Open Thread

  • Bookmark and Share

For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: 40 percent of 2009 income taxes to go towards paying the interest on the national debt.

If you think those town hall meetings over health care were fierce, wait until Americans come to understand the threat to our national financial survival posed by the interest on the government's credit card.

When the government spends more than its revenue, there is a budget deficit. These deficits are paid for by Washington selling interest bearing Treasury securities. If the government were ever to default on its promise to pay periodic interest payments or to repay the debt at maturity, the United States economy would plunge into a level of chaos that would make the Lehman bankruptcy look like a nonevent.

Will Congress make the tough--or maybe not so tough--decisions?

Read commentsFree email alertsTake action

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This had me reaching for

This had me reaching for the duct tape this AM:

Polanski Depressed in Jail

So after 30 years,  now he is depressed, because he's actually in jail, instead of just hanging around Europe, and we are supposed to feel sorry for him?

Well, Boo-freakin'-hoo!!

 

Well said,

Well said, mb.

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

He should be depressed

He should be depressed. He should be depressed until he is depressed 6 feet underground at the end of his miserable life. I hope he rots for a very long time in jail, no quick outs by either eary release, suicide, or execution.

Last Chance

I think the elections of 2010 and 2012 will be the last chance to change the death-spiral that is looming for America.  The United States of America will still exist, of course, even if we continue on our current path.  The death-spiral I am referring to is the death of freedom, market capitalism, and what's left of our constitution and republican form of government.

I think one message will resonate with the vast majority of voters in 2010 and 2012.  Governement is corrupt.  Government cannot be reformed.  The more power and the more money that flows to governement, the more corrupt it becomes.

The only way to stop government corruption and the squandering of our money and personal liberties is to reduce the size and power of government.  Some drastic changes need to be made, and soon, or America as we know it will be lost forever, if it's not allready.  

"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber.  Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them."  Judge Smails 

→ It's a foot race

If the Liberals can push enough Americans to the tipping point, the point at which they are addicted to government giveaways, the march is irreversible.

Unemployment is a good thing for Liberals in a twisted sort of way. 

It's Bush's fault.

It's Bush's fault. I really don't know why. It's just been thirty minutes since someone said so, so I thought I'd pitch in and do my part.

→ KC

"It's Bush's fault" really doesn't require qualification.

It's a stand-alone axiomatic, universally accepted, fact. 

If it wasn't for Bush

 

Mary Jo Kopechne would still be alive.

http://gjresult.com

 

→ How true

I'm thinking Bush Sr. had an appointment with Kennedy that day, but couldn't make it because little George had gotten in trouble at school. 

If it weren't for Bush

The Broncos wouldn't have beaten the Patriots in OT yesterday.

Chai

“It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world.” —1906 Nobel Peace Laureate Theodore Roosevelt

no way to do it

Can't make it through a day, let alone an hour without someone blaming something on Bush.  If it wasn't you, someone else would have, kinda like the rising and the setting of the sun.

-Jon

I have a thought on the congress doing their job.

 

The Constitution lists all the powers allowed to the federal government.  They are known as the Enumerated Powers.

You, each and individually, took an Oath to Uphold and PROTECT the Constitution from ALL enemies, both foreign and DOMESTIC.

Any affirmative vote to usurp the Powers Protected to the States, or to the People, respectively, is a DIRECT VIOLATION of both the Tenth Amendment and your Oath of Office.

This can, and SHOULD be treated as an act of Treason against the Constitution.

Given the current feelings of the People towards the federal government, and those who would desire to CONTROL the People...

How long before elected District Attornies  in a large number of congressional districts start enpaneling Grand Juries to discover whether or not Treason has been committed by current, as well as has been, representatives and begin pressing charges?

Have you looked lately to check out the Statute of Limitations on Treason?

Which of the Enumerated Powers does "health care" fall under?

 

http://gjresult.com

 

Which of the Enumerated Powers does "health care" fall under?

That's a damn good question! I'm sure one of the resident oBama followers can opine with some vagaries to justify this outrage.. well, in their minds anyway.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

My kind of Constitutional scholar!

We have, unfortuately, allowed the Supreme Court to twist and turn the enumerated powers to fit almost any situation.  I believe Congress could legitimately regulate health insurance via the Interstate Commerce Clause, but has historically declined to do that as long as the States do a decent job of regulating insurance companies.  

Lost in the whole health care debate is the fact that each of the 50 states has an insurance commission that regulates insurance companies.  The libs would have us believe that health care companies are free to do whatever they want.   

Back to my first paragraph.  Libs like Barney Fife believe they can go beyond the words contained in the short list of enumerated powers and the additional Congressional powers granted by a few of the Amendments.  Barney told O'Reilly these additional "powers" were "discretionary."  O'Reilly, not being a strict-constructionist Constitutional scholar, allowed BF to get away with it.

I am fairly certain that the current, relatively conservative, Court would uphold a federal law requiring health insurance policies to contain certain mandated coverages, charge certain mandated premiums, etc.  But the current court might declare as uncontitutional federal attempts to require everyone to buy personal health care "insurance."  And someone would certainly challenge such a law in federal courts.  I believe that laws requiring individuals to buy health care coverage can only be constitutional if passed at the state level.

Stop federal judges from foisting their notions of "fairness" on the States.  Amend the 14th Amendment! - tim413, JD 

IF

 

This was about 'healthcare', the commerce clause would not cover it.

IF this was about 'healthcare insurance', the commerce clause would still not cover it.

The commerce clause was designed to mediate between States.

AND not between private companies, their competitors and moving goods across State Lines.

Nor was it written to regulate any PRIVATE INDUSTRY.

 

http://gjresult.com

 

            The

            The mafia run congress cares only for themselves. The people mean nothing to them, untill election time. They lie, cheat, steal & spit on the citizens.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Rambles

I'm not worried at all.  We can have a $900 nonillion debt!  As long as those EVIL Chinese don't buy as much as a $50 Series EE Savings Bond, we can run up as much debt as we want!

(Or so some posters on NB and people elsewhere will have you believe...)

Okay, smartassing over with.  It's not hopeless. BUT...we NEED to inject some fiscal sanity into the United States beginning in 2010.  This means tossing out some of these idiots that currently inhabit the halls of Congress who truly think they have a limitless credit card. 

I would also seriously suggest that we Tea Partiers take that credit card from the Congress once and for all by ratifying a balanced budget amendment with a provision calling for the pay-down and elimination of the national debt.  Remember the good old days when Congress at least put one forward in the House and Senate, as happened in 1995 and 1996? 

We also need to privatize Social Security and see about privatizing Medicare/Medicaid (or contracting it out at huge savings to the government) and getting the government out of such industries as passenger rail, automobiles, insurance and banking.  Take the savings from that, pay down the debt; watch the dollar explode in value once again and all this talk of replacing it as a reserve currency die. 

 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Fiscal responsibility?

But how would your Red friends make a buck then? I mean, above and beyond the lopsided trade deficit.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Well, allow me to retort to the so-called "counter argument"

 But how would your Red friends make a buck then?  Yep.  Call me a Communist sympathizer precisely because you have zero arguments. 

China makes plenty of money off of exports, but not enough for 80% of the country to get out of third-and fourth-world status.  Yep. even now, it is still 80% agrarian and full of desperately poor people who don't even own their own property.  And Beijing is scared to death of that very fact.  Indeed, it is a threat - modernizing its nuclear arsenal, stationing missiles near Taiwan, targeting U.S. communication, and so on.  But instead of cowering in total FEAR, I look for problems; problems that can be exploited.   

I mean, above and beyond the lopsided trade deficit.  You seem to have an obsessive devotion to the trade deficit.  So you must be HAPPY with a government that spends like drunken sailors!!!  After all, when the value of the dollar collapses, the trade deficit, which you are so obsessed with, shrinks!

Instead of me quoting it, I suggest you read, very carefully, pages 83-86 of Mark Levin's Liberty and Tyranny.  Doubtless you believe things like the Fordney-McCumber Tariff of 1922 and the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 were great and wonderful pieces pof legislation, but I'd rather not have the country go through a depression because you are obsessed with one single economic statistic. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Insane

Yeah, you being the one defending so-called 'free trade' with your friends the Red Chinese at every turn under the guise that the Reds will import a Ford truck for every peasant, thanks to their newfound prosperity and all. But, if the shoe fits.. And just how do think they are financing their military upgrades? Rice exports? You want to address the 'problem' after the horse has already left the barn? What is that? Job security for 'problem solvers'?

Now smartass, show me where I ever defended a Republican or Congress in general over their spending habits? I'll just chalk that up as a diversion from your defense of bogus trade agreements with the Reds.

I suggest you read the definition of 'free trade' - that's not what we have with the Reds, so your scare tactics are mute.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Just a thought on the repossession of America...

 

When the chinese come to repossess The United States, can we switch the collateral to former and current politicians that voted for all the Unconstitutional spending?

We ship them to china, write all debts as paid in full and begin again?

