NBC Lawyer Who Blocked Pro-Troops Ad Gives Generously to Dems

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

The recent NBC kerfuffle involving the rejection of ads supporting the troops during the holidays continues to get more and more interesting.

Now, it appears one of the attorneys involved in the decision gives generously to Democrats.

As reported by Michael Brady of the Majority Accountability Project:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The NBC lawyer who refused to allow a non-profit group to air an advertisement thanking American troops for their service has donated at least $45,000 to a host of Congressional Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, New York Senator Hillary Clinton and the campaign committees of House and Senate Democrats, research by the Majority Accountability Project (www.majorityap.com) has found.

According to a Fox News report, Richard Cotton, the general counsel for NBC/Universal, was one of two network officials who decided not to sell ad time to Freedom's Watch, which describes itself as "a nonpartisan movement dedicated to preserving, protecting, and defending conservative principles and promoting a conservative agenda."

In fairness, Cotton has also donated to Republican candidates, including Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and John Boehner. However, as Brady noted, Cotton's Democrat contributions are far greater than for GOP candidates:

According to FEC records, Cotton has been a generous donor to Democrat campaigns and liberal causes. Earlier this year, he donated $1,000 to the political action committee (PAC) of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and last year gave the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) $7,000.

Over the past decade, Cotton has contributed at least $45,000 to Congressional Democrats, including $2,000 each to Clinton and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC).

Cotton has donated to some GOP candidates, including $1,000 earlier this year to House Republican Leader John Boehner, D-OH, but those contributions are a fraction of his total giving. While Cotton has written checks to the DCCC, DSCC, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), he has never given to a Republican campaign committee, according to those FEC records.

Yet, Brady identified a possibly more delicious side of this story:

Ironically, it was one of NBC's networks, MSNBC, that earlier this year created a stir when they detailed the political giving of journalists and news organizations.

"Because appearing to be fair is part of being fair, most mainstream news organizations discourage marching for causes, displaying political bumper stickers or giving cash to candidates," the cable news station reported.

"The pattern of donations, with nearly nine out of 10 giving to Democratic candidates and causes, appears to confirm a leftward tilt in newsrooms," according to the MSNBC study, which found that 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes since 2004, 16 to Republicans, and two gave to both parties.

Noting that "many news organizations have applied the rules to only political reporters and editors," the report revealed that "NBC, MSNBC and MSNBC.com say they don't discourage or encourage campaign contributions, but they require employees to report any potential conflicts of interest in advance and receive permission of the senior editor."

Oh what a tattered web...

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Donations

Do you think there is a chance that Mr. Cotton has donated to moveon.org?

<disclaimer>  The website listed in the above post has a decidedly left-wing slant.  Had it leaned to the right, any reference to it would have been redacted. 

Sincerely,

The NBC legal department.

NBC Has Capitulated

And not a second too soon.  This was an incredibly stupid move by NBC management and, if anyone at GE has a brass set, someone or somebodies, at NBC, will be looking for a job on Monday.  I don't know what's worse, the act itself, or the absolute dumbass explanation.  There was never a policy preventing showing this ad. It was done by some liberal weenie who thought he found an excuse to rejecting it with the web address. You'd love someone to demand to see the written policy, which of course would leave them wetting their pants.  What a disgrace; I hope GE is proud of their dumbass network.

Yes, they did.

Yes, they did.

Link here

This was their explanation: they "changed" their standards to accomodate the ad. LOL

Here's the money quote:

"We have reviewed and changed our ad standards guidelines and made the decision that our policy will apply to content only and not to a referenced Web site. Based on these amended standards the Freedom's Watch ad will begin to run as early as Sunday."

You don't suppose the fact that they got caught with the MoveOn ad had anything to do with it, do you? Or the boycott rumors?

Nah...couldn't be that. They just had a sudden attack of patriotism. ;-)

 

 

from motherbelt's link

They have a firm bedrock of standards and principles over there at NBC !

 Totally explain's why

 Totally explain's why they have a peacock as their symbol, they love to lay egg's. Change it to a chicken allready.

 

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

MB,

Seems to me this is news. Any chance NBC nightly news will lead with this story Sunday evening -- and then continue to press on it until the very top person at NBC News is asked "What did you know, and when did you know it"?

Any chance Matthews or Olberman will denounce the network as biased?

