Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 07, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Clint Eastwood: 'I Am Certainly Not Politically Affiliated With Mr. Obama'
  • Brent Bozell to Media: Tell the Truth About Obama's Assault on Religious Freedom, Millions Served by the Catholic Church
  • Study: Media Go to Bat for Abortion Giant, Ignore Catholics vs. Obama Controversy
  • Network Newscast Blackout of Mandate on Catholics Continues, But Sunday Talk Shows Take It Up
  • Howard Kurtz Gives Jonathan Martin 17 Minutes on CNN Without Asking About 'Cracker Counties'
  • CNN's Crowley Does Two Segments on Jobs Numbers Without Mentioning Plummeting Participation Rate
  • NPR Promotes Animal-Rights Vegans Fighting the Yellow Menace of....Cheese
  • Gingrich Tells NBC's Gregory 'You Just Managed to Precisely Repeat the Obama Administration's Line'

CNN Deletes Claim Tax Rebates are a Refund Advance

By Noel Sheppard | February 08, 2008 | 15:06

Change font size:  A |  A
Noel Sheppard's picture

Something rather fishy occurred within the past few hours at CNN.com.

Some time Friday, the cable network's website posted a piece entiitled "Treasury chief: Tax rebate checks to go out in May" which included the following (emphasis added, h/t NB reader Chandy):

The package, which passed the Senate 81-16, will send rebate checks to 130 million Americans in amounts of $300 to $600 for people who have an income between $3,000 and $75,000, plus $300 per child. Couples earning up to $150,000 would get $1,200.

The checks are an advance on next year's refunds, and most, if not all of the money, will be deducted from taxpayers' refunds in 12 months' time.

If you click on the link to the article, the above-bolded sentence is nowhere to be found. Yet, it certainly did exist, as CNN.com indicated the following blog linking to this piece asking:

Can This Be True

Does this mean what i think it means? From CNN:

The (tax rebate) checks are an advance on next year's refunds, and most, if not all of the money, will be deducted from taxpayers' refunds in 12 months' time.

If this is right, the vaunted "rebates" are in fact loans to be repaid on next year's taxes. So I'm going to get a check that I haven't asked for, and that check is going to increase my tax liability next year, and for this I'm supposed to be grateful?

Can this possibly be true, or is it some kind of misprint?

UPDATE: Sharp-eyed reader Teri notes that the curious sentence quoted above has been removed from the article. Hmm...

Several other blogs have noticed this as well.

This raises two interesting questions: Is this sentence true, and CNN just doesn't want readers to know about it, or; did the author get it wrong, and CNN did a fast delete rather than an update with a retraction?

Stay tuned.

*****Update: Tipster Chandy has provided the following screen-cap of the original article:

Share this

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.
  • Noel Sheppard's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

  • On Asian stereotypes and the Left's double standards (Malkin)
  • Don't blame Heritage for ObamaCare mandate (Heritage’s Butler in USA Today)
  • The film career of Ronald Reagan (Mooney)
  • Funny how Politico suddenly upset at 'indignation industry' (Ace)
  • Komen and the enforcers of liberalism (Steyn)
  • Mexican conservatives pick woman as presidential nominee (Reuters)
  • Sheldon Adelson signals he'd support Romney if he won GOP nomination (Surber)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • Gee Ed why should we care..it
    20 min 56 sec ago
  • Honey
    25 min ago
  • Just to set the record straight Garrison Keillor
    29 min 46 sec ago
  • Married Three Times?
    36 min 29 sec ago
  • What are you guys fighting about?
    41 min 36 sec ago
More >

Obama's Bully-the-Catholic-Church Pulpit
more cartoons
  • Pop Star Who Flipped Off Camera During Super Bowl Show Has Radical History
  • Honoring 'Bill Belichick the Progressive'
  • Saturday Night Funny Video: Woman Scolds Local TV Reporter: ‘Total, Complete Killjoy’
  • NPR Hails 'Legendary' Drag Queen for 'Wisdom Watch' Segment on When Boys Can Wear Dresses
  • In New Movie, Woody Harrelson’s Odious Character Impugns Founding Fathers and Fox News
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.