TM -- once you see the truth, you have to speak out.

I first became aware of the truth after watching an excellent fictionalized documentary called "THEY LIVE"

Check it out. You'll be shocked. WHISPER... THEY ARE EVERYWHERE MAN.

Check out my latest YouTube...but only if you support the troops and their mission: Better Men Than Me/The Battle For Fallujah

ckc -- dude, it's a fat comic book guy alone in a basement hooked up to the internet.

They'll find him dead one day, half-eaten by his only companions, a dozen stray cats.

Check out my latest YouTube...but only if you support the troops and their mission: Better Men Than Me/The Battle For Fallujah

You got a problem with you-tube science?

Support our Troops   

There is flight data recorder from "something." If you watch the animation provided by the NTSB, it follows a different path than the "official" path as provided by the 9/11 commission report.

This path would not have struck down the light poles AND would have been too high to have hit the pentagon..hmm..

Please watch the provided youtube clip for the evidence. It's only a minute. Surely you'll want to take 1 minute to find out that 9/11 was an inside job, right?

OH geez...here we go again..

Ok, so now the "magic fuselage" not only carved out a nearly perfect round hole through 9 (3 x 3 walls it went through) ft of reinforced steele concrete that had just finished renovation, and it made its way into the basement?? That is one magic fuselage..

You see, you can't say an F-4 is pulverized by hitting reinforced concrete causing no hole, but that AA77 hit reinforced concrete and did?!?

Fine, I accept your "magic fuselage" theory...where is the part today?? I have NEVER seen any evidence of any fuselage from AA77. Actually, I have never seen engines, or wheels, or seats, or luggage, or any body parts for that matter.

Hmm, Maybe April Gallop will have the answer? She was in the exact location that "something" hit on 9/11. Did she see any of that stuff? Nope. Did she see thousands of gallons of Jet Fuel?? Nope.

Hmm, something isn't adding up with your "magic fuselage" theory...maybe you should go back to the drawing board.

Not sure, there isn't enough video/photographic evidence to be sure of what type. From what there is though, you can't see any type of commercial logos on any of the planes. People have identified the white planes that were flying over the white house (restricted airspace) and around the WTC complex as an E-4B, the most advanced military craft (this usually trails air force one, but for some reason did not on 9/11). (you don't want any links, but I can give them to you for proof later).

You crash military planes because: you don't have to worry about actual people on board; you don't want to take the risk of missing the intended targets so you use remote controlled planes (you think hani Hanjour could fly a plane into the pentagon? Flying jets at 500 mph and making sharp turns and maneuvers is NEAR IMPOSSIBLE unless you are an extremely talented pilot.)

You attack the WTC because it is a symbol of "our freedoms." Actually, you attack it because it is the nexus of the financial markets of the U.S. The cover of a 1997 (I think it was '97) FEMA manual had the twin towers in cross hairs. The same place the cross hair was on the North Tower was where the plane actually hit. Yet, we are to believe, if you listen to condoleeza rice, they had "no idea this was possible."

I cannot speculate on what happened to the commercial flights, I don't have enough information myself. Some people think those flights never took off and the passengers were transfered to other "flights" due to the "inconvenience." They were more than likely killed, but again, I can't be certain. (It is no coincidence that two of the 4 flights left from Dulles Int'l airport. Here is the scoop on that: "George W. Bush's brother was on the board of directors of a company
providing electronic security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International
Airport and United Airlines, according to public records. The company was
backed by an investment firm, the Kuwait-American Corp., also linked for years
to the Bush family.")

There were witnesses yes, but none ever confirmed commercial airlines, just big jets. Actually, if you watch the video of the North Tower being struck, the plane DOES NOT look like a big 747. If you watch carefully, it looks like something is shout out of the back/sides to make the damage bigger. (again, the need for military planes).

Yes, the official theory as to why WTC 7 fell (actually, NIST is still working on it), is because of fire and damage. However, no high rise steel framed building has ever fallen due to fire, yet on 9/11 we are to believe that 3 buildings fell. If you look at pictures of the Murrah building in OKC, it is gutted about 45-50% and it did not collapse. As to whether it is possible, sure. Probable? nope..