Following the Media Research Center's ongoing call for an explanation of George Stephanopoulos's reported strategy conference calls with Democratic operatives Paul Begala and James Carville and White House Chief-of-Staff Rahm Emanuel, the MRC has released a new Profile in Bias for the "This Week" host.
"[I]n his on-air role at ABC, Stephanopoulos has been a reliable mouthpiece for the Democratic spin of the day — using his perch as an analyst and correspondent to add an extra boost to liberals, undermine conservatives and push a liberal policy agenda," the profile notes before listing scores of examples, such this one from March 18, 2008, wherein Stephanopoulos lauded Obama for refusing to castigate his former pastor:
By refusing to renounce Reverend Wright, that was in many ways an act of honor for Senator Obama.
As we at NewsBusters have documented, ABC News executives have refused to directly confront the breach of journalistic ethics first reported in the January 27 Politico:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Kerry Smith, ABC's Senior Vice President for Editorial Quality, has in an open letter responded to Media Research Center President Brent Bozell's call to publicly address and resolve the apparent breach of ethics of its Chief White House Correspondent George Stephanopoulos. Smith succeeded in delivering distortions and hurling false allegations at Bozell and the MRC, but failed to address the journalistic problems reported in the original Politico story.
While "pleased to see" that ABC did not ignore his concerns, in a letter responding to Smith the NewsBusters publisher denounced as "unfortunate how inadequately, disingenuously and indeed dishonestly" the network brass has chosen to respond to his criticism:
First, it's the original Politico story that reported that for 17 years Mr. Stephanopoulos has been participating in regular strategy calls with fellow Democrats. To quote from the story, "... in any given news cycle, it is quite likely that Washington's prevailing political and media interpretation - at least on the Democratic side - is being hatched on these calls."
That is not my willful and knowing distortion; it's the Politico's reporting. If you believe the story is false, then you have a fight with Politico, not me.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Is that Andy Warhol? He's
February 10, 2009 - 14:52 ET by lotrIs that Andy Warhol? He's dying his hair I see.
And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. -- Edgar Allan Poe
if it is Andy Warhol......
February 10, 2009 - 15:13 ET by Paarlthe hair is portable
Paarl of Rhodesia
No - Not Warhol
February 11, 2009 - 03:02 ET by DoktorFrankenPerhaps it's that Crispin Glover guy from Back to the Future. ''I'm just not good with confrontations.''
"Profiles in Bias"...
February 10, 2009 - 15:12 ET by SickofLibsAKA "Douchebag Datasheets"
Keep em coming!
I always wondered...
February 10, 2009 - 15:31 ET by owr084I've never trusted him ever since he arrived in town with the clintons. One thing that realy irked me was a picture in the paper showing him in front of the place he just bought in Georgetown. It was for $700,000+ dollars. How could a young 30 something with no salary history/ savings buy a place for that much? And remeber, 1993 was before many of the creative financing options were available...
I might be missing
February 10, 2009 - 15:38 ET by RMRI might be missing something, but is there a direct link to the ABC letter?
NB has done a tremendous
February 10, 2009 - 15:37 ET by celatorNB has done a tremendous service in exposing Stephanopoulos and the shenanigans of ABC over this whole issue. ABC has been completely brazen and unaccountable to its audience in this matter.
I would add, as a sidenote. that Stephanopoulos's Executive Producer is Ian Cameron, husband of Susan Rice, Obama's UN Ambassador. So there's another hidden link to the White House. At the very least there should be full disclosure from ABC on these connections, particularly when Stephanopoulos reports on Obama's foreign policy or the UN.
Good job. Keep on them. Make 'em honest.
For liberal Democrats and the Old Media, everything is crisis, chaos, calamity and catastrophe. That justifies stealing your property and liberties.
Why
February 10, 2009 - 15:54 ET by klchadwickWhy would ABC want to give up an insider at 1600 Pennsylvania? Not only do they try to shape the news from the outside when presenting it to the public, but they can in a roundabout way, shape it from the inside as well. Also, I'm sure the upper echelon loves hearing the inside scoop as well as being able to get the jump on the competition.
Stephanopoulous predicts something and later that same day or same week, his crystal ball visions come true. ABC can show that George S. knows what he is talking about...and of course it isn't the due to the fact that he heard about it directly from the fish's mouth. I'm sure that ol' Rahm is whispering sweet nothings in his ear... Why let facts get in the way of journalism?
The fact that
February 10, 2009 - 16:17 ET by motherbeltThe fact that Stephanopoulos is the Chief Washington Correspondent for ABC News is a disgrace.
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
It sort of makes everything
February 10, 2009 - 17:08 ET by Chris NormanIt sort of makes everything a giant sham and a farce, doesn't it?
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
Stephanie Poulos. He is a
February 10, 2009 - 16:29 ET by semolina_filcherStephanie Poulos. He is a woman in a man's clothing, masquerading as a "journalist". Not that there is anything wrong with being a woman.
Where are the Democrats?
February 10, 2009 - 18:19 ET by pbthinkerDo you think the Democrats will bring on the fairness doctrine to look into this breech of journalistic integrity? Of course not, the "D" is a get out of jail free card.
Election 2008-God's way of showing us that elections count.
i wanna see it
February 11, 2009 - 07:57 ET by AJBWhen the libs reenact the 'fairness' doctrine, I'm going to sue to have Rush Limbaugh co-anchor CBS news with Cutie (gag) Katie. Then we can get Ann Coulter to with with Matthews. They both deserve 50% of the airtime. Then we get Newt to sit in with Stephy. Who's with me? Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?
Somewhere in the West Wing
February 10, 2009 - 19:53 ET by jdhawkSomewhere in the West Wing at the White House:
Rahm: Hey, Obama.
Obama: Yeah, Rahm?
Rahm: Is there some way I can automate those strings to that puppet Steffie?
Obama: Gee, I don't know. Put it in the "Stimulus" bill and we'll see - we got everything else in there. Ha Ha. And, don't forget to throw in some money for some new strings. That puppet is getting mighty worn after all these years.
Rahm: Yes, boss.