberal
Hey botg! Happy New Year!
January 1, 2009 - 12:59 ET by sentforth5I never assume..I have come to the opinion that this is the case by many of the Authors and Theologians I've come to trust over the years. In the Strong's Concordance hebrew dictionary, in context to Gen.4:3, that word offering was rendered from minha #4503:
From an unused root meaning to apportion;i.e. to bestow,a donation. euphemistically tribute....and so on. To me these are adult activities.
Until God states something it is not law. "Be fruitful and multiply" was law because God told them to do it.Do not murder had not yet been ststed by God ,and in my opinion, until Adam and Eve had their downfall, everyone prior to them and were innocent people free of sin. Sin was introduced by satan. Like I said, IN MY OPINION.
When God said "of every clean beast thou shall take to thee by sevens" that became Law to Noah, but the formal codice, or law, was not introduced until the time of Moses. Note ch 7 : 16 says: And they went in, male and female OF ALL FLESH, as God had commanded him: and the Lord shut him in.
God placed a mark on Cain so that people would recognize him and not kill him because he did not break a law. Plus God has an Election to use to execute good on the Earth as well as a negative group of people who execute the bad on this Earth and therefore the Earth has Good and evil so we all have a level playing field,for us to choose one or the other. Therein are we judged. That is my opinion.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
right as i said before the
January 1, 2009 - 13:41 ET by botgright as i said before the law was codified, Noah knew what clean animals were without explanation.
also re Cain:
13 Cain said to the LORD, "My punishment is more than I can bear. 14 Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me."
15 But the LORD said to him, "Not so [e] ; if anyone kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over." Then the LORD put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. 16 So Cain went out from the LORD's presence and lived in the land of Nod, [f] east of Eden.
so that no one who found him, how would they find him without recognizing him?
God elects bad? Let not any say God tempts us to evil but we are led astray by our own desires......
----- Radical Liberal
Yikes...I've done all I
January 1, 2009 - 14:29 ET by sentforth5Yikes...I've done all I can do on the subject of cain....I would only be repeating myself..see if you can do a study on the mark of the beast....maybe we can both benefit from it....
God elects bad? My response will be in examples.
Joel ch 2 speaks of the locust army...same army described in Rev ch9...These are religious types sent by God to confuse and strip bare the minds of would-be Christians...they feed Christians with lies about Christ... God said in Joel ch2:25
And I will restore to you the years thet the locust has eaten,the cankerworm, and the caterpillar, and the palmerworm, MY GREAT ARMY WHICH I SENT AMONG YOU. Why would God send an army that tells lies about the deity of Christ?
How 'bout Pharoah? God set him up for Moses to tear him down..God said many times of Pharoah and the Egyptians..."Pharoah shall not hearken unto you; that my wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt." (Gen 11:9)
God uses some very ugly people in a negative aspect so that His ultimate will should come to pass. He allows satan's evil spirit to be on Earth for that very reason.
At the catabole, or overthrow of satan in the first Earth age, God pronounced death on satan, but He didnt kill him right away because He is using Him much like a tool. I did not say evil elect, but He uses the election as well as a particular group of "bad"people to accomplish good and evil on the Earth so everybody has even examples of both so God can see what each individual will choose. Then comes judgement and each child receives what they chose.
Hey, I gotta leave the computer and do some stuff. Be back later!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
1. The Bible not only does
January 1, 2009 - 04:26 ET by tim_gallant1. The Bible not only does not need to tell us every time that conception precedes birth - it does not do so just a few verses later, in 4.25, when Seth is born. It does not need to tell us about sexual relations every time, either; as in most instances, it does not.
2. The affirmation of Eve immediately follows in response to the birth of Cain, not to the birth of Abel. It is an affirmation of faith, made in light of what God had said in Gen 3.15. He had promised seed that would fight for her in contest with the serpent.
3. Scripture never suggests that Cain's biological father is the serpent. If the serpent/Satan really were the father, that silence would be beyond surprising, given the conversations between God and Cain before and after the murder of Abel. But instead, God treats Cain with gentleness and entreaty; indeed, He tells Cain that if he does well, he will be accepted. (In truth, Satan could not father a child. The notion that angels father children is based on a serious misreading of Genesis 6, which in turn arises due to failure to understand the thread of Gen 4-5.)
