Foreign Investors More Confident in U.S. Economy Than Media Are

Photo of Noel Sheppard.

As NewsBusters has been reporting this week (see this and this), as the stock market hit new all-time highs, the media have been dour Nervous Nellies carping and whining about gas prices, the low value of the dollar, the housing slump, and the rising trade deficit.

Yet, there are a variety of issues that press outlets have conveniently ignored during this record bull run that not only explain rising stock prices, but also give a more accurate view of what is going on in the global economy.

For instance, Bloomberg was one of the only major media outlets Tuesday which reported record purchases of U.S. securities by foreigners in May (emphasis added):

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

International buying of U.S. financial assets unexpectedly climbed to a record in May as investors snapped up American stocks and corporate bonds.

Total holdings of equities, notes and bonds climbed a net $126.1 billion, from $80.3 billion the previous month, the Treasury said today in Washington. Economists predicted foreign investment would slow to a net $73 billion, based on the median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey.

[...]

``The breadth and depth of U.S. markets help it attract capital,'' particularly from emerging markets and oil exporters flush with cash from trade surpluses, said Joe Quinlan, chief market strategist at Bank of America Corp.'s investment strategy group in New York. Foreign investors ``still have confidence'' in the U.S. economy, he said.

Yep. Foreign investors have more confidence in the U.S. economy than American media. Imagine that.

Didn't hear about this report? Well, how could you? Virtually no one outside of the financial press thought it was newsworthy; reporting such bullishness by foreigners would undermine the media meme about how America is hated all across the globe as a result of the war in Iraq.

So would another inconvenient truth media are hiding from the citizenry: the low dollar has created a boom in foreign travel to this country setting tourism records in cities around the nation.

As reported by the New York Post:

A depressed dollar is turning Fifth Avenue into a virtual flea market for global travelers as strong currencies like the British pound and the euro create a glut of great deals on fashions, electronics and hot status brands.

New York City is celebrating a record year from foreign tourists hitting town for weak dollar bargains - reaping savings of about one-third of what they'd spend back home.

[...]

And it's not only New York City that stands to benefit. European tour operators are said to be packaging shopping tours for U.S. cities - including weekend sprees in such hard-core retail destinations as the Mall of America in Minnesota, the world's largest shopping center - where three nonstop flights arrive daily from Europe.

It is expected that more foreigners will visit America in 2007 than in any year in history. Adding this to record foreign investment in our securities, it certainly appears that this America-hating the media focus so much attention on is largely present only in newsrooms.

Unfortunately, as press outlets mischaracterize the evils of a falling dollar, they conveniently ignore the positives. For instance, in a global economy, a weak dollar is beneficial, as it makes your product cheaper around the world.

This is why China keeps its yuan pegged to our dollar in a fashion that makes the yuan inexpensive compared to all other countries. This makes its products cheap compared to those made elsewhere.

Europeans might be egotistically pleased with the strength of the euro, and American media members green with envy. However, European companies are very unhappy with this exchange rate, and wish the European Central Bank would lower interest rates in order to weaken the euro and make European products more affordable abroad.

Unfortunately, the ECB president, Jean-Claude Trichet, has woefully mismanaged EU monetary policy to such an extent that most European nations aren't experiencing close to the economic expansion America is. Sadly, our European-loving media aren't interested in sharing such facts with the citizenry.

Nor are they willing to give the Bush administration or our Federal Reserve any credit for America's low dollar policy. After all, it's not an accident the dollar is so cheap compared to most other currencies. It is, in fact, an intended consequence of both fiscal and monetary policies to help America's companies sell their goods and services in a highly competitive overseas market.

If the media were at all honest, they would look at exploding stock prices, rising corporate earnings, expanding employment and wages, and surprisingly strong tax receipts as evidence that U.S. economic policy is working. Alas, such appears impossible when a Republican is in the White House.

Nor are they willing to honestly represent the true meaning of trade deficits as they present this largely misunderstood economic statistic in a fashion exclusively designed to generate unwarranted pessimism.

For instance, America is the largest economy in the world, and our entire system is based around consumption. Loads of it. Including piles and piles of debt.

