Neil Cavuto and Ben Stein had quite an argument about bailouts on FNC's "Cavuto on Business" Saturday morning that nicely covered the issues people on both sides of this contentious debate will likely be discussing around dinner tables this Thanksgiving, though hopefully with less screaming:
Any questions?




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Stine should go back to
November 23, 2008 - 21:30 ET by Rob BStine should go back to giving away his money haven't seen his movie i was gonna buy it but now i dont think i want to pay for the labomity he just had
Live Free or Die
Rob - in spite of your
November 23, 2008 - 22:19 ET by HermanoRob - in spite of your thoughts about Ben's tirade here - I do not think anyone truly has enough information on the bailout - his documentary is top notch and worth the price. (My personal opinion on the bailout is DON"T DO IT! But keep that under your hat :) )
O Lord, Thou givest us everything, at the price of an effort. - Leonardo Da Vinci
Ben Stein wrong again! And still does not understand Depressions
November 24, 2008 - 11:39 ET by PopularTechWhy is anyone listening to Ben Stein? He said to buy financials before it all blew up:
August 18, 2007 - Peter Schiff Versus Ben Stein (Video) (10min)
Maybe Ben should read this book:
America's Great Depression (PDF) (368 pgs) (Murray Rothbard, Ph.D. Economics, 5th Edition, 2000)
BTW I usually like Ben but he has no idea what cause the Great Depression and it was government intervention in the free market like they are doing now.
Censored Global Warming Videos
My Dad bought this Stine character's
November 23, 2008 - 21:55 ET by Vonubook on investing. Full of mainstream stuff, but cocksure that putting money away in stocks and bonds is a good idea.
Now that his investing sdvice has not panned out his solution is have the government bail out his investments until his portfolio is stable. What a joke.
Review
November 23, 2008 - 22:02 ET by River CityOne more time for Ben: "Government isn't the solution, its the problem."
"Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind." Ayn Rand
cutting off government
November 24, 2008 - 11:51 ET by TruthMongercutting off government junkies - the detox can get pretty damn ugly
so when do we get to it? it's not going to fix itself I'm afraid - and if we wait too long it may require the second amendment option
Dominate education now
→ Cavuto/Stein
November 23, 2008 - 22:03 ET by Cool ArrowBoth of these guys have something to offer on some level.
Stein's "Expelled" was a good documentary on Evolution/Intelligent Design.
Anything from Cavuto, you can take to the bank.
I like them both, but Cavuto's got my ear when it comes to finances
I concur, Cool. Expelled
November 23, 2008 - 22:17 ET by HermanoI concur, Cool. Expelled was a very enlightening view of the discipline that means a great deal to me - science. How it has been taken over by ideologues is beyond me. Global warming and Darwinism - two wrongs don't make a right. Cavuto is a sharp cookie on finance. He was required watching for me for several years until I got rid of the TV.
O Lord, Thou givest us everything, at the price of an effort. - Leonardo Da Vinci
thanksgiving
November 23, 2008 - 23:01 ET by katainkentI sincerely hope this isnt what my thanksgiving looks like.
Cavuto is an incredibly intelligent person - almost everything he says makes a lot of sense to me and I liked him even when he was back on CNBC. (not a stab at CNBC, I swear ;)) Ben Stein, also quite a smart guy. Its almost disheartening they were screaming at each other from the get-go. My money, pun not intended, is still on Cavuto.
But, I still had a lot of trouble taking away much from this screaming match.
member of the Conservative Independant Witness Protection Program since Nov. 5, 2008
Ben Stein is so disappointing.
November 23, 2008 - 23:09 ET by Matthew VadumUntil this moment, I had great respect for Ben Stein. He is shockingly ignorant both of basic economics and of the history leading up to the Great Depression. Hoover and FDR threw everything they could think of at the economy, and the more they threw, the weaker it got. If this aggressive interventionist approach is tried again, we may have another depression on our hands. Shame on Ben Stein.