4. The reason there are separate genealogies is simple: by *defection* (not birth), Cain had *become* seed for the serpent, and Seth's line carries on the godly line. These are thus placed in opposition - not because of some biological difference, but due to a covenantal one.
There is nothing in the text - whether the King James Version, or the Hebrew - to support your position.
http://www.changeint...
I think my thread
December 31, 2008 - 14:36 ET by ahussergot bushwacked by digression.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
But how is this applicable
December 31, 2008 - 21:17 ET by BDSentforth:
But how is this applicable to the question?
I guess the simple answer
January 1, 2009 - 18:31 ET by BDI guess the simple answer to the question of "How does this apply to the question" is:
"It does not. It is simply yet another theological rant of lesser value."
Thank you. I will be in town all weekend....
BD!
January 1, 2009 - 18:42 ET by sentforth5It never did..I wasn't ignoring you, I am a two-finger typer and it takes me forever. All I said was "fake Jews" and I should never have brought the posterity of cain into the thread and look what I started. Sorry. Sorry everyone.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
ahusser
December 31, 2008 - 14:49 ET by botgwould you propose a certain amount of sociological Stockholm Syndrome has affected segments of this sub-culture?
----- Radical Liberal
well ahusser
December 31, 2008 - 15:14 ET by botgwhat thinkest thou?
----- Radical Liberal
If you mean the Jews and not the guys throwing
December 31, 2008 - 15:24 ET by ahusserscriptural thunderbolts at each other. I am not sure what the disconnect is or why they would go against their seeming self-interest. They are historically a people who were active in the socialist/communist movements and were in the vanguard of said movement(s). Many were exiled or escaped persecution for their socialist beliefs and being Jewish and ended up here. Their support of Stalin always baffled me but it is the ideology that trumps all apparently. But you see the overwhelmingly anti-Israel stance the left continually puts forth which to me is disguised anti-semitism. I think they traditionally have a suspicion of those they believe are on the right as incipient Nazi's or fascists no matter how many Republican Administration's have been staunch allies of Israel. They may also (maybe rightfully so) fear the Christian Right as anti-semitic in nature and very much allied with the Republican Party. On the other hand I believe the Israeli's know who their allies are. Someone blogged on a similar thread a while ago that absentee ballots from jews from Israel were mostly for McCain. I don't know if this was true but would be logical. But Obama's election changes much as I am thinking a more at least neutral stance the administration may take towards Israel for obvious reasons may throw the mideast into real turmoil and these missile attacks could seem like touch football.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
yes i did mean the Jews,
December 31, 2008 - 15:40 ET by botgyes i did mean the Jews, who with a long history of persecution have it seems attempted to appease the ones most likely to attack.
----- Radical Liberal
Sorry, ahusser!
December 31, 2008 - 16:46 ET by sentforth5Sorry..we've never shared comments, so now I prolly seem like a condescending jerk. Didn't mean to..I'm harmless as a hamster with a broken leg. Happy New Year!
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Happy New Year to you also SF5
December 31, 2008 - 18:38 ET by ahusserI've really come to enjoy threading on NB so happy NY to all even the trolls. Haha.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
Is it better propaganda
December 31, 2008 - 14:11 ET by JerIs it better propaganda coming from the left or diminished intellectual capacity?
I'll make it a true daily double, Alex. What is "common sense"?
Jer
Jer
December 31, 2008 - 15:47 ET by Noel SheppardJer,
Started celebrating the New Year early, Jer? Better slow down or you'll never make it to midnight! :-) ns
Sorry, Noel... That
December 31, 2008 - 16:55 ET by JerSorry, Noel...
That second slice of rum fruit cake went straight to my head. :-)
Jer
Jer :)
December 31, 2008 - 15:57 ET by choselife3x'What is truth, O jesting Pilate?'
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
'What is truth, O jesting
December 31, 2008 - 16:36 ET by Jer'What is truth, O jesting Pilate?'
Jesus!...I'm asking the questions here.
Jer
Whether 'tis nobler in the
December 31, 2008 - 18:30 ET by choselife3xWhether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer.....
Ah, nothing like 2 Shakespeare references in one thread.
