As NewsBusters has been reporting all day, President Bush gave a speech on Thursday to the Israeli Knesset that has sparked angry reactions from media members and leading Democrats including Barack Obama.
As it is likely press outlets will cherry-pick from this address, few Americans will see and/or read what the President really said.
With that in mind, the following is the complete text of his speech, with video part one of three embedded right, and the rest after the transcript:
President Peres and Mr. Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, thanks very much for hosting this special session. President Beinish, Leader of the Opposition Netanyahu, Ministers, members of the Knesset, distinguished guests: Shalom.
Laura and I are thrilled to be back in Israel. We have been deeply moved by the celebrations of the past two days. And this afternoon, I am honored to stand before one of the world's great democratic assemblies and convey the wishes of the American people with these words: Yom Ha'atzmaut Sameach.
It is a rare privilege for the American president to speak to the Knesset, although the prime minister told me there is something even rarer — to have just one person in this chamber speaking at a time. My only regret is that one of Israel's greatest leaders is not here to share this moment. He is a warrior for the ages, a man of peace, a friend. The prayers of the American people are with Ariel Sharon.
We gather to mark a momentous occasion. Sixty years ago in Tel Aviv, David Ben-Gurion proclaimed Israel's independence, founded on the "natural right of the Jewish people to be masters of their own fate." What followed was more than the establishment of a new country. It was the redemption of an ancient promise given to Abraham and Moses and David — a homeland for the chosen people Eretz Yisrael.
Eleven minutes later, on the orders of President Harry Truman, the United States was proud to be the first nation to recognize Israel's independence. And on this landmark anniversary, America is proud to be Israel's closest ally and best friend in the world.
The alliance between our governments is unbreakable, yet the source of our friendship runs deeper than any treaty. It is grounded in the shared spirit of our people, the bonds of the Book, the ties of the soul. When William Bradford stepped off the Mayflower in 1620, he quoted the words of Jeremiah: "Come let us declare in Zion the word of God." The founders of my country saw a new promised land and bestowed upon their towns names like Bethlehem and New Canaan. And in time, many Americans became passionate advocates for a Jewish state.
Centuries of suffering and sacrifice would pass before the dream was fulfilled. The Jewish people endured the agony of the pogroms, the tragedy of the Great War, and the horror of the Holocaust — what Elie Wiesel called "the kingdom of the night." Soulless men took away lives and broke apart families. Yet they could not take away the spirit of the Jewish people, and they could not break the promise of God.
When news of Israel's freedom finally arrived, Golda Meir, a fearless woman raised in Wisconsin, could summon only tears. She later said: "For two thousand years we have waited for our deliverance. Now that it is here it is so great and wonderful that it surpasses human words."
The joy of independence was tempered by the outbreak of battle, a struggle that has continued for six decades. Yet in spite of the violence, in defiance of the threats, Israel has built a thriving democracy in the heart of the Holy Land. You have welcomed immigrants from the four corners of the Earth. You have forged a free and modern society based on the love of liberty, a passion for justice, and a respect for human dignity. You have worked tirelessly for peace. You have fought valiantly for freedom.
My country's admiration for Israel does not end there. When Americans look at Israel, we see a pioneer spirit that worked an agricultural miracle and now leads a high-tech revolution. We see world-class universities and a global leader in business and innovation and the arts. We see a resource more valuable than oil or gold: the talent and determination of a free people who refuse to let any obstacle stand in the way of their destiny.
I have been fortunate to see the character of Israel up close. I have touched the Western Wall, seen the sun reflected in the Sea of Galilee, I have prayed at Yad Vashem. And earlier today, I visited Masada, an inspiring monument to courage and sacrifice. At this historic site, Israeli soldiers swear an oath: "Masada shall never fall again."
Citizens of Israel: Masada shall never fall again, and America will be at your side.
This anniversary is a time to reflect on the past. It's also an opportunity to look to the future. As we go forward, our alliance will be guided by clear principles — shared convictions rooted in moral clarity and unswayed by popularity polls or the shifting opinions of international elites.
We believe in the matchless value of every man, woman and child. So we insist that the people of Israel have the right to a decent, normal and peaceful life, just like the citizens of every other nation.
We believe that democracy is the only way to ensure human rights. So we consider it a source of shame that the United Nations routinely passes more human rights resolutions against the freest democracy in the Middle East than any other nation in the world.