As such, we are the world's consumer, a fact that media should revel in rather than rue. After all, since the press live exclusively off of advertising dollars, if consumers stopped consuming, media outlets not supported by government funds would all go the way of the dodo.

Not recognizing their similar dependence on consumers to that of foreign nations, press outlets speciously point at the trade deficit as some sign of American economic weakness. In fact, nothing can be further from the truth.

As the following chart from the Census Bureau illustrates, America has had an uninterrupted trade deficit now since 1976. Coming so soon after the first energy crisis in late 1973, it is likely that much of the change from trade surplus to deficit at that time stemmed from rising oil prices. And, given what's happened to oil and gas prices the past five years, it is conceivable that a good percentage of the trade deficit expansion of late is indeed oil-related, a concept that seems lost on bearish media members.

Regardless, one of the huge fingers being pointed concerning this imbalance deals with China's growing surplus that media members portray as some lurking bogeyman in the closet about to pounce at any moment. This, of course, is similar to how such surpluses in Japan and Germany in the '80s were guaranteed to eventually destroy America.

Twenty years later, Japan and Germany can only dream about having an economy as strong as ours.

Conveniently ignoring their mistaken prognostications regarding the evils of trade deficits in the past, the new ogre for media members is China.

Sadly, they ignore that it will be many years before Chinese citizens become aggressive consumers. As a result, China has to have a trade surplus with its partners. Can't be any other way, and will likely be such for at least another decade, maybe more. Any honest assessment of this situation couldn't possibly suggest otherwise.

As we have now been running uninterrupted trade deficits for more than 30 years without the world coming to an end, ringing alarm bells now is absurd. This is especially true as this deficit has normally come back to America in the form of foreign investment, which is certainly the case today.

Finally, with regard to trade deficits, it should jump at the reader that for the most part, the only time this deficit has declined in the past 30 years was during periods of recession. What does that tell you?

In the end, there's a lot of reasons foreign investors are so bullish on America. If only the media would get it, and, maybe more important, report it.

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thanks for the post

I occassionaly forget the lessons from my macro class about the benefit of a weak dollar. Your post brought back memories of 7:30 am ECON ... lollers

Bush is expected to sign a

Bush is expected to sign a new bill which would not inhibit foreign trade as it exists today but provide the government with the ability to more thoroughly scrutinize transactions which could be terrorist related (energy plants, roads, ports...).

JDW

News media: Scoreboard for terrorists

 

All that stands between this economy and the greatest economy

The only things, for the media at least, that stands between this economy and the greatest economy of all times is the letter after the President's name.

Media reports:

President George W Bush - D

    "Strongest econonmy of all times"

President George W Bush - R

   "Losing the American Dream" - CNN
   "Two Sides of Economic Growth" - NYT
   "States Job Growth Hits the Brakes" - LAT

Gee, I wonder why...

Between the US economy being the strongest there is in many if not all the measures, the dollar being historically weak, and all the european economies starting to commit suicide to reduce their carbon emissions...I wonder why foreign investors are flocking to the US?

Besides, they don't have the benefit of their media telling them 24/7 that the US economy sucks and is terrible, etc. They just look at the data and decide where to put their money.

 

 

The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic

 Everything in moderation

 Everything in moderation is my motto.  It should be noted that our trade deficit like exporting manufacturing jobs is in essence is the capitalist Marshall Plan for the world.  Without commenting on whether it is immediately good or bad for the US, everyone must recognize that the export of jobs to third world countries has raised the standard of living for the poor in those countries.  Similarly, the trade deficit has pumped trillions of investment dollars throughout the world.  Would we be richer as a country if we practiced Merchantialist policies by not allowing the export of jobs and capital via strictly managed trade of tit for tat?  Probably yes, but at what cost to the world?  

Noel has touched upon something here that most people have failed to understand, our wealth as a nation is built upon the export of capitalism.  Wealth creation is not a zero sum game of the liberals/socialists/communists, they only know how to redistribute it.  In the final analysis, a capitalist enriches the world, a socialist is nothing more than a thief.  All that socialism ever does is penalize successful people and remove good role models for the poor.

 

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane"