This isn't something you see every day, even on Christmas: an article at a liberal website castigating the left for being so anti-theistic.
Yet, there it was at the Huffington Post on Christmas Eve, "Why are Liberals so Afraid of Baby Jesus?"
Those familiar with author John Ridley are aware that he very often calls things the way he sees them, even when his views go counter to left-wing dogma.
His Christmas Eve post was certainly no exception (emphasis added throughout):
The far left has no problem with [Jimmy] Carter's faith, and never feared that he would be more of a theologian than politician.
And yet...
Huckabee runs a Christmas-themed ad. The liberals see a floating cross, and believe that alone make the man unfit to be president. Instead, I think that makes some on the far left too paranoid to trust with a vote.
Amazing. But there's more:
What's particularly galling is the left's selective prosecution of religiosity. There is, as first mentioned, Jimmy Carter and his faith which causes no liberal ripples. And few liberals batted an eye when Barack Obama launched his Embrace the Change tour with black ministers -- despite the fact one was (and still is) a homophobe. When Harold Ford Jr. ran a political ad filmed in a church there wasn't a word of derision spoken from the left as they knew such an ad would pull votes for Mr. Ford in Tennessee. And during their presidential runs no one on the left accused the reverends Jackson or Sharpton of being too tied to the cloth.
Shocking honesty to find at one of the most liberal websites on the blogosphere, wouldn't you agree? Not so shockingly, HuffPo readers weren't pleased:
mydogshakespeare (See profile | I'm a fan of mydogshakespeare)Mr. Ridley,
Your article is just more right-wing passive aggressive drivel. The only War on Christmas "wedge issue" is the one brought forth from the persecution-complex-ridden red staters who WANT such an issue.
While it is somewhat true that those on the left want to preserve much of the Constitutional "separation of church and state" (even willing to seek redress in court), it's not the liberals leading the charge against massive celebration. If it were true, you would see huge reduction in gift exchanges from the full-frontal assault you seem to be describing.
Besides the lack of War on the commercial side, the religious right was not as blatant about its need for religious litmus tests until about 20 years ago, but has steadily, stealthly been accumulating the power to do so since Roe v Wade. Too bad for American Politics that the religious folk glommed on to the Republican bandwagon instead of forming their own party.
Insofar as liberals "fear the right", it is only because the religious right and their exploitative political leadership tends to ignore the parts of the US Constitution they view as mere parts of "a goddamned piece of paper."
Otherwise, you are just seeing WMD, and you "know where they are". Probably your eyesight, or mindsight, is affected by reading too many blogs.
Merry Christmas, though, from the left. We hope for Peace on Earth and Goodwill towards All (men, women, and children).
WoodyCPM (See profile | I'm a fan of WoodyCPM)Wow, rarely does one read such a thoughtless, distorted rant as Ridley's here on Huffington Post. Either that, or he's playing the provacateur to bait the letter writers.
Reply if (HuffCookies.get('huffpost_user')) document.write('| Favorite| Flag as abusive'); | posted 11:31 am on 12/25/2007
JohnJames (See profile | I'm a fan of JohnJames)Ridley has clearly bought into the right-wing propaganda that Christians are being persecuted (persecuted, Ridley, not prosecuted). I guess that explains why the whole country is shut down today on a Christian holiday. Liberals don't have a problem with Christians' or anyone else's religion as long as it doesn't pose a threat to other people's freedoms and Huckabee has made it clear that, among other things, his religious beliefs demand that gay Americans be treated as second class citizens. On the other hand, Romney as a devout Mormon had no trouble being elected governor by the LIBERAL citizens of Massachusetts because, at the time, he was not threatening anyone's liberties based on his personal beliefs. Now, however, he is struggling because CONSERVATIVES don't like his religion and, of course, he could never have gotten anywhere as a politician in say Alabama or Texas because of his religion. As far as Huckabee's Christmas advertisement with the cross goes, what angered me was his dishonesty - it was just a bookshelf. It was a bookshelf intentionally made to look like a gleaming white cross so that he could use the inevitable kerfluffle to depict liberals as both paranoid and anti-Christian a la Bill O'Reilly. When did honesty cease to be a Christian virtue?
Reply if (HuffCookies.get('huffpost_user')) document.write('| Favorite| Flag as abusive'); | posted 11:29 am on 12/25/2007
savertime (See profile | I'm a fan of savertime)Once again you have posted a condescending, inaccurate message. You are off-base as always and I am sorry you fail to identify the true issue.
Reply if (HuffCookies.get('huffpost_user')) document.write('| Favorite| Flag as abusive'); | posted 11:36 am on 12/25/2007
vastleft (See profile | I'm a fan of vastleft)Good God, man, what an offensive post!
Since you're the self-appointed expert on both Jimmy Carter and progressives' concerns about the separation of church and state, might I recommend reading Carter's book "Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis"? In it, the evangelical ex-president articulates the same concerns as us too-paranoid-to-be-allowed-to-vote atheists.
Obama's abuse of the faith card -- http://correntewire.com/barack_still_putting_the_u_s_into_jesus -- raises serious questions about his character and judgment.
To the detriment of the party and Jefferson's "wall," Obama constantly conflates religion with "values" and "morals," and like you, he plumps up rightwing strawmen about the left, including the secular left, which despite your bigotry has every right to a voice in America, and which in my experience encompasses a lot of fine, admirable, and eminently reasonable people who (like Jimmy Carter) just happen not to think America should keep lurching toward theocracy.Reply if (HuffCookies.get('huffpost_user')) document.write('| Favorite| Flag as abusive'); | posted 10:48 am on 12/25/2007
Ah. That's better.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Worship the State!!!
