Can a publisher, editor, and owner of magazines be any more biased than proudly admitting on national television that he's contributed to Barack Obama's campaign?
While you ponder, consider that on Sunday, the publisher and editor of Rolling Stone -- who just so happens to also own Men's Journal and Us Weekly -- told CNN's Howard Kurtz that he's given money to the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee.
In fact, Jann Wenner did so without batting an eye in an interview aired on "Reliable Sources":
HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: Jann Wenner, the publisher and editor of "Rolling Stone," is a big Obama fan. Make that a huge Obama fan. The magazine has endorsed the Democratic candidate, put him on the cover, and this week put him on the cover again, an incredibly positive photo matched by the positive interview inside.
I spoke to Wenner earlier from New York.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
KURTZ: Jann Wenner, welcome.
JANN WENNER, CO-FOUNDER, "ROLLING STONE": Thank you. Good to be here.
KURTZ: Now, this is the second time you've had Barack Obama on the cover of "Rolling Stone," a glowing cover portrait with no headlines, no words. What message is that cover trying to send?
WENNER: History in the making. History is here. There's not -- you know, the statement in and of itself is so powerful that it needn't be elaborated.KURTZ: Now, in the interview you asked Obama about Dylan, The Grateful Dead, Springsteen, rap, what's his favorite Stones song -- which, for the record, is "Give me Shelter" -- what's on his iPod.
The guy is running for president. Why spend so much time on his musical taste?
WENNER: Well, I mean, for one thing, that was the smallest part of the interview, was the musical stuff. . But I think you learn something about the individual and about the person and about how intelligent they are according to their musical tastes. But I think especially you learn how connected are they to what's going on in culture around them.
Yes, musical taste is clearly the most important thing to consider in a presidential candidate when the nation is at war, oil is at $140 a barrel, and America's banking system is crumbling under a housing and lending crisis. But I digress:
KURTZ: Well, certainly culture is one way we make judgments about public figures.
Now, you did ask Senator Obama about the war on drugs. You asked him about gay marriage. And you also asked him this -- you told him, "There's little doubt that you're going to be swift-boated in this campaign, and in the past you said Democrats have cowered in the face of such attacks."
Why did you phrase it that way?
WENNER: Well, it was spontaneous phrasing, but I think we've seen a record of behavior in the United States Senate. I think we saw some of it in the original Swift Boat accounts, where they are afraid to stand up to Bush or to Rove because they are afraid that they are going to be tagged as cowards or bad on national security or left wing or liberal, something like that. And I call that cowering, you know, and I think that the public doesn't respect cowering or want cowering.
Hmmm. So you think that's why Sen. Kerry refused to release all of his military medical records in 2004, Jann? You think his concealing such information was due to a concern that he'd be tagged as a coward or bad on national security? Or, might it have shown that he was lying about such things, and the records would have proved him wrong and his critics right?
Ever consider that was the reason, Jann, and not Kerry's concerns about being tagged a coward?
KURTZ: Now, last week, Jann Wenner, you had Barack and Michelle on the cover of your magazine "US Weekly." This week, of course, on "Rolling Stone."Hmmm. I guess the reader couldn't tell just how much in the tank for Obama Wenner and Rolling Stone were without such information. Silly me:
What role does "Rolling Stone" play in a presidential campaign? Is there a special connection here with younger voters that you feel is going to help Obama?
WENNER: Well, I think after all these years with the kind of coverage and (INAUDIBLE) we've had in our history, and people have come to respect "Rolling Stone's" point of view, our coverage, our access. And I think that we are able to articulate for our readers a lot of ideas and thoughts that they have.
We have a very -- we do have our very particular constituency that is, you know, either culturally-oriented or baby boom-oriented. But I think we have a tremendous amount of readership among the press and among professional politicians.
So I think we kind of have an outside influence, and I think in this interview with Obama what you get out of it is something you don't really generally get out of interviews with him, which is a sense of who he is as a person and the way he thinks, you know, and how he feels about, you know, slightly more subtle things. And an opportunity just to hear his voice outside of the response to, you know, the kind of day-to-day stuff about whatever the current brouhaha in the campaign is, or questions that, you know, are about an issue today but die tomorrow. But, you know, really about who you are as a human being.
