Last week at the Republican National Convention, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich told NewsBusters that if Sarah Palin becomes vice president, she will have "delegitimized the entire left's ability to define what a successful, competent, professional woman is."
On Wednesday, feminist author and social critic Camille Paglia published an article at Salon wherein she not only seemed to agree with Gingrich, but also said, "Palin represented an explosion of a brand new style of muscular American feminism" that has the potential to break down the barriers erected by "shameless Democratic partisanship over the past four decades."
That was just the beginning, for Paglia proceeded to tear about the whole concept of liberal, feminist dogma, including as it pertains to abortion (emphasis added throughout, photo h/t NBer Viper):
In a bold move I would never have thought him capable of, McCain introduced Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska as his pick for vice president. I had heard vaguely about Palin but had never heard her speak. I nearly fell out of my chair. It was like watching a boxing match or a quarter of hard-hitting football -- or one of the great light-saber duels in "Star Wars." (Here are the two Jedi, Obi-Wan Kenobi and Qui-Gon Jinn, going at it with Darth Maul in "The Phantom Menace.") This woman turned out to be a tough, scrappy fighter with a mischievous sense of humor.
Conservative though she may be, I felt that Palin represented an explosion of a brand new style of muscular American feminism. At her startling debut on that day, she was combining male and female qualities in ways that I have never seen before. And she was somehow able to seem simultaneously reassuringly traditional and gung-ho futurist. In terms of redefining the persona for female authority and leadership, Palin has made the biggest step forward in feminism since Madonna channeled the dominatrix persona of high-glam Marlene Dietrich and rammed pro-sex, pro-beauty feminism down the throats of the prissy, victim-mongering, philistine feminist establishment.
Wow! But she was just getting warmed up:
Over the Labor Day weekend, with most of the big enchiladas of the major media on vacation, the vacuum was filled with a hallucinatory hurricane in the leftist blogosphere, which unleashed a grotesquely lurid series of allegations, fantasies, half-truths and outright lies about Palin. What a tacky low in American politics -- which has already caused a backlash that could damage Obama's campaign. When liberals come off as childish, raving loonies, the right wing gains. I am still waiting for substantive evidence that Sarah Palin is a dangerous extremist. I am perfectly willing to be convinced, but right now, she seems to be merely an optimistic pragmatist like Ronald Reagan, someone who pays lip service to religious piety without being in the least wedded to it. I don't see her arrival as portending the end of civil liberties or life as we know it.
Somehow I doubt this is going to go over well in the Netroots:
I may not agree a jot with her about basic principles, but I have immensely enjoyed Palin's boffo performances at her debut and at the Republican convention, where she astonishingly dealt with multiple technical malfunctions without missing a beat. A feminism that cannot admire the bravura under high pressure of the first woman governor of a frontier state isn't worth a warm bucket of spit.
Clearly, Paglia likes the
Sarah Palin brand of can-do, no-excuses, moose-hunting feminism -- a world away from the whining, sniping, wearily ironic mode of the establishment feminism represented by Gloria Steinem, a Hillary Clinton supporter whose shameless Democratic partisanship over the past four decades has severely limited American feminism and not allowed it to become the big tent it can and should be. Sarah Palin, if her reputation survives the punishing next two months, may be breaking down those barriers. Feminism, which should be about equal rights and equal opportunity, should not be a closed club requiring an ideological litmus test for membership.
Paglia also wasn't pleased with how Democrats and their media minions have gone after Palin since she was first announced as McCain's running mate:
The witch-trial hysteria of the past two incendiary weeks unfortunately reveals a disturbing trend in the Democratic Party, which has worsened over the past decade. Democrats are quick to attack the religiosity of Republicans, but Democratic ideology itself seems to have become a secular substitute religion. Since when did Democrats become so judgmental and intolerant? Conservatives are demonized, with the universe polarized into a Manichaean battle of us versus them, good versus evil. Democrats are clinging to pat group opinions as if they were inflexible moral absolutes. The party is in peril if it cannot observe and listen and adapt to changing social circumstances. [...]