—Matthew Vadum is Editor of Organization Trends and Foundation Watch, two monthly newsletters published by Capital Research Center
I agree, Matthew; Stein
November 24, 2008 - 06:31 ET by motherbeltI agree, Matthew; Stein usually displays a lot more common sense than that.
He has fallen into the same outlook as liberals on the public school system: if throwing money at the problem doesn't work, it's because they didn't throw enough.
Neil is SO ON TARGET
November 23, 2008 - 23:46 ET by DelsaWhat is up with Ben Stein?
How can Stein not see what is right in front of his face?
The auto makers should reorganize under bankruptcy, keep all employees who want to stay under restructured contracts, keep the unions if they get on board, throw them out if they don't, and come back strong.
This throwing money at everything just frosts me.
News-Flash/another bail-out!
November 24, 2008 - 00:13 ET by bigtimerAh heck, to cut to the chase, Stein started disappointing me greatly about a year or more so ago.
I had a longer post...but heck, I butchered my thoughts.
I just heard a breaking news story...the govt. is going to rescue to BAIL-OUT Citi-Group.
Aren't we lucky...since we ARE the Govt.
Ought to make Stein happy...wonder how much he has invested, or has lost, on the verge of losing..blah blah blah....
Do not misunderstand..I wish no ill on us regular, hard-working folks, I have a very close relative and a very close friend who lost a lot of money during the dot.com era.
I am just furious with what is going on...nice the News Flash cane conveniently this time of night....eh..before the stock opens in the morning, let alone the confidence world-wide with the stocks moving over-night.
Tricky!
Btw...Cavuto is the man!
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Oh no!
November 24, 2008 - 01:59 ET by RousseOh NO! Two of my favorite people coming to blows! I adore Stein' ditto Cavuto. How can this be?
Wobbly
November 24, 2008 - 03:01 ET by nofateStein has gone wobbly on us. I am often struck these days at how clearly those who those who merely claim to be conservative are being flushed out by this economy. And how quickly they turn to derisive (in their liberally infected minds) accusations of "laissez-faire" economics (Stein: "...the federal government is the only one that can stabilize this econonomy(1:25)...we went into a real depression because the government didn't help in 1929-33 in a meaningful way (1:46)") as if that were somehow evil, but consolidating power into the hands of idiots like Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, Waxman, Paulson, Obama, and countless faceless bureaucrats like Jamie Gorelik or Franklin Raines is a good of the highest order.
What conservative principle is it that demands that we throw good money after bad to help out failing businesses that were poor sheperds of the public's money? What conservative principle demands that we have to use more of our money in the form of taxes to help out these fools? What conservative principle demands that we inflate our money (i.e. print more money) to help out fools? Listen to these faux conservatives: Schwarzenegger wants to tax pets now. Every time someone takes a pet to the vet, California wants a cut. In Mo., even though they are cutting "essential services", the lawmakers claim the constitution mandates that they get a payraise.
How is it that the feds didn't do enough in 1929? The truth is that fed intervention probably prolonged the depression that occurred turning it into the Great Depression.
They have already done more than enough to freak it up this time around. What they should do, and keep doing, is cut taxes on the rich, the middle class, the poor, everyone, as well as capital gains and the stupid "die and your family pays" death tax. This economy would take off like a rocket! But I probably dream here, knowing what we elected as prez and the congress that goes with the bargain. But wait! What is that I saw going across the FNC news crawl? Did I see that The Barack of Obama is going to hold off raising taxes on the rich for now? Can this be? I guess we'll have to wait for the answer. Meanwhile, ignore that man behind the curtain.
Update: more from: FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate
In simple non-"pointy headed itellectual" lingo, the government f'd up the normal business cycle. And they are well on the way to f'ing it up again. Dodd, Frank, Gorelik, Raines and all the others that ran the Fannie-Freddie scam for years must be laughing at us all every day. They say what goes around... We'll see.