KURTZ: Well, certainly interviews about policy positions and polls do tend to provide very similar answers, and I guess you were trying to get beyond that.
WENNER: Exactly.
KURTZ: But you closed the interview -- you closed the interview with these words: "Good luck. We are following you daily with great hope and admiration."
It sounds like you're getting ready to write him a check.
WENNER: Already done that.
KURTZ: You're an Obama donor.
WENNER: I put that in there because I -- I left that in there because of his answer to that thing, in which he says, "Don't worry, we'll get this done."
KURTZ: Now, if you didn't consider his musical choices to be cool, would you reconsider your enthusiasm for Senator Obama?Well, I have to agree here, for I couldn't vote for anybody that liked Abba. And I can't argue with Dylan's lyrics. But his voice? Sorry, Jann, you lost me there:
WENNER: If he was an Abba fan, honestly, yes. I mean, look, the guy knows his Dylan really well.
There's a particular type of person who knows Dylan really well and likes Dylan. To like that kind of lyrics, to like the statements of Dylan, to like that kind of voice, it's not being a cultural snob. It's that he is at a -- as I said, an intellectual and cultural level, and he has a -- shares a kind of mutuality of insight with Dylan, who I think is, you know, the leading literary figure of our times, you know, and one of the leading literary figures of the century.
To appreciate that and get it at that level I think is important. I think that sensibility is what I'm looking for.
KURTZ: All right. So apparently he passed the Wenner test.
Last question. In the past you've interviewed John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton for "Rolling Stone" cover stories. I don't see any Republicans on that list. If John McCain called you up and said, "I would like to come and sit down with you and be on the cover of 'Rolling Stone,'" what would be your reaction?
WENNER: Well, I think we might take him up on it. We had Bush on the cover recently. It was a cartoon of him sitting on a stool with a dunce hat on his head, and it said "The Worst President in American History?" by...
KURTZ: Not exactly the kind of cover that you did for Obama.
WENNER: Well, I'm just trying to say that McCain will have to take his chances when he comes.
KURTZ: But you would be open to interviewing John McCain?
WENNER: I would, very much so.
KURTZ: All right. I'll pass the message to his campaign.
Jann Wenner, thanks very much for joining us.
WENNER: Bye.
Liberal media bias? What liberal media bias?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
If he admits he is a
June 29, 2008 - 20:06 ET by motherbeltIf he admits he is a supporter, shouldn't every article about Obama in one of his magazines be counted as an "in kind" contribution?
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
Really? He's a Obama donor?
June 29, 2008 - 20:14 ET by jefflebowskiKnock me over with a feather. Like all of the MSM aren't donors? I'd be more surprised to find that more than 1000 people read Rolling Stone anymore!
Jeff Lebowski
www.angrywhitedude.c...
Of course Rolling Stone has
June 29, 2008 - 21:48 ET by Trix RabbitOf course Rolling Stone has no more than a 1000 people who read that rag.
Such is to be expected from a magazine whose readership named Joni Mitchell as a better guitarist than Frank Zappa or David Gilmour.
Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell
Looking for another admission from Senator Obama
June 29, 2008 - 20:26 ET by ZachJonesIsHomezachjonesishome.wordpress.com
I hope you will consider this article and pass it along: A Step Towards Respect of Our Laws and The Social Mores by Legalizing Drugs
(An Approach to Change That Might Lessen Our Tax Burden)
Found At:
http://zachjonesisho...
Old hippies in charge of the
June 29, 2008 - 20:29 ET by d1carterOld hippies in charge of the media....same as at NBC.
I remember once upon a time,
June 29, 2008 - 20:33 ET by BlazerI remember once upon a time, before the internet and the onslaught of cable tee-vee, Rolling Stone was once a "cutting edge" magazine. Now it seems as if their eating tacos with the works and using Howard Dean's butt as the shell.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
OMG Blaze... I am dying
June 29, 2008 - 20:37 ET by bigtimerOMG Blaze...
