Due out from Random House Publishing:
Breakthrough: Politics and Republicanism in the Age of Dewey
Authors: The Editors of the Chicago Daily Tribune.
Publish Date: January 20th, 1949.
Thoughts from the authors:
- "Dewey chose to get into politics for the most upstanding of reasons, and has achieved much more than his parents could have hoped."
- Dewey is a man of "immense accomplishments."
- "We (the press)'re very lazy when we think about Republicans in this country."
- "So why aren't there more of them? That's a failure of news organizations, mostly newspapers, to support and promote Republicans."


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
"We're very lazy when we think about Republicans..."???
October 2, 2008 - 12:42 ET by RonCWould that this were true today - far from it! Today all of the presstitutes, all of the talking-vacant-heads in broadcast media and all of their brainwashed fans think of nothing other than how to lie about Republicans - 24x7.
Even Fox News seems incapable of doing anything other than repeating ad nauseam the leftist talking points spouted by their less-than-competitive counterparts – never once taking them to the woodshed and deconstructing their blither for what it is.
Will that cause the public to bring on another 'Dewey' moment in American politics? It certainly should - but with the rampant ignorance across this nation today, I wonder if it is at all possible.
Speaking of headlines, I
October 2, 2008 - 12:46 ET by bigtimerSpeaking of headlines, I saw this yesterday, this is supposedly going to be on the cover of the next Rolling Stone Rag ...
Make-Believe Maverick...
Seems to me that they are attempting some swift-boating here...hmmm...
(Hope this was okay to put here...)
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
I hope history repeats itself
October 2, 2008 - 12:47 ET by BlondeThe press keeps counting its chickens.
Dewey beats Truman
Gore beats Bush
Obama beats McCain
The troubling thing now, though, as we all know, is the level to which the media is actively promoting their guy.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
I imagine
October 2, 2008 - 13:16 ET by ConLosRepublicanosNoI imagine this happening Nov 4. The New York Times
predicts an Obama win, only missing something the messiah actually loss.
Obama: "No, if we're going to ask questions about who is promulgating negative ads that are completely unrelated to the issues at hand, I think I win that contest pretty handily"
A Real Doozy
October 2, 2008 - 13:27 ET by easygoerI was reading the comments section on some WaPo article earlier today when I came across this doozy. It really demonstrates how far gone, not to mention how dangerous, the far left really is:
mitt1968 wrote:
The US Public doesn't want to elect somebody who knowingly
brought a deformed fetus into the world, can't name a newspaper she has
read, can't name a Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade (which
she should have made good use of) and who wants to attack Russia if it
invades Georgia (even OUR Georgia isn't worth the bother)?
Even back then...
October 2, 2008 - 14:51 ET by UberconThe Newspaper, Chicago Daily Tribune, dropped the political party affiliation. The headline should have read...
"Dewey (R) defeats Truman (D)"...
Gosh, if history repeats itself the headline would read...
"McCain (R) defeats Obama (D)" ...let's hope not!!!
Ubercon