Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 10, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'
  • Time's Mark Halperin Concedes: GOP 'Would Be Creamed' by Media for Not Passing a Budget
  • CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’
  • Chris Matthews Reacts to JFK Mistress: Kennedy a Hero Who 'Still Arouses the Country'
  • Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers
  • Bozell: It's 'Hilarious' CNN Suspended Roland Martin for Inoffensive Tweet; Maybe 'Lefty Loons at MSNBC' Can 'Scoop Him Up' Now
  • CNN Responds to Bozell Letter Demanding Coverage of Catholic Outrage at Obama; We Reply
  • Barbara Walters: It's 'Heartbreaking' to Force Women to View an Ultrasound Before an Abortion

Gergen: Powell's Obama Endorsement Most Important of Campaign

By Noel Sheppard | October 19, 2008 | 16:45

Change font size:  A |  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

CNN's Senior Political Analyst David Gergen, appearing on ABC's "This Week" Sunday, declared the announced support of Barack Obama by former Secretary of State Colin Powell "the most important endorsement of the campaign so far."

Judging by other media reaction, it is a metaphysical certitude Gergen will not be alone in his Powell-loving assessment.

Is this announcement really the bombshell press members that have been in the tank for the junior senator from Illinois since he first announced his candidacy are making it out to be?

Consider how left-leaning many of the statements Powell made on Sunday's "Meet the Press" were, and how unlikely they will do anything to sway Independent, Conservative, and undecided voters (full transcript available here, file photo):

I think we have to do a lot more with respect to poverty alleviation and helping the needy people of the world.  We need to increase the amount of resources we put into our development programs to help the rest of the world.  Because when you help the poorest in the world, you start to move them up an economic and social ladder, and they're not going to be moving toward violence or terrorism of the kind that we worry about.

Is this something that will appeal to folks in the middle or the right of the political spectrum? Isn't Powell actually just preaching to Obama's choir with this "let's spread the wealth around the world" motif?

With Americans possibly more concerned with their own personal finances than at any time in recent memory, as well as the federal deficit and debt expanding with a velocity we haven't seen since World War II, are voters really more interested in the economic woes facing other nations than what befronts them?

Such wasn't discussed by Gergen on Sunday's "This Week" as he gushed in front of fellow panelists about the significance of Powell's endorsement; neither was the following:

I also believe that on the Republican side over the last seven weeks, the approach of the Republican Party and Mr. McCain has become narrower and narrower.  Mr. Obama, at the same time, has given us a more inclusive, broader reach into the needs and aspirations of our people. He's crossing lines--ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines.  He's thinking about all villages have values, all towns have values, not just small towns have values. 

Really, General? Can you name some votes Sen. Obama has made in the past almost four years that crossed political lines? Are you familiar with McCain's multi-decade history of working with Democrats to advance legislation?

Honestly, the lack of serious examination by Gergen of what Powell told Brokaw is disgraceful. If his defense is that he hadn't yet seen the video or the transcript of this interview, then he shouldn't have stated that this was the most important endorsement of this campaign until he had.

In so doing, he might have uncovered another doozy:

MR. BROKAW:  And you are fully aware that there will be some--how many, no one can say for sure--but there will be some who will say this is an African-American, distinguished American, supporting another African-American because of race.

GEN. POWELL:  If I had only had that in mind, I could have done this six, eight, 10 months ago.  I really have been going back and forth between somebody I have the highest respect and regard for, John McCain, and somebody I was getting to know, Barack Obama.  And it was only in the last couple of months that I settled on this.  And I can't deny that it will be a historic event for an African-American to become president.  And should that happen, all Americans should be proud--not just African-Americans, but all Americans--that we have reached this point in our national history where such a thing could happen.  It will also not only electrify our country, I think it'll electrify the world.

Whether it was six months ago or with just sixteen days before America heads to the polls, didn't Powell basically say that he was supporting Obama because "it will be a historic event for an African-American to become president?"

With the nation at war on two fronts, and in the midst of one of its greatest financial crises, is electrifying the country and the world what this election should be all about?

When you boil it all down, isn't this really the position Obama-loving media have taken since his keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in July 2004 amplified since he first announced his candidacy in early 2007?

If so, what makes this the earth-shattering, game-changing endorsement Gergen proclaimed on Sunday? Or this from Powell?

I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration.

To be sure, Gergen and his compatriots in the media share Powell's concern about the Court. Yet, with this very sentence, wasn't the former Secretary of State once again preaching to Obama's choir?

In the end, what Powell showed Americans today is that despite having served under three Republican presidents -- Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush -- he is indeed much further to the left in his political beliefs than his history would suggest.

After all, there probably aren't many Republicans in the nation today uncomfortable with Justices Ruth Bader-Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens being replaced by more conservative jurists.

With this in mind, maybe Gergen and his fellow Obama-loving press members should be discussing Powell's left-leaning views in the coming days as they make a big deal out of this endorsement.

Alas, I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

Share this

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Barack Obama
  • Colin Powell
  • David Gergen
  • John McCain
  • ABC
  • This Week
  • Campaign Watch
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 


  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)
  • Where are the blacks for Roland Martin? (NRO/Media Blog)
  • Turkish Islamists turn church into mosque (Commentary)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Father Matthews has gone schizophrenic
    1 min 51 sec ago
  • My anecdotes, admittedly from other industries ...
    4 min 18 sec ago
  • Hay, Jer...
    10 min 28 sec ago
  • Those pesky individual rights
    10 min 38 sec ago
  • For the Democrats, it's all about one thing - money!
    11 min 50 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Full Video of Rick Santorum at CPAC
  • Gov. Perry Tells NewsBusters He's Just 'Fighting on a Different Front'
  • Jay Leno Pines for More Socially Liberal Republican Party
  • Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides
  • Cornel West Scolds Al Sharpton: 'Tell the Truth About the White House'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.