I am dying laughing...I kid you not...you should of gave a warning of some kind....
That is one of the funniest posts I have ever read...
We may be close in age so I understand it...
Nevertheless....I am still laughing...and going to open a cold beer!
Thank you...thank you...thank you.
...and Cheers!
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Noel, at least Wenner freely admits it.
June 29, 2008 - 20:40 ET by R D HelmCredit where due here, perhaps?
As for Rolling Stone Magazine itself, I haven't peeled back a cover on that rag for well over a decade now. Their continued and well-documented dissing of one of the greatest bands of all time is nigh unto legendary.
Rolling Stone is nothing more than hideously expensive bird-cage liner.
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
Madonna?
June 29, 2008 - 22:07 ET by AgentAmericanGeddy, Alex and Neil contributed more to music than Madonna's sex book. The RnRHoF is a joke.Wenner is part of that farce.
Drill ANWAR
RUSH
June 30, 2008 - 01:27 ET by UnsaneI KNEW there was a reason I hadn't read that mag in 20 years!
P.S. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame has zero credibility until Rush gets inducted. They should have been inducted right away in 1999.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Unsane, you are correct. Rush has been screwed repeatedly.
July 1, 2008 - 00:41 ET by R D HelmFunny, as they are still out there, and many HOF inductees are pushing up daisies.
-Literally.
Dude, July 22. Encore Park.
:-)
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
Why will they be loved only when they are gone?
July 1, 2008 - 00:57 ET by UnsaneAs a fellow Rush freak once told me: "Rush will not be appreciated by the public at large until a few years after the last surviving member has died."
"Why am I loved only when I'm gone?" - Tuomas Holopainen, Nightwish keyboardist, from the song "Bless The Child"
Unsane,
July 1, 2008 - 01:30 ET by R D HelmSadly, that is probably the way it will be.
The only member of Rush that has passed is John Rutsey, who died recently. Only hard-core Rush fans have ever even heard of the guy. He was the "drummer" on their first album. He wasn't that bad, honestly, but he didn't have anywhere near the dedication or the work ethic (or talent, for that matter) of Neil Peart.
Alex, Geddy and Neil fit my definition of "professional musicians." Frankly, I truly think them to be the most talented people ever assembled in one band. Ever.
Seriously looking forward to my sixteenth attendance at a Rush show. :-)
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
More on Rush
July 1, 2008 - 01:53 ET by UnsaneSixteen times! I am such a slacker for only having seen them FOUR times!!!
Yep, I was thoroughly bummed at hearing of the passing of Rutsey. But you are absolutely correct: Rush was completed with the addition of Peart. What you left off what the penning of the lyrics. That shift to Peart as the primary lyricist was as big an impact on Rush as was his drumming, and perhaps in some ways even more so.
I had repeatedly heard of Rush back in my high school days as a new initiate into the realm of heavy metal. It was crazy: even guys that had the typical headbanger look (who I would think would consider Rush to be music for wimps) were all "Rush rules!!!" Therefore I became highly intrigued by the band.
Then one night I heard, deep in the depths of the personal hell that was high school, on the radio one night: "In the high school halls, in the shopping malls, conform or be cast out!" I HAD to hear that song again, and find out who the hell sang that! I found out eventually that was "Subdivisions" by Rush, and from that point forward it was on!
I've been a Rush freak ever since!
As another I knew once told me in a pool hall over some beer, while we were taking massive amounts of crap for selecting Rush songs on the jukebox: "They just need to sit down, shut up, and just hear ONE Rush song. Absorb all of the music coming from that ONE song. And then realize it is all coming from THREE PEOPLE."
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
→ That sound...That voice
July 1, 2008 - 01:56 ET by Cool Arrow"Subdivisions" was obviously Rush the first time I heard it. Some groups just don't sell out. I wouldn't look fo them to drop their standards for a minue and produce a "Beth" a la KISS.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE
Unsane, LOL-I'm just waiting for the angst-filled PM from Noel..
