Soros suffers from the delusion, typical of the extremely wealthy, that he is qualified to pontificate on literally anything and everything.

He is simply another in a long line of self-righteous egomaniacs who is unable to comprehend the fact that people less wealthy and successful than himself could hold opinions and conclusions that differ from his, so he begins to look for and finance sinister other forces to explain his utter failure to deceive the world to follow his unrequested advice.

Liberal: a power worshipper without power. George Orwell

Devil in a suit, this bastard is. Should revoke his citizenship and send him packing. Socialist scumbag.

wing of the democrat party are all pardners after the same thing. A socialist government in the United States. The USAG should return Soros to France where he's a wanted man for crimes against the people of France.

Any time a story about G. Soros appears I always try and see if there is a way that good ole Mr Soros will profit from this. In his own business dealings he is said to be quite ruthless. I think that his ultimate motivation is about power and money, nothing more than that. I think he would use any political theory if it would advance his own power. Right now he is tied at the waist to the Loony Left. In the future I would not be surprised if he had a conversion to either conservative or libetarian values. This would only happen if George Soros would personally profit or gain power from such a move. Everyone should be wary of anything with Mr. Soros's fingerprints on it.

How could a man who's name is a palindrome be a propagandist? Soros lied, more people than estimated died.

Is it me or does Soros look eerily similar to the Emperor from the Star Wars saga...

"Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat's dream. If you control carbon, you control life," Richard Lindzen - March 2007.

Referring to the benchmark number as "650,000" is much too generous to the hard left. The published article(according to the internet PDF copy) presented an estimate of precisely 654,965 - - an estimate to six significant digits! Those folks are amateurs. No professional health practitioner would present such an astoundingly over-precise number. Such a egregious "estimate" deseves the scrutiny placed on Dan Rather's now infamous "document." Is the article a fraud? 

Check the three amateurish numbers yourself:  low, high, and middle "estimates" each presented to SIX significant places! What kind of established  practitioner would stand behind such unprofessional shoddiness?

Well Noel. 151,000 is a lot of dead.. and it is hard to stomach, however, perspective is always in order:

There was the facts of the 90's as well -that CBS 60 Minutes May 12, 1966 disclosure from the Clinton administration. 

Leslie Stahl: We have heard that a half a million children have died. I mean that's more children than died when-wh-in- in Hiroshima, And- and. you know. is the price worth it?

Ambassador ALBRIGHT: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.

In Rwanda in 1994, 800,000 died in 90 days. Did Soros run out and fund a study to show that the numbers were even larger?

Clinton sent int Brown & Root on a LOGCAP contract, then said "Never Again," but the conflict moved next door to the DR Congo, in 1998, and millions died by the end of the "era of peace and prosperity." Did Soros run out and pay for a study to show that the numbers were even larger? No, in fact the press and the "Save Darfur" activists ignored it, perhaps in fear that knowledge of yet another one might cast a shadow on Clinton's "Never Again" promise.