He was against the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and largely won the Democrat presidential nomination as a result.
He was also against the 2007 surge, and still has a hard time admitting it worked.
But now that things are going well there, Iraq "has the potential to eventually tilt the Arab-Muslim world in a different direction."
As a result, according to New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, "Obama and the Democrats could not only end the Iraq war but salvage something positive from it" (h/t Ace, file photo):
I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect Iraq to have relations with Israel anytime soon, but the fact that it may be developing an independent judiciary is good news. It’s a reminder of the most important reason for the Iraq war: to try to collaborate with Iraqis to build progressive politics and rule of law in the heart of the Arab-Muslim world, a region that stands out for its lack of consensual politics and independent judiciaries. And it’s a reminder that a decent outcome may still be possible in Iraq, especially now that the Parliament has endorsed the U.S.-Iraqi plan for a 2011 withdrawal of American troops.
Al Qaeda has not been fully defeated in Iraq; suicide bombings are still an almost daily reality. But it has been dealt a severe blow, which I believe is one reason the Muslim jihadists — those brave warriors who specialize in killing women and children and defenseless tourists — have turned their attention to softer targets like India. Just as they tried to stoke a Shiite-Sunni civil war in Iraq, and failed, they are now trying to stoke a Hindu-Muslim civil war in India.
If Iraq can keep improving — still uncertain — and become a place where Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites can write their own social contract and live together with a modicum of stability, it could one day become a strategic asset for the United States in the post-9/11 effort to promote different politics in the Arab-Muslim world.
Hmmm. Wasn't that the point, Thomas? Isn't that what the Bush administration intended from the beginning, and what liberals like Obama have been fighting against?
Yet, now that the surge has worked, and proved all of you wrong, you want to jump on the bandwagon and give those opposed to this strategy the credit:
In the last year, though, the U.S. troop surge and the backlash from moderate Iraqi Sunnis against Al Qaeda and Iraqi Shiites against pro-Iranian extremists have brought a new measure of stability to Iraq. There is now, for the first time, a chance — still only a chance — that a reasonably stable democratizing government, though no doubt corrupt in places, can take root in the Iraqi political space.
That is the Iraq that Obama is inheriting. It is an Iraq where we have to begin drawing down our troops — because the occupation has gone on too long and because we have now committed to do so by treaty — but it is also an Iraq that has the potential to eventually tilt the Arab-Muslim world in a different direction.
I’m sure that Obama, whatever he said during the campaign, will play this smart. He has to avoid giving Iraqi leaders the feeling that Bush did — that he’ll wait forever for them to sort out their politics — while also not suggesting that he is leaving tomorrow, so they all start stockpiling weapons.
If he can pull this off, and help that decent Iraq take root, Obama and the Democrats could not only end the Iraq war but salvage something positive from it. Nothing would do more to enhance the Democratic Party’s national security credentials than that.
As amazing as it may seem, Friedman is already laying the groundwork for Obama and all the Democrat doom-and-gloomers to take credit for a strategy they worked tirelessly to prevent.
Even more sick-making, it is a metaphysical certitude the rest of the Obama-loving media, themselves similarly opposed to the surge, will fall in lockstep with Friedman, and bestow upon America's 44th president great praise for the emergence of this new Iraq even though he had absolutely nothing to do with creating it, and we would have departed in defeat years earlier if they had their way.
Suddenly I feel nauseous...how 'bout you?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Friedman is so full of himself that the air around him stinks.
November 30, 2008 - 20:53 ET by CTFriedman lives to tell us everything about anything that he thinks he should have an opinion on. Please excuse me, but to avoid the nausea I just don't listen to him.
Didn't you hear....?
November 30, 2008 - 20:57 ET by superconObama won WWII too.Europe owes it's freedom to Obama.
What world does this guy live in?
If he can pull this off, and help that decent Iraq take root, Obama and
the Democrats could not only end the Iraq war but salvage something
positive from it. Nothing would do more to enhance the Democratic
Party’s national security credentials than that.
Maybe Thomas hasn't heard yet being a NYT's columnist and all but the war is over and no thanks to any prominent Democrat, Barack included.There is even a SOFA agreement for a 2011 pullout.All the heavy lifting has been done.The best the world could hope for in regards to Iraq and the Obama reign is that he doesn't try to tinker with it and screw it up.
Hey Democrats...Don't look
November 30, 2008 - 20:59 ET by rbosqueHey Democrats...Don't look now but we won that war without you you bunch of treasonous bastards.
Treasonous democRATS
December 1, 2008 - 07:35 ET by Sergeant ROCKNo kidding. democRATS were saying the 'war is lost'.. troops are 'murderers'.. etc., etc. And now everything is heading in the right direction for no other reason than because B. Hussein Obama is the next President.
