Glaciers Media Will Never Report

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

As the media focus continued attention on supposedly receding glaciers in Greenland, they conveniently ignore those right here in America that are actually expanding.

Adding insult to injury, as prominent California congresswomen House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California) travel abroad to laughingly see evidence of global warming, they could drive north of their residences in the San Francisco Bay Area - with an entourage of gushing media sycophants of course - to see evidence that goes counter to their alarmist theories.

In fact, as reported by Sacramento's CBS affiliate Sunday, glaciers on California's Mount Shasta have grown by 30 percent in the past 50 years (video available here):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

JOHN IANDER, CBS 13 REPORTER: Big mountains often create their own weather patterns, and this giant, Mount Shasta, at 14,162 feet seems to have a mind of its own these days. Shasta has seven glaciers. The biggest is this one on the middle, Whitney Glacier. What has surprised scientists about the glacier is that if the theories about global warming are true, it ought to be shrinking, but it's not.

And this one sort of defying conventional wisdom huh?

ERIK WHITE, SCIENTIST: It is. Unlike most areas around the world, these glaciers are advancing, they are growing. Thirty percent in the last fifty years.

IANDER: Forest Service scientist Erik White and veteran climbing guide Chris Carr are Shasta experts.

CHRIS CARR: I've been climbing on Shasta for about fifteen years.

IANDER: Have you noticed a difference in snowfall?

CARR: Oh, certainly. Every year it's a little bit different. But the glacier changes dramatically, year to year.

IANDER: So why are these glaciers the only ice rivers in the world larger today than they were a century or more ago?

WHITE: Mount Shasta is right at the very northern end of areas affected by El Nino and we're at the southern end of areas affected by La Nina. So between the two we get to see the benefits of that which means more snow and rain in this area.

What White said is key, because many skeptical scientists believe shifts between el Ninos and la Ninas are significantly more responsible for the planet's warming and cooling cycles than carbon dioxide emissions. In fact, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association's recent announcement concerning 2006's temperatures intentionally tried to deflect responsibility for that year's warmth from the el Nino present at the time. But I digress:

IANDER: Snow scientists have been tracking the glaciers' size by comparing these photos from a century ago to those taken decades later, and then using satellite data and computer programs to determine the rate of growth.

Those models predict Shasta will continue to receive more than normal snowfall, but if the temperature continues to rise, the glaciers will begin to recede. For now, the growing glaciers are good news to the town of Mount Shasta which hosts the thousands of tourists who come to here to experience the thrill of ice climbing.

Sadly, this report didn't address what carbon dioxide is doing in the region. However, as California's population has exploded in the past 50 years, along with the number of cars and greenhouse gas emitting companies, it seems quite safe to assume that CO2 in this region is much higher.

Yet, the glaciers are expanding.

Isn't this newsworthy, or verboten because it just doesn't fit the media's agenda?

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Noel, They can never

Noel,

They can never quite bring themselves to the story's natural conclusion can they? It's like a third rail or something.

 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

"IANDER: So why are these

"IANDER: So why are these glaciers the only ice rivers in the world larger today than they were a century or more ago? "

I noticed that he had to take a swipe at it, and no one said any different, nor tried to correct him in his assumption. Dont these guys do any type of research before they do a story?

Duh! CBS. How silly of me.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

It's all global warming's

It's all global warming's fault. We have to block out the sun!

"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage
morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested,
exiled, or hanged." -Abraham Lincoln

the only ones growing?

I seem to remember at least two other reports of glacier growth. That puts an even bigger lie to their tale.

Then it will be "just one or two" growing lgaciers, as they find more and more. Until they have to travel all the way to Greenland or somesuch (Pelosi, et al?) way out of the way to find one place to fit their agenda

The media will never report

The media will never report on expanding glaciers ... until 30 years or so when it's time for them to start warning about global cooling and a coming ice age again! And maybe by then their new "climate change" slogan will have sufficiently replaced the "global warming" slogan in enough minds of people spoonfed by the msm, thereby making the yet another 180 an easy transition.