The gigantic, instantaneous coast-to-coast rage directed at Sarah Palin when she was identified as pro-life was, I submit, a psychological response by loyal liberals who on some level do not want to open themselves to deep questioning about abortion and its human consequences.
Paglia crescendoed to a spectacular conclusion:
It is nonsensical and counterproductive for Democrats to imagine that pro-life values can be defeated by maliciously destroying their proponents. And it is equally foolish to expect that feminism must for all time be inextricably wed to the pro-choice agenda. There is plenty of room in modern thought for a pro-life feminism -- one in fact that would have far more appeal to third-world cultures where motherhood is still honored and where the Western model of the hard-driving, self-absorbed career woman is less admired.
But the one fundamental precept that Democrats must stand for is independent thought and speech. When they become baying bloodhounds of rigid dogma, Democrats have committed political suicide.
Given some of the recent polling data showing McCain/Palin taking a decent lead over Obama/Biden, especially amongst white women, Paglia's analysis seems quite prescient. Of course, only time will tell.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Great Pic!
September 9, 2008 - 23:09 ET by ViperLove the photo Noel!
Missing the one that gives it contrast though!
Keep up the great work!
Viper
September 9, 2008 - 23:22 ET by Noel SheppardV,
Thanks for reminding me where I got it from. :-) ns
NS,
September 9, 2008 - 23:25 ET by BlondeFrom Saving Private Ryan....
"Clearly, sir, but we have entered the realm of the surreal."
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
B
September 9, 2008 - 23:27 ET by Noel SheppardB,
Yes, ma'am.
BTW: Anybody want to be me that Rush reads parts of Camille's article in the next couple of days? ns
Tricky bet, Noel
September 9, 2008 - 23:36 ET by BlondeHe'd have to admit, as have I, that there just may be "feminists" who actually have a few brain cells left (like Mika).
Color me shocked.
P.S. Your ride hasn't gone to Lion Country Safari yet.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
B
September 9, 2008 - 23:40 ET by Noel SheppardB,
Actually, he's a big fan of Camille's, as am I. I'd be very surprised if he doesn't read it.
Lion Country Safari? Are we talking about a horse? ns
NS
September 9, 2008 - 23:46 ET by BlondeI didn't know that about Rush (or you). I'd love it, actually. Anything to shut up the shreiking feminazis is fine by me.
And yes, we are....they do it the old fashioned way and let nature take it's course, rather than the pink juice and a big truck with a winch. Recycling. It makes no difference to the horse, after all.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
very thorough article - add Paglia to the list
September 9, 2008 - 23:31 ET by mom_roxLet's see: Mika B., Kirsten Powers, Susan Estrich and Camille Paglia.
I've mentioned this before, but I really think that some liberal feminists are a little jealous of Sarah because her husband is rugged and can change a diaper. (the anti-metrosexual)
What's the difference between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin?
One is eye candy while the other kills her own food.
mom_rox... Not just
September 9, 2008 - 23:42 ET by bigtimermom_rox...
Not just anti-metro sexual...throw in anti-Uber sexual too...lol.
No wonder she was smart enough to name him the First Dude!
I love it...just wait..it's a comin' on down the road...
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
"I've mentioned this
September 10, 2008 - 00:15 ET by ckc1227"I've mentioned this before, but I really think that some liberal
feminists are a little jealous of Sarah because her husband is rugged
and can change a diaper. (the anti-metrosexual) "
Many of them are offended that she has a husband period.
"Many of them are offended
September 10, 2008 - 05:42 ET by ThisnThat"Many of them are offended that she has a husband period".
Rather than a bicycle (or bike, as pictured above) or fish.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Hypocrites
September 9, 2008 - 23:31 ET by wdhorningDemocrat hypocrisy:
pro-affirmative action, but relatively racist
pro-feminist, but relatively sexist
I just don't know why
September 9, 2008 - 23:37 ET by RESTLESS 1I just don't know why Paglia is so astonished by Palin. I've known women like Palin my entire life. It's called women with common sense.
