If you had any question as to how hot the climate change debate is getting in governments around the world, all you need do is look at our neighbor to the north for answers.
On Thursday, members of Canada's Liberal Party threatened Prime Minister Stephen Harper with a fall election if he didn't change course on his global warming policies.
I kid you not.
The Montreal Gazette reported Friday (emphasis added throughout):
Liberal Leader Stephane Dion urged Harper to apply solutions endorsed by all three opposition parties and accept a consensus that was growing among environmentalists, economists and business executives that the minority government's climate change plan is too weak to succeed.
"We believe that all political leaders have a moral obligation to do all that can be done on this critical challenge facing Canada and the world, and to put an end to the partisan politicking around this issue," Dion wrote in a letter to Harper. "To date, your approach falls far short of the best that Canada can do. I urge you to put consensus ahead of confrontation. Every day counts in this battle and we must take real action now."
Sound like our liberals and alarmists here in the States? Can you imagine Nancy Pelosi (D-California) or Harry Reid (D-Nevada) making the same silly statement?
While you ponder, the article continued:
The warning came two days after Environment Minister John Baird published a report that appears to ignore requirements of a new law, introduced and supported by the opposition parties, calling on the government to honour its international commitments under the Kyoto protocol on climate change by reducing Canada's greenhouse gas emissions by an average of six per cent below 1990 levels between 2008 and 2012.
Baird has said he was forced to postpone that target in his new climate change plan until about 2025 since the previous Liberal government allowed pollution levels to rise by more than 30 per cent above the Kyoto goal. Dion said Baird's proposals are weak, when compared to a new plan, the Clean Air and Climate Change Act, endorsed last spring by the three opposition parties, which sets tougher targets and regulations to force large industries to change their practices.
At a news conference, the Liberal leader said Harper should ensure that he saves the legislation, if he goes ahead with plans to shut down Parliament and start a new session with a throne speech in October. Otherwise, Dion said Harper was risking a dangerous political confrontation in the minority Parliament.
"If they (shut down Parliament), and they go to another throne speech, everybody knows, everybody, that the risk of an election is going up," Dion said. "I can't speak for the other parties but there's no chance, or no risks I should say, that Liberal MPs would rise in support of a throne speech that we judged was going against the best interests of Canadians and the honour of our country."
For those that are curious, Canada's system is different than ours:
Under parliamentary tradition, a throne speech sets the government's agenda and can be considered a matter of confidence that could trigger an election if it's not supported by a majority of MPs.
As such, the supposed warming of the planet, which has been by no means proven to be caused by anything man is doing, could actually bring a Canadian prime minister to his knees.
How extraordinary.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Got to kill off those moose
August 24, 2007 - 11:15 ET by Airforce_5_OGot to kill off those moose baby. It's the moose farts.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Global warming good for Canada
August 24, 2007 - 11:29 ET by Mica the MagnificentCanada should embrace global warming. They'd be able to move their population northward and ease the crowding along our border.
(Shades of Canadian Bacon with John Candy)
And in Florida. The only
August 24, 2007 - 11:33 ET by Airforce_5_OAnd in Florida.
The only thing you should feel when shooting insurgents is the rifle recoil.
Yeah, if I was Canadian I'd
August 24, 2007 - 13:35 ET by taznarYeah, if I was Canadian I'd be doing everything I could to bring on global warming...
Harper should say, "BRING
August 24, 2007 - 12:51 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveHarper should say, "BRING IT ON, SUCKAS!"
If our Canadian sisters have similar views on AGW as we Americans do, the Canadian Liberal Party will lose the election.
Typical Liberal grandstanding, that's all this is.
"Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There's still plenty of meat on that bone. Now you take this home, throw it in a pot, add some broth, a potato, baby you've got a stew goin'!" --
On Canada, politics, and AGW
August 25, 2007 - 05:18 ET by UnsaneThe Canadians are wishy-washy on AGW as with most other things. In December 2002, they ratified the Kyoto Protocol, but yet, in various articles I have read in The Economist and the various occasions I have watched The National online, they are FAR from attaining Kyoto-mandated limits and benchmarks, and few Canadians see how those mandates will impact them.
I suspect the Canadians ratified it anyway just because the United States didn't...and they always have to differentiate themselves from the United States. But I digress.
As for the Liberals...yes, Stephen Harper's poll numbers have slipped as of late...the problem is, none of the other parties are doing much better. Dion, from everything I have seen, is not necessarily a "lock" for the prime ministership of Canada, and I can't see them going into a coalition with the NDP again, not after their forcing Paul Martin's government to fall and subsequently costing them the government when Harper was elected in January 2006.
Election fatigue may also kick in as well. Harper is reportedly delaying seeking an outright majority government until spring/summer 2008 for that reason. To recap, Paul Martin sought a fresh mandate in June 2004, only to get less than a majority of Liberal MPs, forcing him into that ultimately disastrous coalition with the NDP. That led to the January 2006 election which saw the Liberals lose outright. If the Liberals DO get their wish and have an election in the fall, that will be three elections in almost as many years. I doubt the Canadians want to go through that much trouble.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Energy
August 24, 2007 - 14:10 ET by JDWTurn up the AC or down the heat in the house while waiting 6 months for your hospital appointment.
JDW
News media: Scoreboard for terrorists
Wouldn' a Canuck want to be Global Warmed?
August 24, 2007 - 15:01 ET by Lame CherryHaving a bloodline which invaded Canuckia and later decided to thaw out on the balmy 40 below northern plains, leaves me with a unique not hate speech qualification in terming liberal eastern Canucks frost britten dolts (yes I mean britten as a play on words).
In a land of 3/4 tundra and permafrost would not it behoove my Canucks to thaw out in Global Warming and turn all that nothing into vast fields of wheat and famers eh?
Canada is sitting on the epic migration of the generation in come one come all to the former great white north and build ye olde life to joy and pastles of kiddie Canucks.
Liberals up there must want poverty to continue as turning all that yuck land into value would give them loads of taxes to spend on welfare.
Charles Adler needs to get on the phone and tell China to keep pumping out that fictional greenhouse and get a big mirror in space to heat up Canuckia. Dudley Dooright will then be able to drive his Rover all over instead of sledding or mudding in that mosquito infested nothingness.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
The Canadian Chic Tax
August 24, 2007 - 15:08 ET by Lame CherryOh and although I hate taxes, I am asking Canadian liberals and Nance Pelosi to impose a Canadian Chic Tax where Canada has to share 10% of their women with the Newsbusters site.
I tend to agree with the song Beulah has out Thank God for Canadian Girls...........goodness there are some belles femmes chaudes étouffantes vers le haut dans ce nord gelé.
Scorching hot beautiful women up in the froze north.......didn't want them Kebeckers to be feeling left out in their Frenchie nation.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Where to find eye candy
August 25, 2007 - 05:21 ET by UnsaneIndeed, there is some serious eye candy in Canada.
It is quite a "target-rich environment."
:-)
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Give the Liberals what they want.
August 24, 2007 - 22:08 ET by pbthinkerCOnservatives have been trying to tell liberals their policies are doom and they won't work, for quite a few years. Perhaps it's time to put the ball in their court, let them make some stupid laws, sign them, put them into force and let the people actually see what it's going to cost them. Also, hold them to it, don't let them say it wasn't their idea, or they need more money, or anything else.
Europe has been throwing money at Global Warming and hasn't been able to meet its targets, what makes these Canadian Liberals believe they can do it better?
The only flaw I can see, in this argument, is that they get their laws, global cooling, which is being predicted, takes place and the liberals take credit for it!!!
Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.