Let the politcians work off all those trillions of dollars in chinese work camps.

 

http://gjresult.com

 

You've got my

You've got my support.

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

Chinese Work Camps

I'm all for that.  

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

definitely

I can live with that.  Make sure they take the RINOs too.  We don't need them.

-Jon

PS:  How do they sleep at night knowing how pissed off we are at them?

Yeah, rinos and

 

More than a few members of the media.....

http://gjresult.com

 

To the shrieking populist

 Now smartass, show me where I ever defended a Republican or Congress in general over their spending habits? I'll just chalk that up as a diversion from your defense of bogus trade agreements with the Reds.   I will do this the exact same time you can show I am a Communist sympathizer. 

Stop blaming me for your refusal to read my posts, your refusal to analyze the situation in China in full (because being a shrieking populist is apparently more fun and easier for you), your refusal to read history, and your apparent and depressing inability to critically think. 

I suggest you read the definition of 'free trade' - that's not what we have with the Reds, so your scare tactics are mute.  Ha!  MY scare tactics???  Coming from you this is all too funny. 

When I was in China, I saw an awful lot of planes manufactured by Boeing with Chinese registry.  Are those bought with rice sales?  No.  And do you have ANY IDEA what goes into the making of an aircraft?  Apparently not, but it stimulates manufacturing far beyond Everett and Renton, WA. 

Unfortunately for you, they do in fact buy things from us - and you are falling into the same trap as their government is.  You think that somehow China is special, completely immune from history, and destined to rise forever (unless the United States turns into a protectionist country once again, no matter that protectionism did nothing to help the United States in the 1930s). 

Let me spell this out for you very slowly.  China is a threat in many respects but is not this immortal monster you so desperately depict them to be.  They are not immune to their own very big problems, nor are they immune to history.  Oh, and turning the United States into a protectionist country, because YOU think America is too weak to compete on the world stage, will only hurt, and not help. 

I'll just chalk your posts to your being a shrieking populist guided almost exclusively by emotion, and one who'd rather call people names and lie about them rather than confronting a counter-argument squarely.

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Insane Red Apologist

You're the one defending so-called 'free trade' with the Reds - that's a fact. 'If the shoe fits, wear it' or is it 'When you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that hollers is the one that got hit'? Stop barking already.

Ooo! They bought a few Boeing jets! Wowzers! What's that bring the trade deficit down to? $400 billion? That's 'free trade' alright. 

My main argument is that THEY are the protectionists. The military threat is secondary and my position as described by you is an imagination of your own creation.

You are defending the protectionist Reds, not me. What that  makes you is for the observer to decide. Comrade. lol

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

It does not concern you at all Unsane?

I'm not going to pretend that I know as much about you about economics Unsane, I know you read lots of books on the economy so perhaps you can help me understand.

Ok if  a credit card company lends money to someone and that someone only makes the minimum payments on the balance, everything is okay and both  are partoes are happy.

The borrower wants to buys guns, pay for their deadbeat sons and daughters drug addiction, buy a few guns to protect their family and pay the healthcare for the Mexican family down the street and sex change operation for their neighbor.

There comes a time when the borrower is spending much more than he is taking in and  will have to declare bankrupsy, can you tell me how the national debt is any different?

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Failure to read

Thank you for admitting you did not read my post (again).  I typed a great deal on how to deal with the debt but you rushed right past it. 

The point of my smartass comment that opened it is that ultimately I do not care who or what holds the debt.  I am pissed that it exists at all, and have been for years.  Ultimately, in personal finance, it doesn't matter who holds my debt, be it MasterCard, Visa, American Express, the bank, whoever - what matters is that I owe, and owing is bad.  Follow? 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

I did read it Unsane

I was actually focusing on this statement

"I'm not worried at all.  We can have a $900 nonillion debt!  As long as those EVIL Chinese don't buy as much as a $50 Series EE Savings Bond, we can run up as much debt as we want! "

Okay sounds like you said you were not worried about what you owe. Hmmm. So if you owe a serious amount of money, that would not only involve you, but every member of your family for generations to come, your not worried? How come?

"Thank you for admitting you did not read my post (again).  I typed a great deal on how to deal with the debt but you rushed right past it." 

I did read your idea's. Lets just say for arguments sake you are right and your ideas make a ton of money. Is it enough money pay over 12 trillions dollars, fight two wars, medicare and national defense?

I look at it like simple math. Your ideas save you 10 grand, but you owe one million dollars and debt just keeps getting higher. So please tell me why we as a nation should not be worried?

 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Ugh

No, you have NOT read it.  Again.  And again.  And again.

 Okay sounds like you said you were not worried about what you owe. Hmmm. So if you owe a serious amount of money, that would not only involve you, but every member of your family for generations to come, your not worried? How come?  Listen to me ONE MORE TIME.  I do not care about WHO I owe.  I care about WHAT I OWE.  OWING MONEY IS BAD.

Even if the national debt was 100% owned right here in the USA, it preents a huge problem: that is $11-12 trillion that could be invested elsewhere.   

I did read your idea's. Lets just say for arguments sake you are right and your ideas make a ton of money. Is it enough money pay over 12 trillions dollars, fight two wars, medicare and national defense?  You completely missed where I suggested Medicare could be privatized or contracted out for less money. 

Shawn, just as the bank doesn't demand you pay your entire mortgage right away - read it again - I would like to see a balanced budget amendment that provides for the retirement of the national debt.  Say, $500 billion a year.  (In my mind that is really the only way to FORCE Congress to pay its bills and eliminate the deficit.)  You could even write that provision to call for a longer period of time.   

Where could that money come from? Well, the federal government shouldn't be paying for education, for starters.  (That is a local government prerogative.)  Or other things.  I like symphonies, but I don't think the federal government should be paying for them via the NEA.  Donations can cover them just fine.  Or subsidies to sugar farmers - even more laughable at a time when the government wants to TAX sugar!!!  Or other farmers.  And so on. 

I have not looked at the budget in full but I bet there is lots of spending like that, that could be axed with little or no effect to funding the military (and other items as called for by the Constitution).  As for coddling and babying poor people, that needs to stop.  The debt really took off when the government decided un the mid-1960s that it really ought to baby people - the so-called "War on Poverty", which has only paid the poor to BE poor.   

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

I disagree with you about educationj Unsane

You believe cutting education from the government budget will save us money? The folks that are out of work cannot afford to send their kids to school, what are they do?  Home school them? 

I have nothing against home schooling, but you have to be qualified to do it. Do you really believe Mike Tyson can teach his children the difference between a noun and a verb?

How about  the time between 9-3 when you are home with your child and not making not at work making a living. Sorry Unsane but the cost of having dumb children and parents not working will easily offset the savings.

Okay but for the sake of argument lets say your brilliant idea saves us a 10 billion a year. Your medicare bill saves us 30 billion a year, in fact we save 200 billion a year. The debt is still 12 billion and it is building every year, I just don't see mathmatically  how we can pay it down 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Shawn?

 

Under which of the Enumerated Powers, as specified in the CONSTITUTION does the government indoctrination fall?

Should the federal government discard portions of the Constitution as they see fit?

Does the First Amendment out weigh the other nine Amendments in the Bill of Rights?

http://gjresult.com

 

I don't know Willis

I can't answer that question without doing some research. My point was not about the constitution it was the cost of not having government run education would be greater that keeping it.

My other point was there comes a time when your debt gets too large that you cannot pay it off.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

In other words shawn228...

You don't know 'why' there is a government run indoctrinartion center, but since there is an abundance of them in every community in the countrym they must be good things and maintained in spite of better plans in place?

I could suggest you actually READ the Constitution with your mind set on learning THAT WHICH YOU WERE NOT TAUGHT  in the pubic indoctrination centers in your youth.

Then question WHY were you not taught about the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, as well as the entire history of how, why, when and by WHOM this nation was envisioned, designed and DIED FOR.

Here's a good starting point.

http://www.ushistory...

 

 

http://gjresult.com

 

The constitution had nothing to do with what was being discussed

....that is why I am not discussing it. I was not taught the declaration of independence or any major history in school, I learned it myself. 

I am a immigrant to this country and I got my Green card in 1999 and have had my Citizenship since 2005.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Seriously?

You dont even have an accent. What nation were you previously a citizen

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

morning general

Vancouver British Columba Canada. Home of the  2010 Winter Olympics.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Ahh,

That explains it, although, cant say I blame you. I would like to see that boarder sealed as well, folks up there are a bad influence. : ]

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

I forgot to tell you general company

My gov thinks I am dangerous as well, why do you think I'm living here now? ;-) 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Sorry little buddy.

 

The subject under discussion, from the top line in this thread is about the interest payments on the national debt.

The national debt is a result of Unconstitutional spending by an out of control government that has violated every one of the LIMITATIONS placed on the federal government by the Enumerated Powers and the Tenth Amendment.