Saw your 'bust' response on the Palin thread. It's getting time consuming to load up so I'll just tell ya here,
You are seriously funny. Too funny to be a Dem. Come play for our side, you'll never regret it.
We're a lot of fun at parties. Virgin Mary's, black coffee, Scrabble, Bingo.....How can you resist?
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
choselife...
December 31, 2008 - 18:52 ET by JerAre you kidding? You actually think all my years as a loyal Democrat can be bought off by a couple of board games? [Throw in Pictionary and I'll do it.]
Jer
Note: I was having problems with that other thread, too. Thought maybe it was just me. (Clicking a comment takes you to the top of the first page, scroll to the bottom, click "next", go to second page, scroll down and search for post--too much trouble.)
Jer
December 31, 2008 - 18:58 ET by choselife3xWe have Pictionary DELUXE. And red wine. In tiny, TINY little cups.
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
The DELUXE version--and red
December 31, 2008 - 19:12 ET by JerThe DELUXE version--and red wine? When's the party? I'll start reading the Gipper's autobiography in the meantime.
Jer
Now that is just scary
December 31, 2008 - 19:29 ET by choselife3xGMTA
I was going to say that after games and drinks we all go out and win one for the Gipper.
Wait, is that you Jeremiah?! My LLDT!!!(long lost Dem twin)
Oh my Obama!!
How have you been?
In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.
Oh, now I know you guys are making stuff up!
December 31, 2008 - 12:23 ET by JWFIsn't Roseanne dead?
I thought she commited suicide when they kicked her in the view and that horrible horrible horrible horrible stinky stanky stunk variety show bombed.
I offer further proof! She is not writing in that awful awful grammatically putrid poety she always writes in.
Little late for April fools jokes guys!
Sincerely,
a Veteran of a 1000 rosie o'wars.
Nothing to see here folks!
December 31, 2008 - 12:18 ET by larry on LIjust another libterd crying out for attention.
Maybe???
December 31, 2008 - 12:28 ET by flyingmonkeyToo much Mackeral, Shark, and Swordfish???
Please stop
December 31, 2008 - 12:29 ET by mikepatrRosanne Barr is a has been. Even when she was famous it was because she was an actress, not because of her keen political savvy.
Please stop enabling these washed up nobodies by publishing posts every time they spew their idiotic drivel.
People shouldn't care what somebody thinks because they happen to be on TV or in the movies. That is totally irrelevant. Their opinion is of no more importance than yours, mine, or the guy next door.
"Their opinion is of no
December 31, 2008 - 12:55 ET by Chris Norman"Their opinion is of no more importance than yours, mine, or the guy next door."
If only that were true. Their celebrity alone makes them influential in some segments of the population. You're right - people shouldn't care what they think. However - unfortunately - some do - enough that it still needs to be noted here.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
It's a shame that it's already been done...
December 31, 2008 - 12:30 ET by c5thenBut they could make a documentary staring Rosanne and Rosie O and call it "Dumb and Dumber".
Wait a minute...how about "B and O - the story of the stupid express"?
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012
Rosanne and Rosie O documentary...
December 31, 2008 - 13:53 ET by SickofLibs...or a pay-per-view Jello wrestling death match?
I'd subscribe if it was guaranteed one of them didn't survive.
Roseanne Barr?
December 31, 2008 - 12:35 ET by BlondeI read the comments....and not being fully awake yet, mistook her for Rosie O'Donnell. Go figure.
Same twisted liberal pretzel logic, vitriol, and illiterate blather.
Poltical genius she is not. The only difference between the two is that Barr is a tad thinner, but that's the result of bariatric surgery and no effort of hers to quit stuffing her stupid face.
The width of dumbness -- barr none
December 31, 2008 - 12:40 ET by Jack BauerThe constitution only guarantees free speech from government dictat.
It's doesn't guarantee that the "speech" has even the most tangential relationship with intelligence.
Meanwhile, back in the real world where Israeli Jews are fighting the depraved barbarians for their very existence, here's what those "poor" Gazans have been busy doing this Christmas...
http://www.jpost.com...
