
It certainly won't come as a great surprise that not every advocacy group gets the kind of special treatment from the New York Times that MoveOn received Monday with its "General Betray Us" advertisement.
Not only did this far-left group receive a huge discount, but also it was revealed Friday the Times often rejects ads from conservative organizations.
*****Update: Michelle Malkin chimes in.
As reported by the American Spectator (emphasis added throughout, h/t Glenn Reynolds):
The New York Times in the past has rejected "advocacy" ads from Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, as well as from the National Right to Life Committee, despite the fact that both would have qualified for the same "special advocacy, stand by" rates that the radical, left-wing organization MoveOn.org was given for its smear ad of Gen. David Petraeus.
I guess this means the Times isn't an equal opportunity advertiser:
According to a former New York Times ad sales staffer, a coalition of pro-life groups attempted to take out a full-page ad in the Times during the Terri Schiavo debate in Congress, but were turned away. "I think that such a group would have qualified for our advocacy discount, but perhaps the policies changed in the past couple of years," says the ad rep.
Similarly, during the 2004 election season, a representative from Swift Boat Veterans for Truth sought to place a full-page ad in the paper, but was turned away.
Hmmm. Color me unsurprised.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
No! This certainly can't
September 14, 2007 - 10:41 ET by NewsbusterbrownNo! This certainly can't be!
I'm shocked -
September 14, 2007 - 10:45 ET by MightyMouthI'm shocked - shocked!!
How can this be in the greatest nation on God's green earth?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
NYT
September 14, 2007 - 11:11 ET by well99Trying to fill in for the old Pravda back in the days of the USSR.One view is all that is necessary with them.
Times Tries to Cover It's Ars and The Daily Snooze Assists
September 14, 2007 - 11:14 ET by SamAccording to the Daily Snooze they got the "standby rate" where the paper picks the day sometime in the next 7 days. Pretty sweet "coincidence" that that day happened to be the day the General gave his testimony <wink, wink>.
Also, it is interesting that
September 14, 2007 - 12:10 ET by LilyPearlAlso, it is interesting that the ad had the word "today" in it. I think it said that "today, General Petraus is testifying...etc.
"Well, duh," just doesn't
September 14, 2007 - 11:48 ET by Jinx McHue"Well, duh," just doesn't seem strong enough.
Just curious
September 14, 2007 - 11:49 ET by JDWHow can this 'discount' not be a campaign contribution?
JDW
CFR: Chung, Riady, Hsia, Trie, Huang, Hsu, Paw... Who's looking?
"campaign contribution"
September 14, 2007 - 12:06 ET by RJI heard that they've committed a violation of federal law. Anyone know anything about this?
Also, Guilani has challenged them to give him the same discount. Tick, tick....
The Old Grey "dead" Lady
September 14, 2007 - 11:54 ET by NofPerhaps if they were equal opportunity publishers they might actually come close to turning a profit....oh wait...that might make sense...let's turn away anyone who does not fit the agenda and give discount rates to those who do..when Hillary gets in she'll subsidize us after the earmarks give out..Meeting adjourned..
ps...thanks Noel 4 the help.
"When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat" R. Reagan
NYT
September 14, 2007 - 15:33 ET by JDWAP- Giuliani places NYT ad
JDW
CFR: Chung, Riady, Hsia, Trie, Huang, Hsu, Paw... Who's looking?