
The more college newspapers I look at, the more I wonder if Nobel Laureate Al Gore and his global warming sycophants in the press have overplayed their climate alarmism.
First there was an editorial in the Harvard Crimson bashing Gore, then a positive article at the Stanford Daily concerning a luncheon address by global warming skeptic S. Fred Singer, followed by a marvelous piece at San Diego State's The Daily Aztec seemingly mocking those that believe we're all going to die because temperatures are rising.
What's the matter with kids today?
Regardless of the answer, business administration senior Justin Weisbrod cleverly began his article with a tad of misdirection I'd like to think was satirizing the current media hysteria (emphasis added throughout):
The world is ending. In the wake of the San Diego wildfires, many residents of the county may be nodding their heads, as they might already know.
The blazes that torched our county are another sign of the "inconvenient" disaster that's ruining our world, at least according to some.
Environmentalists are begging us to ponder, "What will you do when the water is so polluted you can't drink it and the air is so chock-full of smog you can't step outside?"
Could have been the introduction to any number of hysterical pieces at major newspapers and magazines lately, right? Well, strap yourself in, for he was just kidding:
Before you torch my house (or invite me to a party) for being an Earth-loving hippie, let me make this point: We polluted the crap out of the land, air and sea on planet Earth. But, Earth also pollutes itself. Gasses and elements from volcanoes, fires, storms, meteors and earthquakes all naturally contribute to Earth's warming and cooling processes.
The only thing we did was speed it all up.
As such, global warming is not a problem we can fix. Earth's history is riddled with warm times as well as cold times. And let's remember Earth began from nothing and will end with nothing. We are a grain of sand on a never-ending beach and fully exposed to all the elements. Global warming will not end the existence of planet Earth.
I really like this kid. But there's more:
What does global warming really mean? It means the planet is warming, the ice is melting thus, global warming equals a warmer planet. It's that simple. Guess what comes next? Global cooling. But what if the pollution doesn't allow Earth to do its natural cycles? In the '70s, people thought we were heading into an ice age. What happened in just 30 years?
The weather has its ups and downs, as volatile as the stock market complete with trends, cyclicality, skeptics and believers. Just like the stock market, there is little we can do as individuals to create a dramatic impact.
Sanity from someone so young. What does this tell us?
Are these folks not buying into the charade specifically because of their education? Or, are they smelling a rat concerning all the hype that folks many years their senior seem to be either intentionally or incompetently missing?
Whatever the answer, it certainly is refreshing to think that not all college kids are buying into the environmentalist nonsense being hawked to them 24/7.
Bravo, Justin!
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Noel, did Gore propose
November 15, 2007 - 18:44 ET by Chris NormanNoel, did Gore propose banning beer kegs to combat Global Warming? If so, that might explain some of this hostility popping up on college campuses.
Chris
November 15, 2007 - 18:47 ET by Noel SheppardChris,
Interesting thought. That will take some research. Better get my stein. :-) ns
Okay, but better protect
November 15, 2007 - 19:27 ET by Chris NormanOkay, but better protect that elbow on your hoisting arm, fella. :)
Shouldn't he also recommend
November 16, 2007 - 09:39 ET by danboShouldn't he also recommend they ban champagne at award ceremonies? Champagne also has a lot of CO2.
If the man really considers CO2 a pollutant.....
"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT
College Student
November 15, 2007 - 18:52 ET by The PresbyterI'm a student at Stevens Tech and I can honestly say that I am not alone on campus when it comes to being doubtful of all the Global Warming hysteria. I can also say that there are plenty of professors that either blindly accept the hysteria as truth or purposefully try to ram it down our throats.
It's Anti-Alarmist Fever
November 15, 2007 - 19:02 ET by Ralph Hansen Ph. D.Justin, you've obviously spent too much time in the sun and have contracted a fever. The only known cure is repeated viewing of An Inconvient Truth.
Seriously, when will our windbag politicians understand what economists and energy industry experts are saying? We don't possess the technology to get from here to there. Zanies like Barbara Boxer may want to cut emissions 80 percent by 2050, but it doesn't mean it can happen.
Fact: 86% of our energy comes from hydrocarbons!
The unfortunate thing is
November 15, 2007 - 19:11 ET by The PresbyterThe unfortunate thing is that when we actually substantially reduce our emissions by a large percentage in the future, it will be asshat politicians who will try to take credit for it. The people who would really deserve the credit are from private industry and universities. Emission reduction, increased efficiency and carbon alternatives is just the natural path that the energy industry is going to take.
There is hope...
November 15, 2007 - 19:07 ET by taterat least some people are realizing the irrational fear when it comes to global warming, now if we could have people write about something similar when it comes to the irrational hatred known as BDS.