You know Israel's won a war
December 31, 2008 - 12:50 ET by wiwfYou know Israel's won a war again when the world cries for a cease-fire. This must be cease-fire #9085709274
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Barr None
December 31, 2008 - 12:55 ET by SkipperMLMThis concerns me that the media has remained virtually silent for the last 3 years of how Hamas has sent on average over 5 missiles a day to Israel from Gaza. I think 6000 missiles is enough to provoke war. And they are being funded by those who want to annihilate Israel. But now that they are protecting themselves, the media is reporting every detail as if it were unprovoked!
So Rosanne, remember when you grab your crotch again...there's nothing there.
just wow
December 31, 2008 - 13:56 ET by candanceWhile the Bloods and the Crypts probably appreciate the plug, I imagine they would like it more if she bothered to spell their names correctly.
And people actually take this lady seriously? Sad.
I'm a typical white person.
Simple Explanation
December 31, 2008 - 14:37 ET by northoneUgh oh. Somebody forgot to take her meds!
The Jewish Soul is being
December 31, 2008 - 14:49 ET by bigtimerThe Jewish Soul is being tortured in Israel.
What a complete imbecile, once again she opens her filthy mouth and inserts both feet.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
sad
December 31, 2008 - 14:50 ET by jackie3Over 50 palastine children have been killed in the last 3 days. Missles have dropped on thier houses, schools and places considered "safe" by most of us. 12 Israel's children have been killed in the last 8 years by enemy fire. Israel has the 4th strongest military in the world. The Gaza Strip has stones to throw back at them.
Politics aside, these kids cannot leave the Gaza Strip to find a safe place during this military "shock and awe" operation. These kids are trapped!!! The hospitals are over flowing with woulded children. Half the population in the Gaza Strip are kids.
I just saw a picture of a 4 year old being buried. Her 4 sisters all died in thier bedroom when a missle fell on their house. Only a 15 month old baby survived.
It's not about Jew vs Muslim anymore. It's about shooting fish in a barrel. To get one bad fish in the bottom they killed a bunch of good ones.
And now there is a battle cry for the Muslims as these kids become "Martyrs" and the USA is dragged into Israel's war.
Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
jackie it is sad
December 31, 2008 - 14:54 ET by botgthat there is no world wide outcry against Hamas for using human shields and children as pawns. Very sad indeed that you fall for their stunt.
----- Radical Liberal
Jackie... Yes it's very
December 31, 2008 - 14:55 ET by Clear thinkerJackie...
Yes it's very sad. Why their parents don't denounce their leaders and throw them out of power is beyond me. I blame every single death on Hamas and Iran!!!
PHS - Palin Hatred Syndrome
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
You said it yourself-
December 31, 2008 - 14:57 ET by sentforth5Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Yes it is very sad
December 31, 2008 - 15:04 ET by BlondeBut the parents of these poor dead children, voted for Hamas...whom they knew to be in bed with Iran, and terror.
Their parents could have voted for sanity, and peace. But they didn't.
3,000 rockets lobbed at Israel over the past year....yet you call this "Israel's War".
Tell that to the 14 year old boy from my home state who was blown up by a homicide bomber when he visited Israel last year. What did that little kid from Fort Lauderdale have to do with it, eh?
Quit drinking the kool-aid, Jackie.
wow J
December 31, 2008 - 15:12 ET by botgGMTA x4
----- Radical Liberal
Natch, B.
December 31, 2008 - 15:17 ET by BlondeYou're surprised?
A Happy and prosperous NY to you too, my friend.
well that i might be in
December 31, 2008 - 15:23 ET by botgwell that i might be in the vincinity of such wonderful people as the 3 of you delights me no end.
----- Radical Liberal
LOL, B!
December 31, 2008 - 15:28 ET by BlondeThanks.
Someday, soon.
Oh cry me a river
December 31, 2008 - 15:22 ET by bigtimerOh cry me a river J3....
Where are you on your feelings about Iran eh?
You may want to start pointing your finger right there.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
I have seen it said here
December 31, 2008 - 15:58 ET by jistincaseI have seen it said here before and I agree that they just need to wipe out Gaza completely, force them into Egypt and occupy all the land. After that bomb Iran into the stone age again and take all their oil fields. There will be no real peace between Israel and any Islam country until the Islamics are all gone.