I gave you a link to go study up on what you claim to have superior knowledge of.

http://gjresult.com

 

Well Actually Willis

This is an open thread and the national debt is a possible talking point and If I wanted  to I could discuss how pretty my waitress at Hooters was the other day.

Again, lets journey back in time, Unsane said the government should not pay for education, I told him I disagree and my reasons for it, you decided to enter the fray and bring up the constitution. I really do not see what the constitution has to with it and I really did not feel like going over it.

"I gave you a link to go study up on what you claim to have superior knowledge of. "

Really, I said that? Well golly Willis, I know this is something you rarely do, but could you prove it?

 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

It is the rich.

  As we are aware, half of this country pays no income tax at all. Something like the top 5% of people pay half of all income tax. And those people get most of their money from investments. We nearly drove off a cliff a year ago. We did not, but the economy has a long way to go to reach the same level as a few years ago.

   I am not rich, but I invest for dividends in my ira and 401k. And my dividends/interest got cut in half. If the top earners/income tax payers are anything like this. That means the U.S governent is looking at getting only half of the money it used to get in income taxes. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Damn Graham

This bozo needs to be on a short leash:

Graham Working With Kerry on Climate Bill: http://www.politico.com

What is it with this uncontrollable desire to compromise and get along? Is there any piece of legislation that Republicans can admit is so thoroughly bad that it cannot be redeemed or fixed? 

not the piggy flu

But there's a virus among RINOs called "Rino-itis" not to be confused with Rhinitis(phonetically speaking) that has similar qualities of liberalism which has been determined to be a permanent sickness of the mind.  Only difference is that Rino-itis can be cured with a good dose of common sense plus a hard slap to the back of the head and a threat of being voted out of office, followed by some occasional therapy.

True conservatives have a natural immunity to such things.(Most of the time)

 At least that's what it looks like.

-Jon

It's snowing in The

It's snowing in The Dakotas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin.  Al Gore's probably in Hawaii or Bora Bora....

Didn't you watch "Day After

Didn't you watch "Day After Tomorrow" ?

Global Warming is going to cause a new Ice Age.  The movie said so. 

 

 

"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows."  --Boris Epshteyn

But a New Ice Age is what we need!

But we will need a new Ice Age to counter the effects of the giant sink hole that goes to the center of the earth when our nuclear power facilities melt down! 

"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber.  Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them."  Judge Smails 

It was too

It was too scary-looking...

Just like An Inconvenient Truth, Waterworld, Wall*E, Mad Max, Soylent Green, the Omega Man,  Bambi...

Stupid pills

He took stupid pills to enter the Senate.  I am convinced of that.  To think that once I was impressed by his being in the House and thought he would make a great Senator from SC... 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

How Much Power Is Too Much?

Neal Boortz has an absolute must-read today:

This week the House Financial Services Committee is set to mark up
legislation that would create a new federal Consumer Financial
Protection Agency. This would be an agency in charge of regulating
products; anything from credit cards to home loans.

The money question at the end:

...what do you call a system of government where the financial sector and
the means of production are privately owned, but controlled by
government?

Nobel for Nukes

Time magazine saying that the nuclear bomb should get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping the peace for fifty years:

Why the Nobel Peace Prize Should Go to Nuclear Weapons: http://www.time.com

"Instead of fantasies about a nuke-free planet where formerly bloodthirsty humans live together in peace, what the world needs is a safer, more stable nuclear umbrella."

I have to wonder if countries like Japan, Australia, and South Korea and most of Europe really believes that they live under an American nuclear umbrella with the Bamster in charge? Would you?

I'm already feeling it.

My wife and I are going to build our winter home in her country. The dollar has slipped 20% in just the last couple of months against her currency. It's only going to get worse unless this collective horses ass (Congress and Barry) is stopped.

Pretty soon we'll be asking Zimbabwe for foreign aid.

Rand Paul

Rand Paul has opened a campaign office (for senator) next door to my business office in Florence, KY. 

From what I know about him, he IS NOT a Conservative, as he and his supporters claim and he is VERY soft on Obama, including Obamacare. I think he was one of the "White Coat Drs." at that phony Dr photo op at the White House last week.

Where am I going wrong?

→ Is today Columbus Day?

I was thinking Google would put the Santa Maria, Nina, and Pinta, on their logo.

NOT! 

Of course

Of course not.

 

Colombus = Bad

→ Nobel winner asks for bigger bomb

Barack Obama's Pentagon is asking for a bunker buster bomb much larger than the current MOAB. 

Will this one be the MFOAB?

Atomic Annie

The President's advisers have responded thusly:  I believe we should reinstate Atomic Annie, post haste!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Interesting...

"When the government spends more than its revenue, there is a budget deficit."

Is this kind of like what happened during the last 8 years?  I don't recall the Bush tax cuts paying for themselves.  In fact, they've added hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars to our deficit.  The tally is still going... How is that responsible governance?  I also don't recall the Iraq war paying for itself as many, including Dick Cheney, said it would.  What are we up to now?  600-700 billion?  Conservatives don't have a leg to stand on in this debate so stop posturing.  Besides wasn't it Dick Cheney that said something about Reagan teaching us that deficits don't matter? Am I really supposed to take "real" conservatives seriously? This must be some sort of joke.

Actually, if you were

Actually,

if you were paying attention, back in 2007 (before the mortgage meltdown) the deficit was down to $80 Billion.

I'm sure you weren't aware of that.   Huffpoo and Duh-lyKos do not deal in facts.

 

"President Obama is learning on the job and it shows."  --Boris Epshteyn

Leg to stand on?

I love it when a liberal pablum puker opines about spending and how terrible it was of Republicans, namely RINOs - not conservatives, to spend all of this money when their boy oBama has succeeded in quadruppling the debt! lol..

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Not to mention

Bush's Tax cuts increased revenue. But who here thinks we pay way to much for our Gov? Every program they run, fails. If these programs were run as Gov contracts we may sorta get our monies worth, but if we encouraged responsibility instead of handing out crutches, we may not need most of these hand outs at all

The Fed/Obama Admin is trying like heck to grow the non-contributer, to bribe them for votes. Once they succeed in getting 51%, the tyranny will be complete 

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Free he has a point

He certainly could have phased it a little bit better, but Bush administration doubled the national debt. In no way am I saying Obama is doing any better, but almost doubling a 5 trillion and change national debt is pretty scary.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

→ You're right Shawn

When Bush sent those Planes into the Towers, he should have brought in cheap Afghani labor to stimulate the economy and rebuild them. /sarc

I'm sure he was trying to do what was right Cool

I am just saying that under his watch the national debt grew wildly out of control and there was nothing fiscally consevative about his spending , I would say many republicans would agree with that.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

→ I agree too, Shawn

He sold a bunch of favors to get a buy-in on the Iraq War, only to have those Liberals (Hillary , Kerry, etc) whine they were fooled. 

Bush isn't off the hook on this.  It seems the Liberals point to Bush as a reason to quadruple anything Bush ever did.

Let's get to work

Shawn, ultimately everyone from Kennedy onward is responsible - as are the voters for not giving a rat's behind about the debt.  

Time for us to just shut up and fix it instead of engaging in stupid blame games.   

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Agreed    "I have a

Agreed 

 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

There's always a 'But..' with you liberals

EOM 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

→ Yes, Rock

Liberals are notoriously prone to dabbling in buts. 

And some are even into

And some are even into butts.

I thought this was a

 

Bawney fwee zone?

http://gjresult.com

 

Sergeant Rock

It seems to me by reading your opinions about the national debt in this and other threads, you are very concerned about the national debt particularly with what we owe the Chinese

I was merely bringing up the fact that the poster had a point about the Bush administration adding on to the national debt, what did I say that bothered you so much?

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

But..

The liberal 'But' argument is tiresome. Noone here is defending Bush or Republican spending habits overall. So, that dog won't hunt.

Meanwhile, no meaningful criticism on your part of oBama's spending, but rather a lead-in to your 'But Bush..' reply.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

SR

Well considering you did a troll alert then EOM, I was pointing out that the poster made a good point. He used a little bit of sarcasm, "but" who doesn't?

I have criticized our Presidents scary spending on many occasions, but since he commented about Bush and you called him a troll, I kind of thought it was topic. Unlike you when someone tells me how bad of job Obama is doing, I would discuss that instead pointing fingers back to Bush. 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Shawn

Shawn

  • The poster has been here 3 years, but just started commenting 9 days ago
  • The poster complaigned about something Bush did, while ignoring Obama's tripling or even quadrupling of the same thing
  • The poster has disapeared, and not replied.

 

Walks like a Troll, quacks like a Troll, etc . . .

Quack.. Quack.. Quack..

An even better explanation. 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Sarge & Free

Yes, but Bush... Sure our deficit is XX, but Bush... Yes, Afghanistan is a problem for Obama, but Bush... Yes, unemployment is the highest it's been in decades, but Bush.... Yes, I can't get my toilet to flush, but Bush...

 

Okay Free

No biggie, I thought he made a valid point. I do see your point about the long membership think.