Do you realize how much it costs to run for office? More than any honest man could afford. -Montgomery Burns
Hey, I wrote something a
November 15, 2007 - 19:42 ET by wiwfHey, I wrote something a lot like that for the Collegian. Then I got fired! I even included pretty pictures of Roald Amundsen and Polar Bears.
Makes me want to work for the daily Aztec now :(
Just the headline of this topic had me thinking Borat. "Global warming is real, pause, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOT"
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
I'm surprised anyone at SDSU
November 15, 2007 - 19:58 ET by balboaI'm surprised anyone at SDSU has enough time between bong hits to find their computer, let alone write an article on one.
B
November 15, 2007 - 20:21 ET by Noel SheppardB,
I'm sorry, but that's uncalled for. I know a lot of people that went to SDSU, and my son has friends there. This is a very fine State school here. Very fine. ns
Noel
November 15, 2007 - 22:05 ET by balboaI'm looking desperately for the sarcasm indicator...
...nope not seeing one. OK, I was making a joke. Sorry. Didn't realize you were state-school sensitive.
B
November 15, 2007 - 22:22 ET by Noel SheppardB,
Accepted. Sorry. I have amazing pride for my state's schools. Forgive me.
I'll put our State schools against any in the country even recognizing that they are a step below our UC's. You disagree? ns
I don't know...SDSU isn't
November 15, 2007 - 22:33 ET by balboaI don't know...SDSU isn't exactly tearing it up academically, are they?. Long Beach State has gotten much better recently.
I'm a state school grad, BTW.
I did undergrad and M.A.
November 16, 2007 - 14:56 ET by JasonCI did undergrad and M.A. work at state schools, and have found that the academics can be fantastic; though bal's bonghit joke was definitely prevalent as well. As always, it's what you make of it.
"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte
The Pollution Myth
November 16, 2007 - 02:38 ET by PopularTechPeople still think that Kyoto and all this regulation to 'fight' global warming will reduce 'Pollution' which is a total crock.
The Kyoto Protocol is a treaty to regulate 'Greenhouse Gases' only:
- Carbon dioxide (CO2)
- Methane (CH4)
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) (Laughing Gas, Nitrous, NOS)
- Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
- Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
- Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)
Car Exhaust consists of:
Harmless:
- Carbon dioxide (CO2)
- Nitrogen (N2)
- Water vapor (H2O)
Some Pollutants:
- Carbon monoxide (CO) *
- Hydrocarbons or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) *
- Nitric oxide (NO) *
- Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) *
- Particulate matter (PM-10) *
- Sulfur dioxide (SO2) *
* Your car's catalytic converter removes about 95% of these pollutants.
Smog consists of:
- Ozone (O3) * (formed from the photochemical reaction of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) + Hydrocarbons)
- Particulate matter (PM-10) *
- Sulfur dioxide (SO2) *
* Car Exhaust and Smog 'Pollution' is already covered in the: 1970 Clean Air Act (Amended 1977, 1990)
Pollution has nothing to do with the Kyoto Protocol.
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
I'm not surprised by the
November 15, 2007 - 21:59 ET by DaBirdI'm not surprised by the fact that there are college kids who have not fallen for the hoax. My surprise is that their stories are actually getting out for public consumption.
Inconvenient 'Facts"
November 16, 2007 - 14:40 ET by CWellsNot sure you are aware- this is a little off topic- but the folks at ClimateAudit have a couple recent blogs regarding 'Thompson's Thermometer,' related to Goremonger's 'Inconvenient Truth.' Seems he used an incorrect graph from an aritcle by Dr. Thompson to show that 'scientists have confirmed the same basic conclusions in multiple ways with Thompson’s ice core record as one of the most definitive. (AIT, The Book) ' that the Mann Hockey Stick of temps over the last 1500 years was accurate. Read the blogs- readers there determined that the graph in both the dvd and the book are actually from Dr. Thompson's article illustrating......Mann's Hockey Stick and the recent instrumental record!!! And this was also supposedly reviewed and confirmed as Dr. Thompson's own data by a congressional staff (Rep. Schakowsky's).
Amounting to the Gormer confirming the Stick.....with the Stick, which of course is no confirmation at all.
He may have won the prize, but this should be enough to revoke any Dr. they might try to award the Gormer.
C
College Kids
November 16, 2007 - 14:47 ET by CWellsPersonally I think college kids have a leg up on the general public in that they are around these discussions, probably more information access on the subject and have been trained to be more critical thinkers for the most part than we in the general pop.
Plus the best part- as teens and young twenty-somethings, they'll question anything anyone over thirty just tells them- just like most of their teachers did in the 60's!
C