Is it at all possible to arrange just the one in Boston before the Jets have to play there?

What else can they do? They've hitched their tired old horse to that wheel-less wagon, and now have no option but to go balls-to-the-wall. They made an extremely poor decision to endorse the Goracle, and now they are irrevocably tied to his game. Most of the proven leftist MSM were completely and smarmingly attached to this being Algor's opening bid for a presidential run.

My question is why are they being allowed to get away with such potentially devastating and fact-devoid sensationalism?  

The Closed Mind Erects Strong Barriers

I dont live in Boston, Manhattan or Atlantic City. Do you realize the impact all that new underwater habbitat will have on fishing, not to mention all the new coral that will grow. To bad I wont be around then, but the grandkids will be fishing in paradise..

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

I mean, ancient village sites were recently discovered under what is now the English Channel...WE'RE ALL DOOMED!

How about a photo essay of what our major citys would look like after terrorists detonate nuclear devices.. terrorism is a proven threat. 

When asked if he went to war with Iraq  to derail the impeachment vote:  “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

Thanks for posting that Noel. The captions on the photos are hilarious:

First, you have to look at the caption on photo 9 (Honolulu): "In a report issued earlier this year, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change ... said various warming scenarios could raise sea levels
anywhere from 7 to 23 inches."

And yet in all their "scary" photos, the amounts of sea level rise are way higher: 1 meter for Hollywood, Fl., 1.25 meters for Ft. Lauderdale, 1.5 meters for Atlantic city, 1.75 meters for Honolulu, and (yowza!) 3 meters for Boston. That last one is about 10 times the upper limit from the IPCC report.

And I loved the one for New Orleans: "This is what New Orleans would look like if the sea level rose 1 meter."

No. That's what New Orleans actually looked like when the sea levels didn't rise at all.

i guess it is safe to assume that new orleans will become a seaworld or a lost city of atlantis-based theme park.

which makes you wonder ... if manhattan, boston and atlantic city are doomed ... why on earth are all the liberals so hellbent on spending billions of dollars to rebuild a city that is already below sea-level?

it doesn't take a science degree to put together that this drowning city is nothing but BS.

Noel,

You say this is scaring up Mass Hysteria, but do general people really even care about this? 

Like, do you think mass numbers of people saw these mockups and decided to move to higher ground?

I think it's interesting to think about, but I don't really care/worry about it.  My guess would be that most people feel indifferent about this type of stuff. 

That seems to be the LMSM's SOP. These bastards are disgusting. These people are right up there with the terrorists as far as I'm concerned.

The American Revolution Continued

If you were to look at maps of Boston during the Colonial era, much of what is presented underwater in this image was water back then. A large portion of what constitutes "dry" land in Boston today was Harbor area that was filled in over the years.

Those darn colonials and their CO2 generating livestock.

I was also amused by the inconsistent comparison of sea level increases between Atlantic City (1.5 meters) and Boston (3.0 meters). I'm no scientist, but I think if the sea level for both these locations would increase the same amount. That is unless of course there are a couple of watery steps to climb as you work your way up the Eastern seaboard.

Think they would have done that for dramatic effcet?  Hmmmm... 

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.  ~ Unknown

Oh, oh, could they also please post a picture of what New Orleans would look like RIGHT NOW if we took down the levees? Totally underwater, almost every bit. Yet the libs are all whining that we aren't pouring enough billions in to fix the place...

Just a second, we're gonna loose Boston, NYC, San Francisco, Miami ? Come on warming !

In the Boston picture it appears the rising waters take out most of Roxbury, Duxbury, Mattapan, and just for good measure a good portion of Cambridge. 

Just proves to me that "the ocean hates black people" (and liberals).

I would love to see someone counter this with pictures showing the "maximum" rise projected by the beloved IPCC.  A side by side picture showing Boston today and Boston with a rise of 23" of water would be priceless.

"There are scandals that need to be addressed. Republicans address them, Democrats re-elect them." - Tom Delay

I love the "underwater" picture of Ft. Lauderdale.  Total fantasy....there would be a new inlet for the ocean....they just kind of blued the whole thing in...typical.  Notice the downtown, though...it's still there, with the nice "Coral Ridge" (an actual name of a part of Ft. Lauderdale) right where it should be. 

This is the silliest thing I've seen in eons.  Nicely done, Noel.

So glad to see Global Warming sank all the annoying yachts in Fort Lauderdale....the diving is going to be excellent!

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

Looking at the Empirical Evidence:

Observed Changes in Sea Level (IPCC)

QUOTE (IPCC)

"Based on tide gauge data, the rate of global mean sea level rise during the
20th century is in the range 1.0 to 2.0 mm/yr. No significant
acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has
been detected."

Future Sea Level Rise and the New Jersey Coast (PDF) (Princeton University)

QUOTE (Princeton University)

"Averaging the mean values from the tide-gauges provides an approximate 20th
Century relative sea level rise trend of 3.53 mm/year, which is double
the global-mean. This implies a local component of approximately 2
mm/year for the New Jersey coast which can be partially attributed to
land subsidence and sediment compaction."

Apparent Sea-Level Rise Caused by Sediment Compaction (Geological Society of America)

QUOTE (Geological Society of America)

"A tide gage embedded above compacting sediment loses elevation, producing
a water level record that indicates apparent sea-level rise equal to
the loss in gage elevation. The USGS monitors subsidence in the marsh
behind Atlantic City using an extensometer that penetrates 320m of
section. Between 1980 and 2000, this extensometer measured 29mm of
vertical compaction (1.5mm/yr) at this site. The Atlantic City tide
gage rests above the same sedimentary section, plus surface sands
deposited in historic time. The compaction of buried and surficial
clastic sediment is an explanation for high apparent rates of sea-level
rise (about 4.0mm/yr) at Atlantic City, Sandy Hook, and Hampton. On the
Atlantic side of Florida, apparent rates of sea-level rise are
generally lower than those from the mid-Atlantic coast, probably
because historically recent calcium carbonate deposition in clastic
pore space strengthens the Florida sediment, reducing compaction."

It is simple logic to know that sediment compaction is not caused by Global Warming or man-made CO2. But lets do the math for a moment...

- Global average sea level based on tidal gauge data should rise 4-8 inches (1-2mm/yr) in 100 years. (IPCC)

Now using the Atlantic City tidal guage measurements of 3.53mm/yr that works out to:

- 13.8 inches of sea-level rise over 100 years.

- 1.5 meters of sea level rise would take 428 years.

Looks like ABC failed elementary school mathematics.

Empirical evidence doesn't support the hysteria.

The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

When looking through the pictures (I was trying to see if my kids will inherit waterfront property someday) this statement just struck me:

"Sea level rise of 3 feet by the end of this century may seem apocalyptic, but some leading scientists say it is a very real possibility. In a report issued earlier this year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- it's made up of thousands of scientists from around the world -- said various warming scenarios could raise sea levels anywhere from 7 to 23 inches." 

I find it amazing that they go from meters, to feet to inches in an effort to confuse people about what the report actually says.  With Gore talking about a 20 ft. sea level rise and the IPCC talking about a 7-23 inch rise, here's ABC talking about a 36 inch rise or a meter, which is approx. 39 inches. 

This is what the AGW people are left doing, since they can't justify their science they have to juxtapose figures to confuse those not following this issue.

Hopefully, most people have moved beyond the hype and will start looking for the facts.

ABC News Homepage

Never argue with an idiot.  They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.