Anyways I got the Columbus day off and glad to be able to post with the NB day shift today :-)

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Ah yes . . . Financial

Ah yes . . .

Financial companies give Columbus Day off.

Viva Capitalism!!

Welcome to the dayside, Shawnee

:)

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

I was only gone four days, and you guys already have shawn ...

...tracking plants.

LOL-Sheesh, one day I am going to log in here and shawn's going to be a John Bircher, member of the NRA, and driving a gas-guzzling Hummer while leading a revolt against the HA nazis that won't let him grill on charcoal in his own backyard.  :-^)

-Dave

You'd be proud, Dave

You had a whole host of stand-ins on the troll-patrol welcoming committee.

Also, we've identifed a new trend here.  We have the regular paid trolls, from the Obama Schlock Hucksters of Internet Trolling (h/t Free)....and then we have the Volunteers (lol, Lame)....trolls of the really stupid variety.

Welcome back, O Great Troll Welcomer.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

J,

LOL-Well, I hope you guys made their miserable lives a living hell.

BTW, I posted that pic you sent me on my blog.

-Dave

Oh we did, never fear.

The only thing that dawg's missin' is JORTS.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

".and then we have the

".and then we have the Volunteers (lol, Lame)....trolls of the really stupid variety."

How do you tell the difference? They're all really stupid.

Thx B

Lots of good post today. I did not think it would have been as interesting because people tend to drink more during the night shift ;-) 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

"No biggie, I thought he

"No biggie, I thought he made a valid point."

He didn't even do that. As Sarge posted, pretty much everyone here condemned most of Bush's spending. And like the typical economics-challenged lib, he incorrectly blames the Bush tax cuts for deficits. I'll give him credit though, at least he didn't say it was the Bush tax cuts for the rich. Somebody must have given him the wrong talking points, lol.

 

HEY!!! Cut Bush some slack!

 

His VETO pen was out of ink and he was saving money by not buying a new 39 cent pen.

http://gjresult.com

 

TROLL ALERTS 101

Nope. As stated in another post, what warranted the alert was not so much the content but the fact that he's been a member 3+ years and only recently posted anything. A hit and run post, no less.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

A Drive by Troll . . .

A Drive by Troll . . .

*chuckles*

ME, a Leftist?  Man, if I am a Leftist...then Rightists scare the hell out of me.  MODERATE Rightists scare the hell out of me.   

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Nation Debt vs Budget Deficit

You, yourself could have rephrased your comment a little better too.  The nation debt rose 5 times higher than the federal budget deficit. How is Bush to blame for that?

On edit, that's 5 times higher, not 5 times faster.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

What?

 Shawn,

    Source that.  ,,,Bush administration doubled the national debt.

   I have 2 woodshed forums that show President Bush was an average spender despite fighting a war on 2 fronts.

  Show us all in real dollars and as a percentage of GDP how our national debt doubled in 8 years. Then show us how much the GDP rose in that same period.

  I am not saying it did not happen. But, you don't want me to research this for you and show it is wrong, now do you?

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Well JWF

I realize that the national debt is a complicated matter, I'm sorry the only numbers I can offer is when he took over the national debt was around 5.5 trillion, when left office it was around 10 tillion give or take a few billion.

Like I said earlier, not even most republicans will say President Bush was a fiscal conservative, he spent alot of money and it could have been handled better. Could Obama have done any better? Probabaly not, it probably would have been worse, but my point is the bottom is the national debt almost doubled under President Bush. 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Focus Buddy. No one said Obama. Don't bring him up

  The charge was that President Bush doubled the national debt. That was what I questioned.

   Your own figures stated does not amount to double. doubling 5.5 is 11 trillion.

   I also stated real dollars and or percentage of GDP. We have, like nearly every other government on the planet, this thing called a fiat currency. And with fiat currencies come inflation. Inflation has been running - you know what screw it - I asked you nicely - now I will look. Let's see what happens to 5.5 trillion with inflation alone.

 

2001 - 2.83% - 5.6556 trillion

2002 - 1.59% - 5.7455 trillion

2003 - 2.27% - 5.8759 trillion

2004 - 2.68% - 6.0334 trillion

2005 - 3.39% - 6.2380 trillion

2006 - 3.24% - 6.4401 trillion

2007 - 2.85% - 6.6236 trillion

2008 - 3.85%  - 6.8786 trillion

 So, if President Bush teh evils had added another 1.3 trillion dollars only by the time he left office. That 6.8 trillion dollars would be worth exactly the same amount of money as when he came in.

 Can you now for the love of the almighty above see now now now now the error in your original doubling statement. Which I know you did not come up with on your own.

  YOU WERE LIED TO. DAMMIT MAN, WHEN I CATCH PEOPLE LYING TO ME, I GET ANGRY.

 Now, I again ask you. How much did the GDP of this country increase? Because a larger GDP can more easily handle the 3.2 trillion (your original 4.5 trillion minus the 1.3 trillion for inflation).

  Dammit Shawn, quit buying into the liberal propaganda. By the by, buddy, I am doing my own figures here. Not looking it up on some right wing website. You can do the same.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

inflation numbers come from here

No it is not complicated. Stop acting like it is.

   You are acting like a troll - I'm sorry the only numbers I can offer is when he took over the national debt was around 5.5 trillion, when left office it was around 10 tillion give or take a few billion.  

  I have explained inflation. Now let me explain the term as a percentage of GDP. In addition to inflation, the GDP of this country has gone from 9.8 trillion in early 2001 to 13.1 trillion in late 2008. An increase of 3.3 trillion, 33%. And the population has increased as well. So any new debt is spread over a larger population. That is why the only true measure can be AS A PERCENTAGE OF GDP.

  The Gross federal debt of the United States of America went from 57.4% in 2001 to 70.2%. An increase of 12.8%. THIS IS DOUBLE?

  Furthermore, YES FURTHERMORE! Furthermore, if you remove the debt the government owes itself, and only talk about the debt that actual people have in their hands in the form of an IOU. The debt burden of the U.S government went from 33.8% to 40.8%. An increase of 7%. That 7% increase to 40.8 is actually up 20%  from the original 33.8 number.

  NOW YOU TELL ME AGAIN SHAWN227, YOU TELL ME HOW 20% EQUALS OUT TO DOUBLING.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Look up the numbers yourself http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2010/assets/hist07z1.xls

JWF

I believe I did not say doubled, I said almost doubled. Okay for arguments sake just to make teh Vet happy lets say he added on 5 trillion to the national debt.

Obviously you know about this topic more in depth than I do, however like I said earlier, not many republicans or conservatives believe George Bush was fiscally conservative. George Bush has done alot of damage to the Republican party with his massive spending, this is not just my opinion, it is Rush Limbaugh's. He said in on his own show and Jay Leno's a few weeks ago.

Your back to making fun of name again? I thought we were long past that 3rd grade stuff. Also what is it with you and stacking of post one after the other, can't it be said in  1 post? Well I got off lucky with just two post stacked on top of each other, I have seen what you do with other poster's and you are relentless until they do not feel welcome anymore. If you are playing on doing that to me, I want no part. So JWF, I shawn22 iz wrong, teh vet is right..teh shawn2278 eats teh poo. Okay I hope that makes you happy. Have a nice night.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

It is not about me being right.

  It is about getting the truth out there. But we never get that do we? We get liberal lies being spread from one place to another. And no one checks. So we never actually get to talk about what it was about President Bush we disagreed with because we have to spend 2 hours knocking down a lie.

  What am I supposed to say here? Obviously you know about this topic more in depth than I do No I don't. It is called research. Did you look at my links. It is straight out of the White House Budget office. They do most of the heavy lifting.

  So here we are, 2 hours later, after knocking down the liberal lie about doubling the deficit. K.

  Yes. GWB probably did do a lot of damage. No, he was not a conservative. But I disagree on the massive part. He was an average spender of late. I believe I made that point twice in the woodshed.

  Actually, I looked. Shawn227 was a typo. Sorry. We have a thin skinned man in the White House. Is it some kind of disease?

  Finally, iffen teh shawns don't want to eat all teh poopiness, maybe teh shawn can get stuff right the first time. Or at least not be off by 80%. 20% is not doubled or almost doubled or ballpark.

  In the words of the late great Shawn45. If you miss the toilet by 80%, yer poopin on the floor pal.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Now JWF, it's all a matter of perspective.

We call them "lies" and the 'less than intellectually honest' crowd call them "talking Points".

That doesn't make them any less untrue, but it does make them feel all warm and cuddly way down deep inside.

And if it makes them feel all warm and cuddly, can it really be all that bad?

Yeah, it really is all that bad, but HEY Buddy, it's all about feeling warm and cuddly...... isn't it?

:=)

 

http://gjresult.com

 

Silly child.

 

The offer to PROVE me wrong has still gone unanswered.

They shootings aren't being done by Conservatives.

 

BUT, didn't you just try to chastise me for something? .....

Oh yeah, you said something about the Constitution has nothing to do with the violation of the Enumerated Powers....