Any chance the major Democratic candidates will declare NBC, MSNBC "too liberal" and refuse to debate on its network?

___________________________________ 

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber

Sure, TnT!! A Special

Sure, TnT!!

A Special Report on "Dateline"!

Maybe tomorrow AM it will be on "Meet the Press"!

Start holding your breath now. LOL

Pardon my cynicism but you

Pardon my cynicism but you think it may have dawned on NBC there's an election next year...

And that by all accounts the Democrats are outraising Republicans...

And that lots of liberal political groups with websites will be wanting to spend all that loot they got sloshing around..

And NBC would quite like those millions to slosh their bank accounts...

And even NBC couldn't be so brazen as to ban an inocuous ad from a conservative leaning group, and not do the same to the well funded leftist groups...

Only a world weary theory.

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

How Cynical! It's Not That At All

It's simply parent General Electric looking at their defense contracts and the monies they receive from the military complex for their jet engines, service contracts, and hardware and asking the nimrods at NBC - Are you f$%#& nuts?  Do you realize what this means to us?  Talk about a double standard; someone at General Electric/NBC should get their ass handed to them for this stupidity. Oh, and by the way, the only change in standards at NBC worth noting is the one requiring them to eat their words from Thursday. Enjoy the crow girls and boys.

 

One theory

One theory doesn't preclude the other. It can easily be both.  

 

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

GENERAL ELECTRIC...

 I've brought up the fact that GE, who owns NBC, is 1 of the biggest military contrators, ususally in NBCnews threads about their anti-war shilling. They don't care about their double standard, because their viewers don't care. They will if GE sells NBC though, they are trying to unload them according to some reports I've heard. Then I'll laugh.

 

"Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise"  Mark Levin

What about the Moral Accountability Project

This is no victory in getting NBC to do what is AMERICAN and just finding out that some arse of a lawyer is acting like a Mao groupie.

Why does not the Moral Accountability Project instead file a complaint with the FCC in moving this to a Federal Court on the ground the FCC is not penalizing broadcasters who are not upholding the PUBLIC TRUST.

NBC has a broadcast license issued by the United States Government with terms that it must ALWAYS serve the public of the United States. That indeed means not doing things which deliberately antagonizing American citizens.........like not wearing flag pins "as it is American biased" or not running ads which are pro American Military.

NBC should not just be fined, but loose this multi billion dollar license and have it awarded or auctioned off to a list of bidders who will agree they will broadcast in the public interest.

File this with a Conservative Judge who will indeed have an appeal run through the DC Appeals Court and General Electric will loose millions challenging before they loose the billion dollar traitor network NBC.

What could be more satisfying than a Rush Limbaugh group of Conservatives purchasing the NBC license and having Keeter Olberman working for Rush.

Merry Christmas.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

**UPDATE** NBC's gonna run

**UPDATE**

NBC's gonna run the ad after all!

http://www.washingto...

 "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

Did you notice?

That WaPo link does not allow comments as they do for most of their other articles.  Why is that?  (I wonder...hmmmm)

Cause ALPO is pissed NBC

Cause ALPO is pissed NBC decided to do something patriotic and also bowed to us neo-con's. As someone said above about "eating crow".

 "You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

surprise surprise... The

surprise surprise...

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

}}---> Pull the ad

I would think the only maneuver here is to withdraw the request for the ad placement.

It's one of those negative reinforcement things that's hard to understand. Thank you master for removing the shackles you put on me.

FreedomsWatch should tell NBC to rectally insert their policy and walk away.

Synthesis

These old media types constantly denigrate the web, claiming that the web can't match the reporting abilities of the old media. But it's beginning to become clear that the internet has one ability that the old media doesn't have, and never will  --- synthesis.

Here's what I mean by synthesis: it's the ability to notice, and tie together, any connections between events and stories. (Maybe others have a different name for it; synchronicity? perhaps) When you have three reporters who investigate a story, there's a limit to how many connections they'll notice. Even if you have a hundred reporters in a newsroom, there's a limit to how many connections they'll notice. And, because they all work under a hierarchy, the system makes it difficult for each reporter to notice what the other reporters are discovering.