We believe that religious liberty is fundamental to a civilized society. So we condemn anti-Semitism in all forms — whether by those who openly question Israel's right to exist or by others who quietly excuse them.
We believe that free people should strive and sacrifice for peace. So we applaud the courageous choices Israeli's leaders have made. We also believe that nations have a right to defend themselves and that no nation should ever be forced to negotiate with killers pledged to its destruction.
We believe that targeting innocent lives to achieve political objectives is always and everywhere wrong. So we stand together against terror and extremism, and we will never let down our guard or lose our resolve.
The fight against terror and extremism is the defining challenge of our time. It is more than a clash of arms. It is a clash of visions, a great ideological struggle. On the one side are those who defend the ideals of justice and dignity with the power of reason and truth. On the other side are those who pursue a narrow vision of cruelty and control by committing murder, inciting fear, and spreading lies.
This struggle is waged with the technology of the 21st century, but at its core it is an ancient battle between good and evil. The killers claim the mantle of Islam, but they are not religious men. No one who prays to the God of Abraham could strap a suicide vest to an innocent child, or blow up guiltless guests at a Passover Seder, or fly planes into office buildings filled with unsuspecting workers. In truth, the men who carry out these savage acts serve no higher goal than their own desire for power. They accept no God before themselves. And they reserve a special hatred for the most ardent defenders of liberty, including Americans and Israelis.
And that is why the founding charter of Hamas calls for the "elimination" of Israel. And that is why the followers of Hezbollah chant "Death to Israel, Death to America!" That is why Osama bin Laden teaches that "the killing of Jews and Americans is one of the biggest duties." And that is why the president of Iran dreams of returning the Middle East to the Middle Ages and calls for Israel to be wiped off the map.
There are good and decent people who cannot fathom the darkness in these men and try to explain away their words. It's natural, but it is deadly wrong. As witnesses to evil in the past, we carry a solemn responsibility to take these words seriously. Jews and Americans have seen the consequences of disregarding the words of leaders who espouse hatred. And that is a mistake the world must not repeat in the 21st century.
Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.
Some people suggest if the United States would just break ties with Israel, all our problems in the Middle East would go away. This is a tired argument that buys into the propaganda of the enemies of peace, and America utterly rejects it. Israel's population may be just over 7 million. But when you confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because the United States of America stands with you.
America stands with you in breaking up terrorist networks and denying the extremists sanctuary. America stands with you in firmly opposing Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions. Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the world's deadliest weapons would be an unforgivable betrayal for future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
Ultimately, to prevail in this struggle, we must offer an alternative to the ideology of the extremists by extending our vision of justice and tolerance and freedom and hope. These values are the self-evident right of all people, of all religions, in all the world because they are a gift from the Almighty God. Securing these rights is also the surest way to secure peace. Leaders who are accountable to their people will not pursue endless confrontation and bloodshed. Young people with a place in their society and a voice in their future are less likely to search for meaning in radicalism. Societies where citizens can express their conscience and worship their God will not export violence, they will be partners in peace.
The fundamental insight, that freedom yields peace, is the great lesson of the 20th century. Now our task is to apply it to the 21st. Nowhere is this work more urgent than here in the Middle East. We must stand with the reformers working to break the old patterns of tyranny and despair. We must give voice to millions of ordinary people who dream of a better life in a free society. We must confront the moral relativism that views all forms of government as equally acceptable and thereby consigns whole societies to slavery. Above all, we must have faith in our values and ourselves and confidently pursue the expansion of liberty as the path to a peaceful future.
That future will be a dramatic departure from the Middle East of today. So as we mark 60 years from Israel's founding, let us try to envision the region 60 years from now. This vision is not going to arrive easily or overnight; it will encounter violent resistance. But if we and future presidents and future Knessets maintain our resolve and have faith in our ideals, here is the Middle East that we can see:
Israel will be celebrating the 120th anniversary as one of the world's great democracies, a secure and flourishing homeland for the Jewish people. The Palestinian people will have the homeland they have long dreamed of and deserved — a democratic state that is governed by law, and respects human rights, and rejects terror. From Cairo to Riyadh to Baghdad and Beirut, people will live in free and independent societies, where a desire for peace is reinforced by ties of diplomacy and tourism and trade. Iran and Syria will be peaceful nations, with today's oppression a distant memory and where people are free to speak their minds and develop their God-given talents. Al-Qaida and Hezbollah and Hamas will be defeated, as Muslims across the region recognize the emptiness of the terrorists' vision and the injustice of their cause.
