She wouldn't debate on Fox News before her nomination was considered inevitable.
However, now that the supposed heir to the throne, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), is in the fight for her political life with Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill), FNC doesn't look so bad.
Maybe Hillary thinks there are a lot more conservatives like Ann Coulter that will support her if Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) wins the GOP nomination.
Regardless of her reasons, the junior senator, according to Fox News, has accepted an invitation to debate Obama on the supposedly conservative cable network (emphasis added):
Clinton communications director Howard Wolfson just announced that the campaign has accepted a Fox News invitation for a one-on-one debate with Barack Obama in Washington DC on February 11 — the day before the so-called Potomac Primary featuring DC, Virginia, and Maryland. The debate would also air locally on the DC Fox affiliate WTTG.
[...]
Wolfson said the party has been clamoring for more head-to-head debates between the two candidates left standing; “voters ought to have the opportunity to see these two candidates compete against each other in a one-on-one setting.”
And he disputed one reporter’s observation that the candidate calling for debates is usually the candidate who’s in trouble — saying that usually happens with a candidate with low name recognition, a problem Sen Clinton obviously doesn’t have.
Wolfson can dispute all he wants, but is there any way to take this announcement other than Hillary must be scared? After all, in a two "man" race, only the person trailing the pack wants more debates.
Sam Stein elaborated at the Huffington Post (emphasis added):
Risking the ire of progressive activists, Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign announced that it has accepted a debate to air on Fox News on February 11, according to her chief strategist Mark Penn.
[...]
Though Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama have frequently appeared on Fox News for interviews, Clinton may be debating alone. Bill Burton, a spokesman for Obama, said that no plans existed as of now for his boss to participate in upcoming forums.
Frankly, I'd love to see Hillary debate herself, for it would be interesting to see which persona cries first. But I digress:
During a campaign conference call on Tuesday, Wolfson defended the campaign's decision to accept the Fox News debate, citing the reach the network had in the Chesapeake area (the debate will be held in Washington D.C.) and prior appearances by both Clinton and Obama on station.
"Given that Senator Obama had been on the network, we've been on the network, and that the offer is a good one for this debate in terms of this upcoming primary, it made sense to accept it," he said.
Makes one wonder why Hillary and Company weren't acting so rationally a few months back when they supported the Fox News boycott.
What a difference a close race makes, huh?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Maybe with so many
February 5, 2008 - 20:08 ET by Chris NormanPerhaps with so many conservatives vowing to vote for the Democratic nominee over McCain, Hillary wants to "reach out" to them on FoxNews. Her warm embrace waits for you...
Maybe...
February 5, 2008 - 22:56 ET by PrairieSkyRight on!!! All this bloviating about voting for the Dem. nominee makes me nauseous. I say good riddance, and don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out!!!
Heh.
February 5, 2008 - 20:04 ET by dervishBut he still may be worried about appearances: while Wolfson announced
the ABC, CNN, and MSNBC debates at the top of a conference call, he
didn’t mention the Fox debate until asked about it by Major Garrett.
Hee hee... Who's going to moderate, do you suppose? Wallace? Hume? O'Reilly?
I've got an idea...
February 5, 2008 - 20:25 ET by Tom1969caI wonder if Rush is available...?
~~~
The difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives believe liberals are wrong, while liberals believe conservatives are evil.
Suh-weet!
February 5, 2008 - 20:36 ET by dervish...but they'd both back out faster than a startled crawdad...
Fox News will suck at being POLITE
February 5, 2008 - 21:30 ET by Lame CherryLet us remember the half brain Chris Wallace looking like a deer in the headlights as bone finger Bill poked it at him.
Fox is incapable of running this debate. They will either be too polite or either be too polite.
Want a real debate.........sic Sean Hannity on them with Laura Ingraham as back up.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Polite...
February 5, 2008 - 23:00 ET by PrairieSkyI couldn't disagree more-I think Fox will do, and has done, a fine job with their debates. Brit Hume would be my pick to moderate. He suffers no fools, and would hold the candidates feet to the fire. We'll see...
I concur and would hope
February 6, 2008 - 09:57 ET by BDI concur and would hope that the first question he poses them would be the same hypothetical regarding waterboarding and the ticking time bomb that he posed the Republicans.
I wanna see them twist off that hook....
The Daily Kos Kids are
February 5, 2008 - 22:06 ET by mlongThe Daily Kos Kids are going to be p*ssed...the Boycott was supposed to be a sign of how much power they held over the Dems but if St.Hill and Obama actually appear at a FOX debate then they look pretty pitiful. LOL!!!!
"I want my Mommy!!!!"
Hillary Clinton'08
Dem debates on Fox?
February 5, 2008 - 22:15 ET by nkviking75I'm trying to remember if Hillary actually refused to debate on Fox, or simply didn't get the chance because of weenies like Edwards and, if memory serves, even Obama. I certainly don't support Hillary, but I do want to be fair.
Or maybe Hillary understands that the best debates of the campaign, the ones that didn't have a freak show element to them, were on Fox.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
OK, something smells fishy here
February 6, 2008 - 00:52 ET by KC MulvilleHillary is slightly ahead and has the organizational strength. But Obama has the rhetoric and the personality and the momentum. The conventional wisdom is that Obama might win over some independents that Hillary can't possibly get. Somehow, Hillary has to counter that. She has to show that Obama won't be as successful among independents as the hype proclaims.
It's obvious. Until now, the questions in the Democratic debates have all been Democrat-friendly. They ask about healthcare and how fast to get out of Iraq. Even in that environment, Obama is at his worst. Except for the last debate, Obama has spent most of his debate time stammering. Hillary has to figure that when the questions aren't so liberal-friendly, Obama won't look like the golden boy anymore. For example, Obama hasn't faced any questions about partial-birth abortion. Let's see how he handles that one!
This is a Hillary trap, but Obama can't afford to miss it. After all, he's going to face these questions in the general election. He'd better figure out how to answer them, because his GOP opponent isn't going to let him off the hook. Of course, Hillary is going to have to answer unfriendly questions also. But I'll bet she'll try the same old evasions. She must be gambling that she can evade questions better than Obama.
Could be fun ...
After watching some of FNC's election coverage tonight....
February 6, 2008 - 01:21 ET by R D HelmBroom Hilda should feel right at home, as they looked no better than MSNBC.
Fox News is going down the tubes.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
"I'll be there..."
February 6, 2008 - 04:01 ET by RackieFor some reason lyrics are the first thing that comes to mind - an information overload perhaps- my brain just goes to a default.
...as to Hillary and the Fox debate...
"Now if you feel that you can't go on (can't go on)
Because all of your hope is gone (all your hope is gone)
And your life is filled with much confusion (much confusion)
Until happiness is just an illusion (happiness is just an illusion)
And your world around is crumbling down, darlin
reach out come on girl reach on out for me
reach out reach out for me
I'll be there with a love that will shelter you
I'll be there with a love that will see you through"
good timing for Hillary
February 6, 2008 - 12:17 ET by candanceThis comes right on the heels of Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter calling for a boycott of McCain. Hillary sees a chance to pick up moderate GOP voters. If she speaks on Fox with a promise to win the war in Iraq watch McCain stall out.