Sign Our Petition Defending Rush Limbaugh at IStandWithRush.org
Today NewsBusters publisher and Media Research Center (MRC) president Brent Bozell launched a new website: IStandWithRush.org, where visitors can sign a petition denouncing "attempts by radical left-wing organizations and the media to censor Rush and his commonsense conservative message."
Rush apologized for his initial comments, "but the Left won't accept the apology" and "won't be satisfied until all of Limbaugh's advertisers pull the plug on his show," Bozell noted, before detailing a litany of instances where liberal talk show hosts like Mike Malloy and left-wing comedians like Bill Maher used misogynistic and venomous invective to trash conservative women in politics. You can watch that video embedded below or at IStandWithRush.org, where we encourage you to sign the petition.
- NB Staff's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Erm.....................
Submitted by David Kramer on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:17pm.
Not Found
The requested URL /civicrm/profile/create&gid=14&reset=1 was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache Server at istandwithrush.org Port 80
I got an error message when I tried to sign this, Mr. Bozell
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:22pm.
The requested URL /civicrm/profile/create&gid=14&reset=1 was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache Server at www.istandwithrush.org Port 80
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Something wrong - When I hit
Submitted by SFCDeano on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:24pm.
Something wrong - When I hit the sign petition button i get a 404 error
Same. . .
Submitted by rickbren on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:54pm.
. . . problem.
Everything should be working now
Submitted by Matthew Sheffield on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:32pm.
Please let me know if you continue to experience problems.
Got it,
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:25pm.
Thanks
Epic fail
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:05pm.
I signed the petition and someone from the White House showed up at my door a few minutes later.
lol
Let's find out
Submitted by deadeyedan on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:08pm.
It's time to find out which advertisers dumped Rush or threatened to so that they can be roundly boycotted and then find out which ones are filling the gap so that they may be roundly patronized.
This Fluke "gal" is a Dem plant who made herself into one. What a giant surprise she's not accepting a genuine apology nor are the Dems (such as all the anchors/correspondents on NBC/ABC/CBS/CNN ad nauseam) going to let this go, no matter what.
Starting with Chief Marxist George Stephanopoulos a few weeks back, the Dems have been placing their "social issues" shoehorn into the public discourse in a (hopefully vain) effort to divert attention from the monstrous failures of Obummer and his adoring mob (like on MSNBC).
How in blast does someone get the privilege of being a Congressional committee witness to testify on some need to have what has been already so accessible?????
And why is there some perceived need to pander to hedonism?
It's almost laughable that they have stooped to this, but who's surprised? It's time for Newt to chime in again on these monstrous cheap-shot artists.
Note - my petition signing also brought up a "page not found".
LIBERALISM - government of the people by the theories and for the ideologists
Megadittos!!!
Submitted by Wildcatter1980 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:54pm.
Any advertiser who bails on Rush does not deserve my patronage. He has been one of the best deals for them. For them to drop Rush over this deceptive liberal secular progressive is reprehensible.
--
If you want to know what liberal secular progressives are really doing, just listen to what they are accusing others of.
Recommended reading: Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
Consider the Left's reaction
Submitted by kareling on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:27pm.
Consider the Left's reaction to Rush's apology, and the Muslims' reaction to the apologies of Obama and various U.S. generals over the accidental Koran burnings. Neither group is very gracious about it.
Well
Submitted by KornKing on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 8:52am.
Have you considered other similarities?
Glenn Beck & Lou Dobbs got striped of their jobs for
Submitted by lrgon on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:26pm.
being controversial. They went after the North American Union, the Federal Reserve on their show. Lou Dobbs was targetted by the national Council of The Race ( La Raza); bullets even struck his home but he never got a petition of support!
Dobbs' daily exposures of the US homegrown organizations backing open borders got him into hot water. Nonetheless he kept on reporting about the Bush administration's Security and Prosperity Partnership with Mexico. That Mexico/US "security" partnership Lou exposed on his popular evening CNN broadcasts made the Bush people mighty uncomfortable.
That Dobbs would lose his job over exposing the plot to create a North American Union open border made him a target. But he went down fighting the bas****s without issuing an apology. But I suspect it was Dobbs' story on US aid (Dept.Of Energy grant) to Iran's nuclear program that got him fired:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4lB1Y4ZwfU
Petition of Support
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:49pm.
"Lou Dobbs was targetted by the national Council of The Race ( La Raza); bullets even struck his home but he never got a petition of support!"
So, what kept you from starting one?
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Dobbs the shrieking populist
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:54pm.
Lou Dobbs lost his job because like you, he is a Conspiro. Anyone who bought that BS about the forces of evil forging a political union amongst three countries with different histories and cultures and weariness towards each other only shows me that they are completely ignorant of history and culture. (Seriosly. Canada, which has a hard enough time keeping ITSELF together, was to be magically amalgamated to Mexico and the United States? What idiocy.)
You are definitely counted in that category, Conspiro spammer.
Lou Dobbs is also a shrieking populist. To think I was once impressed with the guy.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Are You Serious???
Submitted by Blue_Turf on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:27pm.
The Left could care less about women. In fact, I bet if we went into their "closets" right now we could find a "Sarah Palin is a C*NT" T-shirt
Here is an oldie but a goodie from the American Thinker: The Wilding of Sarah Palin.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/the_wilding_of_sarah_palin.html
You stand with Rush? Really?!
Submitted by mflo999 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:28pm.
So you stand with Rush when he says of all women whose insurance covers contraceptives -- and I quote:
"If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex. We want something for it. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch."
So you really support Rush's call for these women to post pornography?
Do you geniuses realize that according to a new Republican loyalty oath in Virginia, you'd be disqualified as Republicans -- but presumably only if you watched them!
Do you realize that Fox's insurance plan covers contraceptives, so your call for sex tapes applies to all the women at Fox too? OK -- maybe you're on to something there!
But most amazing of all, do you realize Mr Brent Bozo's MRC's insurance plan covers contraceptives TOO!
All I can say as a Democrat is -- keep it coming. Support Rush all you want. You guys have completely lost it.
Thanks for the input.......
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:31pm.
...Ed.
Standing with Rush
Submitted by cocodrie on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:36pm.
Standing with Rush is preferable to rolling around in pig ---- with you jackasses.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
+1,000,000
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:54pm.
"Likes"
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Nah, I personally don't support any Democrat, or ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:38pm.
liberal female, showing any skin whatsoever..
They're so damn ugly, for the most part, that seeing just their face causes headaches.
Anything more might affect the optic nerve in a less than salutary way.
MD
mflo999, just like all
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:49pm.
mflo999, just like all liberals you distort the facts.
did you even READ Bozell's piece?
You were so busy imagining troglodytes waving their clubs yelling "Rush was right!!" that you missed this part:
Let’s all agree Limbaugh crossed a line.
He agrees. He posted an apology to Fluke “for the insulting word choices.
That must be code for "We think Rush was right!!"
Come back when you have a reasoned argument based on truth.
Incorrect, Mommy!
Submitted by mflo999 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:58pm.