For those of you that don't understand this, contrast what Ronald Reagan did in 1980 (note the little market rise that started in '82 ;-) ) with what Hoover/Roosevelt did and what Obama plans to do now.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Took the words, no fate,
November 24, 2008 - 03:12 ET by Indiana JoeYou pretty much said what I was thinking. I have always liked Stein, but I thought he was a bit more financially knowledgeable than he appears here. The fable that the New Deal got us out of the Depression was debunked long ago, I thought. I've heard that WWII was what really, finally got our economy going again, as sad as that sounds.
The simple and obvious fact that the market has tanked (and is still tanking) even with all these "bail-0uts" should prove that they are doing no good, and probably more harm. I've lost about 50% on my 401k so far, but I don't want to move it into money market. That would just be giving up that loss. I want a rebound, and a chance to make some of that back. My funds have rules about moving money in and out, so I can't really "play" the market. Now, on top of my personal losses, I'm going to get stuck with a who-knows-HOW-big future debt, payable through taxes.
We need to stop trying to prop up the losers in this debacle, get the hell out of the way, and let the true market re-assert itself. Only then can we get back to something approaching sanity.
I was originally for the "bail-0uts," but the actual result has changed my mind. It's been like throwing gasoline on a fire, and the answer isn't more gas!
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
Suckling Pigs
November 24, 2008 - 03:39 ET by nofateIndie: "It's been like throwing gasoline on a fire, and the answer isn't more gas!" Absolutely. I was amazed at the absurdity of Congress giving the automakers a hard time about using corporate jets- Reid, Pelosi, Levin, Frank and Dodd! Even Kit Bond. All people who have not seen a regular line at the airport in years- I wish I had time to research how they get back and forth to Washington. Nor do I have any sympathy for the idiots of the big three that bent over for the unions and gave up those pension and healthcare plans that pay ex-workers for the rest of their lives. Then I hear sob stories from those ex-workers on the radio talk shows about how what they are getting is not really that much and how they worked for it so I should pay more taxes and the gov't should print more money to bail Mr. or Mrs. sob story out.
It's all just a little bit too much. I just want the government out of my life. Give us the police, fire and military protection we need, as well as fair application of the laws so we have redress against those that are unscrupulous, and we'll do OK. We don't need a nanny. I don't know who said it, but it's true, "The government that governs best, governs least", or something like that. But, unfortunately for me and others like me, there aren't enough left, if the election results are real, that don't want to suck at the tit of the government sow.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Oh, I'm sure the lord-high
November 24, 2008 - 04:14 ET by Indiana JoeOh, I'm sure the lord-high muckity-mucks of Congress have government jets at their disposal. That whole scene was like little kids in a schoolyard... scratch that, kids aren't that petty!
You're right about the ridiculous contracts with the unions, but the idiot companies agreed to them, and signed them. And people retired, made "life-decisions" based on them. Do the companies just get a "do-over" because of incompetence? What would any labor contract be worth then?
I've seen how the collapse of steel companies screwed people out of what they thought they had coming, what was promised them in writing. It's not right, especially when the execs got off scot-free, with stock options and everything intact. The only ones who "paid" for a company's bad decisions were the "greedy" workers.
Yeah, I'm a union worker. But I'm in the middle. Some folks are "no unions," some are "all unions." I'm "unions are good in moderation, like anything else." But it does take two to make an agreement, and like I've heard Rush say, who wouldn't take the kind of deal the auto companies were willing to offer? It's unbelievable what's in most UAW contracts! But things have changed, and both sides need to work with the current reality.
The only real solution is bankruptcy, just like any business that makes bad decisions. Reorganization, renegotiation, share the misery, and bring everyone back down to Earth. Sticking a $25 billion (for starters) finger in the dike will only put off the reckoning, and make it worse when it finally arrives.