 

http://gjresult.com

 

Well Silly Willis

When I gave my statement about Bush almost doubling the national debt, I at least provided a few numbers backing up my claim. I might have not included the GDP , the mean, the median the mode and written affidavid that JWF might have wanted, but I at least provided something.

You on the other hand said that all school and mall shooters are liberal. Lets take Dylan Klebold for example shall we? We know he did not like gays, so he was not part of a tolerance group. Did  he leave behind his ACLU card? Was he an advocate for affirmative action and universal healthcare?  I can't prove he is a liberal, I certainly cannot prove he was a republican.

You remind me of MSNBC, accusing Rush of racial slander, without backing it up with any proof and demanding Rush prove them wrong. If you want to use the liberal playbook, by all means feel free, just don't accuse them of playing dirty.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

What, am I supposed to be impressed here?

  You posted an unattributed lie. You refuse to state the source of the lie or source it yourself.

  I spent an hour of my time disputing the lie. and now you claim some kind of moral victory because techinically in a roundabout sort of way, if you twist it just so, and get the full light of the morning sun shining juuuuuussssssstttttt so, well it might be just a little true if no one really really really really bothers to look.

  This is the kind of poo I expect from nwahs, not my buddy Shawn.

  The per capita income in 1929 was $688. I make $68,000 a year. Does that make me 100 times better off than the average citizen in 1929? Does it? There is a friggin reason you use real dollars when analysing year over year monetary figures. 

 You posted a lie. I dispelled it. Now you dance and say technically you were right. Well technically I am 100 times better off than the average citizen of 1929.

 WAIT!

 Let's use a set standard like real people do that don't lie. Let's use 2000 dollars and see what it looks like.

 The average citizen made $6000 a year in 1929. And I am only making $60,000 using 2000 dollars. So I am 10 times better off than the average citizen of 1929.

 So my initial figures are off by a scale of 10. Or a 1000%.

 So knock it off with the talk about how you provided figures so technically you were correct.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

JWF

Relax you have it all wrong, I am willing to look at your figures, I admit I just don't understand them yet.  I never said techinically I was right, I was just telling Willis at least I provided some numbers, but he did not bring in any examples about the liberal only serial killers.

I always look at other peoples point of view...okay buddy? 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

All right. I will give you that it is hard to understand.

   In 1983, I was making $400 a month take home pay as an E3 in the U.S Navy. I could buy 80 cartons of cigarettes ($5 each) with that money.

  Today, I am making $4,000 a month take home pay.(example) I can buy. I can buy SURPRISE! 80 cartons of cigarettes ($50 each) with that money.

 It is called inflation (along with taxes, a lot more taxes). It is why you can not use straight up dollar figures when comparing yearly dollar amounts.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

I understand inflation JWF

Clinton took over 92 so we are not going back to 1929 or 1983. I think he raised the national debt 2 trillion. Bush raised it by close to 5 trillion.

I am not arguing with you, I just don't understand it,  please give me a chance to at least study the figures before I can debate you on it.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

edit

No, I don't think you do.

  Especially when you factor it in with a growing GDP and a growing population.

 Clinton presided over a GDP of  6 Trillion in 1992.

 It was 10 Trillion when he left.

 And it was 14 Trillion when GWB left.

Plus a growing population can handle a bigger debt as it is spread out over more people.

  The per capita GDP was 36,200 in 2001. It rose 11,100 to 46,300 in 2009. A rise of 30%. I said the debt per GDP rose 20%. Income grew faster than the debt. We had 30% more income to pay off the 20% increase in debt. Perspective. Yes, ideally, we should not be increasing the debt. But it is nowhere near doubling debt as you stated using nominal figures.

  Are we getting to the same page yet?

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

And what is there to study?

  I am giving you the figures.

  Yes, I double replied. I know it burns your tushy. Did it anyway!

I went back to 1929 to show you the vicious effects of inflation

   The per capita income was $600 in nominal dollars in 1929. What is the per capita income now? 46,000? You can't compare the 2 without adjusting for inflation. It is called an example.

  I used 1983 as a personal example. It was not about going back. It was using examples to explain the difference between nominal, real, and perspective. See my income buys the same amount of products now as it did then, but I make so much more. You can't use nominal figures when you span more than a couple of years.

  Triple replied! Somebody get a firehose. Shawn's tushy is getting charbroiled! 

Thank you the economics lesson JWF

I get it now in movie terms, Titanic is the number one most successful movie of all time, but if you adjust for inflation, many more people saw Gone with the wind or Star Wars, but it still does not change the fact Titanic is still number one does it?

I agree with lots of your points, I don't see the need to post 3 times back to back to back, If you really can bring teh funny, I figure its more quality than quanty but thats me, I'm on my way to get some Preperation H for my burnt tushy, so I will talk to you later. 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

maybe you are catching on.

Did you cheat and look it up? You still ruined it though because of the little snip at the end. You talked about the amount of people. PERSPECTIVE. The population was smaller 30, 40, 80 years ago, so a larger percentage of the population would have seen Star Wars and Gone with the Wind.

 

DOMESTIC GROSSES
Adjusted for Ticket Price Inflation*

Note: Use the adjuster tool in the upper right-hand corner to adjust into any year's dollars.

Rank
Title (click to view)
Studio
Adjusted Gross
Unadjusted Gross
Year^

1
Gone with the Wind
MGM
$1,450,680,400
$198,676,459
1939^

2
Star Wars
Fox
$1,278,898,700
$460,998,007
1977^

3
The Sound of Music
Fox
$1,022,542,400
$158,671,368
1965

4
E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial
Uni.
$1,018,514,100
$435,110,554
1982^

5
The Ten Commandments
Par.
$940,580,000
$65,500,000
1956

6
Titanic
Par.
$921,523,500
$600,788,188
1997

JWF

Layman's terms is one thing, but does something like this really need explaining? :p

 

you tell me big guy.

  I thought I was fairly clear in my write-up from yesterday.

  If you are going to make multi-year declarations in dollar terms, you either use real dollars or use it as a percentage of GDP. Shawn228 seems to be having real difficulty with the concept.

In economics, nominal value refers to any price or value expressed in money of the day, as opposed to real value, which adjusts for the effect of inflation.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_versus_nominal_value_(economics)

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

JWF

"Shawn228 seems to be having real difficulty with the concept."

I agree! I should have been more clear. I was taking a shot at shawn there. Most average-above average thinkers shouldn't need it this spelled out for them, but oh well... You're a warrior, JWF (and you're teh Vet. :)) :p

 

Careful shy

I bet you can taste the cheerios teh vet had for breakfast this morning, keep puckering up buddy 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

shawn

Okay, I won't ever again chime in on a public thread, for fear of being branded an a-kisser by shawn.

I'm not always on your side on various topics, but it's never a personal thing. Must it get you so steamed?

JWF's explanation of the value of the dollar is really basic stuff, so I can't understand why he's constantly explaining it.

 

its really simple shy

 "JWF's explanation of the value of the dollar is really basic stuff, so I can't understand why he's constantly explaining it."

I understand it shy and I just wanted to take a little time to debate him.

"I'm not always on your side on various topics, but it's never a personal thing. Must it get you so steamed?"

I have gotten into some heated arguments with some other members shy some of it pretty personal but I figure its no big deal and I just move on. I admit you are the only member that can get under my fingernails like this, the reason is because you are so sneaky about it.

When you want to flame others, you rarely reply to the poster you want to flame, you reply to another poster that flamed the poster and take glee in the pile on. I am happy teh Vet has not taken the bait.

Sorry shy, its not personal, you just get on my nerves more anyone here.

 

 

 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

shawn

I see. So I am your Jer. Or... I am your Shy, to Jer. :p

 

Jer

..regardless if you agree with him, replys directly to posters and does not name drop the people he has on his buddy list to make him look good. 

edit

Jer also fights his own battles. The people that stick up for Jer do it voluntarily, not because he asked for help

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Hi Mr Shy

Wow this is surprising, you trying to get teh vet torqued at me? Don't you have some banana phallous thingys to make?

Sorry to dissapoint you, I have no beef with JWF at all, I think he makes some great points, your just trying to stir the hornets nest as usual. You are by far the most manipulative person on NB.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

shawn

"You are by far the most manipulative person on NB."

Really?

 

You have to realize, Shawn...

Willis has his own set of rules.  He can make any outlandish allegation he wishes, repeatedly refuse to back it up, and then reject any and all evidence to the contrary as a "lack of proof he was wrong".  Other than making him a complete laughingstock at NB, it's a winning strategy.

Jer

Welcome back Jer,

I trust you've had time to ruminate on this

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

Finally found this. 

Finally found this.  Ruminated and replied.

Jer

Shawn Nilliyweester Moonheimer 227! I am calling you out.

  Sorry. I had a pretty good idea it was not true. My first stop - Wki backs me up. As a percentage of GDP -  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt

  I want your source. Someone lied to you. Who? 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

JWF

Gee, thanks for posting that link. I know it proves your point, but damn, it is depressing. 