Bolton/KEYES 2012
He may be right, so don't be so fast to
November 30, 2008 - 21:07 ET by FastEdcriticize. Don't forget, if anything does go bad, they can still blame Bush.
It will be interesting to see how things will shake out - Barry has called for a pull out, but he won't do it if it appears that the US will lose - even if demolibs want to be cowards (like their friends in the media) they can't appear as if they really are - should be interesting.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Bunch of freakin
November 30, 2008 - 21:28 ET by GregEBunch of freakin morons.
They vote for authorization to use force to oust Saddam.
They see the intelligence and like everyone else they talk about how bad Saddam is and how his WMD's are there and must be stopped.
They're ok for a couple months in the initial stages beyond the 3 week coalition military vs Saddam's military beatdown.
As things begin to not go so well they start running for the hills working 24/7 to concoct stories of how they didn't vote for the resolution (even those that did) and how it's all wrong and Bush is satan, WMDs were never there, our troops are awful, Bush is satan, Bush is satan.
They continue with this crap thru the end of 2006 when they unanimously confirm General Petraeus, even though they know that his objective is to implement a surge that they abhor and see as completely wrong. (I ain't no Albert Einstein, but to confirm that General, knowing what he was going to implement, yet they hating it......is illogical to me, and I guess that's the liberal mind. Perhaps they wanted the surge, not because it would work, but because they were absolutely sure it wouldn't and they could use it to rip Bush yet again on a grand scale).
So the surge begins in early 2007, planning to take several months to get all the pieces in place, yet 3 weeks into it (I remember it because I specifically paid attention to the timeframe), Harry Reid gets up and says "the surge has failed." They wanted it to fail so badly that they called it and over and done with failure before it even got started.
This went on several months, and then...............the surge began to show progress.
They continued to deny any progress.
When it was too much to deny, they couldn't bring themselves to acknowledge the success, so they focused on what still hadn't happened to a high degree yet.....the political aspect of it. They harped on how that has failed so the surge has failed.
The primaries came. Iraq was a hot topic. The surge, working, never acknowledged as such. Their statements were all of the theme of withdrawl.....retreat......surrender......handing Iraq over to al Qaeda and Iran.
The surge continued, progress was stunning, it was going better and better. Democrats were still unable to acknowledge it. Leaving Iraq was the goal. Winning was not. Leaving was "winning." The Democrats wanted troops out by X date. Then it was Y date, then Z, then P, then N. The date changed over and over. Obama had a date, then he changed. He wanted to begin withdrawl on day one of a presidency, then he began to talk more about a slow and more controlled withdrawl, still unable to admit that the troops were successfully carrying out a surge.
Iraq was going very well, it was nearly brushed off the table as a campaign issue. Obama won his nomination. Democrats still unable to admit surge success.
The economy takes a nose-dive. Iraq is a complete campaign non-issue. The messiah wins the election.
It's now less than two months from the messiah taking the Oath of Office.....
......and, as Friedman is speaking of, taking great credit for that which he, the Obama, completely opposed from the start, thru the successful surge, etc, etc.
All those Democrats are cowards. Politics are first, America is who knows where. It's all about their power, and on Iraq, they've shown it bigtime, saying one thing, then another, then denying successes when they've come, yet standing on mountaintops to decry failures when those came. Idiots. Pure....idiots. Yet they've watched (and I'm sure studied) the American sheeple's response to their blatant flipping and flopping - that response being....elect them again. I say they're idiots........perhaps it's ok for them, perhaps their idiocy is unseen by the idiocy of their electorate, and perhaps they know this well.
GregE
November 30, 2008 - 21:35 ET by MrShyBRAVO!
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
Obama wins in Iraq - we knew it was coming
November 30, 2008 - 21:32 ET by Gary HallObama wins in Iraq - we knew it was coming.. Friedman has sunk to Daily KOS levels, Noel..
3 points can't be repeated enough here:
VP-elect Biden, deeply believed this was not possible and as such proposed dividing Iraq into 3 separate enclaves. Bush stuck to the tunes of "it takes a village," "we can do this together," and "all things are worth it." Obama is not a party to this victory - for these people.
Obama, long ago, demanded that we should have left yesterday. Obama has already played his hand here - he left, and lost.
Thanks Tom for finally taking note of what we all understood, and what the Bush administration has been pounding the table for years now. You didn't want Bush to follow them wherever they went, but you'll follow Obama into the the hotels of India and into the wild wooly mountains of Pakistan to fight the war?
