Questions Stephanopoulos Should Ask Clinton and Obama Wednesday

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
By Noel Sheppard | April 15, 2008 - 18:26 ET

The Democrat presidential candidates are squaring off against one another Wednesday in Philadelphia, and, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, co-moderator George Stephanopoulos thinks this could decide the nomination:

"There hasn't been a debate in weeks and the stakes couldn't be higher, there's no question about that," he said. "That's especially true for Sen. Clinton. Pennsylvania is a must-win state. It's the first debate since Texas and Ohio and a lot has happened since then."

With this in mind, Stephanopoulos was interviewed Tuesday by WOR radio's Steve Malzberg who had some marvelous questions he'd like asked of the two candidates (seven minute audio available here, picture courtesy ABC):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
  • Are you going to ask Hillary, you know, exactly when she learned to shoot and when she started downing shots and beers?
  • [For Obama] William Ayers is a man who was head of the Weather Underground, a radical group in the 60s and 70s, set bombs at the Capitol, set bombs at the Pentagon, and was quoted in the New York Times oddly enough, ironically on September 11 before obviously the events of that day, saying that he didn't go far enough, and he doesn't regret it at all, and he wished he could have done more. Your campaign has described your relationship with William Ayers as "friendly." How could a man running for the presidency of the United States possibly have anything to do with, or have anything but disdain for a man who did what he has done to this country?

Stephanopoulos responsed to the last query: "It's a damn good question."

Let's see if he asks it.

Moving forward, Malzberg had a great question for Hillary: "Looking back, Senator, in a post-9/11 world, would you think, would you say that pardons granted, the clemency granted the FALN terrorists, who never requested such clemency, would you say that your husband made a mistake, and did you play any role in requesting clemency for those FALN terrorists?"

Stephanopoulos replied, "Another good question."

On another subject, Malzberg asked:

Jimmy Carter, you did a great interview with him on "This Week" on Sunday, today he not only hugged a Hamas minister in Ramalah, but he laid a wreath at the grave of Yasser Arafat, a man who I'm sure you know, according to Douglas Brinkley's book "The Unfinished Presidency," he, Carter, wrote speeches for Yasser Arafat, even before Arafat renounced terrorism quote-unquote, to make him more palatable to the American public and the world. Carter making a terrible mistake here, and if he winds up endorsing Obama, how does Obama handle that?

Stephanopoulos answered:

Well, Obama is in a kind of a tough spot. On the one hand, he said he himself wants to meet with, or would meet, would be prepared to meet with Ahmadinejad in Iran, but he's now said he would not meet with Hamas leaders. But, Jimmy Carter is free to do whatever he wants. So, he's kind of in a no-win situation. On the one hand, how could he say it's not okay to meet with Hamas given the fact that he'd meet with Ahmadinejad. On the other hand, if he doesn't denounce the meeting as you say, he's open up to the charge that again he's being weak on terrorism.

Malzberg's last question:

There's a report out in today's New York Post, that with Katie Couric's reported impending departure from CBS, Barack Obama is now like, "Well, I don't want to do the debate in North Carolina next week, because, you know, Katie's leaving anyway." I don't see how that makes any difference, do you?

Stepanopoulos:

I don't think it does, but I think Obama is not going to make any decision on that debate until after he sees what happens in Pennsylvania.

Going to be very interesting to see whether Stephanopoulos takes any of Malzberg's suggestions. Stay tuned.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FYI, Clintonopolis was also

FYI, Clintonopolis was also on Sean Hannity's radio show and was also peppered with these same kinds of questions. Yes, it would be interesting indeed if he would interrogate his fellow Dems like Sean or Steve and not softball the "debate".

 

Start each day with a smile, then get it over with. - W.C. Fields

Great questions

Great questions indeed...

I'm looking forward to this...sure hope Georgie doesn't disappoint.

Not holding my breath though.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

"Good questions"...for

"Good questions"...for someone else to ask...

You know Chis, the very

You know Chris, the very best person in my mind to handle any debate would be Brian Lamb...I don't know if you know who he is but he would be excellent in my opinion.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

The host on C-Span? I think

The host on C-Span? I think you may be right - he appears to be pretty neutral in interviews. For that matter, the whole of C-Span appears to studiously maintain neutrality (sometimes to the point of monotony - but, hey, who's complaining? Not me.). Maybe they should run all the debates. 

Chris... Yeah I've been

Chris...

Yeah I've been watching Lamb for about 20 years now, he started C-SPAN with a couple other guys, he just got married for the first time and hasn't been around much and I miss him in the mornings on the Journal, I don't watch it as much as I used to because I get too mad, and nobody comes close to him as the moderator....

anyway...he would remain neutral and ask tough questions....