Rush never mentioned the call for sex tapes in his nopology. Not once did he ever mention them. Nor did Mr. Brent Bozo mention them in his post. Therefore, if you stand with Rush, you clearly are lusting after those tapes! Mommy, that makes you REALLY weird.
Incorrect mflo!
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:07pm.
And just why are you so interested in non-existent sex tapes and what in the hell does it mean: "you clearly are lusting after those tapes!"
Before you answer, keep your grotesque and prurient mind - or whatever exists of it - out of the gutter.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
Another lib troll*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:18pm.
Who else would spew insults based on misinformation?
I often fail to understand these people because I do not speak baaaa!
First of all, I'm NOT your "mommy."
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:19pm.
and you're obviously confusing Rush with Bill Clinton.
Now I'm certain you're a liberal. You went right to the personal insult.
So predictable. Yawwwwwn......
You are a GUEST on Mr. Bozell's website, 999
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:20pm.
And I would strongly suggest you comport yourself accordingly.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Just how long
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:22pm.
has that gerbil been "missing?"
My goodness
Submitted by shawn. on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:27pm.
somebody has a chip on their shoulder
Why...
Submitted by Wildcatter1980 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:13pm.
...should I work and pay my taxes so that my tax moneys can be used to pay for someone else's contraceptives instead of, for example, our nation's defense?
Why is it that so many people feel so entitled to so many things like a college education and/or contraceptives that used to be paid for by the individual earning the money through their own efforts?
And, specifically about contraceptives, abstinence is 100% effective in preventing unwanted pregnancies and it is free! I guess it is just too much to expect people to exercise some discipline and self-control.
--
If you want to know what liberal secular progressives are really doing, just listen to what they are accusing others of.
Recommended reading: Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
Obama promised to fundamentally change America. He is...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:44am.
well into the process of doing so. Once he can get more than one half of the population (he's close already) accepting government handouts, he realizes his Party, the Democrats, will be elected into perpetuity or until everything falls into chaos, whichever comes first.
My guess is, this country can't stand four more years of Obama, so chaos will come first!
mflo999, No doubt that you
Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:23pm.
mflo999,
No doubt that you along with the whole Liberal movement, the Left, the Democratic party were outraged, just outraged when Keith Olbermann, a few years ago, was salavating, along with the collective and mindless Left when they were begging a woman to sell him supposed recorded sex conversations between her and Bill O'Reilly, right?
Left wingers=hypocrite
Liberalism=hypocrite
999
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:26pm.
Do you realize that Mr. Bozell's company is not affiliated with the Catholic church?
Honestly, you're a pig and probably about one foot out the door already.
Mflo999, Please tell me you
Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:28pm.
Mflo999,
Please tell me you are not this dumb, please.
It is NOT about a health insurance company, a company buying and giving to its employees, out of the own free will of the employer, a health insurance coverage that covers contraceptives, you moron.
It is about the government FORCING religious institutions who are against contraceptives to give group health insurance coverage to its employees which cover contraceptives when the religious institutions believe contraceptives are morally wrong!!!
You are a mindless Liberal.
Please go back to the DailyKos, Huffington Post, Thinkprogress.org where you mindless, irrational, illogical lies are a way of living for those who blog there and the Liberals who post there.
Stay away from sharp objects
Submitted by CJohnson on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:28pm.
You have no idea what this issue is about, do you?
Al Sharpton.........
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:38pm.
.........has pretty much made this issue his whole TV show. And of course, doesn't get it right.
Just like he was all over Ed Schultz when he called Laura Ingrahm a slut on the air........Oh wait, he wasn't?
He shouldnt have apologized!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:34pm.
He was right, thats what she is, and look whats happened to him since he DID apologize! To HELL with the left-they NEVER apologize for what they do and say, and are NEVER vetted for it!
Earlier today, I wondered if
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:39pm.
Earlier today, I wondered if Fluke would as much class as Laura Ingraham.
I guess not.
MB - the are all atwitter over this.
Submitted by acaiguana on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:55pm.
Showing class was never in the playbook. But, I think this is much ado about nothing.
ACA
...
Quoted from: 'Acaiguana notes from the Underground' (Soon to be at theaters near you)
She cannot separate it.
Submitted by GregE on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:03pm.
Rush apologized, and today opened his show with an extensive monologue where, on 3 occasions, he reiterated the apology. Doesn't matter. To her, and to the Left, they do not separate the insult from the topical disagreement.
So, though he apologized for the insult, honestly and sincerely, and said he was wrong and should not have said those things about her, and said that she is not either of those things he called her, they can't separate that from disagreement on the issue, and overall disagreement with political philosophy.
Unless he were to sincerely change his view on the topic, and praise her genuinely for it, and say something along the lines of........ "you know, I have thought about this and Ms. Fluke was absolutely correct in demanding the government force Georgetown to supply free contraception,"..........then there's nothing they will even begin to accept.
Reality is, they wouldn't accept even that, but that would be the closest he could possibly come to getting them to even ponder acceptance, and at that point, it's not acceptance of apology anyway. Instead, it would simply be confirmation to them that they can shutdown speech and bully someone into their way of thinking just by going after them personally. It would only encourage them, not that they need it.
Their minds are what they are, and won't be changed in any way unless you become one of them. Unless you do that, and convert to their religion, you are simply an infidel who's speech is to be shutdown simply because you are not one of them.
Other things you can do is to
Submitted by Van Halen on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:56pm.
Other things you can do is to click on his site, buy stuff from his advertisers, or buy some of his items, like his mugs or shirts or whatever. Let the Left know we give a damn.
Look at the bottom of the page*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:23pm.
At the bottom of the petition page on the link, it states that white house.gov has started a petition to shut up Rush.. Amazing that the white house would blatantly try to stifle opposition speech with TAXPAYER MONEY!
Caj
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:28pm.
I'm not seeing it, if I could screen shot the link I'd like to post it on my facebook.
It's on the petition page itself
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:39pm.
On the right side bar, bottom:
On the taxpayer funded whitehouse.gov, there is a petition against Rush.
Call the White House and tell them to take it down 202-456-141
It's not linked...but that would be great.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Most definately Blonde
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:43pm.
I'm living the Breitbart way now.
Killa promised to play guitar when we get to the re-education camp.
Blonde
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:46pm.
Missing a digit on that phone number?
IIRC, it's 1414
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:51pm.
Sorry, my mouse has been twitchy and it bugs me to death! It is so annoying. And it is not the battery either.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Thanks!
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:52pm.
.
fuzz
Submitted by CJohnson on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:32pm.
See if cleaning the little rolling wheel w/rubbing alcohol helps.
Blonde. You could try float testing it.
Submitted by The Vet on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:38pm.
I know you are near a body of water there in Florida. Go out and pitch it as hard and as long as you can throw it into a body of water.
If it sinks, it is broke and you need to a new one.
If it floats, it is... hey, you gonna swim out there and get it? Go get a new one.
Next week. The drop test.
Blonde
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:49pm.
did you know there is also a petition on there for Obama to resign? ROTFLMAO
Ms Rad*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:45pm.
After you fill in the petition page, click sign the petition, it then takes you to another page. Its at the very bottom of that second page..
Edit.....http://www.istandwithrush.org/thankyou
Not just opposition
Submitted by Boudin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:30pm.