Same with the markets; they'll find their true balance naturally, and probably less painfully, if the gov't just gets the hell out of the way.
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..." - The Who
Get out of the way
November 25, 2008 - 11:01 ET by nofateIndie: not trying to pick on unions. I think this comment further down the page by dscott says it better than I did.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
The Myth of "laissez-faire" caused the Great Depression
November 25, 2008 - 09:26 ET by PopularTechThe Myth of "laissez-faire" caused the Great Depression is completely debunked by the facts. Credit Expansion caused by government and the Fed in the 1920s caused the bubble that burst in 1929 and it was further government intervention by Hoover and FDR that led to a recession, turning into the Great Depression:
America's Great Depression (PDF) (368 pgs) (Murray N. Rothbard, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Economics, 2000)
The Myth of FDR and the New Deal
FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate (UCLA)
How FDR Made the Depression Worse (Robert Higgs, Ph.D. Economics)
How FDR's New Deal Harmed Millions of Poor People (Jim Powell, B.A. History)
The Mythology of Roosevelt and the New Deal (Robert Higgs, Ph.D. Economics)
The New Deal Debunked (Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Ph.D. Professor of Economics)
The New Deal Debunked (again) (Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Ph.D. Professor of Economics)
The Truth about FDR (Thomas E. Woods, Jr. Ph.D. History)
Tough Questions for Defenders of the New Deal (Jim Powell, B.A. History)
Books:
FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression (Jim Powell, 2003)
Salvos Against the New Deal (Garet Garrett, 2002)
The Roosevelt Myth (John T. Flynn, 1948)
Papers:
Why the Great Depression Lasted So Long and Why Prosperity Resumed after the War (Robert Higgs, Ph.D. Economics)
Censored Global Warming Videos
Excellent. FDR's policies
November 25, 2008 - 09:47 ET by celatorExcellent. FDR's policies interfered with the natural process of the self correcting economic system.
All systems, by definition, are self correcting (or else they are not true systems). Weather, economic, the human body, the solar system etc. When do-gooders disrupt the system's reinforcing feedback loops, ala FDR, the current bailout mess etc, the system goes kaflooey.
One of the principal roles of the capitalist system is to identify lousy companies and let them collapse--a self cleansing principal. The other end of the system, highly successful companies, must be allowed to thrive--a notion the leftists cannot grasp.
Amen!
November 25, 2008 - 10:13 ET by nofateAbsolutely. See Roy Spencer's site re: the role of water vapor as part of a self-correcting system.
Also, PT, excellent references for the rest of us as usual.
"The future is not set. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."
michaelyon-online.com
Who's the chick? She was
November 24, 2008 - 02:55 ET by mostlymoderateWho's the chick? She was nice and firey; just the way I like em.
As for Stein, I have always liked him and I have always like Cavuto. I wish I was an economist but I am not and I don't know which one is correct on this.
Hey Ben! Not enough Clear
November 24, 2008 - 04:23 ET by semolina_filcherHey Ben! Not enough Clear Eyes for you? C'mon now, don't be myopic like the free-spending libs....no to the greedy financial bailout, no to the automakers bailout and certainly no to anymore bailouts! I still like your "expelled" documentary though...
Orbis non Suffici
I Gotta Wonder
November 24, 2008 - 07:15 ET by NoJellyI really like Ben, have since long, long before Ferris Bueller...And his sense of humor, like, I don't know, deadpan and all, wouldn't that lend perfectly to this whole clip being a spoof on himself? To do the bug-eyed spend advocate part so well...
Had to be a gotcha, makes no sense otherwise...There's just no collectivist in Ben Stein...
Why is the financial sector different than any other?
November 24, 2008 - 08:17 ET by c5thenWhy is Citi Group more important than General Motors? Why was Lehaman Brothers more important than Chrysler? Why does AIG deserve life support and enough capital to "reboot" but Ford not deserve the same thing?