"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008
R1...Yep...Millions of us
September 9, 2008 - 23:48 ET by bigtimerR1...Yep...Millions of us out here...but it is nice to see Paglia who has always been one of my fav leftist gals say what she did...as only she can...
Kim Gandy...beware honey bunch...along with the rest of your ilk.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
The Obama campaign is going to learn
September 10, 2008 - 01:05 ET by IamTinmanA painful lesson in the next few weeks from real world america. In my family I had had a grandmother who worked and raised 7 children alone when my grandad was thought to have TB after getting mustard gassed in WWI and had to leave home.
My mom worked and raised 5 kids when my dad was killed in an industrial accident and 3 sisters worked and raised children.
What's the point of all this? In the big cities and small towns all across this country there are millions of these supermoms, and wives holding down a day job as well as the job of raising a family. They identify with Sarah Palin and resent the cavalier if not downright vicious way she is being treated by the Obama campaign and their stooges in the media. All the while the democrats piously wring their hands and proclaim their innocence.
I'm not buying it and I doubt the rest of america will either. Luckily for the GOP country Governor Palin is strong enough to survive these smears and innuendos from people who should be better than that. At least they proclaim to one and all that they are.
Isn't it hilarious to hear
September 10, 2008 - 05:47 ET by motherbeltIsn't it hilarious to hear the women who for years proclaimed "women can have it all" suddenly switch to "How is she going to do this?"
I think Paglia is astonished at Dems, not Palin
September 9, 2008 - 23:54 ET by mom_rox(read Paglia's article. loved the stories about the calf and the crew rescue.)
The Dems' extreme intolerance has been eye-opening to many public figures. I believe they represent many, many others who are not columnists, TV analysts, etc.
What's the difference between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin?
One is eye candy while the other kills her own food.
I agree. I married one.
September 10, 2008 - 08:41 ET by Ruths husband BenI agree. I married one. I call her my little pit-bull. Tough as nails and pretty as a picture. Hasn't got an inch of backup in her.
“it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.” - Justice Antonin Scalia
True Feminism
September 9, 2008 - 23:46 ET by EverettPThat is spoken from a woman who believes in the principles of feminism and does not fall into the "femi-nazi" category. So many feminisits couple their idealogy with a political agenda, just like how the environmentalist movement coupled with a socialist agenda.
I never thought that I would be impressed with something a feminist said...
first of all, i respect Camille Paglia ...
September 10, 2008 - 00:04 ET by pmohbuck10 years ago my wife loaned me a copy of "Sex, Art and American Culture" which i though was an open-minded and practical view of a variety of topics. although i don't agree with everything she stands for, she is refreshing in the sense that she doesn't stand for everything you'd think she would. she is a grounded intellectual with a strong dose of common-sense ... i enjoy reading her thoughts.
her column sums up my frustration and confusion as to why liberal women are trying so hard to destroy someone who actually has the guts to stand up for herself rather than serve as a doormat (for a philandering husband ... like hillary).
Thanks Mr. Sheppard
September 10, 2008 - 00:14 ET by HillbillyKingfor postin this. I read her article right before I checked in on NB tonite.(What can I say, I'm a Drudge junky) I laughed out loud and believe it was very well thought out and written.
Here were some of the other parts of Ms. Paglia's article that I enjoyed:
As I said in my last column,
I have become increasingly uneasy about Obama's efforts to sound folksy
and approachable by reflexively using inner-city African-American tones
and locutions, which as a native of Hawaii he acquired relatively late
in his development and which are painfully wrong for the target
audience of rural working-class whites that he has been trying to
reach. Obama on the road and even in major interviews has been droppin'
his g's like there's no tomorrow. It's analogous to the way stodgy,
portly Al Gore (evidently misadvised by the women in his family and
their feminist pals) tried to zap himself up on the campaign trail into
the happening buff dude that he was not. Both Gore and Obama would have
been better advised to pursue a calm, steady, authoritative persona.
Forget the jokes -- be boring! That, alas, is what reads as masculine
in the U.S.
