Open Thread

For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: ClimateGate reveals attempts to subvert scientific review.

We’re only beginning to analyze and understand the full implications of these emails and the associated data. Among other things, however, these emails suggest that a number of highly reputable climate scientists had been conniving for years to prevent other researchers from obtaining the data needed to replicate climate science results. At the same time, these scientists appear to have colluded to subvert the whole peer review process in order to prevent critical or contradictory results from being published. This violates the whole social contract that is the basis of what we call science.

Aren't liberals the ones usually whining about putting 'science' before 'ideology'?

NB Staff
NB Staff