Want more evidence that some of Democrat presidential nominee Barack Obama's recent campaign maneuvers aren't going over very well with the ultra-left in this nation?
Take a look at the headline at the front page of the Huffington Post Saturday:
Obama Undercuts His Brand
Readers clicking on the link will find the following opening paragraph to an article bylined "The Huffington Post" (emphasis added):
Sen. Barack Obama is risking his brand as a political reformer, according to reports today in the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. In recent weeks, he has moderated or changed positions on a number of politically-charged issues, leading to criticism from demoralized Democratic activists and charges of "flip-flopping" from conservatives.
The articles in question chronicled some of Obama's recent flip-flops, including his decision not to take public campaign funds, and to vote in favor of amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, both positions tremendously counter to his far-left-leaning base.
Of particular interest is the Times piece, "Obama is Shifting Towards the Center," which actually tried making the case that the uber-liberal junior senator from Illinois "is emphasizing centrist -- even conservative -- positions on hot-button issues."
I kid you not.
As absurd as this might seem, HuffPo readers and Netroots denizens might actually believe this nonsense as pointed out in the Post piece (emphasis added):
But even some who should be his core constituents -- in the Democratic Party's progressive wing and the liberal blogosphere -- have taken his recent maneuvers as a wake-up call. They are warning the senator that in his quest to reach voters in the middle of the political spectrum, he risks depressing the enthusiasm of the voters who clinched the nomination for him.
Which makes this HuffPo piece, as well as its prominent focus at the website Saturday, all the more fascinating.
After all, in an election that promises once again to be very close, both candidates clearly can't rely exclusively on their base. Coming out of the primaries, Obama seemed much more in control of his than McCain who still hasn't been able to get the support from Conservatives displeased with his position on illegal immigration as well as his votes against President Bush's tax cuts.
One would think this would give Obama an edge unless you don't ignore the ferocity of the uber-left.
With this in mind, Obama has a challenging tap dance ahead of him: how does he say things that woo enough moderate voters to get him over the magic 50 percent mark without angering the far-left base that brought him to the dance?
To be sure, these folks aren't very forgiving of Democrats making any move to the center. Just ask Joe Lieberman.
This also puts the Obama-loving media in a bit of a pickle: how do they convince moderate Independent voters that Obama isn't the far-left candidate he really is without angering those pleased with what he actually stands for?
Put another way, what kind of makeover will press members assist the Democrat candidate in achieving that will end up pleasing liberal and moderate voters?
Stay tuned.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
They are warning the
June 28, 2008 - 15:26 ET by motherbeltThey are warning the senator that in his quest to reach voters in
the middle of the political spectrum, he risks depressing the
enthusiasm of the voters who clinched the nomination for him.
I doubt it. I've said all along, and still believe, that the left flank will vote, and vote for Obama, no matter what. I think he knows that, much like Bill Clinton knew he could diss blacks and still count on them. After all, where were they going to go?
Obama has a much better chance of that wing holding their nose for him than John McCain does of real conservatives sticking by him. It always seems to be conservatives who either sit out or write in, as a matter of principle, rather than voting for the chosen Republican nominee.
The left wing always seems to march in lockstep, in the end.
OT...on the photo: How does Obama always manage to appear as if he's looking down his nose, even when he is looking straight ahead?
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
Totally right MB
June 28, 2008 - 15:46 ET by exLibI have noticed also that the left always votes for whom they think has the best chance to win rather than the canidate who they think will be the best President, hence John Kerry as the nominee, rather than Howard Dean.
(this says nothing for the fact that their views are not consistent with the majority of voting americans).
Also, you are exactly right the Obama is bullet-proof and stands the best chance of being everything the left said GWB is, which is a tyrant as President. The Media have consistently looked the other way and ignored or soft-sold any of Obama's positions that would be lose him the election.
If they keep it up, Obama will be so arrogant, that when he gets in office he will try to do whatever he wants without challenge.
Principles? We don’t need no stinking principles.
June 28, 2008 - 19:17 ET by needle“I have noticed also that the left always votes for whom they think has the best chance to win rather than the candidate who they think will be the best President, hence John Kerry as the nominee, rather than Howard Dean.”
You got that right. After one has defined Sin out of existence, as the atheistic and agnostic Left and liberals have, then one is already miles past the point while principles count for anything. So you get people like Clinton. (Bill? Hillary? Who cares!)
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
"I doubt it. I've said all
June 28, 2008 - 15:56 ET by ckc1227"I doubt it. I've said all along, and still believe, that the left flank will vote, and vote for Obama, no matter what."
Bingo. Hannity was asking a random "guy on the street" some questions about Obama yesterday, and it turns out the guy was pretty much against everything Obama was for. Still, despite this, the guy said he was still voting for Obama because he is black and Obama is black.
That just about sums it up in a nutshell.
Another moron casting a vote
June 28, 2008 - 16:04 ET by GregEAnother moron casting a vote for most important political office on earth.
And since I'm a white boy if I don't vote for Obama because I disagree with his views, I'm a racist.
I heard that show also
June 28, 2008 - 17:20 ET by DEVILDOCMOMand found it disturbing. All the people who would stop and be interviewed (at least that I heard) were young and voting for bho...they had no real reasons, just the "change" garbage.
@ MB
June 28, 2008 - 16:01 ET by geoff.galeThere is good evidence that just like the rest of the Democrats, Obama is slowly realising the impropriety of a sudden withdrawl from Iraq. As he and McCain start tussling in earnest over the issue in debates and townhall meetings, his tough stance on Iraq will likely soften to allow him the "wiggle room" he knows he's going to need on troop withdrawl. We saw that with Clinton and we'll see it with Obama. However, the price to be paid for this will be an erosion of a chunk of the seriously committed looney left that he would otherwise count on.