Yes, jackie, only Israel's
December 31, 2008 - 17:06 ET by SmartypantsYes, jackie, only Israel's missiles hurt the innocent. Hammas stands on the side of reason and sanity; and Israel should capitulate to this group, or at a minimum, choose not to defend itself. jackie, the Arab world declared war on Israel, not the other way around. If the Arabs in the Mid-East want to live in peace, they have the power to do so within their grasp. Of course, you and I know they do not really want that, do they?
Are you stupid? Katyusha rockets are not rocks!
December 31, 2008 - 17:18 ET by PopularTechKatyusha rockets are not rocks! Frickin Hamas is HEAVILY ARMED!
I am so sick of propagandists like you spreading lies about subjects you have no remote understanding of.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
I would suggest y'all read
December 31, 2008 - 18:08 ET by JillCWI would suggest y'all read the following piece by Ellis Washington. It would certainly put meat on your bones (as stated above in 8 Amos). http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=84945 Everytime a nation turns its back on Israel, God deals with that nation in like fashion. Remember the Abrahamic Covenant is an everlasting deal. As for Cain and Abel, they were not the twins. Jacob and Esau were and Jacob is often referred to as the deceiver or supplanter. That's not the case, but that's a whole other lesson. Esau was out to kill Jacob before they were even born. Jacob landed a few pre-emptive strikes to stop the infanticide by his own twin.
UH
December 31, 2008 - 19:21 ET by sentforth5Aww, forget it...no, I must say that cain and Able were indeed fraternal twins.
Anyhoo.. Happy New Years
Amos 8:11 Put some meat on dem bones!
Um, who cares whether Cain
December 31, 2008 - 21:27 ET by BDUm, who cares whether Cain and Able were twins or not. It is not germaine to the question.
I personnally assert that the first Jew was named Bolliver Shagnasty III.... And that has just as much relevance.
Fret not, J3,
December 31, 2008 - 21:23 ET by R D HelmIf recent history holds, and I believe that it will, Olmert will be caving fairly soon, thus leaving plenty of your Hamas friends around to fire their rockets indiscriminately (at least the IAF is targeting the Hamas launch sites and command centers-not their fault the cowardly Hamas bastards just happen to locate them in populated areas) into Israel somewhere down the road. Or, maybe next time it will be Hezbollah, or some other group. Who knows?
Of course, now that Barack Hussein Obama (who is certainly no friend of the Jewish race, the smallest minority on the planet) is but twenty days from his anointing, perhaps you and your tolerant friends can convince him, as well as his favorite organization, the UN, to jointly declare the state of Israel a failure, and have it relocated to a place where they will not be in conflict with your precious Palestinians. Say, somewhere like the moon.
Of course, the violence in the region will continue virtually uninterrupted, as the different Palestinian factions will quickly begin to square off against each other. You see, what you and most of your ilk doesn't seem to realize is that, the only thing the Palestinian people hate more than Jews is other Palestinians. Instead of randomly launching their lethal projectiles at Jews, they will be lobbing them at each other.
That is, the ones who aren't busy building a spaceship so they can fly to the moon and kill all the Jews who were moved up there.
-Dave
“Them that’s going get on the wagon.
Them that ain’t get out of the way.”
Then Hamas needs to stop
December 31, 2008 - 21:29 ET by BDJackie3:
Then Hamas needs to stop stockpiling their rockets in schools. Nicht war?
Maybe Hamas should stop firing Rockets and killing people?