Heck, we would never get that lucky.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

This will probably make you both think it's a bad idea...

But I TOTALLY agree with BT.

In fact, there are very few hands in Washington, DC I would go out of my way to shake, and Brian Lamb's is one of them. I'd love to buy a beer for him and thank him for how fair he and C-Span have been to libertarians & Libertarians amid a blatantly antilibertarian biased news media. There. Still convinced it's a good idea? ;)
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

So, he's like a political

So, he's like a political St. Francis, who cares for all the little birds and critters? :)

Well, we've just both seen him being fair.

But you're right, Brian can be a bit bland. OTOH, I think that's part of C-Span's charm. If you listen very carefully, I think you'll find Brian has a great sense of humor underneath that bland exterior. I've complained long and hard about the cable monopolies, but I must admit they fund C-Span, which has certainly been a good thing. And I don't know what C-Span will be like when Brain is gone, he's been there forever. It will be a very sad day for me when he goes.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

I like the blank-looking

I like the blank-looking guys on in the morning, who let the callers ramble and rant while looking like they'd be clipping their nails or making a sandwich, if they were allowed. :)

Hey sarc.... ...why would

Hey sarc....

...why would I be mad about your post?

Not at all...

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Shoulda said ";)"

I was just kidding around with ya. I really think Brian would be a great moderator. I also think it would infuriate various news media types who want the job instead, but that would only make me enjoy it more.
JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

Me too sarc...now that

Me too sarc...now that would truly be delicious!

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Fake out

George is doing these interviews to bolster the ratings for the debate. He will ask the usal softball questions. The day after the debate Sean and the other suggestors will spend a second or two to decry the fact that George Clintonite did not use their questions. George Obamaite will later explain that he did not have time to ask their proposed questions.

Jerry

Jerry,

I'm glad somebody said this, because I very much agree. If you listen to the audio, it almost seems like Steph was patronizing Steve, and really didn't take any of these questions seriously.

Go back and listen to the audio and tell me if you agree? ns

 # 1. Stephie wont' ask

 # 1. Stephie wont' ask Hillary any hardhitting question's because she's his old boss.

# 2. Stephie wont' ask Obama any hardhitting question's because Hillary's his old boss.

I look for this to be a chocolate covered, sugarcoated lovefest.

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.

 "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

                               " The Cake is a lie."   

Blazer

Stephie may not push the issue, but I doubt that it will be all peaches and cream. I think hill will come out with claws at full extension. At this point, she is desperate and has nothing to lose.

bigotry

Mr. Obama you recently said "people cling to... antipathy towards those who aren't like them". We can bring it up on YouTube...

How does that differ from calling them bigots?

Time for a poll

What are the chances of hard questions being asked?

stephie won't be asking ANY tough questions, but there may be fireworks between the two contenders, replying to each others Marxist views - i.e., "you're too soft on the rich", "oh yeah, you won't tax the oil companies enough".

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

I, too, would like to see

I, too, would like to see Obama closely questioned about his relationship with William Ayers (and Bernardine Dohrn).  The Democratic talking heads have been covering these two Vietnam-era radicals like they are a couple of old hippies.  Well, I was against the war in 1970, but I did not go around preaching the overthrow of the government or planning bombings.  The Weathermen were much more than an anti-war group.  Ayers and Dohrn were proponents of violent criminal activity, and they continue to be unrepentant. 

Obama is the spawn of this whole 60’s-70’s radicalism (black power, militant socialism, communes, and on and on), and he’s trying to keep it under wraps…. instead of being honest about who he is and running as a third-party candidate.

Time for George to throw off the chains and conduct a real debate.

Clinton/Obama Debate

I think that both of these people are completely reprehensible, and don't have a sincere bone in their body.....both totally elitelist.  I just watched a tape of Obama's wife speaking.  She even "gaugued" her speech pattern to suggest a poor (ghetto type) upbringing although she boasted of her higher education...coming from "simple roots".  Voters must ask themselves the question; do we want to put either of these candidates in the White House even if it's just for four years?  If I hear the pundent's pet terms ......look!...... or "rock star" one more time, I'll throw up.   What have we got ourselves into?   The voters have to be much smarter than this idiocy.

There's only one relevant

There's only one relevant question for Stephie to ask:

Mrs. Clinton, when can I have my b***s back?

Ha Ha.....

Not only that but it will be interesting to see how much he really wants them back with his treatment of Hussein. Will he display outright bias for the "keeper" or play it straight. If she ever needed a little boost, it is now. I would love to watch this, but the Pens are playing in Ottawa tonite. Surely I will hear about this here tomorrow.