BTW, did you happen to notice what happens between 2030 and 2040? Also notice that "net interest" becomes the single largest driver of the debt at that time.

This is scary stuff man. Never fear though, liberals, it's all Bush's fault. </sarc> 

"If the man, with the power, can't keep it under control...some heads are gonna roll." -Judas Priest

TROLL ALERT!

EOM

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Indeed. The guy has been

Indeed.

The guy has been here 3 years and only started commenting in the last 9 days ?

 

I.  Smell.  Sockpuppet!

TROLL ALERTS 101

Which warranted this alert.

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Looks like he finally got

Looks like he finally got his talking points from Eric Holder and is working to support Obama.  This could be fun!

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

→ Howzit Possible?

His first visit appears to be a week and 2 days ago.

7 + 2 . . .

7 + 2 . . .

→ I get it

So you're better at math than I am. 

Just arithmatic. I'm sure

Just arithmatic.

I'm sure you're much better at Trigonometry.

→ Heck no

Even though I was born under the sine of theta. 

Bush did it, so....

Bush did it, so it's ok that Obama has eclipsed Bush's 8 year deficit total in less than 9 months, right? Bush did it so it';s ok that Obama PROMISED that there will be a trillion dollar deficit for 'several yeas" under Obama's presidency, right?  Bush did it so it's ok that the ten year deficit forecast is over 13 trillion dollars, right?

What ever happened to the 'change" Obama promised us?  Obama is turning Bush into Bush Lite!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Have you ever noticed..

.. that liberals or democRATS are never solely responsible for anything, bad I mean? It's either strictly Republican's fault or everyone's fault. 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

I have noticed

I have noticed that.  I have also noticed that liberals consistently confuse a budget deficit with the National Debt, when the two don't have much in common.  They fail, time and time again, to understand that the National Debt's major contributor is Congress's nasty habit of raiding the Social Security '"trust fund" of cash and replacing it with Treasury bonds.  It is those bonds that are a major contributor of our National Debt.  Bush tried to stop this practice time and time again, as have other Presidents, only to be defeated by Congress.  If anyone's to blame, it's Congress.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court

Congress

Certainly that's true. But you see, to fix it, it will have to be a unilateral effort on the part of conservatives. You cannot count on liberals or moderates for help.Which has always confounded me as to why RINOs expend so much time and energy on appeasing the left when the result is a watered down version of what needs to be done.

Fixing it, is contrary to their agenda. 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Sheesh, I was up until 3:45 am getting my replacement pooter...

... up and running, after being offline for four loooooooooooooong days, and the first thing I run into is a plant from Kos/DU/Move-on/Huff&Puff.

BTW, franky, it wasn't "conservatives" who spent like drunken sailors, and if you cannot tell the difference between conservatives and RINOs,  then perhaps you should start hanging out over at Dummies_R_Us.ass.

-Dave

Welcome back, Dave

I have a pic I'm going to send you.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Bush spent a lot of OUR MONEY

trying to bring a level of civility BACK to Washington DC.

Unfortunately, after 8 years he never did figure out that 'civility' was not a goal of the socialists that took over the democrat party some decades ago.

Hateful, mean-spirited, nasty incivility and the 'politics of character assassination' were the intention of those liberals that controlled not just the democrats with an iron fist, but controlled or manipulated the RINOs in both houses.

What we NEEDED was a warrior that understood his enemy, and battled them accordingly.

 

http://gjresult.com

 

Willis

Hear hear!

Aaahh, I do love echo chambers... that is, when they are echoing TRUTH. :)

 

WLJ,

As I have often said here, Bush got it right (mostly) when it came to the GWOT, but, with the exception of the tax cuts, he blew it most everywhere else.

Conservative he wasn't, but what was worse still was his allowing the left to run roughshod over him at every turn. He flatly refused to defend himself, and thus appeared weak to many.

Much like his veto pen, the so-called bully pulpit remained unused for most of his presidency.

History may judge him differently, but as I see it, GWB is the biggest reason Barack Hussein Obama is now residing in the White House, and John McCain is the other, as he is even more socialist than was Bush, and ran a campaign that was more impotent than did Bob Dole.

-Dave

Obama was not "E lected".

 

Obama was "SE lected" by the media, just as was McKainnedy SElected to be the opponent of the chosen one.

Either way, the media was going to win the last election.

They thought they had the power to control either of their picks.

With the recent direct attacks on FoxNews, the dying media should get a clue that the next target will be them.

There are no millionaire 'reporters' in any socialist countries, and there is nobody in the scm that has figured out the relevance of that statement yet...

http://gjresult.com

 

"This must be some sort of

"This must be some sort of joke."

Almost right....YOU are the joke.

Stupidity

frankmer, thanks for this demonstration of your childishness, your desire to throw tantrums and point fingers, and your wanting the issue instead of endeavoring to solve the problem.

Your comment is laughable.  For one, you demonstrate how completely enraged you are at the fact that the Constitution calls for Congress to fund and Army and Navy.  For the other, you have NO leg to stand on here, as you want the government to turn into a whiny nanny agency whose sole purpose is to baby people with things they can really manage to get on their own - like a doctor. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Ha! Ha! Ha! Protesters at the oBamination school

Mmm.. Mmm.. Mmm.. that's good news. 

"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason

Re China

Yes China and other countries are protectionist, but let's not pretend that's mainly why manufacturing has been leaving our country for fifty years. We should do something about their protectionism, but only for the sake of the principle of free trade, not in some vain hope that it will revive American industry.

An American manufacturer faces the specter of White House-backed Big Union thuggery, the second highest corporate taxes in the world, nutball marxists masquerading as the EPA, the black cloud of Cap and Trade, high health care costs, a government that tells us what proportion of a company's workforce has to be a certain color or sex or sexual orientation, out-of-control lawsuits that can destroy a company, a broken K-12, a federal government that can take over a company with the stroke of a pen, or dictate who the CEO is, or how much management can make, crazy liberals that think profits are evil, an energy policy dedicated to the destruction of the fossil fuel industry, and of course a Marxist-in-Chief dedicated to wealth redistribution. None of these costs are borne by a factory in China.

Yes China holds much of our debt because they are a manufacturing monster, but in the absence of China that debt would be distributed among a handful of other countries that are simply more friendly to business.

Slick, good start, on an endless list.

None of these costs are borne by a factory in China.

I still dreaming of a smaller American government.... Guess I'll outsource that

 


Good points to consider

 Yes China and other countries are protectionist, but let's not pretend that's mainly why manufacturing has been leaving our country for fifty years. We should do something about their protectionism, but only for the sake of the principle of free trade, not in some vain hope that it will revive American industry.  Some ways American manufacturing can take off: 1) unions need to wither away and die, 2) American industry needs to stop making crap - as I know firsthand they can make a nice, quality product (such as what I drive, what I use for computing, what I fly in), 3) we NEED to rein in regulations.  Sure, you can have some environmental rules so that the country doesn't look like China at present (and China looks awful these days; head to Beijing, you'll see what I mean), 4) get the government at all levels the hell out of the way. 

An American manufacturer faces the specter of White House-backed Big Union thuggery, the second highest corporate taxes in the world, nutball marxists masquerading as the EPA, the black cloud of Cap and Trade, high health care costs, a government that tells us what proportion of a company's workforce has to be a certain color or sex or sexual orientation, out-of-control lawsuits that can destroy a company, a broken K-12, a federal government that can take over a company with the stroke of a pen, or dictate who the CEO is, or how much management can make, crazy liberals that think profits are evil, an energy policy dedicated to the destruction of the fossil fuel industry, and of course a Marxist-in-Chief dedicated to wealth redistribution. None of these costs are borne by a factory in China.  Now THAT'S what i'm talking about!  Most industries would rather NOT go through the trouble of locating to China or Mexico or other places.  Could you imagine, for instance, if a flat 17% income tax went in and the capital gains tax, a form of double-taxation, went bye-bye?  The investment in our own country would be HUGE, and states with the lowest levels of taxation and tolerable regulation would benefit. 

The way I see it, much of our problems - sadly, many posters and readers here miss this - in manufacturing and trade rest less with places like China and more with ourselves. 

Yes China holds much of our debt because they are a manufacturing monster, but in the absence of China that debt would be distributed among a handful of other countries that are simply more friendly to business.   Twenty years ago, it was all about Japan.  Today, it's China.  I predict that in another 20 years the populist shrieking will be all about India.  Or Brazil. 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Maybe one day

We can make it all about U.S.

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Great point about Japan

Excellent point about Japan.  I remember how the news media of the 80's railed on Reagan and Bush because the United States was falling behind Japan Inc.  The message of the media was that we needed more cooperation and planning between government and business so we could be more like Japan.  It all peaked right about the time that companies from Japan bought Pebble Beach and Rockefeller Center for hugely inflated prices.

Mainstream media has conveniently forgot the lessons they tried to teach us over 20 years ago. 