As proof of this, look at the steadily declining approval numbers for Congress. The D's were swept into a majority in 2006 on the unpopularity of the war and they have since realised that it's not the cut-and-dried issue they had portrayed to the public during the election. Even before the gas prices went south, they were below 20% approval and sinking, largely because of their failure to deliver the death blow to the war funding.
The scenario I've painted above is the classic problem the Democrats face - they are a party of splinter groups, and as such, they are prone to falling out with one another fairly easily. Too many victims and not enough heroic leaders, I guess. There is cause to believe that they can be spilt over this issue and their support diffused. Not that I trust the Republican strategists to take advantage of it.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
- Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
www.conservativeboot...
You are right as usual
June 28, 2008 - 17:25 ET by DEVILDOCMOMmother. I wonder if this is the left's way of replying to the criticism that they are all in the bag for bho? Tossing us a few crumbs to show their "disappointment" when actually they will all vote for him no matter what.
PS good point about the photos. :)
Moonbats attacking BO?
June 28, 2008 - 15:39 ET by acumenWill this stop Chris Matthew's leg from tingling?
Be Careful What You Wish For Huffer's.
June 28, 2008 - 16:00 ET by CrashBut ... he promised "Change."
Opps, they did it again!
June 28, 2008 - 16:03 ET by CobraManI guess the liberals should have stuck with Hillary when they had the chance. She didn’t flip flop nearly as much and she had the courage to stick it out as long as possible without surrendering her pervious stances on “the issues” simply in an attempt to garner more votes. At least, not nearly as much as Obama has been doing. But no, they just HAD to have Obama as the presumptive nominee, didn’t they, so now they have only themselves to blame for his political triangulations on the "issues". I guess he really was just telling them what they wanted to hear simply because he wanted the nomination. They're just now realizing it. That's got to hurt! It kind of reminds me of Kerry and his triangulations, and look how that turned out.
You are right; Obama has
June 28, 2008 - 16:29 ET by motherbeltYou are right; Obama has been all over the place since clinching the nomination. Maybe HRC should have stayed and waited for the convention. I think there is a chance Obama will have alienated even more by the time Denver rolls around.
The saying is to run left (or right) during the primaries, and to the center for the GE. He is wasting no time; and even on those things he doesn't moderate on, the MSM describe him and his positions as "centrist." It was tough to do while Mrs. Clinton was still in the race, but now they are going at it full throttle.
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
This ties into my comment about principles above
June 28, 2008 - 19:22 ET by needleImpunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
As usual, liberals fight for
June 28, 2008 - 16:06 ET by GregEAs usual, liberals fight for the nomination as the liberals they are, then when the general election comes, they must move toward the center (aka, move to the right) to compete. Says alot about liberalism.
He could don KKK robes
June 28, 2008 - 16:42 ET by jefflebowskiand the great unwashed left would still vote for him. Obama will move to the right of McPain before November but the loony left really knows what he is and what he believes in.
Will the white middle ground people?
Jeff Lebowski
www.angrywhitedude.c...
Well Hillary did suspend
June 28, 2008 - 18:28 ET by bigtimerWell Hillary did suspend her campaign after-all...
Denver is going to be interesting at this rate...hehehee...
Of course the msm will try to make sure he is still the leftists messiah...although it seems a little of his shine from that halo is wearing thin with some of the ultra leftists...
What are they ever going to do?
I know...I know...ask the Come-Back Kid..bet he has a plan!
Really this is fun...
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Truly a con artist
June 28, 2008 - 18:49 ET by HumblepieObama knows the hard core ultra-left will vote for him along with counting on the black vote. What can they do, vote for McCain? Even though he is a liberal at heart, he's not far enough left to capture their votes. I believe he also knows he will lose some ultra liberal vote but is hoping to pick up the "centrist" Republicans, Independents and undecided. By playing the middle ground, he is playing directly for those votes. He know if he doesn't he will not win come November. It's a numbers game to him now.
The press (Obie, Matthews, print, etc) will spin this as proof he's willing to work "across aisles" on national policy. How can you not vote for him when he is more than willing to meet you half way on issues. His biggest challenge is if more light is brought to bear on past web supporters, past and current "advisor's, and his inability to speak without a teleprompter. Plus, how long can they keep Ms M.O. under wraps.
I expect the talking heads to address Huffpo and other liberal sites within the next few days. They will try to defuse the controversies by pleading that all avenues must be reviewed first before a comprehensive plan can be implemented (this will show Independents and centrist their voice will be heard). Expect them to add phrases to remind ultra's of his base beliefs and values (this will attempt to appease the his base).
Get real, what can Obie and Matthews say... They were wrong? Never happen.
During this time with political correctness at its zenith, I reserve the right to let you know you're an idiot.
Obama has NOT changed
June 28, 2008 - 19:01 ET by chessplayerObama has NOT changed positions on anything. They are just more "nuanced." lol
I feel their pain. I
June 28, 2008 - 22:06 ET by amberI feel their pain. I swear McCain does not want my vote. I cover my ears and start yelling, "lalalalala" whenever one of his PC, global warming commercials come on.
"Always remember that you are unique. Just like everybody else." --despair.com
So "Empty Suit" is now an
June 28, 2008 - 22:13 ET by CJK51So "Empty Suit" is now an official brand? Good for Barry! I can see it on jeans, hats and sneakers now.
He can add clothier to messiah on his resume now.
To tell the truth... I
June 28, 2008 - 22:20 ET by RukusTo tell the truth...
I thind "Vacuum" should replace "empty" as the official brand. Less than nothing. God help us!
"Nuke 'em 'til they... oh hell, just shoot 'em!"