Inconvenient Fact: Times Sex Scandal Writer's Left-wing Connection

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

As media digest the recent John McCain sex scandal allegations by the New York Times, one side of the story seems destined to get ignored: one of the four co-authors took money from a liberal activist group to fund a hit piece about Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kent.) in 2006.

Before becoming an investigative reporter for the Times, Pulitzer Prize winner Marilyn W. Thompson was editor of the Lexington Herald-Leader in Kentucky.

As Howard Kurtz reported in October 2006, Thompson was in the middle of what one might call a pay for play hit piece against that state's leading Republican figure (emphasis added):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Kentucky's Lexington Herald-Leader yesterday launched an investigative series on Sen. Mitch McConnell pushing legislation for his affluent donors -- an effort originally paid for by a foundation that has financed several liberal groups that oppose the Republican lawmaker.

The paper's parent firm, McClatchy Co., decided last week to repay the $35,000 grant, which underwrote six months of salary and expenses for a Herald-Leader reporter on leave. The grant came from the respected Center for Investigative Reporting, which was passing on money provided by the St. Louis-based Deer Creek Foundation.

Deer Creek has funded a variety of liberal groups, including New York University law school's Brennan Center for Justice, which represented opponents of McConnell in a campaign-finance lawsuit that reached the Supreme Court.

"It's like the NRA funding a report about Sarah Brady," the gun-control advocate, says McConnell spokesman Don Stewart. "You've got to be somewhat leery about the objectivity."

American Journalism Review coincidentally addressed this very matter in its February/March 2008 issue (emphasis added):

In 2006, as editor of the Lexington Herald-Leader in Kentucky, Marilyn W. Thompson wanted her paper to undertake a major project examining Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell's political fundraising practices and suggestions of influence peddling. When she realized her lean newsroom budget alone wouldn't cover it, Thompson got her Knight Ridder bosses' enthusiastic approval to seek a grant from the nonprofit Center for Investigative Reporting. The California-based center provided $37,500 to underwrite the salary of reporter John Cheves, who took an unpaid six-month leave of absence to do the project, as well as to cover expenses.

Just before the October publication of Cheves' four-part series, "Price Tag Politics," McConnell staff members complained of liberal bias - at the center. They cited center board and staff members' donations to Democratic candidates or causes. They called it "a known liberal entity, but what they seized on was the underlying funding," Thompson remembers. In particular, the McConnell camp objected to involvement by the Deer Creek Foundation of St. Louis, which had funded groups seeking campaign finance reform. McConnell had led the fight against the bipartisan measure in Congress and in court. He was the lead plaintiff in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, an unsuccessful U.S. Supreme Court challenge to the 2002 law.

Yet, there's more, for in November 2007, Dan Riehl reported that at the time the Herald-Leader was working on this piece, its author, John Cheves, was a Congressional Fellow for Sen. Ron Widen (D-Oregon).

Add it all up, and one of the McCain sex scandal co-authors, when she was editor of one of the leading newspapers in Kentucky, took money from a liberal activist group to hire a Democrat Congressional Fellow for a hit piece on a leading Republican senator.

Seems a metaphysical certitude this will elude journalists that cover the McCain story, doesn't it?

*****Update: Check out who's on the advisory board of the organization that funded the McConnell hit piece:

Ben Bagdikian, author, former dean of the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism
Lowell Bergman (Co-founder), UC Berkeley
Belva Davis, KRON-4 News
Mark Dowie, journalist and author
Elizabeth Farnsworth, PBS
Herb Chao Gunther, Public Media Center
Seymour Hersh, journalist and author
Jules Kroll, investigator
Bill Moyers, PBS Bill Moyers Journal
Raul Ramirez, KQED San Francisco
Orville Schell, former dean of the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism
Daniel Schorr, National Public Radio
Susan Stamberg, National Public Radio
Mike Wallace, formerly with CBS 60 Minutes
Judy Woodruff, PBS

Any questions?

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Harlequin Hit Piece and not Romance

It appears Plain Marilyn Jane gets off on being paid to write fictional accounts about those evil white men who shunned her for her entire life.

Instead of Harlequin Romance heaving bossoms, she instead prefers to have pastey old white guys and tarty RINO girls as her subjects to put the dew on her lilypad in the environs of the social order.

If Plain Jane Marilyn is not in power, evil white guys can not be in power and if PJM is not having interludes of passion then she might as well make them up to destroy another evil white guy.

Oh yes, her twin is Kitty Kelly.

We now return you to frumpers whose lives have been wasted in liberal dreams to find out it woke to their scornful nightmarish existence.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

The NYT are trying to

The NYT are trying to increase the number of readers by trying to sway National Enquirer readers.

I saw the headline about the

I saw the headline about the NYT journalistic slide into the toilet.  However, I suggest that the NYT resurfaces out of the same toilet from time to time.  They entered the toilet in the 1960's,  and have never come back out. You just can't flush the buggers down for good.

It's all in the timing

May as well mark October 20 on your calendar. The next NYT hit piece on McCain will probably come out around then.  It's probably already been created and they're sitting on it.

To hold a pen is to be at

To hold a pen is to be at war.

Voltaire

The paper stinks

I've read the Lexington paper a few times and even the opinion section is rampantly left leaning. I remember one hillbilly (I'm from northern KY where we've had education, so I can say that) was fussing about Bush's "oil money" and wanted to "see" it.  What? Huh? Goes to show you what sort of toothless wonders read that rag. Well, 'read' is probably stretching it a bit (ooooh look at the pictures!).

Set 'Em Up To Knock 'Em Down

The tentacles of liberalism in LMSM are so obvious and blatant it seems almost idiotic to have to say, "See that man behind the curtain?"

I love this line which is all one has to read to get the gist of the bias:

Add it all up, and one of the McCain sex scandal co-authors, when she was editor of one of the leading newspapers in Kentucky, took money from a liberal activist group to hire a Democrat Congressional Fellow for a hit piece on a leading Republican senator.

What really knocks me out is when you read the variety of stories on the multitude of LMSM websites and there is a complete absence of the fact that the NYT endorsed McCain almost exactly a month ago. While McCain will not fall because of this he has to waste time defending against a transparent attempt to make something out of an eight year old nothing, this has to be one of the most blatant examples of setting somebody up so that they can knock them down. The New Republic, needing to get some face time after their shamefull Iraq Diary fiction, ironically proved that the NYT was holding back on a story while at the same time proudly endorsing McCain.

This gives a boost for McCain that simply wasn't there 24 hours ago. McCain should joke that the NYT should publish an inuendo hitpiece every week because it really boosts his campaign coffers.