But a taxpaying citizen.
This is just another example of this Admin attacking the productive of this country.
Caj, did you read the petition?
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:37pm.
Firstly, it purports to have been created by "citizens" not the White House. And, the last paragraph says that Rush's comments "directed at a specific individual, meets the Supreme Court test for obscenity: it appeals to prurient interest, it depicts offensive sexual conduct (peeping Toms) and it lacks serious literary, artistic or political value".
And, the author of the "petition" lied, as he/she claims that Fluke testified to Congress regarding contraception, when most anyone knows that Fluke was NOT testifying to Congress, but to a dem dog and pony show.
Upnorth*
Submitted by cajun2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:54pm.
Even if "citizens" created this petition, it is on a government website. Unless the people who work at whitehouse.gov are considered "citizens" from move.on, media matters, SEIU, Organization for liberal whackos leaning toward Paleozoic Utopia.
Let's see how long the petition for Obama
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:56pm.
to resign lasts shall we?
Cajun
Submitted by Denny Crane on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:49pm.
Here is the link to the petition against Rush, the stupid creator couldn't even get the dates right.
On February 29 and March 1, 2010, Rush Limbaugh broadcast biased and distorted news commentary as well as intimidating statements about an individual, Sandra Fluke.
I was thinking about signing it with the name "Karl Marx" or Bill Ayers or Adolph Hitler.
We Are The 53%
Thank you Denny Crane*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:11am.
The white house is attempting to shut out the opposition since they already have control of the LSM.
To me , as I wear my tin foil hat, this is just another step in Obama's plan to create divisiveness and conflict. As it builds to violence and chaos, then we will see the real Obama. The anti American haters will follow him.
From my re-education camp, how I will laugh at the useful idiots as they wake up.
In addition, UpNorth, based
Submitted by Wolfrem on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 10:41am.
In addition, UpNorth, based on the last paragraph you quoted from their website, where are their petitions against the likes of Schultz, Matthews, Maher, Letterman, Maloney, etc.....?
I know. I'm not holding my breath.
When I heard yesterday about the advertisers leaving, I went to Pro Flowers and erased all my data. There was no link for deleting the account so I emailed them. In the email, I said "Since your business decision was based on Rush's comments, your decision was not business, it was political. So my business decision is to not do business with you." I received a canned response of Thank you for your interest... or something like that...lol.
The left think they are being clever, but their hypocrisy is astoundingly obvious.
"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana
"So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause." - Padme, Star Wars 3
Problem with IStandWithRush.org link?
Submitted by mflo999 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:36pm.
Dear NB staff -- there appears to be a problem with your IStandWithRush.org link. I can't see where Rush's sex tapes will be posted, please can you advise?
You know -- these are the sex tapes Rush called for all women whose insurance pays for contraceptives, including the women at Fox an indeed at your own MRC. These are the sex tapes you say you 'stand by.'
Please can you tell me how they will be categorized? How will you decide which ones are uploaded to your Web site?
999
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:38pm.
Can't respond to a debate so you start with the juvenile "jokes" I see.
Blonde said it best: We need a better class of troll here.
This one is pathetically bad, Rad
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:42pm.
I'm kind of over it.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
~I'm waiting for him to call someone a doodyhead.
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:01pm.
Or has he already? Every time I start reading his posts my eyes glaze over.
Typical Troll turd bobbing........
Submitted by BEGRUNT on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 3:03pm.
to the surface. This one has no idea what he is in for!
"A nation can suffer it's fool's, but cannot survive the traitor"
Cicero
No point in replying Radical.
Submitted by Bhaal on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:48pm.
No point in replying Radical. That person won't be able to read your post with his/her head lodged in the nether regions such as it is.
Whoa. Whoa. Whoa. You can't say that.
Submitted by The Vet on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:17am.
This one clearly has issues understanding sarcasm, hyperbole, bombast, and snark.
As it literally thinks Mr. Limbaugh was calling for actual videos to be made, it will now thinks you are actually implying it has managed to physically insert most painfully it's own head up it's own rectum.
Rad,
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:50pm.
This is just one more maladjusted lib who says: “Nyah nyah! You’re stupid!”, followed by the sticking out of the tongue and then running away from any confrontation.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
Double post.
Submitted by Trix Rabbit on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:50pm.
Double post.
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
They aren't Rush's tapes, they're yours.
Submitted by UpNorth on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:41pm.
But don't worry, none of us want to see Brokeback Mountain, Moflo..
Well, UpNorth, after all, he IS a 'staffing' expert...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:11pm.
Right, Markie?
time to ban this troll. Your
Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:42pm.
time to ban this troll.
Your juvenile behavior may be funny to the two year old mentality that is so prevelant amongst Liberals, not here.
Debate like an adult, with facts, not Liberal talking points nor with the attitude of a two year old.
Simple
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:57pm.
To quote another obnoxious Leftist of the distant NB past: Link or slink.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Yes. Little trollie. Rush actually meant that.
Submitted by The Vet on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:20am.
Yes. He was literally requesting sex tapes be mailed in.
And he will get around to viewing all the sex tapes as soon as he UNTIES THE HALF OF HIS BRAIN BEHIND HIS BACK.
No. Really. He has half his brain tied behind his back. Go to his website and see.
Putz.
This guy is another Jer. It is rare when they show up here.
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:30am.
They are easy to spot because fortunately, there are so few of them on this web site. Most of them are found at Media Matters or Daily Kos. They are best ignored and hopefully, they will go away.
Not going anywhere, webster...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:37am.
I have too much fun hanging around watching you wallow in your own ignorance.
Jer
I signed the petition and
Submitted by lesterwink23 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:51pm.
I signed the petition and would do so a thousand more times if I could. Enough is enough. Rush's comments were inappropriate, but he apologized. Ms. Fluke could've taken the high road and accepted his apology, but the fact that she didn't proves that she's more interested in getting mileage out of her 15 minutes than doing the right thing. There seem to be people in the MSM who actually think that this incident will be Rush's undoing. Meanwhile, sleaze like Bill Maher and David Letterman continue their careers completely unabated by the same outrage that has met Rush's comments. We are fed up with the unabashed hypocrisy from the smear merchants on the left. They do not get to tell lecture us on civility and morality. I've listened to Rush for almost 20 years, and I will not stop now.
Have you noticed, like I have, that Liberals don't respect...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:24am.
apologies, that they take them as a sign of weakness. That is why I was surprised that Rush apologized. He simply did what he does all the time and that is illustrate the absurd with absurdity.
It is absurd that that woman requests other people to pay for her birth control. It is absurd that she spends $3,000 per school year on birth control.
It is absurd that she attended a Catholic college with the intent of changing the rules when she could have gone to a secular college.
It is absurd that the Democrats allowed her to testify before them after she was turned down by the regular committee.
It is absurd that she wants other people to pay for sex changes.
Where do we stop? Health Club and Golf Club memberships are quite expensive. Maybe she can get other people to pay for them too. Afterall, they do benefit one's health, don't they?.
whitehouse.gov petitions
Submitted by SouthernRoots on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:53pm.
There are two that I noticed:
There is also one up there for the Obama Administration to resign.
