MRC/NB's Bozell on New Poll on Media Bias; Media Disinterest in Obama's Gaffes


MRC President and NewsBusters Publisher Brent Bozell appeared on the June 10 "Fox & Friends" to discuss yet another poll noting that the public perceive what the MRC has documented for nearly 21 years: the media are not only biased ideologically, they tailor campaign coverage in a way that goes softer on candidates they favor, such as Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

For example, Bozell note, the Illinois Democrat's numerous gaffes have received widespread play in blogs and on video-sharing sites like YouTube, yet are virtually ignored by the MSM:

Barack Obama has a long history of gaffes on this campaign trail, Bosnia sniper type of gaffes. We've documented them. Others have documented them. But you won't see them on the news media. So you just can't say, I mean it's, what Ed has said is true, Hillary did stumble and did make mistakes and Bill did make mistakes but so did Barack Obama and they weren't covered.

Audio from the two segments is available here. Transcript below by MRC intern and NewsBusters blogger Lyndsi Thomas:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

STEVE DOOCY, Fox & Friends co-host: Are the media being objective when covering the presidential election? A brand new Rasmussen poll says not so much. Sixty-eight percent polled say they believe most reporters on TV try to help the candidate that they want to win. Does the media deserve a failing grade in election coverage? Well joining us right now is Media Research Center president Brent Bozell and in Fargo, North Dakota, we've got radio talk show host Ed Schultz. Morning you guys. Brent, this does not surprise you, does it?

BRENT BOZELL, Media Research Center President: No, it's a continuation of an onslaught of polls. Whether it's this poll, whether it's the Pew Center, whether it's Harper, whether it is George Washington University, I mean, they're coming out like a tsunami and they're all saying the same thing that we've been saying for twenty years, that there's a left-wing bias in the news media and they are deliber- they are definitively favoring Barack Obama. And if you think the coverage in the primary was one-sided between Barack and Hillary, ya ain't seen nothin' yet. Wait till you get to the general.

[...]


DOOCY: But, Brent, it [the Reverend Wright story] got a lot of coverage but then the mainstream media just dropped it like a hot potato.

BOZELL: Yeah, I don't know where this four times, four times as much as what? Secondly, Barack Obama has a long history of gaffes on this campaign trail, Bosnia sniper type of gaffes. We've documented them. Others have documented them. But you won't see them on the news media. So you just can't say, I mean it's, what Ed has said is true, Hillary did stumble and did make mistakes and Bill did make mistakes but so did Barack Obama and they weren't covered.

[...]

DOOCY: All right, we're continuing our conversation. Brent Bozell screen left, the president of the Media Research Center and radio talk show host Ed Schultz is in Fargo, and he, oddly, is on the right. Hey guys, also in this - [laughter]. At least screen wise. Guys, additionally in the Rasmussen poll, they asked who has gotten the best media coverage and fifty-four percent of those responding said Barack Obama followed by twenty-two for John McCain and fourteen for Hillary Clinton. Brent, that does not surprise you because as you have said in the past you feel that the mainstream media are in the tank for Obama.

BOZELL: No, it doesn't surprise me. I think, personally I think that overall the media have done a pretty lousy job, the news media, with all the candidates on both sides. I think that there's been a dearth of coverage on the issues, everything has been who's up, who's down, you know, who's winning this caucus state, who's got -

DOOCY: The horse race.

BOZELL: this primary state. But no one's, yeah, no one's looking at the issues on either side and I think there ought to be. I mean, listen to the conversation you and Brian and Gretchen had before the break about where McCain and Barack Obama are on economic issues. Listen, in that three minutes you covered economics more than CBS has this year.

DOOCY: You're welcome.

GRETCHEN CARLSON, Fox & Friends co-host: Well, thank you for that plug Brent. I do want to ask you, though, about Hillary Clinton's roll in this because immediately after she dropped out there were several articles that said, "Oh, guess what, people are gonna blame Hillary Clinton now if Barack Obama does not win." What do you think about that Brent?

BOZELL: I think that's unfair. Look, we have a long ways to go. I think she's gonna do what she needs to do to say that, to show that she was a trooper. Look, plan A didn't work, plan B would be, for her to get to the White House, is for him to lose in November and for her to run four years from now. However, if she's seen as having gotten in the way of his campaign, then she's finished so she won't do that.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Duh!

Of course the liberal media don't want their messiah candidate mocked as the holy Barak Obama doesn't have any flaws.  Yeah, riiiiiiightt!  Just goes to show that you will find more truth on the blogs than you will on the MSM.

I love it when the wingnuts

I love it when the wingnuts refer to Obama as the Messiah.  That must mean McCain is the anti-christ!

No leadbar.... That would

No leadbar....

That would be you.\

"Abstain from McCain"

Yep!

According to the MSM, you are completely right.

I see the second string is

I see the second string is back on the field.

On the contrary

I have heard from several serious, Muslim sources that the Muslim world believes the translation of the name "Barack" to mean "The chosen one". By default, this name, then, implies "Anti-Christ". By it's very nature, this has a very positive connotation for all things Muslim.

There are many Muslims in the U S that are terrified by the possiblity of someone like Barack Hussein Obama as POTUS. Many of them fled from the radicalness that this implied in their home countries.

BOY! Just leave it to the American Democrats to bring this kind of Apacolypse upon this great nation. Hard to believe that a majority of the American people could have gotten this stupid over such a short period of time.

For many years I have said that the democrat party was, by far, the biggest threat to this nation that has ever existed AND many of my friends thought I was terrible for saying such a thing.

Now they are not to sure that I have been wrong. They and the rest of this country better become convinced REAL QUICK or within 4 years, we will not recognize thei nation.

"There are many Muslims in

"There are many Muslims in the U S that are terrified by the possiblity of someone like Barack Hussein Obama as POTUS. Many of them fled from the radicalness that this implied in their home countries."

Good.  Maybe they'll go back to their own countries.

BTW, today both Gallup and Rasmussen have Obama up by 7 points over McCain.

Brilliant Odumbo Gaffe

That was "delicious"! 

That was "delicious"!  Thanks

RRAM Tough! 

How about media gaffes? e.g. Andrea Mitchell

How about media disinterest in *media* gaffes? e.g., Andrea Mitchell's recent "redneck" comment. Can you imagine the outcry from the msm if Brit Hume or Morton Kondrake had referred to the residents of Harlem with a comparable epithet? The person would have been canned immediately and Sharpton et. al. would have been picketing outside the capital demanding congress shut FOX down.

Disinterest

Were it true that the media practiced disinterest—the state of not being influenced by personal involvement in something, or impartiality.

What you meant is uninterestedness—lack of interest in or concern about someone or something.