December 25, 2007 - 16:01 ET by UnsaneLeftists don't want to eradicate religion as much as they want it replaced with a worship of The State and the chosen who run it.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
They don't want to
December 25, 2007 - 21:18 ET by FishFace222They don't want to eradicate religion so much, just Christianity. Why else would Keith Ellison show up at an atheist convention.
Give 'em time
December 25, 2007 - 23:00 ET by UnsaneGive 'em time. They'll go after any religion they see, because ANY religion to a Leftist interferes with the worship of The State.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
"Why are Liberals so
December 25, 2007 - 16:16 ET by Jack BauerBecaus they think Mary should have chosen an abortion!
DING! DING!
December 25, 2007 - 18:07 ET by Tom1969caWe have a winner!
~~~
The difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives believe liberals are wrong, while liberals believe conservatives are evil.
Proudly Banned from HuffPo
December 25, 2007 - 16:26 ET by Lame CherryAs here am I no longer allowed to post at HuffPo for pointing out that John Ridley is the Obama of the plantation house.....showing they let token black people in to show the other blacks they too at liberalmania are open minded too, I refuse to even given Ridley any credit in this as he is like Bono who I apologized here to when he said on thing right...........as Ridley will be racist Ridley tomorrow.
While he makes his points, he never once explains why liberals are terrified of God. He could have just quoted Jesus and the Bible in modern terms by saying, "Liberals flee from the Light as it exposes their darkness and will never flee to Jesus, because they think they are going to be punished by Him instead of forgiven and loved.....as liberals in phobia believe no one could love them as they can not love themselves".
The best part of the post Mr. Shep is the gnashing malevolence of that lurking crowd on HuffPo.........but Merry Christmas to them and may God bless them richly with His Peace. In His Name. Amen
Keep praying that and those little Kos or chaos souls will really go ballistic as Peace of Christ really causes turmoil in troubled soulful waters as they have to start facing the facts of what they are instead of hiding from them and Jesus.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
A Brief History of
December 25, 2007 - 16:27 ET by drillanwrA Brief History of Christmas
The Elizabethans partied hard. The Puritans banned it. Now comes the ACLU.
BY JOHN STEELE GORDON
Tuesday, December 25, 2007 12:01 a.m. EST
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110011034
"And during their
December 25, 2007 - 17:36 ET by scamorama"And during their presidential runs no one on the left accused the reverends Jackson or Sharpton of being too tied to the cloth"
Of course not. The only "cloth" those two are tied to is the cloth that US currency is printed on.
Where to begin...
December 25, 2007 - 18:40 ET by Tom1969caUm, I wonder if 'MyDogShakespeare' would be so kind as to enlighten us as to where that is mandated in the U.S. Constitution?
In fact, the phrase "separation of church and state" did not become a de facto part of American law until 1947, when the Supreme Court (comprised of a Chief Justice appointed by Truman and eight - yes, eight - FDR appointees) invoked the term in Everson v. Board of Education. Once it was part of judicial precedence, it became the law-of-the-land - an early example of judicial activism?
So, SOCAS is the law of the land, but don't call it "constitutional" - 'cause it ain't in there!
As most everyone on this board knows, the "establishment clause" merely prevents the government from (a) establishing a state-mandated, state-sponsored or state-run religion, and (b) interfering in a citizen's free expression of their religion. That's it.
Why is it that the people who believe conservatives are the ones out to torch the Constitution are usually the ones who don't understand what's actually in the document?
~~~
The difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives believe liberals are wrong, while liberals believe conservatives are evil.
Um, I wonder if
December 25, 2007 - 21:25 ET by FishFace222Um, I wonder if 'MyDogShakespeare' would be so kind as to enlighten us as to where that is mandated in the U.S. Constitution?
It's right next to where the right to an abortion is mandated.
... ah ... I thought so ...
December 25, 2007 - 22:17 ET by Tom1969ca...and free healthcare ... and affordable low-income housing ... and food stamps ... and paid parental leave ...
~~~
The difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives believe liberals are wrong, while liberals believe conservatives are evil.
Because he remind them of
December 25, 2007 - 18:55 ET by acadia1755Because he remind them of something
GOOD,
TOLERANT,
Not to HATE,
RESPECT,
TRUTHFUL,
HUMILITY.
and LOVE.
http://www.friendsof...
Hey Libs: Wahhhhhh!
December 25, 2007 - 20:21 ET by ArchConservativeHee Hee HAWHAWHAWHAW!!!!!!!! I just love when the lefty neoprogs get their nose out of joint by the truth. Ahhhh tis truly a very Merry Christmas!
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.
Ridley
December 25, 2007 - 22:18 ET by ReaganJrMy Goodness. Step out of line and liberals will eat their own.
In all of their rush to be the most tolerent people on the planet do you think they will ever realize how blatantly cruel they are to Christians? They even deny their abusiveness while they are abusing us.
A Problem With Jesus
December 26, 2007 - 10:39 ET by misterbee241With most liberals God is not a problem - it's that Jesus guy. I can answer the question as to why liberals have a problem with Jesus. With Jesus there is a conviction of sin - liberals dont like to think of themselves as sinners. They want a touch feely god that does not require accountability and that god is the state.
There is none so blind as they that won’t see. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745