Pow! Wham! The Republicans unleashed a doozy -- one of the most stunning surprises that I have ever witnessed in my adult life.
As a dissident feminist, I have been arguing since my arrival on the
scene nearly 20 years ago that young American women aspiring to
political power should be studying military history rather than taking
women's studies courses, with their rote agenda of never-ending
grievances.
Sarah Palin is like Annie Oakley, a brash ambassador from America's
pioneer past. She immediately reminded me of the frontier women of the
Western states, which first granted women the right to vote after the
Civil War -- long before the federal amendment guaranteeing universal
woman suffrage was passed in 1919. Frontier women faced the same harsh
challenges and had to tackle the same chores as men did -- which is why
men could regard them as equals, unlike the genteel, corseted ladies of
the Eastern seaboard, which fought granting women the vote right to the
bitter end.
One reason I live in the leafy suburbs of Philadelphia and have never
moved to New York or Washington is that, as a cultural analyst, I want
to remain in touch with the mainstream of American life. I frequent
fast-food restaurants, shop at the mall, and periodically visit
Wal-Mart (its bird-seed section is nonpareil). Like Los Angeles and San
Francisco, Manhattan and Washington occupy their own mental zones --
nice to visit but not a place to stay if you value independent thought
these days. Ambitious professionals in those cities, if they want to
preserve their social networks, are very vulnerable to received
opinion. At receptions and parties (which I hate), they're sitting
ducks. They have to go along to get along -- poor dears!
But what of Palin's pro-life stand? Creationism taught in schools? Book
banning? Gay conversions? The Iraq war as God's plan? Zionism as a
prelude to the apocalypse? We'll see how these big issues shake out.
Right now, I don't believe much of what I read or hear about Palin in
the media. To automatically assume that she is a religious fanatic who
has embraced the most extreme ideas of her local church is exactly the
kind of careless reasoning that has been unjustly applied to Barack
Obama, whom the right wing is still trying to tar with the fulminating
anti-American sermons of his longtime preacher, Jeremiah Wright.(e.m.)
She bashes Barry's delivery, gives the Republicans the credit they deserve, offers sound advice to young ladies of this country, very astutely nails one of the major facets of Mrs. Palin's appeal, calls out her media contemporaries group think tendencies and reminds her readers to be skeptical of said manufactured opinion outlets.
I reckon a person could probably learn sumthin in one of her classes at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia. But since registration is over for the fall, I recommend reading her entire piece.
If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you.
Don Marquis 1878-1937
Equal pay for equal work.
September 10, 2008 - 00:17 ET by JWFDon't forget Obama and his equal pay for equal work creed.
The pay for Vice President, and Gov of Alaska for that matter, pays the same whether it is a man or woman.
Camille Paglia is a true
September 10, 2008 - 00:22 ET by Rush FanCamille Paglia is a true feminist, unlike the Gloria Steinems of this world who over the years have put their political beliefs ahead of equality for women and women's interest. Rush Limbaugh describes these so-called "feminist" as feminazis. He says: "Feminazis are liberals first. It's incidental that they are female."
Speaking of Rush, he and Camille Paglia have a mutual admiration for each other. Rush said recently "Camille Paglia, a big Obamaite, and, as you know, I have tremendous respect for Camille Paglia, Camille Paglia said that Sarah Palin's speech with McCain last week was the best by a woman in US politics that she has ever heard."
When Rush celebrated his 20-year anniversary earlier this year Camille Paglia left this message for Rush: "Hello, Rush, this is Camille Paglia, a staunch supporter of Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi. Many congratulations on your amazing career as a political analyst and ace broadcaster. You single-handedly saved and revolutionized AM radio."
-------------------------------------------------------
The liberal media continues to sacrifice ethics and morals for the greater cause: This time for the Election of a Democrat to the Presidency of the United States.
She's been smacking down
September 10, 2008 - 07:41 ET by celatorShe's been smacking down the feminist phonies like Gloria Steinem for years. She charges them with hijacking and destroying the movement, and keeping it off the rails for years.