I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them. - J.B. Books (John Wayne)
Rush Slipped over the edge on this one
Submitted by cbeyer on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:55pm.
I simply cannot defend the indefensible. Rush became the vile left he rails against so often with his Slut reference. Rush's influence is soon to decline.
~What's that?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:59pm.
Your voice is muffled when Mittens is sitting down; get him to stand up and then you can try again.
cbeyer, and his apology
Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:11pm.
cbeyer,
and his apology means nothing to you, right?
Let me guess you are a staunch Romney supporter since I have heard the same thing from radical Romney supporters.
You know, I have said, until a few days ago, that I would vote for any Republican who won the primary, except for Ron Paul. if Ron Paul won, I would not vote for a President come Nov. 2012. However, the more I learn how much Romney loves government run healthcare, the more I think that if Romney wins, I will not vote in the Presidential elections. There is ZERO difference between Obama and Romney.
How can I vote for someone who agrees with Obama on Obamacare? How can I vote for someone who said while Massachussetts governor that judges can decide to force an underage girl to have an abortion even if the parents disagree? How can I vote for a man who had a pro-gay agenda while governor?
what is the difference between flip-flop Romney and Obama, none!
and what has really pushed me to this is Romney's unkind and ridiculous supporters. Well, of course and the facts of who Romney isn't, a Conservative. So, keep it up.
If you can't tell the differences between Romney and Obama......
Submitted by cbeyer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:49am.
You really are brainwashed. No matter what you may think of Romney, he is an unabashed supporter of the free enterprise system and creating a business friendly climate in this country.
You may not like him but to suggest he is no different than Obama is simply ignorant.
And yes...Rush has hugely damaged his brand. Sorry to say.
Opinions differ on whether Rush's brand is damaged. The Left and
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 2:58am.
supporters of the Left's efforts to damage Rush, including it seems, at least one Romney supporter, say it's so. As a Romney supporter myself, I say it's not so.
However, I agree with you that anyone who says there is no difference between Romney and Obama is unenlightened and uninformed.
Let me add that for someone on the Right to throw their vote away by not voting in the Presidential elections against Obama is just plain foolish!
I agreed with you up until your last line. Rush apologized.
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:03am.
He tried to make a point but in so doing sunk to the level of many liberals, mostly those found on ABCCBSNBCMSNBC and CNN.
Rush has been on the air for well over twenty years, broadcasting three hours per day, five days per week. As far as I know, this is the first time he was ever forced to apologize.
No one is perfect, not even Rush, when it comes to broadcasting, but he came darn close.
Rush was right in what he said by illustrating the absurd with absurdity. He just should not have said the two words Liberals say and get away with all the time.
We Conservatives are held to a much higher standard than Liberals and that's fine with me.
He wasn't forced to apologize.
Submitted by Denny Crane on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 6:20am.
He came to the realization that what he did was beneath him.
We Are The 53%
cbeyer, Where in the things
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 11:55am.
cbeyer,
Where in the things I pointed out about Romney am I wrong?
1) Did he or did he not support Mass. judges forcing an underage child to have an abortion against her parents' wishes?
2) Did he or did he not have a pro-gay agenda in Mass.?
3) Did he or did he not write letters, have meetings, etc, etc. asking the Obama administration to use his Mass. healthcare law as the model for the USA?
4) Did he or did he not support abortions?
5) Did he or did he not say that he really wasn't a real Republican while running for Mass. governor?
Throw all the person insults you want, cbeyer, it does not change the fact that on social issues, Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are exactly the same.
Unbelievable that anyone who condemns President Obama's and the Democrats Affordable Health Care Act, you know Obamacare, would then turn around the guy who put an equal system to work in a State of the Union.
You support Romeny, you support government run healthcare!
Again, point out where I am wrong and I will listen. As for you, you seem to have made up your mind by ignoring the FACTS that prove Romney is a RINO.
You want to see how stupid Romney is going to look when he goes after the Affordable Healthcare Mandate? All Obama has to say, "Governor, what are you saying, I modeled our new healthcare law after what you created in Massachussetts." End of story for Romney.
Romney cannot and will not win the general election. Oh and don't worry, I don't believe that Newt, Santorum or Ron can either. But Ron Paul and Romney are the worst of the bunch.
Similarity
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:49pm.
Both His Majesty The Shahinshah and Romney think being successful is criminal, and that the tax code exists simply to punish successful people.
Whine about brainwashing all you want, but I'd say you are the one who is brainwashed. You see, Romney has said this about the successful.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
When I first glanced at your name, I thought I was reading...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:06am.
Liberal allies as in you favored Liberals. Then, upon closer inspection, I saw your name means Liberal lies and I erased my bad thoughts of you.
Now, after reading this comment, I take it all back. If Romney is our nominee and you refuse to vote for him you are indeed a "Liberal ally".
For our Country's sake, I hope we don't have many like you. America, as it has been for well over 200 years, can not survive four more years of Obama!
jawebster1, Four years of
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:04pm.
jawebster1,
Four years of Romney will be four years of Obama. One and the same when it comes to social issues.
I will tell you that you are being a Liberal ally by supporting the RINO Romney.
I want a Romney supporter to explain how he will go after Obama on Obamacare. And not legal language, not in-depth, but rather how it is going to play out in the minds of the way too many simple minded Americans.
Romney, if he wins the nomination, will go after Obamacare law. The second that he does, all the Obama team will do with its hundreds of millions of dollars is put out adds using Romney's own words on how he supported government run healthcare in Mass. Obama will show how Romney aides helped create Obamacare.
in a debate, Obama will tell Romney, "Governor, I mirroed my law after the government run healthcare you created in Massachussetts!"
Where it is run by the State government or run by the Federal government Romney put into place government run healthcare. Explain how this is different than Obama?!
If Romney goes after Obama on abortion, countless of videos of Romney supporting abortion.
When Romney goes after Obama on Obama's pro-gay agenda, countless of videos of Romney supporting a gay agenda in Massachussetts.
Why are Romney supporters so blind to this FACT! Romney cannot and will not defeat Obama in Novemeber.
You can't claim to be a social Conservative and support Romney.
Sorry, the Liberal allies are Michael Medved who adores and worships Romney and the rest of the Romney supporters.
I pray and hope I am wrong, but the facts do not lie. Romney will not defeat Obama.
Pay no mind
Submitted by Unsane on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:32pm.
That's okay. Neither you, nor your hero, are conservatives anyway.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Rush is like sex cbeyer
Submitted by cocodrie on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:43pm.
Sex has been around so long people are growing tired of it. Same for Rush, people are growing tired of him too. - You wish.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Battle Lines
Submitted by kilrod on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:41pm.
Glad to sign the petition. Most interesting is the continuation of battle lines being drawn. The libturda have already taken out Beck and Buchanan,(Palin, Cain, Bachman, Perry, etc.) now they're taking a shot at Rush. If by some "fluke" the Reps. do win the elections does anyone really think the issues will be settled and problems solved. Does anyone think the libturda will just lay down and accept the rule of law advanced by conservatives?
