CNN has just released what it claims to be the "first national poll conducted after Barack Obama publicly named Joe Biden as his running mate," and the news isn't good for those heading to Denver to watch what likely will be the official nomination of the junior senator from Illinois.
In fact, according to this poll conducted Saturday and Sunday after Obama's announcement, the race is now all tied up.
As reported at CNN.com moments ago, "This looks like a step backward for Obama, who had a 51 to 44 percent advantage last month" (emphasis added throughout, photo courtesy Getty Images):
In a new CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Sunday night, 47 percent of those questioned are backing Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominees, with an equal amount supporting his Republican opponent, McCain.
"This looks like a step backward for Obama, who had a 51 to 44 percent advantage last month," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Even last week, just before his choice of Joe Biden as his running mate became known, most polls tended to show Obama with a single-digit advantage over McCain."
This decline might be the result of lingering disappointment from Hillary Clinton backers:
Sixty-six percent of Clinton supporters -- registered Democrats who want Clinton as the nominee -- are now backing Obama. That's down from 75 percent in the end of June. Twenty-seven percent of them now say they'll support McCain, up from 16 percent in late June.
"The number of Clinton Democrats who say they would vote for McCain has gone up 11 points since June, enough to account for most, although not all, of the support McCain has gained in that time," Holland said.
Wow. Makes one wonder how much coverage this will get away from CNN.
Stay tuned.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The Apprentice
August 24, 2008 - 20:53 ET by Dr_LibertyImagine that you've been a hard-working and loyal mid-level manager all your life.
You've tried to show your boss that you're ready for the "big promotion."
Now imagine that in comes some whiz kid from an elite preppy school and gets the "big promotion" ahead of you.
But wait, all is not lost. The new whiz kid decides to make you his apprentice.
How would you feel?
<insert witty signature here>
DL
August 24, 2008 - 21:26 ET by Noel SheppardDL,
How much am I getting paid, and what does this do for my future ability to get HIS job? ns
Hmmm
August 24, 2008 - 22:51 ET by Dr_LibertyGood retort, thus my analogy is not 100%.
But I don't think that most prez's and veeps are in it for the paycheck, and Biden is 65 (soon to be 66) right now. After 8 years of The O (God forbid), he would be 74. According to the MSM, that's a bit too old to be running for president.
I'm just guessing that it will be hard for Biden to remember that he is not the top of the ticket. Egos run large in Washington, but Eggos run even larger in my toaster. (Yeah, that's a non sequitir, but it does sound somewhat profound.)
<insert witty signature here>
distressed childhood
August 24, 2008 - 21:52 ET by WesenBarry needed either a Father figure, a butler or a figure head. In any case, I'll bet Joe won't last the 4 years before Barry's nuance drives him out of the job.
What about
August 24, 2008 - 22:53 ET by Dr_Libertya fatherly butler head? That would take care of all three!
<insert witty signature here>
Washington Post Poll
August 25, 2008 - 07:20 ET by Dennis DDencal
Interesting note on the ABC-WAPO Poll that has Obama up 4 Pts. Sounds like it was padded with many who were assumed Obama voters.
among a random national sample of 1,108 adults and 916 registered voters, including additional interviews with randomly selected African Americans, for a total of 201 black respondents. The additional interviews (commonly referred to as an "oversample") were completed to ensure there were enough African American respondents for separate analysis; the group was not over-represented in the reported results from the full sample.
Dennis
August 25, 2008 - 07:23 ET by Cool ArrowThat disclaimer sounds like one of Obama's answers at Saddleback. (with all the stuttering and stammering edited out)
I ♣ my seal
I wouldn't trust CNN as far
August 25, 2008 - 07:29 ET by midnight cowboyI wouldn't trust CNN as far as I can spit. This seems like an attempt to lay the groundwork for after the convention, CNN is hoping the messiah gets a sizable bounce, they can then claim how he shot up from a no lead to a great lead and now has his mojo back.
I don't know what CNN's
August 25, 2008 - 07:58 ET by Free ThinkerI don't know what CNN's angle is here unless they are just disappointed with the pick. I was surprised it was Joe Biden. Obama has an issue with arrogance and he ended up picking the one member of the Senate that is possibly more arrogant than he is. And Joe's work on the judiciary comittee just goes to reinforce the radical liberal that Obama is. Also, neither one of them can speak coherently. I'm not sure what Obama's handlers were thinking here. The ship continues to sink.