Bush has made the ultimate sacrifice
November 30, 2008 - 21:41 ET by jackie3Bush sacrificed his popularity, his legacy as a president to win this war in Iraq, giving a huge blow to Bin Laden and the terrorist. People in America haven't felt this safe from a terrorist attack in years.
And now the Messiah Obama will ride in and take ALL the credit for everything that Bush has done for the last 8 years. There are no words for just how pissed off that makes me. Not only has the media bashed Bush about the war for the last 8 years at every freaking turn but now he will get no credit for what he has finally accomplished. Not even from his party. Bush has been abandoned by everyone except us few. This man has been given the ultimate finger by the media and his fellow republicans.
Obama hasn't even been sworn in and the media basically has him not only winning the war but also as the bringer of world peace. This is insane.
Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
Yes Jackie, and on the bin
November 30, 2008 - 22:01 ET by GregEYes Jackie, and on the bin Laden front, Clinton tore down intelligence. Bush had to quickly begin a resurgence, after 9/11, of the intelligence community abroad. It's been building over the years again.
And I hope that the capture or killing of bin Laden comes. But mark my words, if it happens within the next 4 years, the buildup of intelligence that I spoke of above, will not be mentioned. The sole mention will be how Obama was able to get bin Laden and Bush could not.
Mark........my.........words! (as Biden liked to say)
I am sure
December 1, 2008 - 01:05 ET by ahusserThat as we speak there are plans in the works to dismantle both the military and intelligence communities. They have got to get the money somewhere for these handouts Obama promised.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
Yeah it makes me sick, I
November 30, 2008 - 21:43 ET by bigtimerYeah it makes me sick, I see which way the msm is trying to take this war now, why they will have ticker-tape parades when our troops come home, with O standing tall as they pass by, as if....(you get my drift)
I do not think I can take what I already see happening in the next four years and keep my political sanity.
I see Friedman, I click it.
I despise him, and all his ilk.
Hypocrisy at it's best....in fact outright liars by their previous words and actions.
Matters not now, the majority of sacrifice and hard work is about done...O will get the credit in the msm world, plus so-called historians like like Beschloss and Brinkley...not our military first and foremost, and most certainly not President Bush.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
What a POS
November 30, 2008 - 21:43 ET by GoodieFreeqeek, please go away.
Obama's Last Day 1-20-2013, please be out by then......
If Iraq can keep improving
November 30, 2008 - 21:46 ET by motherbeltIf Iraq can keep improving — still uncertain — and become a
place where Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites can write their own social
contract and live together with a modicum of stability, it could one
day become a strategic asset for the United States in the post-9/11
effort to promote different politics in the Arab-Muslim world.
Hmmm.
Wasn't that the point, Thomas? Isn't that what the Bush administration
intended from the beginning, and what liberals like Obama have been
fighting against?
Damn Skippy, Noel!
But when it was on Bush's plate, to Democrats it was a disaster that would turn the whole Arab world against us: remember the vaunted Arab street?
When their messiah comes in, of course Iraq will be the jewel of our mideast policy! Obama will sweep in after Bush did all the dirty work, and the MSM will hail him as having salvaged what George Bush bungled.
Throught the Obama's career,
November 30, 2008 - 23:22 ET by GregEThroughout the Obama's career, he's always just been in the right place at the right time to swoop in and win the day. I hope that in the next 4 years we are not forced into a war by some outside entity. Of course the war against radical Islamic fundamentalist morons is going to be underway for years to come, and that includes Afghanistan, but I can't even see (I hope I am wrong, should we have to enter into a war with another nation, etc) the Obama having the fortitude to take on anything of length, at all. Let's hope #1 we never have to find out, and #2 that if we do find out, we find out that I'm completely wrong. I will gladly be so.
Obama has no fortitude.
November 30, 2008 - 23:25 ET by Clear thinkerObama has no fortitude. Hell, he can't even produce a birth certificate!
The Best Video By A Conservative
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Hell, he can't even produce
November 30, 2008 - 23:37 ET by bigtimerHell, he can't even produce a birth certificate!
Why Ct...don't you know, haven't you heard little matters like that are "inconsequential" and "what difference does that make"....
I still cannot believe that was the reply to a caller with an inquiring mind about O and his place of birth and him producing his real/original birth certificate from the Wa. Journal the other morning with Alexis Simendinger making first reply I have and the host Greta something making the second comment.
Btw...when they made these comments the caller was already hung up on.
Just throwing this thought in before I check out here tonight..early morning tomorrow...later.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
There is absolutely no way
December 1, 2008 - 01:12 ET by ahusserThis nation as it now exists would or could fight a war on the scale of say WWII. Psychologically we couldn't take the casualties and all the liberals/Dems would run away.