(grins) kilrod "the Birther"
"Here Lies Lester Moore, 4 Slugs From a 44, No Les, No More" on a tombstone in Arizona. h/t MD
If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,??
MRC is falling into the trap
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:12pm.
Limbaugh took the bait and paid the price. He's big enough (commercially) to survive all this.
What effect are you hoping to get with this petition?
Most likely the MSM will use it as "MRC's war on women."
Limbaugh drew the fire, but he'll survive. Don't rush (no pun intended) into the ambush. HIt back from another angle.
I've never cared for Ed Schultz...
Submitted by Jer on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:47pm.
but this is an example of a classy apology:
Good evening, Americans and welcome to The Ed Show from New York tonight. Thomas Roberts will be here tonight anchoring the program, but first I want to take some time to offer an apology. On my radio show yesterday I used vile and inappropriate language when talking about talk show host Laura Ingraham. I am deeply sorry, and I apologize. It was wrong, uncalled for and I recognize the severity of what I said. I apologize to you, Laura, and ask for your forgiveness.
It doesn't matter what the circumstances were. It doesn't matter that it was on radio and I was ad-libbing. None of that matters. None of that matters. What matters is what I said was terribly vile and not of the standards that I or any other person should adhere to. I want all of you to know tonight that I did call Laura Ingraham today and did not make contact with her and I will apologize to her as I did in the message that I left her today.
I also met with management here at MSNBC, and understanding the severity of the situation and what I said on the radio and how it reflected terribly on this company, I have offered to take myself off the air for an indefinite period of time with no pay. I want to apologize to Laura Ingraham. I want to apologize to my family, my wife. I have embarrassed my family. I have embarrassed this company.
And I have been in this business since 1978, and I have made a lot of mistakes. This is the lowest of low for me. I stand before you tonight in front of this camera in this studio in an environment that I absolutely love. I love working here. I love communicating with all of you on the radio and the communication that I have with you when I go out and do town hall meetings and meet the people that actually watch. I stand before you tonight to take full responsibility for what I said and how I said it, and I am deeply sorry.
My wife is a wonderful woman. We have a wonderful family. And with six kids and eight grandkids, I try to set an example. In this moment, I have failed. And I want you to know that I talked to my sons especially about character and about dignity and about the truth. And I tell you the truth tonight that I am deeply sorry and I tell them every day that they have to live up to standards if they want to be a successful human being in life. And I have let them down. I have never been in this position before to the point where it has affected so many people. And I know that I have let a lot of people down.
To the staff here at MSNBC, I apologize for embarrassing the company and the only way that I can really make restitution for you is to give you a guarantee, and the only way that I can prove my sincerity in all of this is if I never use those words again. Tonight, you have my word that I won't. Laura Ingraham, I am sorry. Very sorry. I'll be back with you in the coming days.
Contrast it with the sanctimonious, self-serving, finger-pointing, ideology-reeking diatribe against Democrats and liberals authored by Mr. Limbaugh as part of an apology which Bozell implies the very targets of Rush's scorn should "accept".
Jer
A slightly different analysis
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 11:55pm.
When An Apology Proves You’ll Say Anything: Ed Schultz’s Amazing Mea Culpa
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
Kingfish...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:10am.
By the same token, Rush kept doubling down on Flute for three days until sponsors started bailing and GOP leaders like Santorum and Boehner joined in the criticism, which I'm sure influenced Limbaugh's initial apology. But whatever the motivations in either case, the words of the respective statements speak for themselves. One is an unqualified mea culpa. The other, not so much.
Jer
Sandra Fluke IS
Submitted by gfrrman on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:29am.
a SLUT AND a PROSTITUTE by her own words!!!...for crying out loud. SHE said the words, NO ONE ELSE. Ed Schultzs' "apology" was complete BS and those with brains can see the difference.
g
How do you know, Jer, what kind of ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:30am.
musical instrument Limbaugh plays?
And does doubling down on it mean back-to-back practice sessions, or what?
MD
Sorry, Matthew...It was a Fluke mistake.
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:48am.
Jer
"S okay, Jer, I imagine as a result of Limbaugh being in ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:56am.
"hot" water, you are sporting a woody the size of a woolly rhinoceros and can't see to type properly.
MD
Well I'm not posting the video, if that's what you're
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:04am.
leading up to.
Jer
⇒ Jer
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:06am.
And no Twittering either.
Don't worry, Cool...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:46am.
It wouldn't be much of a tweet.
Jer
MD
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:12am.
Maybe you can link Pinkard and Bowden's: Sexual Harrasser on you-tube for Jer.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
cocodrie ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 2:24am.
Not for a million bucks.
It is way too much fun to listen to Jer squawk about my distinct lack of links. :o)
MD
Re to Jer regarding unqualified
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 8:24am.
I listened to Rush's whole show that day and the first 45 minutes was an unqualified apology, regarding what he was sorry about. He was sorry that he used the words slut and prostitute. That was all. He didn't say, "if I offended anyone, I am sorry". He said he was sorry he used those words.
Has Ed Schultz toned it down? I don't know, I don't listen to him. When someone says their sorry, they only way to really tell if it's true is to see how they act in the future. Sorry is just the start.
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
~BINGO
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 9:38am.
A person who is truly sorry for their actions refrains from repeating them in the future; someone who apologizes and does it again was just sorry he/she was called on it.
Excellent rebuttal Kingfish17. With all respect Jer, those of
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:19am.
us on the Right, including Rush Limbaugh, don't expect those on the Left to apologize for the abhorrent remarks and treatment of Palin, Bachmann, Ingraham, Coulter, Malkin, etc. Moreover, to use Ed Slut Schultz as your example of a "classy apology" is disappointing.
Rally for Rush
Limbaugh vs. Party of Subsidized Sin
Why is it disappointing, Rush Fan?
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:45am.
As I said, the motivations are less relevant than the actual words which are spoken. Letterman's was another example of an unqualified apology, absent of finger-pointing. Do you really believe Rush's apology was classy by comparison...and one the left should accept even though it is the object of derision in the very statement Limbaugh issued?
Jer
Jer....Rush apologized. I could give a C...(obscene word) if it
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:48am.
is accepted.
Understood, R F...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:58am.
But it seems to be a meaningful issue to Brent, which I find rather odd for the reasons previously stated.
By the way, for the record my (absolutely meaningless) opinion is that Rush should remain on the air, and I'm sure he will for as long as he wishes.
Jer
Agreed. Now that's the Jer I've come to know and respect.
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:04am.
`
And...
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:54pm.
And you will despise him until he joins the Democratic Party, for in your world, the ONLY humans that exist in the United States are members of the Democratic Party.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
One(an apology) the left should accept?
Submitted by UpNorth on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 11:10am.
Great googly moogly, why would the left be considered, Jer? Rush didn't call all of the left a slut. He called one person a slut, and then apologized for it.
I know, I know, he didn't kneel and commit ritual seppuku, which offends you and all of the left, but, for crying out loud, get over it. You and the rest of the left don't, didn't and won't deserve the apology, and Ms Fluck, er Fluke, decided that she's too small a person to accept the apology.
*
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 3:14am.
deleted due to duplicate posting error.