December 31, 2008 - 22:39 ET by PopularTechRocket Attack at Israeli Kindergarten Kills Boy and Man (The New York Times, June 29, 2004)
Gaza rocket strike hurts children (BBC, July 25, 2004)
6 kids wounded in Gaza rocket attack (The Jerusalem Post, July 26, 2004)
Rocket kills two Israeli children (BBC, September 29, 2004)
Gaza Strip Mortar Attack Injures 11 Israeli Soldiers (Bloomberg, December 17, 2004)
Rocket Attack Kills An Israeli Woman (The Washington Times, July 15, 2005)
Palestinians fire rocket at Israel from Gaza, wounding Thai worker (The Jerusalem Post, July 26, 2006)
Rocket from Gaza injures Israeli children on playground (CBC News, July 28, 2006)
Man injured by Gaza rocket fire (BBC, August 2, 2006)
Palestinians in Gaza resume rocket attacks on Israel (International Herald Tribune, September 1, 2006)
Rocket Fired From Gaza Kills Israeli Woman (The New York Times, November 15, 2006)
Israeli man dies after struck by Gaza rocket (Reuters, November 21, 2006)
Palestinian Rocket Lands in Israeli Day Care Center (Reuters, December 3, 2006)
Gaza rocket injures first Israelis since truce (Reuters, December 26, 2006)
Palestinian rocket hits house next to Israeli kindergarten (International Herald Tribune, May 7, 2007)
Gaza rocket lands on house in Israel, two injured (Reuters, May 15, 2007)
Gaza Rocket Attack Kills an Israeli Woman (The Washington Post, May 22, 2007)
Hamas Rocket Kills Israeli Father (News Blaze, May 27, 2007)
Palestinian rocket kills 2 Gaza children (Reuters, August 7, 2007)
Rocket from Gaza lands in Sderot; one Israeli injured (International Herald Tribune, August 28, 2007)
Rocket fired from Gaza hits Israeli border town (International Herald Tribune, September 3, 2007)
Palestinian Rocket Lands in Israeli Day Care Center (FOX News, September 3, 2007)
Palestinian rocket hits Israeli Army base, wounding dozens (International Herald Tribune, September 11, 2007)
Rocket from Gaza wounds 40 Israeli soldiers (International Herald Tribune, December 11, 2007)
Israeli woman seriously wounded in Palestinian rocket attack (International Herald Tribune, December 13, 2007)
Rocket fired from Gaza wounds Israeli child (International Herald Tribune, December 16, 2007)
Gaza Rocket Wounds 2 Israeli Girls (ABC News, February 7, 2008)
Israeli boy and older brother seriously injured in rocket attack from Gaza (International Herald Tribune, February 9, 2008)
Israeli Killed by Palestinian Rocket (FOX News, February 27, 2008)
New rocket attack aimed at Israeli city (International Herald Tribune, March 11, 2008)
Gaza rocket squads launch barrage against Israel (International Herald Tribune, March 13, 2008)
Hamas rocket attack kills one Israeli, wounds three others (Al Bawaba, May 6, 2008)
Rocket Fired From Gaza Kills Woman in Southern Israel (The New York Times, May 13, 2008)
Gaza rocket hits Israeli mall, hurts 14 (USA Today, May 14, 2008)
Rocket hits as Bush begins Israel visit (International Herald Tribune, March 15, 2008)
Poll shows Palestinians support rocket attacks and want peace talks to end (International Herald Tribune, March 18, 2008)
Gaza rocket fire damages Israeli nursery (UPI, March 28, 2008)
Gaza missile kills one at kibbutz (BBC, June 5, 2008)
Rockets hit Israel, breaking Hamas truce (International Herald Tribune, June 25, 2008)
Gaza rocket lands in southern Israel (Reuters, July 12, 2008)
Gaza rocket firings break cease-fire (UPI, August 9, 2008)
Rocket from Gaza lands in Israel (International Herald Tribune, August 20, 2008)
Rocket from Gaza hits Israeli town (International Herald Tribune, September 14, 2008)
Rocket fired from Gaza Violating Cease-fire (International Herald Tribune, October 21, 2008)
Gaza rocket strikes Israel (International Herald Tribune, October 30, 2008)
Hamas fires long-range rockets at Israel (International Herald Tribune, November 14, 2008)
Gaza mortars wound 6 Israelis (International Herald Tribune, November 28, 2008)
Rocket fire from Gaza wounds two Israelis (Reuters, December 17, 2008)
Palestinian militants fire rockets from Gaza (International Herald Tribune, December 18, 2008)
Gaza militants hit Israeli house with rocket (International Herald Tribune, December 21, 2008)
Israel Hit by Biggest Gaza Rocket Barrage Since Cease-Fire (Bloomberg, December 24, 2008)
Palestinian rocket kills 2 Gaza girls (Reuters, December 26, 2008)
Israeli killed by Gaza rocket (AFP, December 27, 2008)
Rocket fired by Gaza militants kills Israeli woman (Reuters, December 29, 2008)
Hamas hits Israel with dozens of rockets (International Herald Tribune, December 29, 2008)
Three killed by Hamas rocket fire in the South (The Jerusalem Post, December 29, 2008)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution
Jackie3
December 31, 2008 - 23:02 ET by cocodrieThese children would still be alive if Hamas did not put women and children at their rocket launch sites and keep them there at gunpoint.