Change: When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles. From a Poster
Now I know how Rush
November 30, 2008 - 21:49 ET by MidAmericaNow I know how Rush feels when he says he knows what the democrats will do or say before they do. I said on NB some time ago that we will know when the Iraq War is won, it will be when the democrats step forward and take the credit.
They are such weasels.
DITTO
November 30, 2008 - 22:13 ET by CTCarbon Credits Smoke'em if you got'em!
Exactly, MA
November 30, 2008 - 22:16 ET by BlondeI'm sure Dingy Harry, along with the rest of the democrat congressional surrender monkeys, will be issuing a proclamation of victory, forthwith.
My only hope is that Rush will be able to make mincemeat out of it, like he did with the idiot's letter about phony soldiers.
Weasels, indeed. Three months ago Obama wouldn't admit the Surge was working, not for love nor money. Now he's taking the credit for it.
The sky was yellow & the sun was blue. ~ Grateful Dead
Oh yeah, Blonde, Dingy
November 30, 2008 - 22:48 ET by motherbeltOh yeah, Blonde, Dingy Harry (This war is lost) Reid will not be shy about muscling to a microphone and claiming that he was glad to help secure our victory there.
And to think Harry Ried
November 30, 2008 - 23:27 ET by Clear thinkerAnd to think Harry Ried said a just a few short months ago "the war in Iraq is LOST". Geeez, no wonder half the country hates these low lifes.
The Best Video By A Conservative
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Thanks to Obama? THANKS TO
November 30, 2008 - 23:20 ET by Clear thinkerThanks to Obama? THANKS TO OBAMA???
This makes me so damn mad I could choke this turd of a media whore lefist peice of crap. And that's on a good day.
If you need to lower your blood pressure for few minutes I suggest this very cool video. Trust me, you will love it! The Best Video By A Conservative
Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
Iraq "has the potential
November 30, 2008 - 23:20 ET by BDIraq "has the potential to eventually tilt the Arab-Muslim world in a different direction."
This just steams me!
November 30, 2008 - 23:44 ET by BlondeAnd I can't even begin to think what YOU must think about this idiocy.
Someone said it earlier today....this guy needs to be pummeled with a cluebat.
I find it totally amazing that these cretins spout this revisionist pap like it's the truth and expect everyone to just lap up the kool-aid. There ought to be a law.....
NYT Bestseller
December 1, 2008 - 06:49 ET by Dan LaHood"His Head Is Flat"
Anyone who has ever heard Santayana's famous quote about History repeating itself is condemned to repeat it.
the sun can't shine...
December 1, 2008 - 14:48 ET by i was just thinking...on the same dog's ass every day. "From Beirut to Jerusalem" was excellent. Other than that, I wouldn't give you a flyin' Fig Newton for anything else Friedman has said or written.
It must be great to live in
December 1, 2008 - 07:57 ET by billbIt must be great to live in a world where one gets to decide which events for which we will take credit or blame!
Friedman must be using a crystal ball to foretell the future.
December 1, 2008 - 08:12 ET by Par for the CourseWhat does Friedman base this statement on? Maybe Obama's "extensive foreign policy experience"?. Don't make me laugh.
Yeah, there is NO basis for
December 1, 2008 - 08:22 ET by BDYeah, there is NO basis for this assumption other than HOPE on Friedmans part.
Hardly analysis....Emotion.
Isn't it obvious to everybody?
December 1, 2008 - 08:51 ET by c5thenObama isn't going to change one damn thing in the Iraq strategy. He's even keeping the Sec. of Defense on in his own administration. The difference will be the media declaring that every new decision, and event will be the result of the absolute masterful genius of The Obama. All good results and positive outcomes will be attributed to The One and his 'best ever Cabinet' while all bad events and setbacks will be attributed to the evil past administration.
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012
As I have said before, I
December 1, 2008 - 09:08 ET by SeashellAs I have said before, I think in 10 or 20 years when history is written, Bush will get the credit he deserves. Credible historians (at least some of them) will write the truth.
Bush won't get the credit at first, the media will see that Obama takes all the glory, but in years to come, I think (and pray) that Bush will get the honor and place in history that he so richly deserves.
Species Change
December 1, 2008 - 10:51 ET by dboI've seen a lot of "squaring of circles" over the years by politicians, lawyers and bias media types but this could be a gold medal winner. But besides the utter nonsense and blatant partisanship, I think it speaks to the broader difference between liberals and conservatives. Whether it's foreign policy or economics, liberals by and large have an amazing inability to see things on a long term basis. Friedman would have more credibility and consistency if he had written "Obama lied, people died".
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
December 1, 2008 - 12:56 ET by RESTLESS 1HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!
That's a good one Noel. Whew!!!
Wait, you're serious???
"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008