Thank you, Mr. Liberal Lefty Democrat; your ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:03am.
calm, cool, and dispassionate contribution, on this most conservative site, as a Democratic Party standard bearer for Obama and
yourhis ilk is greatly appreciated.Your renowned
hatred of all things Rushability to call out both sides of the political aislewhenever it suits your agendaat the drop of a hat is acceptedas the usual bullshit we get from youin the spirit in which it was offered.Thank you, again, for your concerns.
We shall waste no time in looking into your talking points.
MD
MD, How do you get your computer to draw lines through...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 4:27am.
words? Oh, BTW, I agree with everything you said. I also don't waste my time in looking into the Liberal Lefty Democrat's talking points. I instantly stop reading when I come across his three lettered name.
webster......Below the comment field click on
Submitted by Rush Fan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 4:44am.
Switch to rich text editor. To the right of Normal are buttons for Bold, Italic, Underline and
StrikeThrough. If you hover your mouse over the buttons you can see the buttons identification.. Just highlight the word (s) you want to strike through and click on the Strike Through button.Thanks, Rush Fan ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:55am.
Jim, there you go.
I was busy for a bit there, composing a post to
bust the ol' Liberal Lefty Democrat's bareply to Jer.Sorry for not getting back to you.
MD
That's interesting, webster...it pretty much blows your
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:34am.
credibility with respect to the comment quoted below which you posted eight minutes earlier:
This guy Jer is a far left Liberal and anything he says is...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 3:19am.
the same exact stuff you are apt to read on the Media Matters or Daily Kos websites. In other words, when you read his stuff, you should consider the source.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2012/03/05/sign-our-petition-defen...
Good evening Jer
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:06am.
Pretty words probably written by Ed's lawyer. Ed's sincerity scores zero and its nice of you to support a fellow liberal. Your support, however, also scores zero.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
Good evening cocodrie...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:13am.
I support the nature of Schultz's apology. I've never supported Schultz. You should know that. The fact that you don't says a lot about the worth of your opinion.
Jer
Jer
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:19am.
Ed's apology was well written but Ed was totally full of the usual BS. He didn't mean a word of it and he's still vomiting out the same old bile.
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
cocodrie, 1) If a Liberal
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:33am.
cocodrie,
1) If a Liberal would have said what Limbaugh said, Jer and his Liberal buddies would have said nothing about it.
2) If a Liberal would have given the apology that Limbaugh gave today, using his exact words, just from the Left, the likes of Jer would be cutting and pasting it as classy, awesome, amazing, incredible, worthy of worshiping.
I am so sick and tired of the double standard, hypocrites, easily led tools, attack religious freedom, mysoginists of the Left and the easily led tools like Jer.
I am in no mood to read Liberal crap. I already took on quite a few radical Left wing professors in my university and handed their lunch.
I will ask Jer what I asked the idiotic professors I work with....If calling a woman a slut or any other synonym of it is such a horrific, mysoginists thing to do...where is Jer's petition and his countless Liberal followers demanding that HBO remove Bill Maher? Jer? Buller...Buller? Hypocrites, Hypocrites?!
It speaks volumes about Jer and his Liberal buddies how unwilling they are to accept Limbaugh's apologize, but how they worship and kneel down at the feet of Ed Schult'z apology.
As Andrew Breirbart said, fight fire...with fire!!!
Good evening LL
Submitted by cocodrie on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:53am.
Exactly
Jesus Loves You so much He died for you
cocodrie, When Liberals
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:20am.
cocodrie,
When Liberals start a full fledge movement to have Bill Maher removed from HBO for his mysoginist attacks and insults on Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman and Conservative women, I will take their fake outrage against Limbaugh seriously.
When Liberals start a full fledge movement to have the likes of Mike Malloy, Jeanin Gerafolo (is that how you spell her name) and countless other prominent Liberals worshiped by the left who constantly use digusting, vile insults against Conservative women, to be removed from movies, t.v. shows, air wavies, etc., I will believe the fake outrage of the Left.
All you have to do to see the hypocrisy of the Left is speak to your Liberal friend, read DailyKos, huffington post, Thinkprogress.org, and any other radical Left wing site. While they condemn Rush Limbaugh, in the SAME EXACT posting, they will call all types of vile names Conservative women when their hypocrisy is pointed out.
Pay attention, Liberallies and cocodrie...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:31am.
I can't stomach the lefty blowhards. For example, I've previously posted that Maher is a "worm", a "son of a bitch", and a "towering asshole who should be thrown off the air" because of his inexcusable slurs regarding Palin and others. I've said even worse about Malloy.
Admittedly my rhetoric was perhaps a tad too colorful, but what have the two of you done as far as criticizing the Right in furtherance of the cause for more civil discourse?
Jer
Jer, Conservatives are not
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 2:04am.
Jer,
Conservatives are not the ones who have countless of campaigns to take off the air the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck.
We do not have militant Left wing foot soldiers who call, email, write letters, etc to have personalities they disagree with thrown off the air.
I could careless what Mike Malloy, Jeanine Gerafolo, Bill Maher and the rest of your Liberals buddies say if it wasn't for the fact that Liberals LOVE to claim that Right wing talk is so hateful, vile, digusting, etc.
Politics is FAR from being about civility. This is a FARCE, a lie, a pathetic attempt from the Left to silence the Right. Read up on how Jefferson and Adams went after each other. When do you think it first came out that Jefferson may have fathered children with his slaves? Recently?! hahaha....this started during his Presidential run!!!!
It is the Left who is constantly screaming and demanding civility from the Right while at the exactly the same time applauding, laughing with, putting on pedestals Left wingers like Maher, Malloy, Randi Rhodes, Gerafolo, Olbermann, Pelosi, Obama and countless of Left wingers who use vile, disgusting, radical, stereotypicals attacks which if these were used by the Right, the Left would be screaming, "How uncivil!"
So, I ask you again, what have YOU done to push the Left to meet the civility that you demand from the likes of Rush Limbaugh? where are your petitions, mailings, calls, movement to have Bill Maher and his ilk on the Left removed from the public eye? where is your campaing to have DailyKos shut down for the vile, disgusting attacks against Conservatives, Conservative women?
When I see the Left, YOU, demanding from the Left the same level of civility you demand from the Right, when I see the Left, YOU, taking acting against hateful, vile, disgusting Left wing personalities such as Bill Maher, I will take your fake outrage seriously.
Can you answer the question? Where is your petition demanding that bill maher be removed from HBO? how many of your Liberals buddies have you taken along with you? hmmm....against Mike Malloy, against Gerafolo, against Olberman, against all the hateful personalities on the Left?
You demand and expect action from the Right, but not from the Left. It is the Left who constantly demands civility, but act like disgusting pigs!
And what exactly, Jer, do you think an ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:21am.
Obama loving lefty opinion is worth on this site?
That would likely be ZERO.
Minus zero.
Times zero.
You funny guy.
MD
cocodrie ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:15am.
That would be the sum, also, of ol' Jeringo's actual, sincere, heart-felt concerns, as a lefty lib, for us here on the right, posting on our own fine conservative site. Zero.
I understand that word is also indicative of all the positive accomplishments of Jer's messiah, AND his administration. Zero.