You really need to open your eyes see reality. Can't you see that Hamas wants them to be martyrs?
Yes Jackie
January 1, 2009 - 11:19 ET by ahusserWar is a sad, violent affair with many innocents caught in the crossfire but if the blue meanie Israeli's would stop defending themselves well then we could all buy the world a coke and live in harmony and sing Kumbayah with the One raising his hands and it will be so. Stop drinking the Kool aid and use your mind.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
I had to vent on this last
December 31, 2008 - 19:45 ET by WorriedI had to vent on this last day of a hellish year. Roseanne Barr is an idiot and so are the people siding with Hamas.
Israel has been more than patient with the scum that want them destroyed. I don't care if it is a 1,000 stones or a homemade bomb, Hamas will use anything to try to kill Israelis. THEY DO NOT WANT PEACE WITH ISRAEL. They want to wipe them ALL out, just like mini Hitler does.
Jackie, there is nothing you or the other defenders of the scum can say to justify the constant terror being inflicted upon Israel. If Hamas kills only a couple of Israelis and the Israelis kill 200 Palestinians, in my eyes it is equal. Israel has the big guns and Hamas knows it. They are asking for it and are to blame for any civilian deaths.
The U.S.A. is a superpower because of our military strength. That is why the countries that hate us don't dare start a war with us.
Unfortunately, with a bunch of liberal nutjobs coming into power, our military strength may dwindle.
GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GOD BLESS ISRAEL
She has always been like this
December 31, 2008 - 23:44 ET by crtuneI know someone who was in the production wing of Carsey Werner. I've heard the stories. Apparently no one in their right mind would actually WANT to go on set during the "Roseanne" production.
Her typical response upon noticing someone new on set was: "Who is that person on set?"
Roseanne was "odd" then, too.
I knew she was kinda stupid...
January 1, 2009 - 03:35 ET by Army Bratbut I had no idea she was insane.
Happy Trails...
and...
January 1, 2009 - 09:32 ET by mizflame98we pay attention to what Rosanne has to say because...
Perfect Demotivator for the Obama Administration
http://www.despair.com/government.html
isn't rosanne barr jewish
January 1, 2009 - 09:43 ET by lunaticcringeradiolunaticcringeradio
Roseanne? Jewish?
January 1, 2009 - 09:50 ET by sherylsimsNo, I don't think so. If I recall correctly she was from Utah and was brought up in a Mormon family under pretty crappy circumstances. She rejected that pretty early in life. I noticed when I saw her on a re run of Third Rock from the Sun the other day though she was saying all these yiddish words, trying to SOUND Jewish. I assumed it was because she thought it was funny. (That would have been sometime in the 80's maybe by now she IS Jewish j/k)
She's half-jewish
January 1, 2009 - 09:58 ET by mizflame98http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr#Early_life
She claims to be a Kabbalahist and Christian now but she's also a known liar so who knows what she is.
Perfect Demotivator for the Obama Administration
http://www.despair.com/government.html
I stand corrected...
January 1, 2009 - 10:08 ET by sherylsimsAnd like our beloved dear leader, half is enough to count I guess.
I think---
January 1, 2009 - 12:22 ET by misterbillI think--- she is shrewish and maybe Jewish.
PS She will never be asked to sing the bar strangled boner again!!
I am confused
January 1, 2009 - 12:24 ET by misterbill"this is equivilent to los angeles attacking and launching war on the people of watts to attempt to kill the bloods and the crips."
Would that be a bad thing??
About all I can ever say
January 1, 2009 - 15:23 ET by RR GOPAbout all I can ever say with these 'celebs' is that as far as most of them are concerned I do not do anything to add to their wealth nor their fame...don't watch/buy their movies, don't watch their shows and thus their advertising, don't buy their books, don't buy their products, don't buy their CDs...
I've seen maybe 30 minutes total of her awful TV show over the years (mostly looking around for something decent to watch). I hope that many people complaining about her now are not the same ones who helped make her rich and famous 20 years ago.
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.