July 1, 2008 - 02:08 ET by R D Helm"Get this sh*t off my thread!"
LOL-Noel is a really good guy, but I am probably pushing it here.
Ya'll be good, as I gotta work tommorow.
D.
The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz
Perfect Record
June 29, 2008 - 20:42 ET by TexndocI wouldn't worry about Rolling Stone given their track-record when it comes to Presidential choices. I still remember Rush going on and on about Algore's cover and how he swore they added an enhancement, photoshopped, or did something to those tight pants he was wearing. In fact, if McCain has anything to do with one of their reporters, he's giving them more legitimacy than required. He might as well sit down with Arianna Puff and Huffington.
Yawn Wenner supports a
June 29, 2008 - 20:48 ET by scamoramaYawn Wenner supports a Democrat and this is news?
How... unfair.
June 29, 2008 - 21:22 ET by Mike BrattonHow remarkably unfair.
You know, you'd think there's be some kind of law requiring... oh, I don't know... balance in reporting, or some such thing, wouldn't you?
Oh, right--that's just for radio. Why is that, again?
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport.com
KURTZ: But you would be
June 29, 2008 - 21:55 ET by Republic1KURTZ: But you would be open to interviewing John McCain?
WENNER: I would, very much so.
--------
Don't do it John! Unless you want a vile, left-wing propaganist like Wenner portraying you as a warped, senile old fascist bent on destroying planet earth. The only thing missing from that RS cover is the "VOTE OBAMA!!!" caption under the photograph. Oh well, at least this cover looks like a real photo and isn't in the upward-looking Communist propaganda style that comrade Wenner and crew ran earlier in the year.
"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad
McCain is so stupid that he
June 29, 2008 - 22:15 ET by TEMcCain is so stupid that he certainly has no idea that the McCain-Feingold Political Speech Suppression Act restricts the speech of only certain political advocacy groups but completely leaves other advocacy groups like Rolling Stoned and the New York Times to spend unlimited, unregulated amounts of money to campaign for their favored candidates (i.e., Democrats) and spend millions and millions of dollars producing attack ads and smear campaigns (see New York Times "report" on McCain's "inappropriate relationship"/"romantic relationship") against their enemies (i.e., Republicans).
TE... Yeah..but McCain
June 29, 2008 - 22:34 ET by bigtimerTE...
Yeah..but McCain was backed by Soros for the McCain/Feingold Bill/Act.
$$$$ don't ya know...
I'm glad it's coming back to bite him in the arse.
In fact...I couldn't be happier.
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
"I keep gettin' richer, but I can't get my picture on the ...
June 30, 2008 - 07:17 ET by Crash... cover of the Rolling Stone."
The Rolling Stone has always been in the tank for liberals. But, is that news, are they news?
Deep down I think we're screwed no matter who wins this election. Certainly I can't be the only one who thinks McCain is a douche. 2008 will be a classic example of voting against the lesser of two evils. Sadly, I have a sinking feeling that the charming devil Barrack Hussein Obama will roast McCain in this lopsided brimstone matchup.
I'M SO SHOCKED ROLL ONE IS
June 30, 2008 - 08:33 ET by charlietexasI'M SO SHOCKED ROLL ONE IS IN THE TANK FOR B.O.!!!! THANKS FOR THE INFO.....................
MOM
Ahhh...
June 30, 2008 - 13:30 ET by greenfairieI didn't know Werner also publishes Men's Journal and Us. Isn't Men's Journal the mag that claimed smoker and former hard drug user Obamessiah was one of the fittest men in America? That definitely explains the fluffy-wuffy recent Us cover with Mr. and Mrs. Obamessiah.
The personality cult
July 1, 2008 - 02:21 ET by UnsaneI'm telling you, the personality cult is coming!!! Trust me, if Obama wins the presidency, images like that of the RS cover, and what you saw on Men's Journal and Us will soon cover the country to the point that you simply will not be able to avoid them ANYWHERE in your field of vision.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.