It is also a very descriptive word for ol' purple-lips himself. ZERO.
MD
Jer, Liberal
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:09am.
Jer,
Liberal thinking.....
Liberal talking head apologizes = Classy, great, amazing, time to worship and kiss his behind.
Conservative talking head apologizes = Fake, sanctimonious, evil, not ment, self-serving.
hahahaha!!!
You Liberals are such hypocrites. Kind of sad you know.
AND
What's the matter Jer, can't stand the TRUTH!
LOL
Love it how Rush Limbaugh can make the head of Liberals explode.
Liberallies...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:28am.
Please point out what you believe to be inaccurate in the following statement from my earlier post, portions of which I've emphasized.
Contrast it with the sanctimonious, self-serving, finger-pointing, ideology-reeking diatribe against Democrats and liberals authored by Mr. Limbaugh as PART of an apology which Bozell implies the very targets of Rush's scorn should "accept".
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2012/03/05/sign-our-petition-defen...
Thanks...
Jer
Jer, here you
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:40am.
Jer,
here you go...
"Contrast it with the sanctimonious, self-serving, finger-pointing, ideology-reeking diatribe against Democrats and liberals authored by Mr. Limbaugh as PART of an apology which Bozell implies the very targets of Rush's scorn should "accept""
Every single word you wrote is inaccurate and full of Liberal propaganda from an individual who can bring himself to say, "Ok, good, I disagree with Rush Limbaugh, but I am glad he apologized!"
When you start a petition to ban Bill Maher and make it internent wide, I will believe your silliness Jer, until then, all you are is silly talk and as bad as Sandra Fluke, incapable of putting partisan politics aside!
Sincerity
Submitted by GregE on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:35am.
I believe Ed was sincere in his apology. I believe Rush was sincere in his apology.
Apologizing doesn't mean one must change to agreement with the idea espoused by the person who you personally "attacked" (for lack of a better word). Ed still doesn't agree with Laura Ingrahm, but his apology was not about philosophical disagreement, it was about words used personally against her. Rush still doesn't agree with Sandra Fluke, but his apology was not about philosophical disagreement, it was about words used personally against her.
All that being as it is and was, the media reaction is off the chart different. Night and day. Rush is a big fish in the pond, and the Left are crocodiles that have been sitting on the bank for years, waiting for moments on which they can pounce. There have been some, and their organization and vitriol in recent years has them salivating this time. No apology would have been accepted. Rush could have severed his legs and said it was to show how sorry he was, and it would not have made any difference to the Left. No apology, zero apology would be accepted, because they taste blood in the water, they see an opportunity to take down the biggest fish. Sandra Fluke cannot accept the apology, as it would dampen the Left's current campaign. And that is what it is, a campaign. Rush's words against Sandra Fluke don't truly matter to them, but they if they think they can use those words to push to silence the big fish that has evaded them for years, damn the forest, let's take down that tree.
This guy Jer is a far left Liberal and anything he says is...
Submitted by jawebster1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 4:19am.
the same exact stuff you are apt to read on the Media Matters or Daily Kos websites. In other words, when you read his stuff, you should consider the source.
I recommend to everyone but Jer that they sign the "IstandwithRush.org" petition. I just did.
Continue doing what you are doing Rush. Our Nation needs you more now than ever!
Oh, alright webster...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 4:20am.
I won't sign it.
Jer
However, it seems to be an appropriate time to pull up
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:18am.
this golden oldie from an occasion when you were posting similar inanities:
Webster, your relentless ignorance is becoming tedious
Submitted by Jer on Sat, 08/06/2011 - 4:15am.
as hell.
This is one of the numerous less than flattering comments I've posted about Pelosi [and Harry Reid] over the years:
"However, I've said it before and I'll say it again: Pelosi was a miserable choice for House leader. The last thing Obama needed--or the majority of Americans wanted--was a San Francisco far left/liberal in charge of shaping and passing the Democratic agenda. As for Harry Reid, well...he's just a feckless buffoon."
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2010/11/02/dan-rather-compla...
That was eight months ago and was one of the more generous compliments I've paid the lady. I've blasted Olbermann and Maddow, called for Schultz's firing and referred to Maher as a "towering asshole:". Does that sound typical of liberals, son? How about providing a few of your criticisms of conservatives, hack? Then I might grant a neutron of credence to your ill-informed, thoroughly unsupported and unsupportable, utterly worthless blather.
Jer
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/08/05/rush-limbaugh-catc...
****************************************************************************************************
So, genius, since you apparently hang out at dKos and Mediamatters more than I do, perhaps you'll be kind enough to post some comments from those sites which are the "same exact stuff" like the examples I posted above.
Jer
Day-um, Jer ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 6:11am.
"relentless ignorance", "son", "hack", "ill-informed, thoroughly unsupported and unsupportable, utterly worthless blather", "genius" ---
No wonder Jim doesn't bother reading your posts.
Why don't you get really serious, though, and hit him with that deadly left-right combination of yours that references no links?
Think of all the time you could save by typing out "no links" in place of "ill-informed, thoroughly unsupported and unsupportable, utterly worthless blather."
No charge. :o)
MD
matthew...
Submitted by Jer on Wed, 03/07/2012 - 6:08pm.
if you had bothered to devote a few minutes to utilizing NB's search engine, tracking feature, or simply following the links I posted to the contemporaneous threads, you would understand why I responded to webster in the manner indicated. But it does require a degree of legwork which you, as we all know, find too onerous to trouble yourself with ascertaining background, context and motivation.
Frankly, I was easy on webster under the circumstances. If you had been the target of a string of similar trollish potshots it would have undoubtedly provoked one of your notorious "shove it up your ass sideways" injunctions. In fact, I suspect this present comment of mine may trigger a like reaction inasmuch as you have exhibited a clear proclivity for meltdowns in the face of considerably less critical posts.
Jer
Au contraire, Jer---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 03/08/2012 - 2:45am.
I was just siding with a fellow conservative against your regular lefty lib insults.
No need to "track anything down; you do that "oh woe is me" crap all the time around here; and it is duly noted by most; who see it as just an ordinary outing by you and nothing to get up in the air over.
I just respond to your posts as a way to encourage involvement and engagement from a fellow word wizard. I suffer neither illusions nor delusions as to my ability to alter your life course away from your beloved Democrat Party and adoration of Obama.
I certainly hope your inveterate use of such clever little tidbits referring to my unruly temper, my unwarranted explosions, my camouflaged racism, my ill concealed anger, my obvious hatred for all things liberal, my flights of fancy wherein I misrepresent or out and out lie about EVERYTHING you post, my notorious "shove it up your ass sideways" injunctions and my "clear proclivity for meltdowns in the face of considerably less critical posts", continues to provide you with the much needed solace you require after an exhausting day of posting lefty liberal stuff on a conservative site and then, horrors, having to justify same against the onslaught of the hordes of conservatives unexpectedly encountered on a conservative site.
My, my.
Life's a bitch, then we all die.
:o)
MD
Calling Fluke a prostitute is
Submitted by GrannyGrump42 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:29am.
Calling Fluke a prostitute is an insult to prostitutes, who only ask people to pay for sex that they actually get.