Overall, the Middle East will be characterized by a new period of tolerance and integration. And this doesn't mean that Israel and its neighbors will be best of friends. But when leaders across the region answer to their people, they will focus their energies on schools and jobs, not on rocket attacks and suicide bombings. With this change, Israel will open a new hopeful chapter in which its people can live a normal life, and the dream of Herzl and the founders of 1948 can be fully and finally realized.
This is a bold vision, and some will say it can never be achieved. But think about what we have witnessed in our own time. When Europe was destroying itself through total war and genocide, it was difficult to envision a continent that six decades later would be free and at peace. When Japanese pilots were flying suicide missions into American battleships, it seemed impossible that six decades later Japan would be a democracy, a lynchpin of security in Asia, and one of America's closest friends. And when waves of refugees arrived here in the desert with nothing, surrounded by hostile armies, it was almost unimaginable that Israel would grow into one of the freest and most successful nations on the earth.
Yet each one of these transformations took place. And a future of transformation is possible in the Middle East, so long as a new generation of leaders has the courage to defeat the enemies of freedom, to make the hard choices necessary for peace, and stand firm on the solid rock of universal values.
Sixty years ago, on the eve of Israel's independence, the last British soldiers departing Jerusalem stopped at a building in the Jewish quarter of the Old City. An officer knocked on the door and met a senior rabbi. The officer presented him with a short iron bar — the key to the Zion Gate — and said it was the first time in 18 centuries that a key to the gates of Jerusalem had belonged to a Jew. His hands trembling, the rabbi offered a prayer of thanksgiving to God, "Who had granted us life and permitted us to reach this day." Then he turned to the officer, and uttered the words Jews had awaited for so long: "I accept this key in the name of my people."
Over the past six decades, the Jewish people have established a state that would make that humble rabbi proud. You have raised a modern society in the Promised Land, a light unto the nations that preserves the legacy of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob. And you have built a mighty democracy that will endure forever and can always count on the United States of America to be at your side. God bless.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Thank you
May 15, 2008 - 17:19 ET by CobraManThank you for the links and text to President Bush's wonderful speech.
I think this is the best passage:
"Sixty years ago, on the eve of Israel's independence, the last British
soldiers departing Jerusalem stopped at a building in the Jewish
quarter of the Old City. An officer knocked on the door and met a
senior rabbi. The officer presented him with a short iron bar — the key
to the Zion Gate — and said it was the first time in 18 centuries that
a key to the gates of Jerusalem had belonged to a Jew. His hands
trembling, the rabbi offered a prayer of thanksgiving to God, "Who had
granted us life and permitted us to reach this day." Then he turned to
the officer, and uttered the words Jews had awaited for so long: "I
accept this key in the name of my people."
I just have one question: Where in the speech did President Bush call the democrats "Nazi sympathizers," as the new MSM spin seems to be claiming.
Goldbar, would you care to answer that for us?
Snakedude,
May 15, 2008 - 17:51 ET by Indiana Joe"As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."
How much you wanna bet the quoted senator was a Democrat? THAT'S probably why they take it as a "shot."
I heard this wonderful
May 15, 2008 - 17:35 ET by bigtimerI heard this wonderful speech this morning by President Bush...
For the media and Obama to be so vein to think every single thing is about them makes me ill as they did right here...
Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.
Talk about arrogance...Pretty sad isn't it...the words are true and by the way Obama and crew...if the shoe fits...
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill
Arrogant is right, bt
May 15, 2008 - 17:56 ET by Indiana JoeAssuming a general statement has to be about them.
It reminds me of a line in the original "Dune" novel. Paraphrasing, "I display a garment, and you claim it fits you."
I think it's very telling that they take the term "appeasement" personally. Guess they know themselves, huh? Anything to make themselves "victims."
The media is angry? Mmm
May 15, 2008 - 17:40 ET by Gary HallThe media should report the news - not get angry. What they should be reporting here, is that President Bush's speech was more than warmly received (standing ovation) by those in the Israeli Knesset, and that certain partisan Democrats are, well being partisan.