"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber.  Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them."  Judge Smails 

There is an email concerning Hiroshima and Nagasaki 64

64 years after the nuclear weapons were used to bring an end to WWII.

Both cities are thriving metro areas with awesome amounts of new buildings and infrastructure.

The comparison of those two Japanese cities with current, democrat controlled, Detroit should tell every man, woman, and child all they need to know about the philosophy of the democrat party.

 

http://gjresult.com

 

Ex-almost Marine Hillary Clinton saves day. Again.

Apologies if you've read this, or NB has covered it... but I only just spotted the news.

This is hilarious... and apparently it's NOT from The Onion, or Scott Ott.  Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Someone's not happy about the No-Idea Putz prize.

Under sniper fire, and at great danger to herself as she almost spilt her late morning latte in her lap.... that's damn hot people. Very dangerous.

No seriously, stop laughing. This breathless tale told under conditions of anonymity (it was Hil herself)

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8d7d5f00e10f34124d253754c8f59ddf.261&show_article=1
Clinton leads high-drama cellphone diplomacy from black BMW
Oct 11 02:38 PM US/Eastern

In a black BMW outside a chalet-style hotel in the foothills of the Swiss Alps, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used high-drama cellphone diplomacy to clinch a historic Armenian-Turkish deal.
 
"There were several times when I said to all of the parties involved that 'this is too important, this has to be seen through, you have come too far,'" the chief US diplomat recalled afterward on the plane from Zurich to London.

Chicago's 2016 Olympic Games bid... one more example of Obama's SMART diplomacy. 

I just heard a radio report that Obama's economic advisors...

...are saying we are heading for an economic recovery.

I am calling BS on that right now.

-BTW, as of this morning, foreclosures are starting to hit the top 1/3 of the housing market around here in earnest.

That does not bode well for the near future economically.

-Dave

Not suprised

They have been claiming this since before the stealfromus bill was passed.

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

~If you're thinking about getting the swine flu vaccine

Read this first.

Kossacks hate me. And yes, it does feel good.

Flu vaccine - Take it or leave it?

Thank you, cl3. I'd like to offer this article for your consideration as well.

Dr. Gary Null

If I have the wrong guy, please provide references.

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

~>.<

Typical.


By all means, ignore the point.

Kossacks hate me. And yes, it does feel good.

Try to be fair

What is the point? Seriously.

BTW, here's another article on "Dr." Null.

Edited to add: Do you object to someone doing a little research on the people behind the article you linked?

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

~Dr. Null

Is not 'behind' the article. I couldn't care less about him. He has nothing to do with the point of the post.

Which is:

A. The vaccine was rushed into production.

B. It is recommended for pregnant women when no tests have yet been done on pregnant women. 

Refute either one of those points, or shut up.

You are doing the same thing you did when I ferreted out the Kos plants, desperately reaching for any dirt you can possibly scrape together to make yourself a mud pie. Why don't you just use it to give yourself a facial and spare us your condescension.

Meddling old women hate me. And yes, it does feel good.

H1N1 flu vaccine

I'm sorry you can't seem to be able to move on, cl3. It's not always about you.

Dr. Null is one of the principals behind the lawsuit on which the article is based. Given his dubious reputation and his disdain for mainstream medicine, I think it perfectly reasonable to question the basis of the lawsuit.

(NaturalNews)
Health freedom attorney Jim Turner is filing a lawsuit in Washington
D.C. mid-day Friday in an urgent effort to halt the distribution of the
swine flu vaccine in America. On behalf of plaintiffs Dr. Gary Null and
other licensed health care workers of New York State, the lawsuit
charges that the FDA violated the law in its hasty approval of four
swine flu vaccines by failing to scientifically determine neither the
safety nor efficacy of the vaccines.

Note that the lawsuit seeks to halt distribution of the vaccine. I guess we'll see how far Dr. Null et al get with the case.

According to the CDC:

"During
the week of September 27-October 3, 2009, influenza activity continued
to increase in the United States. Flu activity is now widespread in 37
states. Nationwide, visits to doctors for influenza-like-illness
increased over last week and are higher than expected for this time of
year. In addition, flu-related hospitalizations and deaths are
increasing as well, and are higher than expected."

"Some pregnant women who have been infected
with the 2009 H1N1 virus have had severe illness. Overall, pregnant
women have had higher rates of hospitalization than the general
population. About 6% of confirmed H1N1 2009 influenza deaths in the US
have been in pregnant women, while only about 1% of the general
population is pregnant at any given time. One recent large case control
study found that the seasonal flu shot (inactivated flu vaccine) given
to pregnant women reduced flu illness in their infants under 6 months
of age by 63%*. This study confirms that seasonal flu vaccination of
pregnant women can benefit both mothers and infants. The Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) designated pregnant women as
one of the initial target groups to receive the 2009 H1N1 vaccine as
soon as it is available."

Key Facts

General Information

The process for development and manufacture of the H1N1 vaccine is the same as for other flu variants. The charge of the vaccine being "rushed" seems to be based on the idea that developers were starting from scratch. According to the majority of medical experts I've heard talk about the safety of this vaccine, I don't believe it to be any more risky than the seasonal flu vaccines that have been in use for many years. And since medical authorities as respected as the Mayo Clinic are recommending pregnant women be vaccinated, I don't see cause for general concern.

IMO, it's best that pregnant women rely on the advice of their doctor re: the risks associated with either the vaccine or contracting H1N1 rather than be influenced by what may be unwarranted fear. And that's my point.  Perhaps one of the regular N.B. members who has medical expertise can comment on whether the article you shared should be cause for concern.

Note: For what it's worth, I see that this lawsuit is also a topic on the Ron Paul website.

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

~Still

Didn't refute the thrust of the post. 

I find it amusing that your long-standing spite towards me goads you to these lengths.

When are you going to give up on your vendetta Debra, and get on with your life?

 

Spiteful old women hate me. And yes, it does feel good.

~QM

I don't read your PM's, they go straight to the trash bin. The only reason I would open a PM from you is if the subject line read "I'm sorry for all the hateful things I've said about your children."

Please feel free to ignore my comments. Or, just "shut your freakin' pie-hole."

Kossacks hate me. And yes, it does feel good.

chose~

Thanks for the info.  I got the regular flu shot two weeks ago and I think that's enough for me.  I'm not in the supposed high risk group for the swine flu (children, young adults) so hopefully I'll be OK. 

Mr. Shy's moral and ethical dilemma....

I might have a job designing/developing a site for a "hip, cutting edge" and, "rebel chic" line of clothes, who's items include t-shirts with the word "c*m" on them and phalic-looking symbols like bananas... Oh, and, a really cute one of Bush-with-devil horns and some dumb slogan around it.

It's money. I NEED THE WORK. And I'm in NYC, where this sort of a**jack culture is everywhere and unavoidable. If I take it, will there be a firey-hot place waiting for me??

 

Nah

Just try to hide some conservative stuff in there somewhere....Obamas**x.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

If you need the money and

If you need the money and it's the only job around, take it. 

I don't think there'll be a fiery-hot place waiting for you because of this job.   But if there is, be sure to look for me.  ;)

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

FeynmanFan

Heaven won't take me and Hell is afraid I'll take over.

 MrShy GTM

I'm sorry Shy

I have to be totally honest with you. I don't find it hypocritical if you did that, because a man has to support himself and you did what you had to do to pay the rent.

However.........Whenever you smell blood in the water, I notice that you are always the first man to jump in and you seem to get off on the teaming up on a liberal point of view, more than most others here.

I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me, but there is a certain sick type of justice for you to design a site to make your hero look like a monkey and having to right slogans like "He was  born with silver straw". ;-) 

edit 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Mr. Shy's dilemma....

Hey FeyFan & J, thanks to both of you, and very funny! :):) Yeah, I'm really living on every dime and nickel I can find in my pocket these days, so need the work... sux, I know.

As for shawn, I don't completely get what you wrote, but okay, my predicament is some type of sick justice. Got it.

 

Hi Shy

Its pretty simple, I know I should not, but I when I think of this delicious irony, it brings a smile to my face :-) 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

shawn

"Its pretty simple, I know I should not, but I when I think of this delicious irony..."

When are you going to start putting more care into your writing? It reflects bad on you when you write like this.

I really don't see the irony, btw, but whatever floats your boat.

 

People reveal a lot about

People reveal a lot about themselves by the way they react to someone else's misfortune.

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

FeymanFan

I'm not sure what you implying but I am not that type of person at all. I want Mr. Shy to be successful in his career, both as a artist and as a designer.

Mr. Shy loves to throw digs at people that criticize his man crush about anything, I just can't  help but to be amused that he might have to design a site that will do what he criticizes others for. 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Shawn

It's good that you want Mr. Shy to be successful.  We are in total agreement on that.

What I don't agree with is finding amusement in seeing someone compelled by financial circumstances to do something that makes them uncomfortable.