Not to mention prostitutes' standards are higher. Think about it -- whoever's pounding Fluke isn't even willing to chip in whatever it costs to buy a condom nowadays. I doubt you'll find a prostitute anywhere in America willing to bang a guy who is that cheap.
So it's the streetwalkers to whom Rush owes an apology.
Rush owes ol' Jer an apology, too, GrannyGrump, cuz ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:33am.
Rush is gonna cause Jer to have a heart-a-stroke.
MD
Oh, please....
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:49am.
This stuff relaxes me.
Jer
Sure, Jer, your strident posts reference Limbaugh are ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:58am.
such a perfect example of your relaxed state.
MD
You'll have to take my word for it...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:41am.
I'm not posting any videos of that either.
Jer
No can do, Jer, as your 12:31 reply to LL & cocodrie ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 2:53am.
is ample proof that your desire to be seen as being critical of the Left when necessary is completely unrealistic when you attempt to portray the Right as being as nasty, vicious, and untruthful as the Left unfailingly is.
I will grant that I have never known you to intentionally lie; but the leftist lens through which you peer while fervently defending players and policies on the left, that do not merit that defense, is so distorted as to render a required tender of 'No, thank you" to your "You'll have to take my word for it..."
Thanks all the same; but no thanks.
MD
Matthew, you are the pure ideologue...
Submitted by Jer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 4:16am.
thoroughly convinced of the infallibility of your beliefs and the righteousness of your cause against the perfect evil of liberalism. To you it is irrelevant whether or not Fluke is in fact a slut or whether or not labeling her one is fair. Whatever is done or said in the name of good in the crusade against the enemy of good is perforce ennobled and thus eminently justified--regardless of its fairness and despite any adjudication to the contrary by an unbiased yet unenlightened umpire. And it is why you find a request for corroboration not just bothersome but frankly offensive, as if the Almighty were being pressed for proof of a moral absolute.
Jer
Not too bad an attempt, overall, Jeringo, with your ---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 5:40am.
oft attempted mind reading schtick; but I would advise against depending on it as a steady source of extra income as a retiree.
I am convinced of the infallibility of conservatism over liberalism; but admit that human foibles all too often sully what could otherwise be a very gratifying and fulfilling ideology and lifestyle for those who choose to follow it.
I certainly don't consider liberalism to be the 'perfect evil' you say I do; because you libs prove time and time again that you screw things up so badly that nothing under your purview could ever be mistaken for perfection.
Again, you have no earthly idea what is or is not relevant to me personally; and you certainly have no idea what my ruminations regarding Sandra Fluke are or aren't.
As a reply to this:
"Whatever is done or said in the name of good in the crusade against the enemy of good is perforce ennobled and thus eminently justified--regardless of its fairness and despite any adjudication to the contrary by an unbiased yet unenlightened umpire."
I say this:
You really should stop channeling ol' Henry Clay; that kinda flowery Victorian shit will rot your brain.
Though I imagine it will be just another shot in the dark, I will state again that I am not required to provide corroboration for my opinion. I am starting to suspect that you get off on using any word that has more syllables than 'watermelon'.
Lastly, old pip (from the Edwardian era, I hope, and not the Victorian Age), I find your link requests to be neither bothersome nor offensive.
See my tag/signature line - I find them hysterical. :o)
MD
Signed petition now that it is fixed.
Submitted by David Kramer on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:51am.
Funny how leftists are all about open and frank discussion, until they are not.
Hey lefties, can you tell me what the now allowable times and definitions to be used for such words? It is kind of hard to follow your established rules when they only apply to us conservatives. I think we will just use your leftists patterns for now on as the base ruling system.
In other words, anything goes.
Does it not just piss off the leftists when we use their rules and their tactics against them?
Names of all advertisers who bailed out on Rush
Submitted by Hausmaus on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 6:55am.
We need the names of all the advertisers who bailed out on Rush immediately so we can stop using these cowards's products right away. Multiply 20 million by 5 and you'll get a pretty good idea how your bottom line is going to fade into the wind. This list must be made available, and posted for a month so everybody who used these products can make up their minds.
Trailer Trash Logic
Submitted by JCLINE on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 9:54am.
Isn't it just like a liberal whack job to compare Apples to Oranges?
Somewhere above this on this page some liberal Trailer Trash made the assertion that we are losers because Fox news and Brent Bozell at MRC also supply contraception through their employers insurance. The circumstances surrounding Fox and MRC are fine and good, no problems there because these are both non religious organizations and including contraception does not go against the freedom of religion or the first amendment, however it does serve to prove that conservatives do not hate Woman and in fact take every measure to insure that a woman’s right to contraception is being fully protected.
Trailer Trash in her urgency, forgot that the real debate here is about a President unconstitutionally mandating that contraception be distributed through the Catholic Church and other religious institutions, something that is strictly against their religious beliefs and an aberration to their first amendment rights.
As far as the posting of pornography on the web...a request such as that is pure absurdity and since the left chose for absurdity they were met with it.
Trailer Trash should get the story straight before trying to school people on Virginia law, because this is not about Virginia law this about the US Constitution and the laws therein.
You see it matters not if your rights are trampled,
Trailer Trash, like her liberal and democrat confederates will use every means to justify their nature of changing the topic of the debate to suit them instead of dealing with the facts .
Trailer Trash Logic
Submitted by JCLINE on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 9:54am.
Isn't it just like a liberal whack job to compare Apples to Oranges?
Somewhere above this on this page some liberal Trailer Trash made the assertion that we are losers because Fox news and Brent Bozell at MRC also supply contraception through their employers insurance. The circumstances surrounding Fox and MRC are fine and good, no problems there because these are both non religious organizations and including contraception does not go against the freedom of religion or the first amendment, however it does serve to prove that conservatives do not hate Woman and in fact take every measure to insure that a woman’s right to contraception is being fully protected.
Trailer Trash in her urgency, forgot that the real debate here is about a President unconstitutionally mandating that contraception be distributed through the Catholic Church and other religious institutions, something that is strictly against their religious beliefs and an aberration to their first amendment rights.
As far as the posting of pornography on the web...a request such as that is pure absurdity and since the left chose for absurdity they were met with it.
Trailer Trash should get the story straight before trying to school people on Virginia law, because this is not about Virginia law this about the US Constitution and the laws therein.
You see it matters not if your rights are trampled,
Trailer Trash, like her liberal and democrat confederates will use every means to justify their nature of changing the topic of the debate to suit them instead of dealing with the facts .
I don't get it
Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:36pm.
I don't get it, Rush has issued a public apology, so that should be the end of it. Just WHY does he need my support? Even if, and it;s a mighty big if, the liberals are successful in trying to get all his sponsors to "boycott" Rush's show, he worth MILLIONS! He can afford to start his own radio network.
Try as anyone might, you really can't force people to stop broadcasting their opinions to the entire world, if that is what they wish to do. There's FAR to many venues available for these type of "censorship" attempts to be effective. So, just what will this "petition" actually accomplish? It';s not like Rush is liable to disappear from the airwaves any time soon. His loyal fans will still listen to him, even if he is only broadcasting on a single ham radio station!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.