The answers to these questions will point toward the root of the problem. Hint: Where did Paulson work before he was Treasury Secretary? What sector is Ben Bernanke from?
This 'crisis' was manufactured and was put in motion over 10 years ago when it was mandated that a certain % of the mortgages lent out by banks had to be 'subprime'. It was known then that the housing market is cyclical. so as long as the housing market was growing and there were more byers than sellers all would be fine. Which is to say the flaws and dangers would be easily overlooked and hidden. Once the market started it's inevitable correction, then all hell would break loose and the 'crisis' would manifest.
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012
I believe
November 24, 2008 - 09:01 ET by NoJelly"This 'crisis' was manufactured and was put in motion over 10 years ago when it was mandated that a certain % of the mortgages lent out by banks had to be 'subprime'. It was known then that the housing market is cyclical. so as long as the housing market was growing and there were more byers than sellers all would be fine. Which is to say the flaws and dangers would be easily overlooked and hidden. Once the market started it's inevitable correction, then all hell would break loose and the 'crisis' would manifest."----c5then
I believe these facts to be well established and the situation has been explained and re-explained, but will continue to fall on deaf ears of sycObamaphants in perpetuity. Denial is a mainstay of the Lib mentality and agenda. People like Franks, Conrad and Dodd will die in office, old, decrepid, with the taxpayers' money stuffed in their pockets. Facts cannot serve to help in politics if they won't be acknowledged by the constituancy or the Right won't aggressively prosecute.
This crisis is as much the fault of the conservatives in Congress for not taking the criminals to prison when there was still time...
There are precious few conservatives left in Congress
November 24, 2008 - 09:28 ET by c5thenMost republicans are moderate populists. The ones who actually hold conservative ideas and speak conservative principles are demonized by the liberal press and the democrats and marginalized and shuned by their republican collegues. It's all about the pary now. The ideology that was the catalyst to spawn a political party is now being undercut by the party 'leaders' in an effort to 'grow the party'. The republican leadership has drunk the liberal cool-aid that has been held under their noses for dacades.
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
Alan Keyes / Sarah Palin - 2012
I've liked Stein since I
November 24, 2008 - 09:24 ET by ConservativeRexI've liked Stein since I first read his column in American Spectator years ago.
Cavuto irks me at times, but then again, I am just irked at FOX News in general.
I don't know what the answer is. I just don't see how we can let American auto company's go, on this scale, all at once. There are too many ancillary jobs asscociated with the auto industry and they are not all in Detroit.
Not to mention thousands of jobs lost at the auto comapny's themselves. I know there is a ton to blame to go around.
But, I am coming down on the side of Stein on this issue. Someone made the point that the financial sector is no less important than the auto industry. You can not have one and not the other.
Man what a mess all this is. Some how, other than the obvious tax money involved, we as a nation will all be affected by this, and not in a good way. But, we've all seen our tax money wasted on worse than this.
This is not as easy as it appears. And no, I do not believe this will "nationalize" the auto industry any more than we nationalized NYC when we bailed them out in the '70's. So please spare me the "slippery slope" pablum.
And that CR is where the
November 24, 2008 - 11:58 ET by dscottAnd that CR is where the problem lies, you and Ben are so scared of NOT doing anything for fear if something had been done it would have avoided the whole mess, and this is where you are easily fooled into doing the WRONG thing. Where you and Ben are being mislead is the fact that EVERY dollar of government bailout money has to come from the private sector in the form of taxes or purchase of bonds. Then all that money that should have been used on those making the correct decisions are now deprived of the working capital to continue making the correct decisions. The perversity is ALL government activity to this point has been self defeating because they are draining liquidity from the system to throw at those who have and are making bad decisions. This is why we should not bailout the auto companies, they made bad decisions and any money given to them will be equally mispent especially now the "green conditions" would be the strings attached. Any bailout that does not force the auto companies to put their financial house in order will only delay the inevitable. You remember AMC? Are they still with us? How about British Leland? Same deal. Both governments in an attempt to save jobs only lost their money and still the jobs were lost, because the bad decisions were not corrected.
