...get in the way of broadcasting the news!

"CNN says it hasn't heard any complaints concerning its behavior in Mumbai."

hey, that selective hearing thing really worked for them all through the presidential campaign, so why change tactics now?

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." Edmund Burke

Can't hear the complainers if they're dead 'eh CNN?

today's lame excuses for news networks. I saw this in the first Gulf War. I hated all new correspondants. Anything goes if it makes the front page/exclusive report.

"And now a live report from our CNN correspondant in Mumbai".

"Yes Bill, we're barricaded in a small room next to an American Jewish couple and just heard their impassioned cell phone call for police help. We're now going to broadcast live, right here on CNN, the pleas of the Jewish couple's phone call to police."

"Bill, right now as we speak, they're holed up in room 214 in the closet. Wait! It sounds like gun fire has erupted from room 214, Bill. No more cell phone calls seem to be emenating from the room. We expect the worst, Bill. Another report will follow as soon as we get video 'comfirmation' of the carnage. Back to you in CNN headquarters Bill. By the way did you hear about Obama's new plan to save America?"

I'm so disgusted at the MSM I can't even think straight.

There is an Indian living here, Deepak Chopra, that did blame the United States for the actions in Bombay.  Typical.  Bite the hand that feeds them.

When my son was in Sadr City on his first tour in Iraq, a Newsweek reporter attempted to get a story from him for their rag.  By the time my son was done chewing that reporters ass out he was running away from him! 

He asked him why they were not reporting the truth back to the states, told him that all the soldiers were aware of what was being said about them in their own press. 

I still say if any Republican ever grants an interview with CNN they ought to get voted out on the nearest election.  

I'm glad this subject finally came up.

A guest from the Trident was on CNN. Near the end of the interview the talking head teleprompter idiot was hell bent on getting the guest to say where he was but the hotel guest on the phone finally said he didn't want to say fearing the bad guys are still at large and monitoring the media.

... CNN throughout the interview had the hotel guests first name along with the name of the hotel plastered on the screen.

TRIDENT 

I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.

It's that simple really.

Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!

Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012

There are two points to ponder here.

First, it was believable. The media doesn't care about the victims, only the story. Witness the dying baby penguins in that movie last year. All the photographers had to do was reach down and save them, but no, being objective was more important. Or the story about the Mumbai photographer following the terrorists around taking pictures. Did he call anybody to report where the terrorists were? Probably not. It was more important to "objectively" document the story. We all believe that CNN would report the story even if it endangered somebody. Who was that CNN reporter based in Baghdad that distorted the news so he could stay there? Journalists wouldn't call the cops to save a victim if they could get a better story. To a journalist a dead victim is worth more than a saved victim. That's the issue here.

Second, the seriousness of the accusation is an issue as Rush would say. The Democrats use the media's desire to smear people to their advantage by making serious accusations of conservatives. Who cares if it is true. Being a Demcrat or Liberal means never having to say your are sorry. Being a consevative means posting the truth with the same visibility as the original story. Good job NB.

Never let the safety of human life get in the way of a good story.

• LYDSEXICS UNTIE!