Larry King likes to ask, "Why would anyone want to be poitically incorrect?" Because I'd much rather be factually correct than politically correct, Larry! You good little pc boy you!

Noel, Mt. Shasta is not

Noel, Mt. Shasta is not alone in the US. The Hubbard Glacier (sound familiar? Nah, the media would NEVER mention it) in Alaska has been growing and advancing since it was first mapped in 1895:

 http://ak.water.usgs.gov/glaciology/hubbard/index.htm

 

To me, this is what makes it so obvious that AGW is a scam and a lie. The way contradictory evidence is COMPLETELY ignored every single day, unless it keeps being brought up by skeptics, then it will only be addressed once they've come up with a few science with far fetched theories that oppose what the skeptics are saying.

 

 

 

The earth is on fire and it is YOUR fault for owning a car...

In other GW news, Leonardo

In other GW news, Leonardo DiCaprio's Eco Movie Bombs.

To quote Fox News send up of the er . . . snooze fest: 

"The 11th Hour," has been a total bust at the box office. After 18 days in release, the film has grossed only $417,913 from ticket sales.

"The 11th Hour" is grindingly boring. Basically, a series of scientists, one after another, warn the audience that the world is coming to an end. These talking heads are interspersed with stock footage of melting glaciers. The film has the effect of Ambien — with no hangover post-nap.

 

 

Growing glaciers have company

Growing glaciers have company. Didn't you recently mention an analysis suggesting that glaciers in Greenland were adding weight, as well?

Meanwhile, on the other side of mother earth, in the region of the world's largest glaciers, they be growing as well. Surprise. Surprise. 

EORC | Seen from Space - Glaciers in the Eastern Karakoram Range - The two pictures, from space, are taken 13 years apart (1993-2006). Click on the picture - for an enlarged view. (;~> gary

Good stuff there Gary!!

Good stuff there Gary!!

WASHINGTON -- "Whitney

WASHINGTON -- "Whitney Glacier on Mount Shasta is growing, and scientists think global warming in Northern California is the reason."

http://dwb.sacbee.com/content/news/story/14317368p-15234887c.html

The AGW fanatics have an answer for everything.

answers

So do the old-time Marxists. It's the nature of the dialectic.

Curt

glaciers

when i was a lad i lived in western montana about a hundred miles south of glacier park. we could see a mountain range east of town that had considerable glacier activity.

some of the glaciers stayed the same for years. otheres got larger and smaller. still others dissappeared only to reappear with time.

some of the things that affected this, according to the old timers, was that glaciers on the south (sunny side) of a peak would shrink and grow quite a bit.

glaciers on the north slopes would grow pretty much continously.

large forest fires (about every 15 years they have really big ones >250,000 acres) would sprinkle ash for hundreds of miles and at the end of summer the glaciers in those areas would be considerably smaller. conventional wisdom was that the ash drew the heat from sunlight and melted the snow under it.

i was up there last december and some glaciers were bigger and others gone away from when i was a kid fifty years ago.

there is every appearance that glacier growth and shrinkage cannot be predicted. only measured and reported.

Banning the barbeque will INCREASE the snow levels..

 All that snow blocking the view of mountain! grill man grill

Snow melt is related to the amount of cooking fires in a given area: The more wood fires ( without smoke stack scrubbers) the more the glacers melt. Not a lot of people around  Mt. Shasta using wood to cook with or heat their homes, well not yet.

Entitlement over infrastructure every SINGLE time.

 

Mount Shasta

My youngest daughter climbs Shasta every summer and she said this was the toughest climb ever because there was not a bit of snow on the climb.  All the rocks and boulders were exposed and dragging along crampons and ice gear was just baggage.  It's the same route she has climbed for the past 10 years.  Worst part of it was there was no place to stash the beer and get it chilled for the descent.

According to the global

According to the global warming fruitcakes, glaciers shrinking AND growing prove global warming. It's an unfalsifiable theory (and thus, invalid).

Noel

Noel,

You. Are. The. Man!

Keep up the good work!   :-)

 

-Free 

Fred Thompson and Ann Coulter walk into a bar. The bar is instantly destroyed because that much awesome cannot be contained in one building.