I read her quite a bit and I like the way she writes. When Drudge had his radio show, he would have her on occasionally, and she was very good. She's a screaming liberal, of course, but she's honest and takes no prisoners when the sisters act stupid.
The major media report only half the news. Why are they surprised they have only half the potential audience?
Best comment I've read all
September 10, 2008 - 00:57 ET by mastersofdeceitBest comment I've read all day.
First I want to say thanks to NB and all the great posts this last week. I hope you guys are getting some sleep, I realise it's like shooting fish in a barrel lately.
The best comment I've read comes from PJ's own DuFu.
This guy has it in a nutshell, and the MSM will never, ever get it.
Keith said...
THIS IS OUR GAME CHANGER, FOLKS!
Is this the 33rd game changer this week? Or the 34th? The previous
"game changers" have resulted in a substantial shift in favor of
McCain/Palin. I thought it was a game changer when DUmmies exposed
Palin as a White Supremacist? Or when they exposed her fake pregnancy?
Or her book banning time machine? Or her secession dreams? Or...well,
you get the picture.
By all means, DUmmies, have some more rope. You attack, she gets more
popular. Meanwhile Obamessiah cannot campaign in key states because he
has to fund raise in 45,000 sq ft San Francisco mansions due to his
genius decision to forgo public financing. That should play well with
the "gun clingers" in Pennsylvania. While McCain and Palin are
campaigning in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Talking to working
class people and independents, drawing pretty sizeable crowds. I never
in a million years would have thought McCain would be President, but I
refused to believe that once again the Democrats would snatch defeat
out of the jaws of victory. I am humble enough to admit when I am
wrong. Unless Obama pulls his head out of his ass, yesterday, he will
go down in history as the most spectacular choke artist in electoral
history. Simply amazing.
do we have an Olympic record on NB postings?
September 10, 2008 - 07:30 ET by mom_roxNo kidding about the NB staff working OT. Has this been a record on postings? Some days I can barely keep up reading the home page. But I'm trying hard, because this has just been too good.
What's the difference between Barack Obama and Sarah Palin?
One is eye candy while the other kills her own food.
Biden is palin' and Palen is bidin'!
September 10, 2008 - 04:41 ET by Ted ClarkeThis concept of a muscular feminism could also be described as a kind of "masculine" feminism. Now take that and put it up against the "feminine" masculinism of a guy like Joe Biden. Man, (or woman) the possibilities are very....intriguing.
Liberalism, more than anything else, has wreaked havoc (or in Obamaese: "wrecked" havoc) on the American male. To a Lib, if a man is strong and resolute, he is intolerant and unsophisticated. If he is weak and wavering, he is open-minded and nuanced. This won't fly in a debate format. People will spot a loser a million miles away.
I think that Joe Biden knows this down there where his testes live and he is turning white. He knows that Sarah is going to clean his clock (with Windex!). And Sarah is just taking it nice and easy. She knows who she is. And she knows who Joe Biden is (and isn't). I can't wait to see them face off. Biden is palin' and Palen is bidin'.
Drudge had a link to that column
September 10, 2008 - 07:24 ET by Iowa BoyI read it this morning and thought, now I understand why Rush likes this woman so much. She's a liberal who THINKS.
"Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain." Official Motto of the State of Iowa
Wow! What a refreashing read.
September 10, 2008 - 07:32 ET by c5thenShe has summed it all up rather succinctly and eloquently. Instead of the feminists celebrating their woman-ness and pushing for their intellectual and political equality with men, they tried to make women just like men. That's where abortion is so important to them. When that didn't work too well, they tried to feminize men in order to shrink the 'gap'. That's why homosexuality is so important to them. The differences are there for a reason and they should be acknowledged and reveled in, not covered up as if they were something to be ashamed of.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Commenting on Photograph
September 10, 2008 - 08:29 ET by Copperhead RidgeI wonder if Barak Obama has ever had something that big between his legs.
YES!
September 10, 2008 - 08:59 ET by NorthCoasterYes, Yes, Yes!
Our women are strong and independent partners in Life!