In today's media, the only
May 15, 2008 - 17:48 ET by CortillaenIn today's media, the only thing that matters is shock and emotional value. The facts can take a flying leap off a cliff for all they care, so staying calm and reasonable doesn't serve much purpose for them.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
if the shoe fits ...
May 15, 2008 - 17:48 ET by pmohbucki never heard obama's name mentioned in that speech ... if that was the case, why would obama take offense and assume it referred to him ... if the implications weren't in fact true? bush blew the lid off the whole democrat party with that speech and the fact that he did it in israel (the ultimate target of radical islam) was impressive.
he single-handedly pimp-slapped the democrat foreign policy agenda as being parallel with that of neville chamberlin and illustrated the point perfectly by reminding us of the destruction that followed such an approach ("tanks rolling into poland"). i think think this was utterly brilliant ... and the reactions of the prominent democraps is a tell-tale sign that bush is still very much in control of his presidency.
kudos to the President for not being a lame-duck and proving, once again, that the only true idiots in our gov't are those who have repeatedly underestimated this man's intelligence.
...that the only true
May 15, 2008 - 20:06 ET by HypocriteHater...that the only true idiots in our gov't are those who have repeatedly underestimated this man's intelligence.
Here, here!!
He's making them all look like blubbering idiots. Someone needed to wipe the smugs off their faces, and GWB is the one to do it!
i have pored over this
May 15, 2008 - 18:42 ET by kahoonai have pored over this speech (and if you read john bolton's book - and keep it in mind), the offending passage(s):
it could be (and probably was) directed at the EU who STILL believe it is possible to negotiate nuclear weapons out of iranian hands.
morons.
of course, the dems all start shrieking because their narcissism won't allow them to consider any other possibility.
"of course, the dems all
May 15, 2008 - 19:02 ET by ckc1227"of course, the dems all start shrieking because their narcissism won't allow them to consider any other possibility."
That, and the fact that he could have been talking about them and he would have been just as accurate. They know they're the appeasement party, they just don't want you to know it.
That is a beautiful speech.
May 15, 2008 - 19:26 ET by mister josephThat is a beautiful speech. As they can't attack him on what he said, they must take offense at what he might have said. I've always believed that there's nothing more suspicious than a defense to an accusation that has yet to be made.
But this whole 'take offense' thing is absurd. I apologize for the negative phrasing, but if you're such a p***sy that you're "offended" about what someone who is philosophically opposite of you in your beliefs and who disagrees with you, then, really, how can we take you seriously? It's trying to take the high ground in rural Kansas. It's not leadership; it's certainly not the work of a 'uniter,' and it's a poor quality of an adult.
Obama's standing athwart history, fingers in his ears yelling, "LA LA LA LA IM OFFENDED BY YOUR STATEMENTS!"
That he's more offended by references to Chamberland that indirectly reference what he's said in the past than by what his "pastor" says, it speaks volumes...
Mister Joseph
May 15, 2008 - 19:35 ET by DelsaI loved what you wrote. It is a close second to Bush's comments.
These democrats are so guilt ridden they actually think if they shout outragous insults at George Bush, we will all forget that they are exactly what they say they aren't.
did I make sense?
Ferraro comment
May 15, 2008 - 19:35 ET by balboaI saw a Geraldine Ferraro commenting on the Obama comment, and she said that it was a terrible idea to comment at all, as it brings up Obama's weakness in foreign policy again, putting it front and center, instead of keeping the conversation on topics he's more familiar with.
She said Obama's camp should have left it to Pelosi et al.
pretty sad when you want to
May 15, 2008 - 19:41 ET by mister josephpretty sad when you want to leave commenting to Pelosi.
i have this rather unnerving feeling Pelosi and co. in congress is intentionally holding the country hostage w/gas prices until the election. considering the insults and hatred and animosity directed towards Bush and a MSM that is gouging from the same trough, it's easy to pass the buck to a gullible and ignorant American population willing to accept the scapegoats "oil companies" and "Bush" without ever realizing the truth.
if a dem. wins, watch prices fall dramatically--only, of course, to go higher than before when all sorts of 'environmental' taxes and initiatives are imposed. if a rep. wins, watch prices go sky high and blame go straight to us.