Let's be clear about the auto companies. There are three parties to blame: Feckless Management, Greedy Unions and Incompetent Government. Management was feckless because they allowed themselves to be caught in the no win situation of giving into the union's absurd demands that were way out of line with the industry standard, so they put their hope in the high profit models like the SUVs and pickup trucks and other high dollar vehicles. Due to the CAFE' standards by the government to keep the fleet mileage up, they were forced to make subcompacts but because of their demograhics appealed mostly to low end users, those who couldn't afford the gas guzzlers as a result there was little if any profit in it. Then the government screws up the whole ball of wax by the domestic drilling ban and ethanol, thus driving UP the price of gasoline. Surprise, surprise, the price of gas goes to $4/gallon and the bottom drops out of the gas guzzler market and thus evaporates all profits. The combination of fecklessness, greed and incompetence is what ailes the auto companies and no amount of bailout can overcome the combination of all three. The auto companies must declare chapter 11, re-write all the contracts to industry standard (Toyota and Nissan), lay off excess workers, and the government needs to stop meddling with the energy supply by ending all impediments to domestic energy production to ensure a stable oil price of less than $60/barrel oil and < $2/gal gas.
I will also emphasize a point here about foreign outsouring of oil, some $200 billion was siphoned from the private economy just this year because of the drilling ban. That's $200 billion private industry was denighed in capital financing, that's jobs that will never be created. Now imagine over a trillion dollars of government siphoning money away from the good decision makers for bail outs...in a vain attempt to prop up failure but not creating anymore jobs.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Please put this in BOLD
November 24, 2008 - 12:14 ET by HermanoThen all that money that should have been used on those making the correct decisions are now deprived of the working capital to continue making the correct decisions.
dscott - you are dead on. I would highlight the above sentence in your reply. It is the reason government intervention is bad.
O Lord, Thou givest us everything, at the price of an effort. - Leonardo Da Vinci
Hey CR - while the problems
November 24, 2008 - 12:10 ET by HermanoHey CR - while the problems of not bailing out this industry or that are obvious, the problem is that no one is considering the true solution. Bandaids are nice if you have a nick or scratch, but this is more like gettin gcaught in the gears of a combine, and the government is the one that got us into this plight. Regulations, like everything else, are good in moderation. We have been going beyond moderation for years now. While I do not claim to understand everything that is happening or the underlying reasons for the situation, I do believe that Capitalism is the best financial system available. It works if it is left alone. People need things, and if someone can afford to produce something that people need at a price they can afford, then the system works. The Big 3 do not work because their "business plan" does not work. Toyota, Nissan, Hundai and the likes have created a plan that works. Government regulations and union pressure has made it so the Big 3 cannot compete as easily. The people will go elsewhere.
O Lord, Thou givest us everything, at the price of an effort. - Leonardo Da Vinci
Hermano... I do not think
November 24, 2008 - 13:24 ET by ConservativeRexHermano... I do not think cutting your nose off to spite your face is the answer either. "We'll show those car makers"! To use an analogy: It's kind of like taking off through an intersection when your light turns green and not hesitating for a second or two and another car runs his red light and T-Bones you. You were right, but, you were also dead right.
We no longer have a man walking up the stairs with a block of ice on his back either, and the buggy whip clientel is getting mighty thin as well.
However, when we are talking about millions of jobs, millions, and this is no scare tatic, then there has to be an intervention. Maybe we should scrap the whole damn mess and start once again.
We all realize there is plenty of faults here, and they go way back. But now is the time for solutions. Hell, I wish we could get the money back we gave to the financial institutions and use it instead. At least in the auto business they were producing something.
It appears we are just concentrating on the Big Three in Detroit. It is them yes, but think of the millions of jobs associated with the auto industry not in Detroit.