The web is filled with millions of people paying attention. They're also disconnected, which means that there's no restriction on one observer picking up on something another observer noticed, and tying loose ends together. A newsroom is highly centralized, with information flowing through an editor. The internet, widely dispersed, pays no coordination cost.

  • In any normal newsroom, what are the chances that a reporter would have known enough about fonts and typefaces to notice that the Rathergate documents were forgeries? But the web noticed it, because the web has millions of observers.
  • Now, the internet is finding connections that the old media would never find, and the connections reveal the dysfunction (i.e., corruption) in the old media!

Brave new world, indeed!

}}---> Synthesis is good

But the MSM used to call it corroboration.  Hardly worth the trouble to them anymore.

Yeah, that too

Well, corroboration used to mean having someone double-check something you've investigated. Here, I mean that none of the reporters would have noticed it in the first place. But you're right, they don't seem to corroborate anymore, either. I'm thinking of the fact that some guy (I think it was at Little Green Footballs) knew enough about typefaces to notice that the Rathergate memos were fishy. It took a specialized knowledge to spot that, didn't it? It required a knowledge base that ordinary reporters don't have. Reporters wouldn't have caught the typeface discrepancy, because their education is limited to reporting; whereas the worldwide web audience has no restriction on its knowledge base.

It goes back to a structural problem with reporting. News stories come on all topics: law, medicine, politics, war, business, etc. In a perfect world, you'd have a lawyer available to cover law stories, a doctor on staff to cover medical stories, a general to cover war, etc. But few news operations can afford a staff of experts in each field, and besides, very few of those experts would also have journalism degrees. So, most news media outlets rely on reporters, who have no specialized expertise of their own.

  • Over many years, these reporters may acquire experience on their beat, but let's face it, in the real world none of them acquire professional expertise. Things that an expert would spot immediately fall through the cracks of a newsroom.
  • But when the story is developing over the web, the web is filled with lawyers who would have spotted a legal flaw. The web is filled with doctors who would spot a medical mistake that a medical reporter wouldn't.
  • Remember the Beauchamp story where he accused Humvee drivers of trying to run over animals in the street? Who caught that discrepancy? Answer: Humvee drivers. But how many regular reporters, even military reporters embedded in the field, ever drove a Humvee and realized that what Beauchamp said was functionally impossible? It took someone with the kind of experience that a regular reporter doesn't have.

In my opinion, the web is exposing all these events to the technical expertise of the entire web community. Regular reporters are no match for that.

KC

i'd say linkage rather than synthesis to avoid obsfucating your meaning.  When i hear synthesis it brings the Hegalian Tactic to mind  (note i have not perused the link just it's description of the dialectic)

"everytime you take a shower you are a mass murderer"  -- the Profff

Tiptoeing past philosophy

Yeah -- when I hear synthesis, Hegel pops to mind, and Hegel is a philosopher who bored the hell out of me. Better to tiptoe past his theories for fear of getting him involved.

tiptoeing

would be easier if i didn't see the dialectic in the outlandish claims made continually in the political arena.

"everytime you take a shower you are a mass murderer"  -- the Profff

Leave it to a guy named

Leave it to a guy named "Cotton" to give money to a bunch of Polyester Pantsuits.

I am shocked! Shocked, I tell you!!

That this obese-government-lovin' executive would give money to "conservatives" like those 2 major-league RINOs and John Boehner. NOT!!!
JMR

Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)

I used to watch CNBC

But not anymore after this. I never watch MSNBC.

FOX has a new business channel, I guess CNBC isn't interested in their viewers anymore.

I think FOX's business channel is better.

SNBC

I didn't know this until last night when surfing the satelite but I found a SNBC-a shopping channel. There was the peacock in the upper corner. Might as well put them in with the rest  of NBC and the evil step sisters.

"May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't.” General George S. Patton.

It was MORE than one person

It was way more than one person, I believe even a couple of the "Admin. clerks" for that Guard unit got involved and posted that CBS was doing a fake story.

It was MORE than type font too!

The format of the memo was copied from an Army memo, Army cira mid 1980s and no where near the format for an AIR FORCE memo of the 1970s, let alone 1980s or 1990s (Thank-you "Tongue and Quill"!!! )

President Bush served in the Texas Air National Guard flying NORAD Air Defense Missions and sitting "hot" NORAD alerts.

I believe a big DUHHH  is

I believe a big DUHHH  is in order ...