I don't think the point was
May 15, 2008 - 19:43 ET by balboaI don't think the point was letting Pelosi speak for Obama. The point was for Obama's camp to not comment at all, as it puts his foreign policy experience back at front and center, which is not where he wants it.
(Esp. since Obama wasn't mentioned by name.)
Thank-you Noel for posting this.
May 15, 2008 - 19:36 ET by upcountrywaterOne of the best Speeches President Bush ever gave.
And a future of transformation is possible in the Middle East, so long
as a new generation of leaders has the courage to defeat the enemies of
freedom, to make the hard choices necessary for peace
This is what the Cha Cha Changelings la la la ,don't want to hear.
The POPE says, GOD BLESS AMERICA!! Liberals/are/crazy/IranianUranium/<sleep>
People who do not read or hear
May 15, 2008 - 19:42 ET by Delsathis speech, miss the essence of President Bush.
He is not perfect but pretty darn close to it.
He makes me proud. I need to savor this moment.
I agree
May 15, 2008 - 21:40 ET by ChesterBogusThe attack isn't there, but I think what he said was inappropriate. It added nothing to the speech, which was full of platitudes anyway. Far too wordy with no real substance.
Typical Bush speech. Nothing to see here. Meaningless. People should calm down about it.
Chester... I'm betting
May 15, 2008 - 21:49 ET by Clear thinkerChester...
I'm betting there is a small country full of people, stuck in the middle of , and surrounded by, Jew hating states that want nothing less than the total anihilation of said state, that would angrily disagree with your assesment of president Bush's speech.
"Abstain from McCain"
Chester
May 15, 2008 - 23:00 ET by RESTLESS 1Why don't you ask the Taliban and al Quaeda how "meaningless" those "platitudes" are?
"We believe that democracy
May 15, 2008 - 22:36 ET by RESTLESS 1"We believe that democracy is the only way to ensure human rights. So we
consider it a source of shame that the United Nations routinely passes
more human rights resolutions against the freest democracy in the
Middle East than any other nation in the world."
When President Bush appointed John Bolton as ambassador to the U.N., I hoped our days in the U.N. were short. I still wonder why we allow them to reside in our largest city, or give them the time of day.
Amen to that. Rescind our
May 15, 2008 - 22:49 ET by CortillaenAmen to that. Rescind our support (monetary and otherwise) and watch the worm-eaten mass of corruption collapse.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
What was said - was not what the MSM reported
May 15, 2008 - 23:07 ET by JayTeeBut then. . the MSM is on the Campaign Trail . .We need stand in reporters to give us some facts, un inflenced by B------T .
W.V. has spoken. . .nobody was listening.....Bush spoke better words than the MSM COULD SWALLOW.
The Speech was in NO WAY reported upon by Media. . .TV 'S ARE TURNING OFF all over this great land, and this non-Reporting of a great SPEECH is why.
Great Speech
May 15, 2008 - 23:14 ET by candanceBush has disappointed me some over the years, but this speech was a great way for him to begin his departure. A year from now we'll probably have this man there to speak in his stead and everything will be different.
Speaking of which, if Obama thought that remark about appeasement was aimed at him, he's either paranoid or has a guilty conscience. If the Obama Doctrine did not involve appeasement then those words would never have applied to him anyway.
By volunteering that connection for us, he basically conceded that appeasement really is his plan. Not a smart vote.
»→ Obama admits appeasement
May 16, 2008 - 04:15 ET by Cool ArrowTo whatever extent the recognition of the US government is important to Ahmanadinajad, B. Hussein Obama is willing to extend it.
Obi Won Carter has taught young Obama well.
♣ a seal
Once more I marvel......
May 16, 2008 - 04:55 ET by old croat the commitment this president shows to Isreal and world peace. I am proud that he stands so staunchly with the only true democracy in the Middle East. His vision and legacy are stated in one paragraph....
Ultimately, to prevail in this struggle, we must offer an alternative
to the ideology of the extremists by extending our vision of justice
and tolerance and freedom and hope. These values are the self-evident
right of all people, of all religions, in all the world because they
are a gift from the Almighty God. Securing these rights is also the
surest way to secure peace. Leaders who are accountable to their people
will not pursue endless confrontation and bloodshed. Young people with
a place in their society and a voice in their future are less likely to
search for meaning in radicalism. Societies where citizens can express
their conscience and worship their God will not export violence, they
will be partners in peace.