 

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

FeyFan

Is FeyFan okay, btw? Didn't know the first part was a word (has a few meanings, actually... :p)

Shawn's game is almost always "I want Mr. Shy to be successful...." and then the figurative (if not the literal) but follows. His tendency to do this brands him more of a liberal, from my dealings with them.

EDIT: or maybe "FeynFan" :) 

 

MrShy

"Now you can call me Ray, or you can call me J, or you can call me Johnny, or you can call me Sonny, or you can call me Junie, or you can call me Ray J, or you can call me RJ, or you can call me RJJ, or you can call me RJJ Jr., but you doesn't hasta call me Johnson!"

Whatever you want to call me is fine with me.  It's just a nom de plume anyway.

"Reason and persuasion are the only practical instruments against error.  To make way for these, free inquiry must be indulged" - Thomas Jefferson

FeyFan

Haha, okay, good to know.

I just don't wanna not be cool around here, you know? :)

 

Fey

Yes, indeed. Or, actually, what they reveal is not a whole lot. :p

 

Um, watch the "Fey"

Not cool.

"Feyn" is more appropriate.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Shy

Sorry I have the day off, my back hurts and I had a few too many happy pills. 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Hhmm

Slacker,

Are those Gov. bought "happy pills"?

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Can I have some of your happy pills?

Been having chest (actually, rib cage muscles) probs for the last week. The "pain" pills I got are just glorified aspirin! JK! I could use some happy pills! LOL!

Gary

 

POLITICS: poly (many) + ticks (blood sucking parasites)

 

shawn

Sort of reminds me of the book-long vitriolic email a once-friend sent me because I was going to bat for the other side back in the fall of 2008.

His anger and rage and hate was so blindingly red, he ripped into me on every level (he's known me since childhood) and ended by telling me I have blood on my hands from not reviling Bush.

Days later... I'm not making this up... he emails again profusely and "humbly" apologizing, and that he had a horrible tooth ache that he was dealing when he wrote his manifesto. 

Gotta love it. 

 

Shy

Shy,

I stubbed my toe last week.

I guess I missed a key opportunity to wig out on people?  ;-)

Free

Haha. I swear, I looked at that email (the second one) and couldn't believe my eyes.

Well, the first one, too, but that was not totally unforeseen as he was dropping a lot of weird, anger-fueled stuff on facebook before he completely went off in the private email.

 

Shy, Freestiker and FF

The difference here is I am not angry. I told you that to excuse my poor spelling and grammar today. It is usually pretty awful and today is its really awful.

 I would never make fun of anyone's financial position. If Mr Shy had to be a telemarketer, work at Mcdonalds, washing dishes, or cleaning elephant poop for minimum wage, I would not laugh because it wrong.

I just see the humor of this situation and very curious to see if he will accept a job that will force him to do exactly what he hates others for, if he gets paid for it.

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Shawn, Woah there!  I

Shawn,

Woah there!  I didn't say you were angry. I didn't even mean to imply it.

D*mn pills

Sorry fs, maybe Its time for me to take a nap ;-) 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

At least you didn't call me

At least you didn't call me Free Stiker this time!  :-p~

:-)  "I have a Bush

:-) 

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Free

"Freestiker".... do you hand out free stickers?

 

The first one is

The first one is free.

 

I charge big $$ after you get addicted to 'em.

Wow,

Nice, whats that about karma?

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Shy Guy: It's easy for me

Shy Guy: It's easy for me to say, but I've always found that when I make a choice based on principle, God honors that decision in ways I may have never expected. I don't think he'd punish you for taking the job. But He may have something better waiting for you if you could somehow hang on a bit longer. Whatever you decide, I hope things work out for you. Being broke sucks.

Edited to correct spelling error.

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

Hey QM

Thanks a lot for the comforting words. Yes, being broke sucks. I make decent homemade hamburgers on English Muffins, but not sure how much more of this diet I can take. :p

But seriously, it is very stress inducing, and really, I have only myself to blame. I choose to remain a freelancer...

 

THis is just cool

Artifacts from the Mary Rose, Henry VIII's flagship.

I'm tempted to just send them the 500 pounds to be a "crewman" in the effort to fully restore and display these artifacts.

My mom has been nagging me forever to take her to London....now I'm really thinking about it.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

That IS too cool,

That IS too cool, Blonde...I love that sort of thing.  Thanks for sharing it!

Kat

Glad you enjoyed it.

If you love that sort of stuff, bookmark the UK Daily Mail site....they always have cool stuff there, and the reporting on Obama is a little more to our liking, too.

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

PM Cameron???

Go to London, early in June. 

And watch the downfall of Gordon Brown, too. 

:-) 

"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)

Going to Britain.

I'll have to tell you some time about my parents trip to Britain. They planned it for years and years and when it finally happened, dad ended up in a hospital (amputated his leg), long story, But my little brother and sister saved the day! Mom loves Britain! I want to go there too! And my uncle lived many years in CR! I almost got to go, drat! Take her, you'll be happy you did. 

Gary

 

POLITICS: poly (many) + ticks (blood sucking parasites)

 

Blonde

That is terrific, just to keep the ship preserved above ground is a huge undertaking. I always love seeing what the divers bring up from the past. It's a real thrill even if it's not gold or silver

J wins post of the day

Hands down.

As a history buff, I can look at stuff like that for hours on end. Sadly, my HD died and I am not sure I am going to be able to recover much of what I have lost from it that I was too lazy to back up.

That's okay, because I am going to have a pretty good time finding it all over again.

-Dave

Blimey!

That is cool, Blonde. Thanks.

Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys.
- P.J. O'Rourke

Wow...I'm glad you ALL enjoyed it

I sometimes find cool stuff on that site and post it here...usually only one or two replies.

But it is gratifying to know that we all have the same fascination with history.

So I'll keep on posting the "cool" stuff.

Cheers!

I hope he fails, too.

 

 

Blonde

Just snooping. Thought I would suggest reading material. The name of the book, The Guernsey Literary And Potato Peel Pie Society. Cant remember the authors name.Sorry. But the book was great. Guernsey is a small island off coast of UK. The story is about the residents ordeal with the Nazi occupation. The book was great in lieu of actual travel. Back to my silent snooping.

Slight Correction

I don't like to be persnickity, (and it drives my wife crazy!), but Guernsey is a small Island off the coast of Normandy, which is somehow owned by the UK.  I first came to know about Gurensey by watching the movie, "The Others", which I would highly recomend.

England would not have tollerated German occupation of a small Island off the UK coast during WW2. 

"I've sentenced boys younger then you to the gas chamber.  Didn't want to do it, but I felt I owed it to them."  Judge Smails 

shawn

I didn't understand the last post you made, above (but it's getting too narrow up there :p) regarding Jer and people volunteering to defend him...

 

Shy

Jer fights his own battles and he sticks up for what he believes in my himself. You try to get people on your side for a team up, you also use the people on your buddy list to your advantage and feel like you can speak for other people.

Example,

"We" are tired of you Shawn/Jer/JasonC/Nwahs/Balboa. Jer does not expect people to help him and anyone that does stick up for him is not coerced. Anyway shy lets drop it, this is getting far too personal

"I have a Bush man-crush, you need to understand."-Mr. Shy

Alright. Let's bring it home now.

  Shawn forwarded a liberal lie that Bush doubled the national debt. I have explained that you cannot compare monetary amounts more than a few years apart without adjusting for inflation. I have also explained a more useful measure is as a percentage of GDP. I have also explained that you must remember we have a growing population and we did, until late last year, have a growing GDP.

  I have also explained the difference between nominal and real dollars. Now........

Real Federal Debt Per Capita

If you think about it, the chart below could be sort of encouraging:

JWF note: Please go to the website and look at the graph. 

(Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis)

So the national debt hit a peak of $19,360 per person, in 2007 dollars, at the end of World War II.  Then it fell, steeply, then slowly, to a low point of $6,759 in 1974.  Interestingly, it was falling in the early 1970s even though the government was running deficits, because the deficits were being monetized through inflation.  It soared under Reagan, and kept rising, more slowly, under Bush I and Clinton until 1995, peaking at $18,660.  After that it started falling, to $13,635 in 2001.

As everyone knows, the deficits rose under George W. Bush.  This may be a little overblown however.  He's a minor offender compared to Reagan, and didn't increase the debt nearly as much as in World War II, and he was fighting two wars.  Although since the war in Iraq was to some extent a war of choice, and fought under a doctrine-- the forward strategy of freedom-- which would get us in a lot more wars if pursued consistently, maybe we had an obligation to finance it in a more sustainable way.  Anyway, at $16,712 per person, the debt at the end of the Bush II administration was still lower than its peak under Clinton.  Ah, those were the days!...

It will have spiked up in 2008, and even more in 2009.  However, here's the possibly semi-encouraging thing: both of the previous super-spikes in the national debt, during World War II and during the 1980s, had fairly robust GDP growth.  Who knows?  Maybe things aren't as bad as we think.

- from Freethinker blog

Sorry. I got lazy there. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.