But go ahead, push 'em out of business, I don't have a nickel invested in the auto industry.
CR - I do not want to see
November 24, 2008 - 15:46 ET by HermanoCR - I do not want to see them fail, either. I realize that there are many jobs at stake. If the Big 3 declare bankrupcy, they can then reorganize, including labor. How many laborers will it take for them to produce cars? I am sure they can find them in Detroit and the surrounding areas for a fair market value which will then allow them to be competitive. The real problem is the government getting in the way. I cannot imagine a long-term solution that involves more government interference. The real solution is to get the government and the unions out of the equation. Their competition is able to keep the unions away in the south, so why can't Detroit?
O Lord, Thou givest us everything, at the price of an effort. - Leonardo Da Vinci
See Hermano..that's an
November 24, 2008 - 16:05 ET by ConservativeRexSee Hermano..that's an excellent solution! That's what I was looking for, some kind of answer I could comprehend.
Dadgumit, I can't think of everything! ;-)
We had to do it in the oil patch, we must be able to adapt.
Thank You Hermano!
that was back when socialism was a bad word
November 24, 2008 - 09:51 ET by theduck6When you have a Congresswomen's slip of the toungue saying she would be "socializing...er nationalizing" the oil companies and efforts to eliminate any outlet for differing viewpoints I think that slope is slipperier than ever.
So we want to penalize industry for success(oil and gas) and bail out poor performance( finance, auto etc etc etc). Did all those idiots have the econ books upside down in school? I'm with Cavoto. Love Stein but he's got to have some ulterior motives not evident.
My solution to the auto
November 24, 2008 - 13:34 ET by marpelMy solution to the auto issue is to have the government give every adult citizen a voucher for $20,000 to buy either a Chrysler, Ford or GM vehicle. It's cheaper than bailing the Big 3 out and will stimulate the auto industry and overall economy. Even though their products suck, I would be happy to buy one of their cars if I was given the money.
And where pray tell will
November 24, 2008 - 13:57 ET by dscottAnd where pray tell will this money come from? Al Gore? Nancy Pelosi? Harry Reid? Barack Obama? Should the printing presses be run overtime? The national debt has hit $10 trillion, what's another trillion, right?
It's cheaper than bailing the Big 3 out and will stimulate the auto industry and overall economy. Even though their products suck, I would be happy to buy one of their cars if I was given the money.
And that's where many people are completely wrong, treading water through consumer spending does not stimulate the economy as it only redistributes wealth, wealth creation stimulates the economy. Unleash the oil companies to drill domestically, the electric companies to build nuclear power plants, etc. Savings & Investment is what drives the economy and creates wealth, not spending. Just because consumer spending is approx 70% of the GDP doesn't mean the bigger number is always the most important. Without a sturdy base, the column falls over. Think of the economy as an inverted pyramid, where savings & investment support the upper part called consumer spending. The government in it's infinite stupidity kicked out the bottom of the pyramid by siphoning capital out of the country via the domestic drilling ban and other outsourcing measures and then made the auto companies investment in profitable SUVs useless by jacking up the price of energy.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Calm down...It was a joke.
November 24, 2008 - 14:34 ET by marpelCalm down...It was a joke.
Marple
November 24, 2008 - 16:12 ET by semolina_filcherJoke or not, the Obamafuhrer will probably come up with this as an incentive to buy American. I don't mind but I'd rather pay for something than receive it free. Anyway it would appear the Obama economic team would rather run the automakers on their agenda: be green, make cars Americans don't like, and let the unions and environmentalists run the show from start to finish.
Bail outs
November 24, 2008 - 13:46 ET by OneunderLet them fail, If the CEO's, board members and management are worth anything they will figure a way to solve the problem. What lesson will that teach (Daddy, can I have a nickel)?
"Government is like a
baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of
responsibility at the other."
- Ronald Reagan